Analyzing Attitudes, Behaviors, and Commitment in the Workplace Essay

This essay delves into the realm of organizational behavior, specifically examining the profound impact of attitudes on employee actions and overall organizational success. It begins by defining mental proprietorship and its significance, distinguishing it from related concepts like job satisfaction and organizational commitment. The essay then explores how varying attitudes, both positive and negative, can significantly influence an individual's behavior in the workplace, impacting productivity and the work environment. Key points include the contagious nature of attitudes, the role of different attitude types, and the strategies organizations can employ to shape employee attitudes and behavior. The discussion also covers factors that determine job satisfaction and organizational commitment, including the importance of energy, devotion, and absorption. Finally, the essay emphasizes the critical role of managers in understanding and addressing employee attitudes, highlighting how these attitudes are a conjunction of individual and external factors, making everyone responsible for their influence.

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
Introduction
The possibility of mental proprietorship for the association (the greedy sense which some
question is 'Our own' or ‘MINE’) gets increasing attention from professionals and researchers as
a conceivably vital pointer of employee attitudes and behaviors. A mental proprietorship is a
mentally experienced wonder where a worker generates greedy likings for the objective. An
extensive degree of enquiry in a widespread variety of disciplines (kid improvement,
topography, reasoning, gerontology, brain science, law, and customer behavior) stresses the
significance of belonging and proprietorship in impacting human attitudes, inspiration, and
behavior (Anna & Telin, 2016).
For instance, researchers have tended to legitimate and mental viewpoints on proprietorship
and connections to self-character, self-modification, and prosperity and also responsible for
(e.g., home, toys) and immaterial (e.g., thoughts) objects. In the administration writing,
researchers have tended to the part of formal organizational proprietorship courses of action
(e.g., cooperatives and worker stock possession designs), and additionally the part of mental
possession.
In this essay, we propose that the possessive idea of mental proprietorship for the association
separates it from other business related attitudes. While enabling mental proprietorship for the
association to build our comprehension of worker attitudes and behavior, by clarifying
fluctuation far beyond existing develops, (for example, responsibility and fulfillment).
Circumstances where Attitudes determine Behaviors at work
According to Binod & Devi (2013) attitudes can contrarily or emphatically impact a fellow's
behavior. An individual might not be mindful of his attitude or the influence it is partaking on
conduct. Furthermore, an individual who has helpful attitude concerning associates and work,
(for instance, bliss, kind demeanor, et cetera.) can emphatically affect everybody around them.
These helpful attitudes regularly show in a man's behavior; people with a not too bad attitude
are dynamic and profitable and do what they can to upgrade the perspective of individuals
Page 1 of 6

around them. So also, a man who indicates negative attitudes, (for instance, disappointment,
exhaustion, et cetera.), will go about as requirements are. People with these sorts of attitudes
towards work may in like way impact everybody around them and carry on in a way that
declines profitability and suitability. An optimistic job setting, work fulfillment, a remuneration
scheme, and understood guidelines would all have the capacity to help reinforce specific
behaviors.
Attitudes can decidedly or contrarily influence a man's behavior, paying little heed to whether
the individual knows about the impacts (Eyun Jung & Linda, 2012). Learning Objective Explain‐
how varying attitudes can meaningfully affect representative behavior Key Points Attitudes are
irresistible and can influence the general population that is close to the individual displaying a
given attitude, which thus can impact their behavior too. Understanding diverse sorts of
attitudes and their possible ramifications are helpful in anticipating how people's attitudes
impact their behavior. Farhad & Akram (2012) distinguishes four classes of attitudes: utilitarian,
information, personality guarded and esteem expressive. Companies can impact a
representative's attitudes and behavior by utilizing distinctive administration procedures and by
making solid organizational situations. As individuals are influenced in various courses by
differing impacts, a company might need to execute numerous techniques. Term behavior
changes Any change or alteration of human propensities or examples of leadership.
Why are Attitudes useful for a person?
Key Points Attitudes are irresistible and can influence the general population that is close to the
individual displaying a given attitude, which like this can impact their behavior too.
Understanding distinctive sorts of attitudes and their feasible ramifications are valuable in
foreseeing how people's attitudes impact their behavior. The rule of uniformity reflects folks as
ordinary and try to be sound continuously, and therefore an individual’s behavior ought to be
unsurprising regarding their approach. As this rule might be reasonable, evidently folks fail to
follow it, all over acting in clearly exceptionally outlandish progresses; e.g., smoking cigarettes
yet they know that it leads to coronary and lung disease (Jain, 2016).
Page 2 of 6

A huge individual significance insinuates how basic the attitude is for the person and concerns
egotism and public ID. Subsequently, the attitude will influence a man's behavior. By separate,
an attitude will not be fundamental to a fellow in case it does not concern him.
The attitudes expressed grants the personality or Individuality and may impact us to feel
extraordinary as people have expressed their character. Self-verbalization of attitudes can be
nonverbal too. Perhaps, as soon as individuals supplement their bosses or instructors (and
believe it) or stay quiet if they consider an attitude to be loathed (Jennifer et al., 2015).
Factors that determine either Job Satisfaction or Organizational Commitment
An examination inspected three conceivable elements which have an impact on representative
engagement. The three variables are energy, devotion, and captivation. Life is straightforwardly
identified with the measure of vitality and exertion an individual will advance to finish an
undertaking, paying little mind to challenges. Devotion identifies with the measure of general
importance an errand conveys, and retention is the profundity of work submersion the
individual encounters. The investigation found that the three factors all affected engagement,
notwithstanding, they likewise noticed that a positive manner toward one's employment
additionally associated with positive engagement.
The connection between work fulfillment and employment execution has a long and disputable
history. Researchers were first made mindful of the connection amongst fulfillment and
execution through the Hawthorne studies. Since the Hawthorne studies, various researchers
have inspected the possibility that "an upbeat laborer is a profitable specialist." The research
findings have discovered a powerless association, roughly 0.32, between work fulfillment and
occupation execution (Liwen & Jingkun, 2015). In any case, research directed by Organ found
that a more grounded association amongst execution and fulfillment could not be built up on
account of the limited meaning of occupation execution. Binod & Devi (2013) trust that when
the meaning of employment execution incorporates behaviors, for example, organizational
citizenship (the degree to which one's deliberate help adds to the achievement of an
association) the connection amongst fulfillment and execution will move forward. Note that the
Page 3 of 6

association between work fulfillment and employment execution is higher for troublesome
occupations than for less troublesome occupations.
To what extent does Organizational Commitment suggest that Managers in the organization
should care about how committed their staffs are?
In organizational behavior and mechanical and organizational brain research, organizational
responsibility is the person's mental association with the affiliation. The preface behind
countless examinations was to find ways to deal with upgrade how workers feel about their
occupations with the objective that these experts would end up being more committed to their
affiliations. Organizational obligation predicts work factors, for instance, turnover,
organizational citizenship behavior, and business execution. A segment of the segments, for
instance, part push, reinforcing, work fragility and employability, and assignment of the activity
have been appeared to be related to a worker's sentiment organizational obligation. Specialist
experiences a ‘feeling of harmony' with their association (McManus, 2011).
All the more, researchers have proposed a five-part model of responsibility. However, it has
been created with regards to an item utilization. This model proposes ongoing and constrained
responsibility as two extra measurements which are exceptionally pertinent in utilization
settings. It appears to be, notwithstanding, that ongoing duty may likewise wind up noticeably
applicable in many employment settings. Individuals land habituated to a position—the
schedule, the procedures, the psychological mappings related to an occupation can influence
individuals to build up an idle sense of duty regarding the employment—similarly as it might
happen in a utilization setting (Luciane & Reinaldo, 2013).
Narendra & Karnika (2013) agree that occupation fulfillment is normally characterized by the
degree to which representatives like their work. Researchers have analyzed Job fulfillment for
as long as a very long while. Studies have been committed to making sense of the
measurements of employment fulfillment, forerunners of occupation fulfillment, and the
connection amongst fulfillment and duty. Fulfillment has likewise been analyzed under different
socioeconomics of sexual orientation, age, race, instruction, and work understanding. Most
research on work fulfillment has been pointed towards the individual condition fit worldview.
Page 4 of 6

Occupation fulfillment has been observed to be an imperative territory of research since one of
the best reasons people give for leaving an occupation is a disappointment.
Conclusion
The takeaway here is to be particular while talking about attitudes and characterize terms
deliberately. For a boss to state that some individual has attitude, or that some individual is
negative or positive about something, is unclear and nonconstructive. Rather, an
administrator's occupation is to watch and to endeavor to pinpoint the conceivable
circumstances and results of a man's point of view on something. Everybody has attitudes
about numerous things; these are not an awful thing.
A part in specialists' attitude is the impact it can have on the overall public around them. People
with an elevating attitude can lift the spirits of their partners, while a man with a pessimistic
attitude can cut down their spirits. Now and again, in any case, this standard works in reverse,
and attitudes are routinely more complicated than positive or negative. Attitudes may impact
both the employee’s work execution and the presentations of his/her colleagues.
A man's attitude can be impacted by his or her condition, similarly as a man's attitude
influences his or her condition. A few attitudes speak to a risky component in the working
environment that can spread to those nearest to the worker and influence everybody's
execution. Like this, the appropriate response is that attitudes are the conjunction of an
individual and outer boots, and in this way, everybody is in a place of obligation.
Page 5 of 6

References
Anna T. Perry, Telin S. Chung, 2016. Understand attitude-behavior gaps and benefit-behavior
connections in Eco-Apparel. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 20(1), pp. 105-119.
Binod K. Shrestha and Devi R. Gnyawali, 2013. Insights on strategic management practices in Nepal.
South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 2(2), pp. 191-210.
Eyun Jung Ki, Linda C. Hon, 2012. Causal linkages among relationship quality perception, attitude, and‐
behavior intention in a membership organization. Corporate Communications: An International Journal,
17(2).
Farhad A. and Akram S., 2012. Strategic management: the case of NGOs in Palestine. Management
Research Review, 35(6), pp. 473-489.
Jain, A. K., 2016. Volunteerism, affective commitment and citizenship behavior: An empirical study in
India. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(3), p. 657=671.
Jennifer Kerr, Paul Rouse, and Charl de Villiers, 2015. Sustainability reporting integrated into
management control systems. Pacific Accounting Review, pp. 189-207.
Liwen Tan, Jingkun Ding, 2015. The frontier and evolution of the strategic management theory: A
scientometric analysis of Strategic Management Journal, 2001-2012. Nankai Business Review
International, 6(1), pp. 20-41.
Luciane Reginato and Reinaldo Guerreiro, 2013. Relationships between environment, culture, and
management control systems. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, pp. 219-240.
McManus, J., 2011. Revisiting ethics in strategic management. Corporaate Governance: The
International Journal of Business in Society, 11(2), pp. 214-223.
Narendra Singh, Karnika Gupta, 2013. Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour of Indian
consumers. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(1), pp. 4-18.
Page 6 of 6