Report: Australia's Fire Disaster, Responses, and Critical Analysis
VerifiedAdded on  2023/01/13
|8
|1825
|99
Report
AI Summary
This report provides a detailed analysis of the devastating Australia fire disaster. It examines the significant impacts of the bushfires, including property damage, loss of life, and the decline of tourism. The report critically analyzes the response strategies taken by the Australian government, including the deployment of defense forces and firefighters, as well as the criticisms leveled at the Prime Minister's handling of the crisis. It also explores the response strategies of other countries, highlighting the aid provided in terms of personnel, financial assistance, and donations. The report provides a balanced perspective on the effectiveness of these strategies, acknowledging both positive and negative impacts, and emphasizing the need for financial assistance and long-term recovery efforts. The references include several academic sources that support the findings.

AUSTRALIA- FIRE
DISASTER OF
AUSTRALIA
DISASTER OF
AUSTRALIA
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................3
Main body....................................................................................................................................4
Critical analysis.......................................................................................................................4
Response strategy taken by government.................................................................................4
Response strategy taken by other countries............................................................................5
CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................7
REFERENCES............................................................................................................................7
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................3
Main body....................................................................................................................................4
Critical analysis.......................................................................................................................4
Response strategy taken by government.................................................................................4
Response strategy taken by other countries............................................................................5
CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................7
REFERENCES............................................................................................................................7

⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

INTRODUCTION
Fire disaster is considered to be the one of natural one which can take place at any one around
having specification of any reason. The fire has the critical level of impacts in causing major
level of damages which acne be related to property or the people of country in significant
order (Bardsley and et.al 2018). The major level of bush fire which have taken place in
Australia has causes the significant impacts of life of people along with major impacts of
development of tourism in Australia. In more manner, the existence of report will have the
critical analysis of the major level of step which is taken by stakeholders against respond to
the characteristic. The report will have critical examination of the strategy which is taken by
government and other countries against Australian bush fire.
Main body.
Australia has been considered as the ravaged by the worst level of wildfires which has been
seen in decades which is having the swaths of country which is been devastated which is been
begun form the season of July. The balsamed have be torn out through the bushland along
with wooden areas which have the major impacts of Australia large cities that is Melbourne
and Sydney as the decline in managing tourism impact. The stakeholder which have the keen
interested in providing the different level of steps towards the development of improvement in
making the Australian bushfire to have the lesser level of impacts on the development of
company. The stakeholder were the government of Australia and other countries which are
reduced the negative impact and make major level of attempt over the revival and restoration.
Thus, for improving the state of Australia from the fire the following response strategy have
been adopted by the government and the other countries
Critical analysis
Response strategy taken by government.
The government of Australia have taken the various level of measures which are in order to
have the significant level of improvement to reduce the impacts which has taken place is
Australia. The major level of strategy which is been appointed by the government of Australia
is all about have 300 defense in person conditioning of the army, navel and air forces from
Fire disaster is considered to be the one of natural one which can take place at any one around
having specification of any reason. The fire has the critical level of impacts in causing major
level of damages which acne be related to property or the people of country in significant
order (Bardsley and et.al 2018). The major level of bush fire which have taken place in
Australia has causes the significant impacts of life of people along with major impacts of
development of tourism in Australia. In more manner, the existence of report will have the
critical analysis of the major level of step which is taken by stakeholders against respond to
the characteristic. The report will have critical examination of the strategy which is taken by
government and other countries against Australian bush fire.
Main body.
Australia has been considered as the ravaged by the worst level of wildfires which has been
seen in decades which is having the swaths of country which is been devastated which is been
begun form the season of July. The balsamed have be torn out through the bushland along
with wooden areas which have the major impacts of Australia large cities that is Melbourne
and Sydney as the decline in managing tourism impact. The stakeholder which have the keen
interested in providing the different level of steps towards the development of improvement in
making the Australian bushfire to have the lesser level of impacts on the development of
company. The stakeholder were the government of Australia and other countries which are
reduced the negative impact and make major level of attempt over the revival and restoration.
Thus, for improving the state of Australia from the fire the following response strategy have
been adopted by the government and the other countries
Critical analysis
Response strategy taken by government.
The government of Australia have taken the various level of measures which are in order to
have the significant level of improvement to reduce the impacts which has taken place is
Australia. The major level of strategy which is been appointed by the government of Australia
is all about have 300 defense in person conditioning of the army, navel and air forces from
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

order to help out people and animal from fire. With more level of impacts the 3700 firefighters
were also supported by crew members in order o have the proper managing of the problem
which have been taken place in outburst of huge fire (Young and et.al.,2017). On the other
hand the Australia prime minister Scott Morison has been criticized as one for the been
responsible for missing in action even after the bush-fire have reason on across the wide area
of country have been burning more than 12 million hectare of lands with killed and injured
around 1 million animals and 27 general citizens. The next with taken the breakdown of blow
back have been begun as Australia was in the grip of consecutive already out of control fires
and the government prime minister have seen as the enjoying the vacation overseas. The
government have the taken the important step to have the control over the wide spread bush
fire but this is considered as all in vain after killing large amount of animal and people around
area. There is long term affect of such carelessness of government taking such an important
step in developing the better idea. The next is that the government have taken the step of
appointing the 440 personnel as emergence in the city of Swan Reach in Victoria. This step
has been conducted to have positive major impact in developing more level of encouragement
and motivation towards the city. The government has also allowed to have the extended 26
weeks disaster recovery allowances which is been exempted from the task. The disaster relief
payments of about $1000 which have also had lagged from inflation. The stakeholder were the
government of Australia and other countries which are reduced the negative impact and make
major level of attempt over the revival and restoration (Weber and et.al, 2019). The
government have also the issues of raising a basics Saturday which have more than $400
million as its disbursements should be more level been coordinated in order for agency to have
advice waste and duplication. The government have more level of development of the team
which is ensured as one to have effective mitigation of disaster along with meeting then
develop a better way of training in capacity of mitigating any of the disaster or mis happening.
On the other this method is considered to be the process which takes a longer period as the
defense should be prepared to have maintaining and rescuing such level of mitigation at the
time of disaster which is being predictable in country disaster dairy. The government should
pay major level of attention over the value of timing which can help the one to have the major
level of devastating in killing about 1 billion of animal and life of several people. This disaster
has the long term impacts in life and mental health of Australia.
were also supported by crew members in order o have the proper managing of the problem
which have been taken place in outburst of huge fire (Young and et.al.,2017). On the other
hand the Australia prime minister Scott Morison has been criticized as one for the been
responsible for missing in action even after the bush-fire have reason on across the wide area
of country have been burning more than 12 million hectare of lands with killed and injured
around 1 million animals and 27 general citizens. The next with taken the breakdown of blow
back have been begun as Australia was in the grip of consecutive already out of control fires
and the government prime minister have seen as the enjoying the vacation overseas. The
government have the taken the important step to have the control over the wide spread bush
fire but this is considered as all in vain after killing large amount of animal and people around
area. There is long term affect of such carelessness of government taking such an important
step in developing the better idea. The next is that the government have taken the step of
appointing the 440 personnel as emergence in the city of Swan Reach in Victoria. This step
has been conducted to have positive major impact in developing more level of encouragement
and motivation towards the city. The government has also allowed to have the extended 26
weeks disaster recovery allowances which is been exempted from the task. The disaster relief
payments of about $1000 which have also had lagged from inflation. The stakeholder were the
government of Australia and other countries which are reduced the negative impact and make
major level of attempt over the revival and restoration (Weber and et.al, 2019). The
government have also the issues of raising a basics Saturday which have more than $400
million as its disbursements should be more level been coordinated in order for agency to have
advice waste and duplication. The government have more level of development of the team
which is ensured as one to have effective mitigation of disaster along with meeting then
develop a better way of training in capacity of mitigating any of the disaster or mis happening.
On the other this method is considered to be the process which takes a longer period as the
defense should be prepared to have maintaining and rescuing such level of mitigation at the
time of disaster which is being predictable in country disaster dairy. The government should
pay major level of attention over the value of timing which can help the one to have the major
level of devastating in killing about 1 billion of animal and life of several people. This disaster
has the long term impacts in life and mental health of Australia.

Response strategy taken by other countries
The other countries have been considered as the important stakeholder in order to have the
development the better relational with countries. These strategies have been considering major
understanding helping the neighbouring country in such a large disaster. The major reason of
helping by neighbour countries in have the better level of reviving in terms of trade and
increase better level of mutual understanding. Thus, the other countries are trying and assisting
the government of Australia in improving its state after the fire disaster. The countries who
have come to helps out Australia are like Canada, US, New Zealand to have revival of country
into old form (Muir and et.al, 2017). Thus, for improving the state of Australia from the fire
the following response strategy have been adopted by the government and the other countries.
The countries have better level provided the personal level of freedom fighters who cans
helps them in more way of reduce suffering among the member. There is about more of the
fundraiser of the fire services in new south Wales as more than A$30 m as the part of donation
of 1.1 million people in significant way. On the other hand the big level of business have been
pledged as the level of signifiant contributor as the biggest level of sum been relieved to have
the overcoming in more effective way form and celebrities. Many of the fire ranges
communities over the neighbour countries have provided the more inundation with donation of
toys along with food and other. On the other hand it has been contradicted that this level of
generosity have the causes of various major level of issues. It has been contradicted tats the
providence the helping hand should be done more at level of finance rather than putting old
clothes and mismanaged product which can be considered as more suitable.
The neighbour countries have the management of extra firefighter and troops along with a
thousand of volunteers who are considered to be unpaid have given up there precious time
along with risking their lives in order to have dealing of wealth management. The tiny Pacific
island nation of Vanuatu pledged almost A$250,000 to "assist bushfire victims" as giving back
the effort that Australia have done to them. The people around the world have the found up in
more way of knitting the blanket for the thousand of animal who have the lost there homes in
such as crises (Sharples and et.al,2016). The knitting our such as the items including bat
wraps, koala mitten and animal beds. On the providence of the knitting blanket for animals
and the food resources is considered to be more level of good efforts but the cross-country at
the present situation needed more level of financial assistance in order to have more level of
The other countries have been considered as the important stakeholder in order to have the
development the better relational with countries. These strategies have been considering major
understanding helping the neighbouring country in such a large disaster. The major reason of
helping by neighbour countries in have the better level of reviving in terms of trade and
increase better level of mutual understanding. Thus, the other countries are trying and assisting
the government of Australia in improving its state after the fire disaster. The countries who
have come to helps out Australia are like Canada, US, New Zealand to have revival of country
into old form (Muir and et.al, 2017). Thus, for improving the state of Australia from the fire
the following response strategy have been adopted by the government and the other countries.
The countries have better level provided the personal level of freedom fighters who cans
helps them in more way of reduce suffering among the member. There is about more of the
fundraiser of the fire services in new south Wales as more than A$30 m as the part of donation
of 1.1 million people in significant way. On the other hand the big level of business have been
pledged as the level of signifiant contributor as the biggest level of sum been relieved to have
the overcoming in more effective way form and celebrities. Many of the fire ranges
communities over the neighbour countries have provided the more inundation with donation of
toys along with food and other. On the other hand it has been contradicted that this level of
generosity have the causes of various major level of issues. It has been contradicted tats the
providence the helping hand should be done more at level of finance rather than putting old
clothes and mismanaged product which can be considered as more suitable.
The neighbour countries have the management of extra firefighter and troops along with a
thousand of volunteers who are considered to be unpaid have given up there precious time
along with risking their lives in order to have dealing of wealth management. The tiny Pacific
island nation of Vanuatu pledged almost A$250,000 to "assist bushfire victims" as giving back
the effort that Australia have done to them. The people around the world have the found up in
more way of knitting the blanket for the thousand of animal who have the lost there homes in
such as crises (Sharples and et.al,2016). The knitting our such as the items including bat
wraps, koala mitten and animal beds. On the providence of the knitting blanket for animals
and the food resources is considered to be more level of good efforts but the cross-country at
the present situation needed more level of financial assistance in order to have more level of
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

signifiant developmental in reaching the height of fear. The other hand it has along been
contradicted that providence shelter can be assistance as better idea as all the fire palace has
been damaged to a greater extents. Many of the fire ranges communities over the neighbour
countries have provided the more inundation with donation of toys along with food and other.
CONCLUSION
From the above file it can be said that both the major stakeholder have the significant level of
positive and negative impacts in devastating the major level of implication ion satisfying
negativism and positive impact in developing business. The government have more
development of team to have insurance over effective mitigation of disaster with meeting. This
help to develop a better way of training in capacity of mitigating any of disaster or mis
happening. On other the former method is considered to be process which takes a longer
period as the defense should be prepared to have maintaining and rescuing. On the other hand
the helping hand of the other government. On the providence of the knitting blanket for
animals and food resources is considered to be more level of good efforts but the cross-
country at the present situation needed more level of financial assistance.
contradicted that providence shelter can be assistance as better idea as all the fire palace has
been damaged to a greater extents. Many of the fire ranges communities over the neighbour
countries have provided the more inundation with donation of toys along with food and other.
CONCLUSION
From the above file it can be said that both the major stakeholder have the significant level of
positive and negative impacts in devastating the major level of implication ion satisfying
negativism and positive impact in developing business. The government have more
development of team to have insurance over effective mitigation of disaster with meeting. This
help to develop a better way of training in capacity of mitigating any of disaster or mis
happening. On other the former method is considered to be process which takes a longer
period as the defense should be prepared to have maintaining and rescuing. On the other hand
the helping hand of the other government. On the providence of the knitting blanket for
animals and food resources is considered to be more level of good efforts but the cross-
country at the present situation needed more level of financial assistance.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

REFERENCES
Books and journals
Sharples, J.J. and et.al., 2016. Natural hazards in Australia: extreme bushfire. Climatic
Change, 139(1).pp.85-99.
Muir, C. and et.al., 2017. Physical bushfire preparation over time in Victoria,
Australia. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International
Journal, 26(2).pp.241-251.
Weber, D. and et.al., 2019. Are we ready for bushfire? Perceptions of residents, landowners
and fire authorities on Lower Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Geoforum, 107. pp.99-
112.
Young, M.A. and et.al.,2017. Experiences in supporting primary producers' recovery from the
Pinery bushfire, South Australia. Rural Extension and Innovation Systems
Journal, 13(2). p.135.
Bardsley, D.K. and et.al., 2018. Climate Change, Bushfire Risk, and Environmental Values:
Examining a Potential Risk Perception Threshold in Peri-Urban South
Australia. Society & natural resources, 31(4).pp.424-441.
Books and journals
Sharples, J.J. and et.al., 2016. Natural hazards in Australia: extreme bushfire. Climatic
Change, 139(1).pp.85-99.
Muir, C. and et.al., 2017. Physical bushfire preparation over time in Victoria,
Australia. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International
Journal, 26(2).pp.241-251.
Weber, D. and et.al., 2019. Are we ready for bushfire? Perceptions of residents, landowners
and fire authorities on Lower Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Geoforum, 107. pp.99-
112.
Young, M.A. and et.al.,2017. Experiences in supporting primary producers' recovery from the
Pinery bushfire, South Australia. Rural Extension and Innovation Systems
Journal, 13(2). p.135.
Bardsley, D.K. and et.al., 2018. Climate Change, Bushfire Risk, and Environmental Values:
Examining a Potential Risk Perception Threshold in Peri-Urban South
Australia. Society & natural resources, 31(4).pp.424-441.
1 out of 8
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
 +13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
Copyright © 2020–2025 A2Z Services. All Rights Reserved. Developed and managed by ZUCOL.





