Assessing the Carbon Footprint of the Australian Cotton Industry

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the carbon footprint associated with the Australian cotton industry. It examines the lifecycle assessment of cotton production, from resource extraction to waste disposal, highlighting the industry's relatively small contribution to greenhouse gas emissions compared to other sectors. The report details the various sources of emissions, including fertilizer use and energy consumption, and explores the efforts of the Australian cotton industry to minimize its environmental impact through sustainable practices such as soil management, nitrogen efficiency, and the use of renewable energy sources. The report also discusses the industry's investment in climate change research and the development of tools and strategies to mitigate emissions and adapt to changing climatic conditions. Furthermore, the report emphasizes the importance of life cycle assessment methods in identifying areas for improvement within the supply chain and highlights the industry's commitment to achieving climate neutrality through the adoption of effective management strategies.

Discuss the carbon footprint
of the Australian cotton
industry
1

Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................3
Measuring the footprint..........................................................................................................6
Fertilizer emissions.................................................................................................................6
Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................13
Reference.......................................................................................................................................14
2

Introduction
Atmosphere inconstancy and environmental change have turned out to be national and
universal problems. Australia's cotton producers manage atmosphere consistently and it directs a
ton about an agriculturist's day by day life. Cradle to grave is known as the lifecycle assessment
which includes resources extraction (cradle), processing and production, assembly of a product.
The present research is based on the carbon footprint of the Australian cotton industry. This
report will aim to summaries the cradle to grave analysis of producing carbon from cotton
production in Australia. The cradle to-grave investigation from crude material removal to
disposed of material exhibits that materials made out of acryl and PET have minimal effect on
the earth, trailed by elastane, nylon, and cotton.
Climate
Australia's atmosphere is inalienably factor however particular environmental change
effects are anticipated to incorporate increments in temperature and barometrical carbon dioxide,
diminishes in precipitation and expanded recurrence of thrilling climate occasions (Visser,
Dargusch, and Grace, 2015).
Adjusting to more noteworthy atmosphere changeability will be a barrier for Australia's
cotton cultivators into the future, however the fact of the matter is the cotton business is a little
producer of greenhouse gasses.
 There are total 17% shares of agriculture of Australian agribusiness' ozone harming
substance emanations.
Cotton developing produces under 0.3% of Australian agribusiness' ozone harming substance
emanations (Sejian, Prasadh, and Gaughan, , 2018).
As great natural stewards, cotton producers and the cotton business' examination division is
attempting to discover approaches to decrease the business' effects on environmental change.
This should most ideal be through more prominent efficiencies including:
 Soil management
 Nitrogen loss inhibition
 Energy use efficiency
A small footprint, made smaller
3

In spite of being an extremely insignificant supporter of agriculture greenhouse gas
emanations. The cotton industry of Australia done investment in climate change investigation for
developing knowledge related to the further scope in respect to minimize or capture emissions.
Cotton generation's carbon footprint is far and away superior to impartial. Net on-
cultivate emanations of GHGs in cotton developing are really negative in light of the fact that the
plant stores more carbon (for instance, in the build up and seed) further it discharged from oil
and compost amid development (Xing, Qian and Zaman, 2016).
A huge assortment of investigation and expansion work has been put resources into handling
greenhouse gas emanations in the Australian production framework. Effective technique and
specialized help which is produced over various regions that add to greenhouse gas emanations,
together with carbon cultivating, vitality proficiency, nitrogen effectiveness, estimating vitality
utilization and water utilize productivity (Nigam, Mandade and Sethi, 2016).
In the Australia the farmers who produce cotton focus on minimizing greenhouse gas emission
and to make improvement in the land’s ability for storing more carbon with the performs and
invention incorporating:
 Expanding the proficiency of significant data sources utilized as a part of cotton
developing, for example, vitality and nitrogen, by enhancing water system pump
execution and utilizing fuel-proficient farmstead hardware.
Utilizing elective wellsprings of nitrogen, i.e., the utilization of vegetable pivot crops which
settle nitrogen in the dust (Huisingh, Zhang and Li, 2015).
 Executing dissimilar practices to enhance soil wellbeing including utilizing controlled
movement or least culturing frameworks.
 Additionally, limiting apparatus tasks (and in this manner fuel use) of showering (through
extensive utilization of herbicide-tolerant cotton), and amid collect (through wide scale
changes in hardware to displace different technologies with one).
Utilizing sustainable and elective vitality sources and energizes, for example, sun powered
boards to switch water system pumps, and biofuels (Visser, Dargusch and Grace, 2014).
 Moderating and overseeing regions of local vegetation and riparian territories on
cultivate, these important carbon stores.
Focus on nitrogen efficiency
4

The principal kinds of greenhouse gas emanations on blended cotton cultivating
undertakings incorporate nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide and methane. Nitrogen composts are a
noteworthy wellspring of ozone harming substance discharges, especially nitrous oxide, and the
Australian cotton industry keeps on putting resources into inquire about, showing trials and
choice help devices concentrated on enhancing nitrogen utilize effectiveness.
Ozone depleting substance stock apparatuses for cotton and blended cultivating
properties are accessible web based, incorporating carbon mini-caluclator and administration
devices (Gollnow, Lundie and Rehl, 2014).
Nitrous oxide emanations are being estimated on flooded cotton homesteads, and
discharges can be lessened over changing cultivating practices, for example, diminishing
culturing, limiting utilization of groundwater, enhancing precipitation soil-dampness stockpiling,
pivot crops, upgrading water system plan and planning, and modifying compost situation more
profound in the dirt.
Each product has an impact on the environment, such as CO2, land use and use of
resources. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Carbon Footprint are methods to investigate the
environmental impact of products and supply chains. These methods give insights in possible
improvements in the supply chain.
Preparing for nitrogen change
Preparing for changes in climate- In this it can be said that not only the cotton industries
are taking initiatives to have reduction in contribution but the also researchers are also
determined strategies to help the industry to adapt change in climate. In manner it is essential to
adopt the appropriate adaption strategies, this all are need to be developed. In this way, they need
to investigate the impact over soil health and function which brings extreme events as are
droughts, rains etc. This all are predicted to occur in more frequent manner (Peters, Svanström
and Zamani, 2016).
Thus, it can be said that future climate for the cotton is growing and this all are models to
have the better understanding about the potential impact on the key growth phases of cotton crop.
In this way, there is need to identification of core strategies which will be helpful to carried out
present research systematically. With the help of research, it has determined that researcher are
growing cotton in the largest manner and this is need to be produced in controlled tents under
5

elevated temperature and at the level of carbon dioxide (Robb and Dargusch, 2018). This is
helpful to understand how they effect growth and test in order to irrigation strategies.
Horticulture contributes considerably less to environmental change than the vitality and channel
divisions – yet it can possibly enable us to expel carbon from the air.
Cotton creation put a little ozone harming substance impression (around 300 pounds of
carbon proportionate emanations per section of land, barring potential nitrous oxide discharges).
Cotton makers, be that as it may, which is done anything besides ignore this issue – they've kept
on making enhancements. It is a fact that upto 30% diminishment in ozone depleting substance
outflows in the meantime 1980 .
Cotton developing produces under 0.3% of Australian agribusiness' ozone harming substance
emanations (Mushtaq, Maraseni and Jackson, 2015).
As great natural stewards, cotton producers and the cotton business' examination division is
attempting to discover approaches to decrease the business' effects on environmental change.
This should most ideal be through more prominent efficiencies including:
Measuring the footprint
Vitality monitoring innovation, for example, decreased number of culturing passes and
more productive water system frameworks have lessened ozone depleting greenhouse gas
omission. Protection culturing expands the measure of carbon dioxide caught from the air into
the dirt, as much as 400 pounds of carbon for each section of land every year (Causarano et al.,
2006) – connotation carbon transmitted and carbon put away is about equivalent. Considering the
carbon put away in cotton fiber, a section of land of no-till cotton really stores 350 pounds a
greater amount of air carbon than was transmitted amid creation (Chen, Schmidt and Antille,
2017).
The USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has built up an online
instrument for ranchers, the COMET-VR, that assessments ozone harming substance outflows
and enables producers to intentionally description greenhouse depleting substance reserve funds
with preservation frameworks (Sejian, Prasadh, and Gaughan, 2018).).
6

Fertilizer emissions
Cotton plants can just utilize such a great amount of nitrogen the provided time, and the
abundance is lost to water or air. It truly progresses toward becoming cash down the deplete –
and an intense poison. Nitrogen composts are a noteworthy wellspring of ozone harming
substance emanations, especially nitrous oxide (Chen, Schmidt and Antille, 2017).
Climate challenge and cotton
The LCA contemplate demonstrated that the discharges from nitrogen construct compost
application in with respect to cultivate period of maize creation were the single greatest
wellspring of emanations. Moreover, post cultivate (off-cultivate) applications for generation of
oil and vitality, bundling and transport represented the greater part of the greenhouse gas
emanations ((Visser, Dargusch, and Grace, 2015). Need to think about demonstrated that
applying distinctive strategies, for example, soil culturing, compost administration and yield turn
can impact the dirt carbon and ozone harming substance.
7

Environmental change postures particular difficulties for Australia's essential industries,with
mounting open concern and media examination about the way nourishment is developed and
appropriated through business sectors. Also, there is expanding household and universal lawful
and administrative weights to decrease ozone harming substance emanations. Every single
essential industry utilize vitality and water assets all through their supply chains for bought
inputs, generation, preparing, refrigeration,transport and retail. Life Cycle Assessment is a
system that empowers ventures to distinguish the asset streams and ecological effects, related
with the arrangement of items and administrations. It is a device that is by and large
progressively utilized by farming endeavors for assessing the ecological effects related with an
item, process or movement over its whole life cycle, from cradleto grave (Parada and et.al.,
2018).
Atmosphere lack of bias means an association has zero net ozone harming substance
outflows. This is accomplished by acquainting reasonable managerial strategies with decrease
work environment ozone depleting substance emanations however much as could be expected,
trailed by buying carbon counterbalances to kill those outflows that can't be stayed away from.
Ascertaining an association's GHG impression is the principal critical advance towards
diminished discharges and atmosphere nonpartisanship. An UN Greenhouse Gas Calculator has
been created to enable UN associations to deliver equivalent ozone depleting substance
inventories, emerging from offices tasks and travel, by kind of gas and by source. To gauge
outflows from official air travel, a corresponding UN Interface to the International Civil Aviation
Organization Carbon Emissions Calculator has additionally been produced.
Once arranged, the inventories will serve to create inside procedures for decreasing
discharges, for running the association in a more intelligent and more effective way; burning
through cash carefully and picking the best natural arrangements.
On the 1 September 2009 the UN framework will report its 2008 GHG impression and
atmosphere impartial execution. Every office needs to select a client of the UN Greenhouse Gas
Calculator. The client will be requested to record outflows from UN office tasks and authority
street or rail travel. Run of the mill discharge sources are:
8

Bought vitality utilized as a part of structures for lighting, warming or cooling, heated
water, cooking, et cetera; by and large the biggest vitality source.
Discharges from UN-possessed or rented hardware, for example, control generators or
authority vehicles.
Criminal outflows, for example, spillage of ozone depleting substances from refrigeration
and cooling gear.
Emanations from street or rail transport paid for by the association. The client require just
enter fundamental information by noting an arrangement of basic inquiries in the UN
Greenhouse Gas Calculator. Once the action information is entered, the device will
naturally assess the GHG impression.
There are diverse assets for exploring GHG Protocol apparatuses:
 Cross area methods Applicable to numerous ventures and organizations paying little heed
to division.
 Nation particular method Customized for specific creating nations.
 Part particular system Principally intended for the particular division or industry
recorded, hoever they might be relevant to different circumstances (Trushina,
Greenhouse, Greenman and Thomas, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education, 2018).
 System for nations and urban areas These devices enable nations and urban areas to track
advance toward their atmosphere objectives
In spite of being an extremely minor supporter of agribusiness' ozone depleting substance
outflows, the Australian cotton industry has put resources into environmental change research to
see advance chances to lessen or catch discharges. Cotton creation's carbon impression is far and
away superior to neutral. Net on-cultivate emanations of GHGs in cotton developing are really
negative on the grouneneds that the plant stores more carbon than is discharged from fuel and
manure amid growth. Australian cotton agriculturists keep on reducing ozone depleting
substance outflows and enhance the land's capacity to store more carbon through practices and
advancements including:
 Boosting the effectiveness of real data sources utilized as a part of cotton developing, for
example, vitality and nitrogen, by streamlining water system pump execution and
utilizing fuel-productive homestead apparatus (Lebon and et.al., 2018.)
9

 Utilizing elective wellsprings of nitrogen, i.e., the utilization of vegetable pivot crops
which settle nitrogen in the dirt.
 Executing different practices to enhance soil wellbeing including utilizing controlled
activity and least culturing frameworks
 Additionally limiting hardware activities (and in this way fuel use) of splashing (through
all inclusive utilization of herbicide-tolerant cotton), and amid gather (through wide scale
changes in apparatus to supplant numerous machines with one)
 Utilizing inexhaustible and elective vitality sources and fills, for example, sunlight based
boards to control water system pumps, and biofuels Rationing and overseeing zones of local vegetation and riparian zones on cultivate, which
are significant carbon stores
Thought upon the nitrogen productivity
According to the examination it has been discovered that inside the Australia, there is an
extraordinary hugeness of the cotton cultivating and the standard of kinds of nursery gam
discharge incorporates carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. Nitrogen manures are a
noteworthy wellspring of ozone depleting substance emanations, especially nitrous oxide, and
the Australian cotton industry keeps on putting resources into look into, showing trials and
choice help devices concentrated on enhancing nitrogen utilize effectiveness.
Ozone depleting substance stock devices for cotton and blended cultivating properties are
accessible web based, including carbon mini-computers and administration instruments.
Nitrous oxide discharges are being estimated on flooded cotton ranches, and outflows can
be diminished through changing cultivating practices, for example, decreasing culturing, limiting
utilization of groundwater, enhancing precipitation soil-dampness stockpiling, revolution crops,
streamlining water system plan and planning, and modifying manure situation more profound in
the soil.The Australian cotton industry assumes an extremely critical part in the agribusiness
ozone depleting substance emanations (Stewart and et.al., 2018). The Australian cotton industry
is generally an extremely minor supporter of horticulture's ozone depleting substance outflows,
speaking to short of what 33% of one for each penny of Australian farming's ozone depleting
substance discharges.
Cotton developing has a superior than-unbiased carbon impression. Net on-cultivate
emanations of ozone depleting substances on cotton ranches are negative in light of the fact that
10

the cotton plants store more carbon than is discharged from generation inputs utilized amid
development
The principle wellsprings of emanations on a flooded cotton cultivate are manufactured manures
and power and non-renewable energy sources used to control water system pumps
On-cultivate contextual analyses have demonstrated that the reception of least culturing has
decreased vitality expenses and ozone depleting substance outflows by 12% since 2000 The
business has completed an existence cycle appraisal of an Australian cotton T-shirt. It observed
the major ecological effect to be in the 'utilization' segment of the piece of clothing as opposed to
generation and assembling
As per the research it has been analysed that in the Australia cotton farmer continues to
overcome the greenhouse gas emission and increase the lands ability to store more carbon
through several strategies and criteria. These practices and criteria are discussed below-
 One major effective strategy and criteria to reduce the green house gas emission and
improve the land ability is to maximise the efficiency of main equipment and resources in
the production of cotton such as energy and nitrogen.
 Another effective practice for improve land ability and decrease the green house gas
emission is to use alternative sources of nitrogen such as utilisation of legume rotation
crops etc (Chen and et.al., 2018).
 Another strategy is to implement other practice to improve soil health include utilisation
of controlled traffic and minimise tillages system.
 It is recommended that by use of renewable and alternative energy source and fuels .By
use of this practice, it is easy to overcome the green gas emission and enhance the land
ability to store the more carbon.
A good adoption of the measures to mitigate the green house gases and reduce the carbon
foot print will help in suitable rise in wellness of the cotton industry helping in saving the
environment.
The cotton industry is Australia has invested in climate change to reduce emissions. It has
transformed the entire cotton industry. The major step taken in this is reduction of green house
gas. For this several practices and methods has been implemented to provide support to industry.
It includes carbon farming, water use efficiency, etc. Moreover, it includes many other measures
that are as follows :-
11

 Maximising efficiency of inputs by using techniques such as nitrogen end energy. Using
renewable sources of energy like solar plants, biofuel in cotton farming.
 The focus is on using nitrogen to improve efficiency of farming. Now green house gas
tools are available online. Besides this, action has been taken to measure carbon
emission. Many more practices are used by farmers like reducing use of groundwater,
crop rotation etc. This all has resulted in maintaining the efficiency of soil and reducing
emission (Gollnow and et.al., 2014).
 To improve nitrogen use approaches like crop nutrition, the best management practise is
implemented. It has resulted in improving nitrogen use efficiency. In this monitoring is
done for plant during season. The use of nitrogen fertiliser is calculated and then
performance of farm is assessed.
 At last research is been done to adopt several strategies in changing the climate.
Researchers are investigating impact on soil due to occurring of events like drought and
rain. The future climate regions is being modelled to identify impact of cotton crop on
land. Other researcher are evaluating effect on crop growth due to rise or fall in
temperature and carbon dioxide levels.
The carbon footprint of the Australian cotton industry.
The cotton growers are deeply dependent on the various environmental and weather
conditions that prevails in Australian continent. Thus, the cotton industries will look after better
handling of operations that will help in effective management of carbon foot print. The
industrialization has caused rise in pollution and deforestation, impacting the carbon cycle of the
ecosystem and thus the emission of green house gases and carbonised gases have increased in
very a tremendous manner that will impact the overall growth and development of other
plantation and the accessibility of the pure air to local citizens residing in the local market or
industrial zone (Wolfram Wiedmann and Diesendorf, 2016). High transportations and
establishment of human residences in large concentration in locality has rocketed the range of
carbon emission, causing depletion of ozone layer. This has to be assimilated that high carbon
footprint will lead to increase in temperature, causing an adverse impact on the cotton crop.
12

In some areas, however the preventive measures are been taken with the help of local
authority, citizens, NGO's and government. The using of man based tilling and cultivation has
reduced the consumption of fossil fuels, mitigating the rise in CFC's and other green house gases,
maintaining the ecological cover in the area. Also, proper irrigation services are been used that
will impact the operations in a better way. The approaches involving recycling of good and
services and other by products will help in controlling the carbon foot print in Australia (Biswas,
2014).
Conclusion
From the above report it is concluded that Australian cotton energy consumption and
greenhouse gas emission are mainly affects due to fertilisers and herbicides application rate.
Further the manufacturing process with the application energy can impact the values. Further it is
concluded that people. Nitrous oxide emanations are being estimated on flooded cotton
homesteads, and discharges can be lessened over changing cultivating practices.
13

Reference
Visser, F., Dargusch, P., Smith, C. and Grace, P.R., 2015. Application of the Crop Carbon
Progress Calculator in a ‘farm to ship’cotton production case study in Australia. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 103, pp.675-684.
Sejian, V., Prasadh, R.S.,. and Gaughan, J.B., 2018. Assessment of the carbon footprint of four
commercial dairy production systems in Australia using an integrated farm system model.
Carbon Management, pp.1-14.
Günther, J., Thevs, N., and Abdusalik, N., 2017. Carbon and phosphorus footprint of the cotton
production in Xinjiang, China, in comparison to an alternative fibre (Apocynum) from Central
Asia. Journal of cleaner production, 148, pp.490-497.
Xing, K., Qian, W. and Zaman, A.U., 2016. Development of a cloud-based platform for footprint
assessment in green supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 139, pp.191-203.
Nigam, M., Mandade, P. and Sethi, S., 2016. Energy consumption and Carbon footprint of
Cotton Yarn Production in textile industry. Int Arch Appl Sci Technol, 7(1), pp.6-12.
Huisingh, D., Zhang, Z., and Li, Q., 2015. Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction:
policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production,
103, pp.1-12.
Visser, F., Dargusch, P., and Grace, P., 2014. Proposed industry-level model to estimate the
carbon footprint of irrigated versus dryland cotton in Australia. Journal for Food, Agriculture
and Environment. Under revised review.
Gollnow, S., Lundie, S., and Rehl, T., 2014. Carbon footprint of milk production from dairy
cows in Australia. International Dairy Journal, 37(1), pp.31-38.
Peters, G., Svanström, M., and Zamani, B., 2016. Carbon footprints in the textile industry. In
Handbook of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Textiles and Clothing (pp. 3-30).
Robb, S. and Dargusch, P., 2018. A financial analysis and life-cycle carbon emissions
assessment of oil palm waste biochar exports from Indonesia for use in Australian broad-acre
agriculture. Carbon Management, pp.1-10.
Mushtaq, S., Maraseni, T.N., and Jackson, T., 2015. Integrated assessment of water–energy–
GHG emissions tradeoffs in an irrigated lucerne production system in eastern Australia. Journal
of Cleaner Production, 103, pp.491-498.
14

Chen, G., Schmidt, E., and Antille, D.L., 2017. Opportunities of adopting renewable energy for
the nursery industry in Australia.
Parada, S.A., and et.al., 2018. Accuracy and reliability of a simple calculation for measuring
glenoid bone loss on 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Arthroscopy. 34(1).
pp.84-92.
Trushina, E., Greenhouse, R., Greenman, K. and Thomas, W., Mayo Foundation for Medical
Education, 2018. Compounds for modulating mitochondrial function. U.S. Patent
Application 15/554,767.
Lebon, F.,and et.al., 2018. The Neural Specificity of Movement Preparation During Actual and
Imagined Movements. Cerebral Cortex.
Stewart, A.K.,and et.al., 2018. Small molecule inhibitors of G protein coupled receptor 6 kinases
polypeptides. U.S. Patent 9,902,739.
Chen, I., and et.al., 2018. Safety of single dose primaquine in G6PD-deficient and G6PD-normal
males in Mali without malaria: an open-label, phase 1, dose-adjustment trial. The Journal
of infectious diseases.
Wolfram, P., Wiedmann, T. and Diesendorf, M., 2016. Carbon footprint scenarios for renewable
electricity in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124, pp.236-245.
Biswas, W.K., 2014. Carbon footprint and embodied energy assessment of a civil works program
in a residential estate of Western Australia. The International Journal of Life Cycle
Assessment, 19(4), pp.732-744.
Gollnow, S. and et.al., 2014. Carbon footprint of milk production from dairy cows in
Australia. International Dairy Journal, 37(1), pp.31-38.
15