Analysis of the Intelligence Process and Australian Agency Roles

This essay provides a comprehensive overview of the intelligence process, focusing on the Australian intelligence community. It begins by defining intelligence and its application in law enforcement, then delves into the historical context and structure of Australian intelligence agencies, referencing the Intelligence Services Act of 2001. The essay examines the intelligence cycle, including tasking, collection, evaluation, collation, analysis, inference development, and dissemination, highlighting the significance of each stage. It also discusses the impact of cognitive biases on intelligence analysis. The core of the essay involves a critical evaluation of the challenges faced by Australian intelligence agencies, such as role clarity and accountability, and analyzes the emerging threats like lone wolves and terrorist cells. The essay concludes with a summary of the key findings and assessments of the agencies' strengths and weaknesses.

Running head: INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Name of the student
Name of the university
Author note

1INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Introduction
The term intelligence may be implemented to demonstrate the procedure of interpreting
data to provide the meaning of the same. It has applied to demonstrate a department or group that
accumulates or tackles the data or to demonstrate the product of the department. Thus in the
simple sense, the intelligence may be defined as the information that has been processed. The
law enforcement applies intelligence that can be labeled as the data that is exploited, acquired, as
well as safeguarded by the actions of the organization of law enforcement to take the decision
and to assist criminal investigation (Symon and Tarapore 2015). The Intelligence Services Act,
2001, made relevant development to the intelligence community of Australia (Intelligence
Services Act, 2001). The intelligence agency of Australia is regulated and controlled by The
Intelligence Services Act, 2001. The act initiates a legitimate basis for the service of Australian
Secret Intelligence. It reconsiders typically the contemporary and emergent development in
crime surroundings, the threat to the order, and public safety, the scope for the regulation of
activities (Walsh 2015). The operational intelligence facilitates the team of investigation with the
inferences and hypotheses that concentrate on the particular factors of unlawful functioning of
that sort. It is significant to put emphasis on the national legislation of the state, who will instruct
the method intelligence can be operated for the purposes of law enforcement. The intelligence
process gathering in connection to the particular investigation is generally overture the evidence
gathering the phase. The statute, in addition to that, will also instruct whether the materials of

2INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
intelligence that was gathered at the time of conducting the investigation is safeguarded from
revelation in the criminal proceedings. The portion of the investigation reacts to the reported
occasions as well as describes what happens and who was engaged in the same (Raymond and
Julian 2015). The analysis of intelligence assists the investigation by aiding to aim the resources
that were available and also to determine the information crisis to concentrate the investigation in
a clearer manner. Furthermore, it also aids to evade effort duplication as well as eradicate
straying into the zone of having no importance( Ratcliffe 2016). Therefore in order to gain
maximum advantage, the analysis capacity must be engaged at the prior stage of the
investigation if at all possible at an earlier phase, though in practice, it is not conceivable.
The scope of intelligence secretly obtains information. The chief feature of the
intelligence data is it acquire without the sanction of the governmental body. The intelligence
comprises three major disciplines that si the intelligence that is acquired through the interaction
with the individuals. Furthermore, the intelligence that is obtained by overhearing on electronic
communications as well as the information acquired by the photography that involves imint or
imagery intelligence.
Background
The office of the National Assessment is the intelligence agency of Australia. It is the
independent structure that is established by an act of the parliament under what reports directly
to the prime minister (Philip 2004). The office of the National Assessment initiates its
functioning in the year 1978 that is followed by the royal assent of the National Assessment Act,
1977. The genesis is observed in the range of recommendations in the third report of the Hope
Royal Commission on Intelligence and security.

3INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Structure
The framework of the Australian Intelligence agencies is unique. Similarly, the
constitution’s advantages were influenced by the United States and Britain (Crispino et al. 2015).
The structure and role of an intelligence agency of Australia have borrowed, however, develop in
the unique model over the early sixty years.
Role
The role of the agencies in facilitating information, the modern intelligence may be active
machinery of the governmental body, disrupting the planning of adversaries, regulating the
policies of the chief foreign actors as well as contribute to contemporary electronic welfare. The
intelligence of Australia requires dynamic and reflects speedy global transformation. The
technological development diffuse power in addition to that empower people to play the
character in world politics (Gruszczak 2016). The intelligence department has chief character in
piloting policies in all sectors of government as well as the modest strengthening of resources
and concentrates on the matters of intelligence that would be justified.
Intelligence Cycle
The conception of the cycle of intelligence is identified as the establishment of the
procedure of intelligence analysis at strategic and operational levels (Criminal Intelligence
Agency 1999). The cycle of intelligence involves tasking, collection, evaluation, collation,
analysis, inference development, dissemination.
Tasking

4INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
The analysis of intelligence is driven by the necessity of the clients that are the
consumers of the analytical product. The analytical determination is directed by means of tasking
by the clients. They obtain effort at the phase of the intelligence cycle; however, the doctrine of
partnership needs that providers part the liability to operate combine for ensuring that the criteria
for analytical product and demonstrated clearly and comprehended by either side. The second
phase of the intelligence cycle is a collection (Clark 2019). The process of intelligence relies on
the capability to gather and apply information. Nevertheless, the primary and fundamental issue
to come across lies along with gathering and storage of information that emerge from
electronically retrievable to the hard copy. Evaluation involves inference validity is connected
directly to the data quality behind inference. The collation is the shift of the collected data or
intelligence in storage structure in the structured formatting that allows accurate and rapid
access. The analysis phase of intelligence procedure can be demonstrated as a deep inspection of
the essential features and meaning of the available data. The phase of dissemination involves that
the analyst of intelligence has the duty of disseminating products that are analytical to the aim of
audiences as proper (Ross 2015). The regular dissemination may be carried out by means of the
short notes. Nevertheless, the analyst of intelligence must be capable of providing an oral
briefing on the greater investigations as well as write reports that are structured that detailing
recent available data. Throughout the process of intelligence, the client has close by a
conversation with an analyst and asked on several events to respond to the questions linking to
the specific project. The process of dissemination takes place in several forms as formalized
structured reports, formal and structured oral presentations along with the supporting
documentation. In addition to that, weekly summaries in the manner of bulletins, ad-hoc
updating to the intelligence as well as the investigative process. The phase of dissemination

5INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
concludes the primary cycle of the intelligence process. The stage of re-evaluation engages the
continual reconsideration of the complete cycle of intelligence to determine the method in which
the phase of the cycle may be enhanced.
Cognitive Biases
The cognitive biases are designated as mental errors that occur due to the simplified data
processing strategies. It is significant to demarcate cognitive biases with other categories of
biases, for instance, organizational bias, cultural bias, or the bias that is resulting from the self-
interest of the individual. The cognitive biases, in another way, does nor resulting from
intellectual or emotional predisposition to certain judgment, however, from mental procedures
that are sub-conscious for the processing of data. Cognitive biases regarded as identical to the
optical illusions; even error is inducing when one has knowledge about its nature. The complete
information about bias does not generate accurate perception. Therefore cognitive bias is
complicated to overcome intelligence analyst function in the unique data environment. The
analyst, therefore, has restricted dominion over the information stream. Avoiding and
recognizing biases under the particular situation is complicated. The biases involved are
unconnected to one another and grouped combine due to they focus on some characteristics of
evidence evaluation.
The proper and complete evaluation needs the ascertainment of consistency of source as
well as information validity. An accurate assessment may be attained by changing it in a
systematic manner by sequential addition of premises. In the strategic intelligence, the inference
and hypothesis focus on concerns connected to possibilities, intentions, vulnerabilities,
limitations of the criminal adversaries permitting for preparing and planning efficient long-term

6INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
measures. The procedure of intelligence relies on the capability to achieve and implement
information.
Critical evaluation
The challenges faced by the intelligence agencies of Australia are accountability and role
clarity. The role clarity that is engaged by the agency of the intelligence community in Australia
along with minimal replication of capability regarded as a strength of Australian structure. The
inquiry observed robust assistance among the community of consumers for retention of
separation in between assessment action and collection. With the foreign collection group, there
is a deficit and no relevant dispute regarding the labor division (UNODC 2011). The deficit of
overlap, clarity is the significant element assisting the collaboration between the intelligence
agencies. Therefore corresponding to overlapping with the ONA, there is a deficit of clarity in
between the character of Defense’s operational level intelligence center and DIO (Power and
Kibell 2017). The restriction on the public form of the accountability position particular liability
on the ministers to the cautious appropriate functioning of the agencies of intelligence.
The significant crisis encounter by the intelligence agency of Australia is lone wolves and
terrorist cells. The impact of greater scale functioning on the military intervention, intelligence
agency, law enforcement, exponential development of private and public security intervention.
Apart from the operation of terrorist lone wolf terrorists becoming the major threat to the
community. The lone wolves are ideologically and fundamentally drag to obtain terrorist action
automatically. They, in general, cohere to no hierarchical system in addition to that meticulously
prepare and plan such action during maintenance of virtual invisibility in the community
(Ribaux, Crispino and Roux 2015). The danger of long wolf and terrorist cells provides a series
of concerns that are complicated for LEIA in the initiatives to determine those along with

7INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
manifest hate that tends to the violence. The lone wolves and terrorist cells never function
without assistance or influence of the peoples who are like-minded, and that is the chief factor to
undoing.
The terrorist action is designated as support , financing, transportation, participation
that si considered by the state or federal legislation to be the action of terrorism. Therefore no
data shall incorporate about religious, political or social views of group, individual, attempted
financing, organizing and planning or committing terrorist act or suspected of being engegd in
illegal act connected to terrosist attack. The inquiry is conducted if the one is suspected of
engaged in criminal activity or terrorist.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the comprehensive assessments of the failures of the intelligence agency,
however, the comparable demonstration of the achievement of an intelligence agency. Therefore
the Intelligence process involves the rank of interpretation that is impacting the inevitable grade
of risk and speculation. Intelligence is categorized into strategic intelligence and operational
intelligence. The strategic intelligence concentrate on the long period target of the agencies of
law enforcement.

8INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
References
Clark, R.M., 2019. Intelligence analysis: a target-centric approach. CQ press.
Crispino, F., Rossy, Q., Ribaux, O. and Roux, C., 2015. Education and training in forensic
intelligence: a new challenge. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47(1), pp.49-60.
Gruszczak, A., 2016. Intelligence security in the European Union: Building a strategic
intelligence community. Springer.
Power, R. and Kibell, J., 2017. The social media intelligence analyst for emergency
management.
Ratcliffe, J.H., 2016. Intelligence-led policing. Routledge.
Raymond, T. and Julian, R., 2015. Forensic intelligence in policing: organisational and cultural
change. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47(4), pp.371-385.
Ribaux, O., Crispino, F. and Roux, C., 2015. Forensic intelligence: deregulation or return to the
roots of forensic science?. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 47(1), pp.61-71.

9INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Ross, A., 2015. Elements of a forensic intelligence model. Australian Journal of Forensic
Sciences, 47(1), pp.8-15.
Symon, P.B. and Tarapore, A., 2015. Defense intelligence analysis in the age of big data. Joint
Force Quarterly, 79(4), pp.04-11.
Walsh, P.F., 2015. Building better intelligence frameworks through effective
governance. International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, 28(1), pp.123-142.
Philip, f., 2004. [ebook] Available at: <https://fas.org/irp/world/australia/flood.pdf> [Accessed
19 March 2020].
UNODC, 2011. [ebook] Available at: <https://www.unodc.org/documents/organized-crime/Law-
Enforcement/Criminal_Intelligence_for_Analysts.pdf> [Accessed 19 March 2020].
Criminal Intelligence Agency, 1999. [ebook] Available at: <https://www.cia.gov/library/center-
for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/psychology-of-
intelligence-analysis/PsychofIntelNew.pdf> [Accessed 19 March 2020].
Intelligence Services Act, 2001. [ebook] Available at:
<https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2020C00029> [Accessed 19 March 2020].