Final Project Report: Auzi Security Service Website Development

This final project report details the development of a website for Auzi Security Service, outlining the project's objectives, scope, and execution. The project was completed as planned, with a well-defined scope and efficient scope management, leading to the achievement of its business value. The report documents the project's deliverables, including the website, a user manual, and a description of its features. It also assesses the business value achieved through weekly reports, meeting minutes, client communications, and feedback. The schedule and budget estimates aligned closely with actual costs, with minor deviations in the coding phase due to PHP programming knowledge gaps. Key lessons learned include the importance of resource scheduling and allocation, as well as the need for appropriate expertise in specific areas like coding. The report concludes with references, a self-evaluation of the project's success, and promotional efforts undertaken, highlighting the positive user feedback received.

2002/03 FINAL PROJECT REPORT
Project Title Development of website for the “Auzi Security Service “Company
Project Members [Please Fill]
Sponsor Including contact details
Email Telephone
ABOUT THE PROJECT
Description
Project Completed: (Yes, as
planned / Yes, with changes to
project scope / No)
Was the project completed as
planned or were there considerable
changes to the project scope or
schedule? Provide details where
significant variation occurred.
How well was the scope defined?
Did it change?
How effective was the scope
management process? Was there
any scope creep?
Was the business value was
achieved? Include support to prove
that the business value was
achieved.
Yes, the project has been completed as planned.
The scope was defined properly in an organized manner and there
was no change in project scope.
The scope management process was efficient enough so that the
project could be completed within the estimated timeline. No, scope
creep did not occur in the project.
The business value was achieved as the website is able to support
the business processes required for the organization.
Project Deviations
Document any exceptional or
significant changes in project scope
How close was the project
schedule and budget estimates
to the actual cost of the project
Were there any surprises or
discrepancies? If so, why.
There was no significant changes in the project scope and the
project was completed as per the estimated schedule and budget.
List of Deliverables Brief user manual or site map
Description of product
Description of special features – security, animation, product
highlights etc
Assessment of Business Value
Weekly Reports
Meeting minutes
Client communications
Client feedback
Project Website address
If hosted site
http://auzisecurityservices.cloudaccess.host/
[ Page 1 of 3

FINAL PROJECT SCHEDULE
STAGE and
Project Milestone
Original
Target
Completion
Date
Actual
Completi
on Date
Budget
(hrs)
Actual
(hrs)
Reason for change
Project planning
phase
Completion of
planning phase
Fri 06-04-18 Fri 06-
04-18
88 88 No change
Web application
design
Completion of
design phase
Fri 11-05-18 Fri 11-
05-18
200 200 No change
Coding
Completion of
coding phase
Tue 05-06-
18
Tue 05-
06-18
145 136 Issues with coding of modules as there was less
knowledge of PHP programming language
Web content build
Completion of
content building
phase
Thu 07-06-
18
Thu 07-
06-18
10 10 No change
User experience
Completion of user
experience
evaluation
Tue 19-06-
18
Tue 19-
06-18
64 64 No change
Project
requirement
Completion of
project
requirement phase
Tue 03-07-
18
Tue 03-
07-18
80 80 No change
Testing phase
Completion of
website testing
Wed 11-07-
18
Wed 11-
07-18
48 48 No change
Project closure
phase
Completion of
project closeout
Fri 20-07-18 Fri 20-
07-18
56 56 No change
PROJECT REVIEW
Lessons learnt and recommendations
 What have you learnt from this project that
you would use again or advise for a similar
type of project?
 What would you do different next time?
 What processes/procedures did not work
well? What changes would you make to
improve these?
 What processes/procedures did work well?
How would you make sure you would repeat
this next time?
 Where conflicts handled effectively? What
main challenges did the team face? How well
did the team members function as a cohesive
team?
 Were there any ethical issues? How were they
handled?
 Completion of project within estimated time
and budget. Proper scheduling of resources
is an essential factor for success of project.
 Next, the allocation of resources have to be
checked for over allocation so that they are
not overburdened to complete the project.
 The coding phase was a bit difficult to
execute hence, next time a suitable person
with coding knowledge will be hired.
 The conflicts were handled effectively and
the major challenged faced by the team was
conflict within the team members. Despite of
the conflict in ideas between the team
members they did function effectively as a
team.
[ Page 2 of 3

 As far as the project has been analysed there
was no such ethical issue.
Useful references
Please list any documents, specifications, etc which
may be useful to others trying to understand the
process or outcomes of your project. List any
documents which others might want to use in future
projects.
1. Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced project
management: a structured approach. Routledge.
2. Heagney, J. (2016). Fundamentals of project
management. AMACOM Div American Mgmt
Assn.
3. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management metrics,
KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and
monitoring project performance. John Wiley &
Sons.
4. Kerzner, H. (2018). Project management best
practices: Achieving global excellence. John
Wiley & Sons.
5. Kerzner, H., & Kerzner, H. R. (2017). Project
management: a systems approach to planning,
scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
6. Martinelli, R. J., & Milosevic, D. Z. (2016). Project
management toolbox: tools and techniques for
the practicing project manager. John Wiley &
Sons.
7. Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology
project management. Cengage Learning.
8. Turner, R. (2016). Gower handbook of project
management. Routledge.
Project self-evaluation and promotion
Was the project implemented successfully?
Do you have any specific indicators of success? (eg
no. of website hits or users, user feedback)
How has the project been promoted?
The project was implemented successfully as it was
able to fulfil requirements of the client.
The major success indicator of the project was the
feedback received from users.
The project was promoted with the help of
advertising campaign by preparing poster, leaflets
and brochure for the website.
[ Page 3 of 3