Detailed Comparison Report: Avast Antivirus and Quick Heal Security

This report provides a comparative analysis of Avast Antivirus and Quick Heal Security, two prominent players in the information technology sector. Avast, serving over 435 million users monthly, boasts a strong market presence in regions like the US, Canada, and Europe, offering both free and premium security products, including mobile and tablet protection, but suffers from an ineffective password manager and low tolerance for anti-phishing. Quick Heal, on the other hand, emphasizes consumer-centric products and relationship-driven services, incorporating next-generation technologies and a web-based GUI, yet faces challenges with rapid updates and compatibility issues. The conclusion favors Quick Heal for its superior consumer-driven approach and specified features, positioning it as a leader in the IT industry. Desklib provides access to similar past papers and solved assignments for students.

COMPARISON REPORT AND PPT

Introduction
• Avast Antivirus Securities
• Pros and Cons
• Quick Heal Securities
• Pros and Cons
• Graphs
• Conclusion

Avast Antivirus Securities
• One of the leader in Information Technology
Sector.
• Serves over 435 Million users monthly.
• Market captivated:
• US, Canada, Brazil, France, Russia and
Germany.

Pros and Cons
• Pros
• Free and Premium Security products.
• Security for Mobile and Tablet devices.
• Cons
• Ineffective Password Manager Features.
• Low tolerance for anti-Phising.

Quick Heal Securities
• Application of Next Generation
Technologies.
• Consumer Centric Products
• Relationship driven services.
• Includes mobile, desktops, tablets etc.
• Web based GUI

Pros and Cons
• Pros
• Consumer Centric Products
• Designing as per specifications of consumers.
• Cons
• Rapid Updates
• Compatibility Issues
• Decreased Value Proposition

Graphs
Anti Spam Heuristic
Technology Cloud AV
Avast Securities
Quick Heal Secutrities

Conclusion
• Preference of Quick Heal Securities.
• Better consumer driven products and services.
• Market leader in the Information Technology
industry.
• Specified features for the consumers.

References
• Huang, H., Chen, K., Ren, C., Liu, P., Zhu, S. and Wu, D., 2015,
April. Towards discovering and understanding unexpected
hazards in tailoring antivirus software for android.
In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Symposium on Information,
Computer and Communications Security (pp. 7-18). ACM.
• Ignatchenko, S. and Ivanchykhin, D., OLogN Technologies AG,
2016. Systems, methods and apparatuses for protection of
antivirus software. U.S. Patent 9,443,083.
• Patil, B.V. and Joshi, M.J., 2016. The Benchmarking Model for
Ideal Antivirus Software for All Users. EPH-International Journal
of Science And Engineering (ISSN: 2454-2016), 2(10), pp.01-05.