Virtual Server Hosting: AWS, Azure, and IBM Bluemix Comparison
VerifiedAdded on 2020/03/28
|4
|1024
|308
Report
AI Summary
This report provides a comparative analysis of Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and IBM Bluemix, focusing on their virtual Linux server hosting capabilities. It details the use of Amazon EC2, Azure Virtual Machines, and IBM Virtual/Bare Metal Servers, along with Amazon Lightsail and Azure App Service. The report compares storage options, including virtual machine storage, object storage (S3, Blob storage, Bluemix Object storage), and archival storage (Glacier, Cool Storage). Database and analytics tools, such as Redshift, dashDB, and Azure SQL, are also compared. Furthermore, the report examines virtual machine management, including management consoles and command-line interfaces, along with additional tools like CloudWatch, Log Analytics, and Application Insights. The report also explores IPv4 and IPv6 addressing support and details the redundancy, backup, and disaster recovery solutions offered by each provider, including conventional backup, Pilot Light, Warm Standby, Multi-site solutions, and Zerto Virtual Replication technology.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
1 out of 4