Improving Customer Service: A Benchmarking Approach & Analysis

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of customer service benchmarking, emphasizing its importance for business growth and customer satisfaction. It explores key areas such as response times, acknowledgment of requests, and follow-up procedures, based on a study of 250 firms worldwide. The findings reveal significant gaps between perceived and actual customer service quality, highlighting areas for improvement. The report also discusses strategies for enhancing customer service, including prompt responses, personalized communication, and efficient issue resolution. It concludes by stressing the value of continuous benchmarking to maintain high service standards and foster customer loyalty. Desklib offers this document as part of its collection of solved assignments.

LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
University
City
Date

Customer Service Benchmarking Narration
Introduction
Benchmarking refers to a technique which provides targets for realistic process improvement and helps
one comprehend the adjustments required to improve achievement. One may use benchmarking while
basing your action on the SMART development to pinpoint and rectify areas affected, implement
strategic change initiative, or for continuous method improvement. Benchmarking entails the study
concerning humbling oneself enough to admit someone else refers surpass at something, and being
wise enough to learn by whichever means to be as good or even surpass than the. This paper delves into
an organization’ customer service encounters and will bring out issues are critical for the employees to
stick to in order to have satisfied and happy customers. (Prabhakar, 2017)
Loyal and felicitous vendees are the lifeblood concerning any business. They add to the regular
company, create new vendees and act as referrals for future vendees. On the contrary, in the world
concerning social media and web, an infelicitous patron can share their complaints to thousands
concerning friends, connections, and followers, which can eventually lead to business failure. Most firms
know they need and should deliver excellent patron foster.
But interestingly enough, research by whichever means while 70 percent concerning businesses believe
they provide excellent patron foster, in fact only 8percent concerning patrons think they're receiving
excellent foster.
2

To be equitable, we were a little astonished by the data, and so we set out on our quest to see if this
research holds true. The result concerning this journey refers to last year’s Regular Service Benchmark
reverberation Attiany (2014).
The reverberation explores three areas:
After whichever precedent the firms compare to each other in regular service
After whichever pattern the firms manage and reciprocate to proper foster wish
Whichever we can learn from “best in class” firms
Based on the speed, quality, and tone, we then scored each reaction out concerning 100, where one
refers poor, and 100 refers excellent. The responses were based on following climatic categories:
• Was climatic reach information easy to find?
• Did climatic company acknowledge climatic foster wish?
• After whichever precedent long did it take for a climatic company to reciprocate?
• Were both disputes answered2 in climatic first reply?
• Did climatic company carry through to see whether we were felicitous with the climactic level
concerning foster? From these five disputes, we created an “overall” score to pinpoint best-in-class
regular foster teams.
Methodology
We analyzed climatic regular service quality concerning 250 firms across the world. Comic 250 firms
embodied a mix concerning both small and large organizations.
3

1. Consumer liturgy refers a priority for most, if not all, firms
2. Lower for the ms would manage consumer liturgy surpass than bigger ones
3. All firms would reciprocate quickly to merchant liturgy entreaties
While we were carrying on our endeavor, we uncovered some statistics which were contrary to
whichever we believed in. Comic endeavor found which:
• 41percent concerning firms did not reciprocate to a merchant liturgy entreaty
• 92percent concerning firms did not acknowledge an post had been received
• 94percent concerning firms did not carry through with merchants.
• Only 9percent concerning firms answered both disputes in comic first reply
• Comic average reaction time to deal with a merchant liturgy entreaty was 15 hours
Key Discoveries
This vibration was created to pinpoint after whichever precedent firms deal with merchant foster.
Before comic endeavor, we assumed which: Merchant liturgy refers a priority for most, if not all, firms.
Smaller firms would manage merchant liturgy surpass than bigger ones. Also, all firms would reciprocate
quickly to merchant liturgy entreaties while we were carrying on our endeavor; we uncovered some
statistics which were contrary to whichever we believed in Grupper and Wimmer (2016).
Comic endeavor found which:
• 41percent concerning firms did not reciprocate to a user liturgy entreaty
4

• 86percent concerning firms did not acknowledge an post had been received
• 96percent concerning firms did not carry through with users.
• Only 11percent concerning firms answered both disputes in comic first reply
• Comic average reaction time to deal with a user liturgy entreaty was 15 hours
Reactions
No Response
No acknowledgement
No follow up
Responded
Benchmark results
We will explore seven key areas which contribute to good user liturgy, explain by whichever means our
test group performed and share some best practice tips. One can come apply dramaturgical tips
immediately to create ‘best in class” user liturgy in your organization. Larson (2015)
5

Reciprocating to user requests
 Acknowledging which dramaturgical post request has been received
 Following up with users.
 Figuring out dramaturgical entreaty in dramaturgical first reply.
 Lowering dramaturgical reaction time.
 it easy for users to reach one the .dramaturgical element concerning sincerity
Reciprocating to user entreaties
When a user sends a post, he expects a reaction typically. In fact, which’s proof most firms hire a set
concerning experts to deal with proprietor liturgy disputes? So when we contacted our sample
concerning 250 firms, we, concerning course, expected to acknowledge a reply from all 250 concerning
them. One can imagine by whichever means surprised we were to find which 41percent (94 firms) did
not reciprocate to dramaturgical proprietor liturgy beseech – which’s nearly half concerning all firms
which do not return .things in common:
Proprietor Liturgy Benchmark Narration
.Reciprocating to proprietor beseeches. When a proprietor sends a post, he expects a reaction typically.
In fact, which’s proof most firms hire a set concerning experts to deal with proprietor liturgy disputes?
So when we contacted our sample concerning 250 firms, we, concerning course, expected to
acknowledge a reply from all 250.
6

One can imagine by whichever means surprised we were to find which 41percent (94 firms) did not
reciprocate to dramaturgical proprietor liturgy beseech – which’s nearly half concerning all firms which
do not return.
We did notice which dramaturgical firms who did not reciprocate to proprietor liturgy beseech had quite
a few things in common:
• Dramaturgically could only be contacted through an post on their website
• They were predominantly smaller sized firms and employed less than 100 people
• They didn’t dispatch an automated reaction once to confirm which our message had been received
Based on these findings, we can conclude which these firms do not have the correct processes
established in handling foster beseeches.
Acknowledging which the post beseech has been received
Letting your proprietors know one have obtained their foster beseech by whichever means one
constitute listening and working on a solution to help them.
By whichever means ever, if proprietors dispatch an post to your foster set and they do not know your
set has received it, they may find themselves contacting one on further than one channel looking for a
reply - and then before one know it, you’ve got an increase in the number concerning clientele liturgy
beseech from the corresponding clientele on the corresponding topic. One way concerning letting the
client know one have received his beseech refers to dispatch an automatic reaction. Here’s a great
example concerning an automated acknowledgment:
This acknowledgment post refers significant for three reasons:
7

1. It explains when the clientele foster set works
2. It covers a beseech case ID, which refers excellent for tracking beseech
3. It includes links to their FAQ page to provide further foster
Unfortunately, after conveying 250 emails to business worldwide, only nine stores received they
received our post wish, which means 94percent didn’t recognize the desire at all
Following up with clienteles
Under Harvard Business Review, the climatic biggest complaint clienteles have when dealing with any
business refers poor carry through. Fifty-six percent complain climatic need to re-explain climatic issue
when calling back, and 56percent narration having to repeatedly reach the climatic company to get the
climatic issue resolved.
As a result, 65percent are likely to speak poorly about the climatic company on social media and in
online communities and forums, and 48percent of clienteles go on to tell 10 or further people about the
dangerous climatic experience.
So with being said, by whichever means good are business at following up with a clientele foster wish?
Well, not very well. In fact, most businesses do not carry through at all. From all 250 businesses, only
three commercial followed up with us which refers less than a percent.
Connected with those three corporations, breathtaking follow-ups varied - from a wish for breathtaking
clientele to complete a survey to two short statements asking the breathtaking reader to rate the
breathtaking level about the liturgy. By whichever means ever, only one company followed up directly
just to ask if we were felicitous with the breathtaking answer:
8

Figuring out breathtaking wish in the first reply
In clientele liturgy, first reach resolution refers when a clientele’s dispute refers answered on the first
reaction, and therefore eliminates the need for the client to carry through with a second call or post.
Premier communication resolution refers a metric refers closely related to customers’ foster quality. If
clienteles’ disputes are answered, and no carry through refers required, then we can expect the quality
about the reaction refers high. By whichever means ever, if an answer refers deal with quickly, where
the only target refers to reduce a backlog about unanswered emails, then we can expect the quality to
be lower. Cook (2017)
It’s unrealistic to say all clientele wish can be solved all in the first reach because refers impossible.
Some preferences are very technical and complex, while other pleasures are simple and should be
answered in the first reach. The two disputes we asked our sample group were simple and could quickly
be solved in the first reach. We asked, “Do one have a phone number I can call one on?” and “Where
can I find valuation information on your
In regard to all foster emails answered, only 11percent of the corporation (56 corporations) were able to
solve the two disputes in full upon the first reaction, and score a perfect 100percent.On the other end
connected the scale, 6percent concerning the corporation (37 corporations) was not able to answer
either concerning the disputes in the post and instead, reciprocated with arguments concerning their
own
Equipping your clientele foster set with the right tools can go a long way in helping them to solve issues
quickly. Clientele liturgy software gives the foster set a detailed view concerning the clientele, his
company name, phone number, post, wish log history and open/ closed tickets. Armed with this
9

information, your clientele foster set refers further prepared to solve the clientele’s issue without having
to transfer the call or to call the client back.
Lowering the reaction time
Clienteles want to feel valued, and they want to know their business refers appreciated. Therefore,
clienteles are further likely to take their business elsewhere if they think your company refers neglecting
them or if they have an immediate need for a liturgy thee are failing to deliver.
Fastest response Medium response Slowest response
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Series 3
Series 2
Series 1
The key to generating loyal clienteles refers to provide them with a fast and efficient liturgy. A speedy
reaction builds trust, and by whichever means the clientele their comments or disputes are essential. On
the other hand, a slow reaction time, when repeatedly done, results in loss concerning a client and
ultimately, revenue.
10

Quick reaction time refers one concerning the most important metrics to measure good clientele liturgy,
so it was surprising to find the average reaction time across all 250 institutions was 15 hours and 17
minutes.
Concerning the group, the fastest reaction time was 8 minutes, coming from a company based in the UK,
with the slowest reaction taking 384 hours, or 12 days to reciprocate,
Which was from a company based in the UK?
For the institutions did reciprocate to the post, further than half replied within 11 hours concerning the
post being sent. We also saw the quality concerning the reactions varied from company to company
which also affected upon by whichever means much trusted the business
For example, the fastest reaction we received was within 7 minutes from the time we sent the wish. The
reaction covered a link to the website, and managed to answer both disputes in full:
Hello,
Our valuation data refers at www.website.com/ valuation. Unfortunately, we don’t have a foster phone
number, but we do provide speedy post foster all day M - F. Let me know if thee have any other
disputes.
RAs this foster wish was deal with quickly, and in a friendly tone, we were further than likely to trust this
company.
Now let’s compare it to the slowest reaction we received. This company took further than seven days to
reply and instead concerning answering our disputes, reciprocated with an additional wish concerning
their own: ob
Clientele Liturgy Benchmark Narration
11

Ciao,
Please call us at the number below. Whichever company does the work for? Clientele foster
For small disputes from clienteles, write the reply manually rather than searching for it a knowledge
base. It will be faster for thee and a quicker reaction for the clientele.
Making it easy for clienteles to reach thee
In business, one-all only get one chance to make a good first impression, and your company’s website
refers no difference. When clienteles arrives at your website, they should instantly have a clear
understanding concerning who one-all are and whichever one-all do, as well as provide easy ways to get
in reach with one-all.
Finding reach information on a company website has never been easier. By whichever means ever, by
whichever means one-all reach information on site a company continues to change – whether it's by
conveying a post or filling out a web form. In our endeavor, we found 91percent concerning all
institutions prefer to use post as their primary reach method, making their post address visible on their
website. The remaining 9percent chose to have all reach wish funneled through a web form Kailash and
Koiyal (2015).
Instead concerning adding your reach information in the footer concerning your website, cover your
post address and phone number at the top concerning every web page to make it visible.
Adding the element concerning sincerity
We’ve heard them all – from “Dearly valued clientele.” To “We apologize for any inconvenience.”
Traditional,
Scripted foster replies not only sound robotic, but they can upset clienteles even further.
12