Analysis of BHP Billiton's Sustainability Report after Dam Failure

This report provides an executive summary and detailed analysis of BHP Billiton's sustainability report, particularly focusing on the aftermath of the Brazil dam disaster. It examines the incident's impact on communities, the environment, and the company's CSR disclosures. The report highlights the importance of responsible practices, risk mitigation, and stakeholder engagement, including the involvement of internal and external parties. It reviews the measures taken by BHP Billiton in response to the disaster, the framework agreement for restoration, and the implementation of socio-economic and environmental programs. The analysis also includes a discussion of the company's efforts to improve safety, enhance risk management, and promote sustainable development. Furthermore, the report considers the company's approach to joint ventures, compliance with operational standards, and the role of the Sustainability Committee in monitoring health, safety, environment, and community (HSEC) performance. The report concludes by emphasizing the importance of managing material risks and prioritizing the safety of people and communities.

Running head: FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Authors Note

1FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
Executive summary
The report throws light on the importance of sustainability management in the light of the given
organization named BHP Billion. The CSR disclosures had been evaluated from its sustainability
reports after the Brazil dam disaster. The materiality of the report is based on the different kind
of reviews on the sustainability risks identification with the proper analysis of the different inputs
and risks has been registered with engagement of both external and internal stakeholders.

2FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................3
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................9
References......................................................................................................................................10
Bibliography..................................................................................................................................10

3FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
Introduction
The BHP Billiton dam collapse was not only an incident but a disaster that could really
have been really prevented by the management if the company could have followed more
responsible practices. The town of Bento Rodrigues was hit hard with over 600 by people losing
their homes and at least 11 people were killed a till date 15 people are still missing. The red
sludge that was muddy extended to over 440 km downstream across two states and affected
various municipalities and left the thousands of people with interrupted water supply that
polluted and left crucial implications for agriculture and health.
The major cause held responsible for the bursting of the dam is still unknown but it is
viewed that that state mining regulations were insufficient and the mine owner’s including
Samarco, Vale and BHP have miserably failed to stand according to the diligence
responsibilities. According to the Szoke (2018), there is no as such accident but the mistake was
discovered in the negligence and operational activities while monitoring. Australian mining
companies must improve its due diligence as well as the oversight across all its operational
activities. BHP Billiton main focus is to develop long-term shareholder value through
acquisition, discovery as well as marketing and development of all the natural resources. The
main strategy is to operate and own large, low-cost, expandable, long-life and expandable
upstream assets are diversified through the commodity and market.
The chief executive officer Andrew Mackenzie has responsibility to support the local
authorities and Samarco in the response effort. Major responsibility must be focused on the
future and immediate needs for thousands of people that faces ongoing environmental
devastation and immense uncertainty. The disaster made in the country highlights mining

4FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
industry is not adequate to provide safety and security while conducting the business all around
the world. The disaster was entirely man-made and could have been easily prevented with the
help of inclusive monitoring and oversight. The main approach for all such activities is risk
mitigation and the operational activities should meet the expectations of the people. The BHP
Billiton’s assets include joint venture that has been owned as joint operation that is included in
the substantiality report.
According to the reports, the CEO of the organization, Andrew Mackenzie, the
organization is committed to work efficiently with Samarco; the Brazilian authorities are
therefore committed to do the correct thing both in the recent times and also in the long-run. The
organization is committed to plan and effectively deliver the social and economic development
outcomes in all the countries in which they operates. During the financial year 2015-16, BHP
Billiton has implemented strict measures to decrease the environmental footprint for all the
operational activities (Szoke, 2018). These measures would help the communities and its people
to be safe and healthy. This creates both environmental and social values in the long-run.
Samar co is a joint-venture that is non-operated business owned by the BHP Billiton
Brazil and Vale. Both the organization has equal amount of shareholding. The operational
activity mainly comprises of concentration and processing facilities and iron-ore mine. on 5th of
November, 2015, one of the most important tailings dams of Samarco its Fundao dam failed
miserably. The Samarco dam failure thereby resulted in releasing huge amount of mine tailings
comprising of water and mine waste that were mud like in form. This therefore resulted in
flooding the overall regions of Paracatau, Gesteria and Bento Rodrigues. In addition to this Rio
Doce and several others downstream communities were also adversely affected.

5FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
This accident took the toll of 19 people overall, which included fourteen workers who
were working on the dam and five community members. Moreover, the combined infrastructure
of the dam downstream was hampered and communities were affected. Due to the tailing spill
the natural environment of the region especially, Rio Doce were extensively damaged. After the
failure of the dam more than 700 people were homeless. More than seven bridges were
destroyed, the accessibility to the roads was damaged and around 100 km were severely
impacted. More than 2000 hectares of agricultural land and vegetation were severely affected as
tones of tailing were deposited along river banks and in the river beds.
Due to the depositing of tailing materials in the riverbeds various aquatic fauna were
severely affected. The tailings material was earlier known to be very non-toxic in nature but after
the dam failure huge amount of fishes were killed due to deoxygenated water and highly turbid
sediments deposits. The sediments also led a negative impact on the town and communities
alongside the river for short periods and the downstream of Candonga dam. The businesses of
the region suffered severely and the sand miners besides the fisherman suffered more prolonged
impacts.
Just after the dam failure of Samarco, the BHP Biliton Brasil extended their assistance
and support as a respond. Their major concern was the welfare related to the Samarco workforce
as well as the affected communities. The company initiated a new global inclusion and diversity
council that made the organization a major priority to obtain an inclusive and diverse workforce.
The workforce is now more diverse and productive in nature and staff turnover is very low and
the employee engagement is higher. Samarco facilitated the affected communities with water,
food aid and temporary accommodation. The BHP Biliton Brasil dispatched experts from all the

6FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
fields like disaster relief, geotechnical and humanitarian response experts. Operations ongoing at
the mines were immediately suspended and this also included various other staff support.
As per the reports, the CEO of BHP Billiton, Andrew Mackenzie immediately after the
dam failure conducted a meeting with the Samarco, Vale, community members and local
authorizes. The main motive behind this was to get a clear understanding for the reasons behind
the dam failure and also know the scale of assistance needed by the local people. The members
from Forum on Corporate Responsibility (FCR) of BHP Billiton include respectable civil society
leaders. In 2016, the members visited the Mariana area to know the dam failure impacts (Szoke,
2018).
In the recent times, BHP Billiton has established its permanent existence in the Belo
Horizonte to assist Samarco’s response and remediation work over a long time. Currently, a team
of over senior management and 35 technical experts is involved in the ongoing effort on a full
time basis. Thousands of employees were deployed from the area due to rebuilding, intense
clean-up, restoration and rebuilding effort for the stabilization and monitoring of dam. After the
unfortunate tragedy, sustainable measures were implemented to restore the lives of the people
through extensive engagement and range of actions to maintain and reconstruct the impacted
communities (Da Costa, 2017).
In the year 2016, a framework agreement was signed by Samarco, BHP Billiton Brasil,
Vale and the Brazilian Authorities for restoration. The agreement was formed so that a
framework should be provided for the inclusive set of compensation actions, programs, and
remediation. The program includes around 22 socio economic and 17 environmental measures to
compensate and restore the overall environment and communities that were affected because of

7FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
the dam failure (Bhp.com., 2018). The framework agreement mandates the involvement of
community in the programs development through formal Advisory Committee that includes
direct representations from a social dialogue programs and the impacted communities. The
framework also helped in establishing an ombudsman process that is at present designed by the
inputs from affected communities and international experts.
Effective progress is made along the various socio-economic priority aspects that include
community resettlement, compensation, community health and education. The community
members are empowered so that they can make informed decisions that include the resettlement
process. This resettlement plan includes acquisition and identification of lands besides careful
planning and designing the urban plan. In addition to this, meetings with the affected
community members are held weekly. Education services in the area were also drastically
affected due to the dam failure and all the schools in both the regions of Paracatu and Bento
Rodrigues were completed destroyed. Therefore restoration of the educational services was given
the major priority after the dam failure. After two weeks of the incident, everything was back to
normal in the Mariana city. Psycho and social support for the students that were affected by the
tragedy is still ongoing and the resettlement program is still being implemented.
The community members that earn their livelihoods from the river, such as fisherman
suffered huge financial impact. Such community people after the dam failure were recognized
and provided with an emergency financial support. The Brazilian was providing 20 % more than
there minimum wage rate trough debit card system. Till date, more than 7000 cards have been
issued to the people. Moreover, an extensive negotiated program that includes adequate
compensation for the individuals will commence from the financial year 2017. This program is
made to ensure that all the people, who sustained loss can obtain equitable and fair

8FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
compensation. In addition to this, health services in the impacted area have also been provided
and both psycho and social support to the members are offered.
Various environmental remedial actions were implemented for effective management and
sustainable land use. This also included management of tailings, recovery of water quality,
biodiversity conservation. Major focus were given on recovery of water quality, water security,
raising awareness as well as environmental and preservation safety. The dams and materials
present within the river system were fully subsidized. Measures such as building of sediments
dams were made to decrease the potential related to tailing of the sediments downstream. Tailing
deposits are re-contoured and temporary vegetation cover are established with a rock armoring
segments for the main river channel so that erosion can be significantly reduced (Loh, 2005).
BHP Billiton also initiated a widespread review of the non operated mineral joint
ventures and significant dams. The main purpose of reviewing the dam was to assure the
reliability of its similar other dam structure. The organization is committed to enhance the risk
and safety management of the operational activities. The BHP Billiton furthermore created a
centralized management function for the dam that brings along more additional expertise. The
latest technology installed by the management would also help in assessing the technology
options so that dam management can be enhanced across the portfolio.
The sustainability framework of the organization includes sustainable development, risk
management and useful guides for its involvement in the host countries. BHP Billiton shares its
local cultures, environment as well as economic development. BHP Billiton also holds major
interests in joint ventures and organization in which it does not operates. Through technical
exchanges and formal governance structures, the organization actively engaged with its joint

9FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
ventures partners. The organization periodically evaluates the compliance with the operating and
management standards procedures and controls that includes their security standards. The health,
safety, environment and community (HSEC) is monitored by the Sustainability Committee. The
performances related to HSEC are measured through balance scorecard.
Conclusion
BHP Billiton major priority for their sustainability framework is evaluated by managing
and identifying the material risks. In the financial year 2016, the priorities related to the
material safety issues were reviewed and properly assessed. The safety of the people and the
communities in which it operates always comes first. More focused is given on the improving the
managerial approach for occupational safety facilities and reaching its mission of zero fatalities
at their operated assets annually.
With the help of Climate Change Portfolio Analysis, a crucial disclosure for addressing
the climate changes and its impact in the operational activities has been ascertained. This helps in
enhancing in transparency all the across the business. In the coming years, the organizations
advance in the crucial area and they must focus on strategic sustainability goals. This includes
Social Investment framework, indigenous people strategy and the commitment to safety. The
success of the organization is obtained because the partners, people and host communities. The
BHP Billiton has also designed effective standards to manage and reduce the material risks.

10FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
References
Ali, W., Frynas, J. G., & Mahmood, Z. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility
(CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: a literature review. Corporate
Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. G. (2017). Voluntary assurance of voluntary CSR disclosure. Journal
of Economics & Management Strategy, 26(1), 205-230.
Bhp.com. (2018). Bhp.com. Retrieved 27 April 2018, from
https://www.bhp.com/-/media/bhp/documents/investors/annual-reports/2016/
bhpbillitonsustainabilityreport2016.pdf
Bibliography
Chauvey, J. N., Giordano-Spring, S., Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2015). The normativity and
legitimacy of CSR disclosure: Evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4),
789-803.
Chen, Y. C., Hung, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm
profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and
Economics.

11FOUNDATION OF ACCOUNTING
Da Costa, K. (2017). Corporate accountability in the Samarco chemical sludge disaster. Disaster
Prevention And Management: An International Journal, 26(5), 540-552.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/dpm-07-2017-0171
Giannarakis, G. (2014). The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International
Journal of Law and Management, 56(5), 393-416.
Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate
social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of
Business Ethics, 125(4), 601-615.
Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate
social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of
Business Ethics, 125(4), 601-615.
Loh, B. (2005). Disaster Risk Management in Southeast Asia: A Developmental Approach.
Asean Economic Bulletin, 22(2), 229-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1355/ae22-2f
Szoke, H. (2018). Brazil mine disaster exposes BHP's failures. The Age. Retrieved 27 April
2018, from https://www.theage.com.au/opinion/brazilian-dam-disaster-shows-bhp-falls-
short-of-global-expectations-20151119-gl2i8c.html
Thijssens, T., Bollen, L., & Hassink, H. (2015). Secondary stakeholder influence on CSR
disclosure: An application of stakeholder salience theory. Journal of Business
Ethics, 132(4), 873-891.
Vilar, V. H., & Simão, J. (2015). CSR disclosure on the web: major themes in the banking
sector. International Journal of Social Economics, 42(3), 296-318.