Feedback on Brain Structure & Function Project: Source Evaluation

This report provides a detailed analysis of feedback received on a project concerning brain structure and function, focusing on both positive and negative comments from the tutor. It discusses the importance of feedback in learning and how the learner intends to improve based on the feedback rec...Read More

QUESTION-ANSWERS

Table of Contents
QUESTION-1..................................................................................................................................2
QUESTION-2..................................................................................................................................2
QUESTION-3..................................................................................................................................3
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6
1

QUESTION-1
Feedback is an important part of the studies and the learning. With respect to receiving of
feedback the learner would able to make an analysis that where it is right and where it need an
improvement. As per the received feedback of tutor which states that I had present excellent
understanding along with a good application of skill with respect to each area of the project
would motivate me a lot. I have taken it as a recognition of my efforts which motivate me to take
more effective efforts in my future projects. In the same with respect to the received feedback I
recognized that my level of understanding in respect to subject matter is quite good.
Likewise, as the tutor said that the use of AC in my content is good which make me feel that I
will take more effective measures for my future project too so that I will always receive such
positive comments and feedbacks from my tutor.
In addition of this positive feedback I have received a negative feedback with respect to the
shrinking of images and use of sporadic citation. Although it is a negative comment towards my
work but I had taken it in a positive manner because if I will make improvement towards the
suggested area then it will further lead to enhance my quality work. As the tutor said that the
shrinking of image would lead to make the content as inevitable to read which is right that I will
never be repeat in my future project. In the same way as the tutor said that I need to cite every
theory and paragraph which is also a subject matter of point because it will lead to make my
work more authenticate and valid. Likewise, the citing of images will also be taken care by me in
the near future. Thus, it would be right to said that the positive as well as adverse comment of the
tutor are taken as positively by me which will make me assist to improve my mistake and present
better and quality work.
QUESTION-2
While making an evaluation of the sources the aspect which I have considered with regard to
the selection of project is its reliability and validity that whether it is suitable or not with respect
to the content of the project. As when I searched the secondary data in the relevance of the
project a large number of articles and information come. Secondary data referred to the data
which is already collected by the scholars (Martins, da Cunha and Serra, 2018). But I make
selection of the data as per the content of the concerned article or journal. This means I have
looked towards the data content in respect to its reliability. Likewise, I had also seen that the
2

concerned paper must be copyright which shows its authenticity and validity. I had made
confirm about the information of the concerned data with a look towards a large number of
search and cross checking with the work of other authors and scholars. As the project is made
based on the wide proportion of secondary information which would further be enhanced in
terms of making an integration of such data which may contain the primary information.
On the other hand, as the articles and the journals which is used in the project are all
concerned with the pubmed as well as government website which itself show its reliability and
authenticity because these are some of those source which are counted as most authenticate and
reliable (Fiorini and et.al., 2018). Since the source are directly associated with the stream of
science which itself make me help to analyse the information that it is suitable or not. Although it
has been taken from the internet which itself counted as most appropriate mode of enabling
information towards the project but yet in order to make the improvement in the quality the
future sources would include the books so that along with broad approach the project will also
got the approach of the course material.
Thus, for making a selection of source I looked at various aspects including the authenticity
of source like the government sites and reliable source. Likewise, the content of the data is also
looked before making a selection of the data in respect to the project.
QUESTION-3
3

The above information is taken from end of page 3 of the project. the concerned
information is included in the work because the information is related with the function of the
brain. As the project is based on the topic of structure and function of the brain which will not be
completed and explained if this information will not be included in the project. This information
explains the major aspect of the project. In order to avoid the plagiarism and make the project to
be valid and authenticate with the retaining of original meaning of the project the paraphrasing is
used so that it will convey the same meaning along with avoidance of plagiarism.
The information is taken from the top of page number 7 of the project. The reason of
choosing this information is related with the topic i.e. as the topic of the project is related with
the structure and function of Gail cells and neurons which would be incomplete if the process of
communication between the neurons will not be explained. This information has contributed a
major role in the project and thus included. Also as the information is taken from the specific
source which is cited i.e. the contain of the information is referred and not copied which make it
important that the paraphrasing will be performed so that the authenticity of the project as well as
the information will be maintained.
4

The information is taken from second last paragraph of page number 8 of the project. this
information is included in the project because the question that is related with the project is
related with the explaining the role of neurotransmitter which will not be able to meet if this
paragraph is not included in the report. Likewise, in order to retain the main meaning of the
content and the avoidance of plagiarism which is an academic misconduct the information is
paraphrased. This will lead to retain its original meaning.
5

REFERENCES
Books and journals
Fiorini, and et.al., 2018. Best match: new relevance search for PubMed. PLoS biology. 16(8).
p.e2005343.
Martins, F.S., da Cunha, J.A.C. and Serra, F.A.R., 2018. Secondary data in research–uses and
opportunities. PODIUM sport, leisure and tourism review. 7(3).
6