Breast Cancer Essay: Impact of Screening on Mortality Rates, 2019

This essay examines breast cancer detection methods, focusing on screening, imaging, and palpable lesions. It analyzes the effectiveness of screening programs in reducing mortality rates, citing studies that demonstrate the benefits of early detection. The essay compares different diagnostic approaches, including organized mammographic screening and extra breast imaging, and their impact on patient outcomes, such as survival rates. It highlights the importance of early diagnosis and treatment, emphasizing that screening tests are more effective in detecting breast cancer in its early stages. The essay references studies that show the impact of breast cancer screening on survival rates and the need for further research to analyze the impact of diagnosed by objective examination. It also discusses the importance of early diagnosis and treatment, highlighting the need for continued research and improvement in screening methods.

Running Head: Breast Cancer
BREAST CANCER
Essay
MAY 29, 2019

Breast Cancer 1
Answer-1
The method of cancer detection is the primary way of reducing the mortality rate in
cancer. In breast cancer, there are three types of cancer detection test such as screening, imaging
and palpable lesion (Youlden, Cramb, Dunn, Muller, Pyke, & Baade, 2012). Screening is the
initial stage where most of the cancer detected and it reduces the number of deaths because of
breast cancer in the women. Screening of breast cancer helps to reduce the mortality by 25% to
31% in Europe. Detection in the early stage of breast cancer may be possible if the patient is
gone through screening process. The data collected from 2811 women who were diagnosed and
operated after the breast cancer detection. It is found in the 7.9% of people who used tobacco
products and smoking in the life were screening for the breast cancer while 28.6% of people who
belongs to familial history of breast cancer were involved in screening process while this
percentage is 4.7% in tobacco smoker and 28.7% in familial history of breast cancer in Imaging
process of cancer. However, the percentage is dramatically increased in palpable test where 5.7%
tobacco smoker were involved in palpable test while only 36.3% involve those people who
belongs to familial history of breast cancer. However, the percentage of detection of cancer in
early stage is very less while it has been considerable that during surgical treatment 84% women
are surgically treated among after the screening process, while 75.6% were treated after imaging
detection test, and 47% were treated after the palpable lesion test. However, it has been also
found that out of 2070 cases of breast cancer operated in the clinic between 2001 to 2008, 247
were detected by the organized mammographic screening which is almost 11.93% of total
female, while 1176 breast cancer detected by extra beast screening which is 56.81%, while 1393
be extra screening breast screen objective, which is 67.29% (Cedolini, Bertozzi, Londero,
Bernardi, Seriau, Concina, & Risaliti, 2014).
Answer-2
The result of this report shows that breast screening test is more effective test in detection
of breast cancer in early stages. The repost shows that a systematic and organized breast cancer
screening increased the detection rate in the first stage of cancer and increase the survival time
by 5 years after the treatment. The second thing is that women who were involved in all both
type of detection test (mammographic screening and extra breast imaging) will have more than 5
years of survival rate than those women whose breast cancer diagnosed after the breast objective

Breast Cancer 2
examination (Cedolini, Bertozzi, Londero, Bernardi, Seriau, Concina, & Risaliti, 2014). The
overall outcome of the result was that the early examination of breast cancer through screening
and imaging process help to detect the cancer on early stages and reduce the mortality due to
breast cancer in women. However, there is a further examination and research is required to
analyze the impact of diagnosed by objective examination. Apart from this, the major issue is to
detect the cancer between two consequent screening detection test calls (Caplan, 2014).

Breast Cancer 3
References
Cedolini, C., Bertozzi, S., Londero, A. P., Bernardi, S., Seriau, L., Concina, S., & Risaliti, A.
(2014). Type of breast cancer diagnosis, screening, and survival. Clinical breast
cancer, 14(4), 235-240.
Youlden, D. R., Cramb, S. M., Dunn, N. A., Muller, J. M., Pyke, C. M., & Baade, P. D. (2012).
The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: an international comparison of
screening, incidence, survival and mortality. Cancer epidemiology, 36(3), 237-248.
Caplan, L. (2014). Delay in breast cancer: implications for stage at diagnosis and
survival. Frontiers in public health, 2, 87.