This essay examines the multifaceted implications of Brexit on the protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in the United Kingdom. It begins by providing context on the Brexit process, including the initial uncertainty and the gradual legislative changes. The essay explores the potential impacts on EU-wide rights, such as trademarks and registered designs, which will cease to be valid in the UK, and the implications for pan-European injunctions. It discusses different post-Brexit models, such as the Norway and WTO models, and how these could affect the alignment of UK and EU law. The essay highlights that Brexit does not explicitly affect legal commitments under IP law conventions like the Berne Convention. The dissertation aims to consider changes in the field of Intellectual Property after the UK leaves the European Union, discuss all the laws of the European Union of IP and what the UK needs to do to overcome the IP matters after coming out from the European Union. The methodology relies on secondary sources, including case laws, statutes, and academic publications. The essay concludes by discussing potential legal divergences and the challenges for IP holders in handling cross-border transactions. The objectives include discussing the EU's IP laws, the circumstances for the UK after a transition period, and possible solutions and recommendations for the UK. The essay concludes by emphasizing that Brexit will not soon influence UK national copyright law, and that EU and UK copyright law may disappear.