An Essay on Business Environment: Types, Functions, and Effects

This essay delves into the intricacies of the business environment, examining various types of organizations, including public, private, and volunteer entities, and their respective legal structures like general partnerships, limited liability companies, sole proprietorships, and corporations. It explores the size and scope of organizations, categorizing them as micro, small, medium, and large enterprises, and elucidates how these factors link to business objectives, products, and services. The essay also analyzes key organizational functions such as marketing, finance, and human resources, highlighting their interrelationships and the advantages and disadvantages of these connections. Moreover, it discusses the impact of these interrelationships on organizational structure and performance, providing a comprehensive understanding of how businesses operate within their environment. The essay concludes by emphasizing the importance of understanding these elements for organizational success and the ability to adapt to changes in the business landscape.

Student’s Last Name 1
Business and Business Environment
By (Name)
Course
Professor
University
Date

Student’s Last Name 2
Introduction
A business environment defines the factors which affect the way an organization runs its
operations. These factors can be internal or external. This essay aims at analyzing the size, scope
and different types of business organizations. The essay also analyzes the interrelationships of
various functions of organizations which link to the structures of their business. Lastly, this essay
will analyze the effects which influence the macro environment of a business.
LO1
Types and Purposes of Organization
There are several types of organizations depending on their operations. Public
organizations are organizations that offer services which are meant for social purposes and may
include the not-for-profit government-owned organizations (Raharjo and Eriksson 2017, pp.
1799; Groeneveld & Verbeek 2012, pp. 355). The purpose of these organizations is to deliver
governmental services such as public infrastructures, military services and other public services
and goods which are meant to make the society better (Raharjo and Eriksson 2017, pp. 1799).
Operations of public organizations rely on paid staff (Caemmerer & Dewar 2013, pp. 1454;
Groeneveld & Verbeek 2012, pp. 378). These organizations raise funds for their services through
various methods including financial transfers from other levels of governments and taxes.
Private organizations include organizations owned both by the government and private
bodies such as groups and individuals. These organizations are formulated for the sake of
making profits and are hence referred to as for-profit organizations. Private organizations aim at
making profits for their stakeholders; hence they are fundamental to the economic system of a
country (Caemmerer & Dewar 2013, pp. 1454). The private organizations also widen the GDP of

Student’s Last Name 3
a country by generating the per capita income (Raharjo and Eriksson 2017, pp. 1800). Thus, they
are important tools in the growth and development of a country.
The volunteer organizations, on the other hand, refer to nongovernmental, not-for-profit
organizations that aim at offering social activities. Their sole purpose is to enrich the society by
offering a wide range of services without any return for profit. These organizations contribute to
the development of society by creating social wealth for the society. Volunteer organizations are
not governed by the state; rather, these organizations are governed by a board of unpaid trustees.
Also, membership in these organizations is not prescribed or inherited. Volunteer organizations
depend on regular or occasional volunteer workers. The staff may be or may not be paid.
Legal Structures
There are four types of legal structures used in business. The first legal structure is
general partnership. This legal structure is formed when two or more individuals come pull their
resources together to start a business. In general partnership, the management of the business as
well as profits and losses are shared equally among the partners. The partners obtain a formal
partnership agreement which has the terms and conditions of the agreement and incase of debts,
each partner becomes equally liable for them. The second structure is limited liability (Caramela
2018, n.d). This structure is formed when one or more people start a business through a special
written agreement. A limited liability company‘s agreement details include information about
distribution of profits and losses, provisions of management as well as allocation of tasks and
interests.
The third legal structure is sole proprietorship. This is the common form of business
structure where an individual decides to start a business either alone or with his spouse. This type

Student’s Last Name 4
of business is easy to establish and operation. The business owner(s) of such businesses enjoy
fewer taxes, and legal controls. Also the owner can decide how he wants the business to be
managed; hence, the leader enjoys greater flexibility management. However, if the business
incurs debts, the business owner becomes personally liable for the debts (Caramela 2018). The
last structure is corporation. This type of business has liabilities; benefits and certain rights with
are beyond those of an individual. An individual has little control over benefits and liabilities in
these types of businesses. Corporations might be established either for non-profit or for profit
purposes.
Types of Organizations
Organizations are divided into groups depending on their size and scope. They include
the micro, small, and medium and large enterprises, depending on their size and scope. The
microenterprises include small business organizations that operate on a very small scale because
of the low investment capital (Storey, 2016, n.d.). These organizations have nine employees or
fewer. The scope of the micro-enterprises is defined by a wide range of activities that require less
sophisticated technologies.
The small enterprises are small privately-owned businesses that are characterized by
small finances and a fewer number of employees of less than 50 employees and limited revenue
depending on the industry. The scope of the small enterprises is defined by their varying sizes
and revenue structure (Bell, Bryman and Harley, 2018; Rostamkalaei and Freel, 2016, pp. 267).
They are mostly owned by sole proprietors who work in partnership.
The medium and large enterprises, on the other hand, refer to large businesses that have a
relatively large number of employees, for instance, the medium enterprises employ a maximum

Student’s Last Name 5
of 250 people whereas large enterprises employ more than 250 people (Berisha and Pula, 2015;
Hillary 2017, pp. 21). The medium and large enterprises have a possibility of increasing their
growth at a faster rate. The scope of the medium and large enterprises is characterized by a huge
customer base. These enterprises have their operations in more than a country.
How Structure, Size and Scope Link to Business Objectives, Products and Services
One of the organizational objectives is to expand the business and be able to compete
effectively with other organizations offering similar products and services. This business is a
micro business because it has been operating on a small scale as a sole proprietorship. However,
I feel that for this organization to compete effectively with other businesses in the transport
sector, it has to make some changes on its structure, size and scope. For instance, I have been
considering running the business either as a partnership or as a private limited company (Hassan
2018, n.d). Looking at the two structures, I think that the limited liability structure suits this
business. This is because, as a private limited company, the organization will be able to attract
individuals who want to invest in it and raise more capital to expand the business. Also, as a
private limited company, the organization will reduce personal risk because of the limited
liability for business debts. Nonetheless, even if some members decide to leave, the business
would still continue.
However, if the business operates as a general partnership, it would not be able to achieve
its objectives. This is because, basing on the products and services offered by the business, there
would be a high risk of friction and disagreements among the members of the business
(Caramela 2018, n.d; Steiss 2019, n.d). Nonetheless, the general partnership would mean that the
every member of the partnership is liable to the mistakes committed by one of the members

Student’s Last Name 6
(Nigam & Mishra 2018, n.d). Also, if an individual leaves the business, the business can lose
some of its assets and this can be costly to the business. Lastly, basing on the products and
services of the company, and the fact that the organization has been operating as a sole
proprietorship, the corporate structure is not suitable because it will be costly to establish. Also,
due to double taxation, the organization is likely to enjoy little benefits in terms of revenues.
Basing on products and services delivered by the organization, it is evident that the
organization has been operating as a micro-business. However, if the organization wants to
effectively compete with other public limited companies in the transport sector, the owner of the
business should consider growing the size and scope of the organization (Harraf, Wanasika, Tate
& Talbott 2015, pp 675; Lonial & Carter 2015, pp. 102). For instance, the organization should
consider employing more people to work within the organization and ensure that the objectives
of the organization are fully met (Kasemsap 2017, pp. 45). If the owner of the business works
alone, he might not be able to achieve his objective of effectively competing with other public
limited businesses in the transport sector.
LO2
Organizational functions
The first function of an organization is marketing. This is a very important function that
helps an organization to strike and develop good interactions and relationships with its clients
and other organizations. The second function is finance (Kokemuller, 2017, n.d.). This
department helps the organization to manage its entire investment process by controlling the
company’s various expenditures and other obligations that the organization might be involved in,
such as legal obligations. It enables the organization to maintain its profits.The third is the

Student’s Last Name 7
human resource function (HR). This function focuses on managing the employees to ensure that
the internal work processes of the company run smoothly to improve the performance and profit
the services of the organization meet the needs and expectations of the customers (Noe,
Hollenbeck, Gerhart & Gerhart 2017). Thus it controls the entire production process.
The three organizational functions; marketing, finance and human resources are
interrelated in various ways. The three functions enable an organization to achieve its ultimate
objective of high profitability and performance. In the organizational context, the human
resource function enables an organization increase its profitability and performance by ensuring
that highly talented and skilled employees are recruited. On the other hand, the finance function
ensures that company’s profitability is enhanced by estimating the impact of employee bonuses,
salary increments and other motivational programs on the profitability of the company. The
marketing function looks at how an organization can enhance its profitability through its image
on the market. This function looks at how an organization can attract clients and make profits
through its brand image. The three organizational functions are interrelated because they work
towards one organizational objective; enhancing the profitability of a business.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Interrelationships between Organizational Functions
and their Impacts on Organizational Structure
One advantage of interrelationships between organizational functions is that they push an
organization towards greater performance to enhance its profitability. For instance, the human
resource function will focus on hiring talented and skilled individuals to ensure that they enhance
the performance and profitability of the organization. The finance function will ensure that the

Student’s Last Name 8
company minimizes its expenditure on salaries and bonuses to ensure that it remains profitable.
Whereas the marketing function focuses on attracting and retaining customers for the company.
The disadvantage of these interrelationships is that they can lead to friction and
disagreements between the organizational departments. For instance, the finance department
would want the human resource department to consider the cost of hiring talented and highly
skilled employees, while the human resource department would want the finance department to
consider the benefits of hiring talented employees rather than the cost (Bundy, Vogel & Zachary
2018, pp. 477; Edvardsson & Teitsdóttir 2015, pp. 36). Such disagreements between various
organizational departments can have far-reaching consequences on organizational performance,
which can later affect the profitability.
The organization functions and their interrelationships can have a significant impact on
the coach business. As mentioned above, these interrelationships can be advantageous and
disadvantageous to the organization. These interrelationships can enhance the performance of the
coach business by increasing the profitability of the business. Also, the interrelationships
between different organizational functions can cause friction between various departments of the
organization, thus affecting its performance.
Conclusion
Organizations vary depending on their operations. Public organizations are organizations
that offer services which are meant for social purposes and may include the not-for-profit
government-owned organizations. Understanding the size, scope and structure of a business is a
critical aspect of success in the business environment. If the business structure is not profitable,
stakeholders and customers might end up pulling away from the business. Customer and

Student’s Last Name 9
stakeholder withdraw can have a negative impact on the organization. Therefore having the
structure enables an organization to expand its business and ensure that the business remains
profitable.

Student’s Last Name 10
Bibliography
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. 2018. Business research methods. Oxford university press.
Berisha, G. and Pula, J.S., 2015. Defining Small and Medium Enterprises: a critical
review. Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences, 1(1), pp.17-28.
Besley, T. 2015. Law, regulation, and the business climate: The nature and influence of the
World Bank Doing Business project. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 99-120.
Bundy, J., Vogel, R. M., & Zachary, M. A. (2018). Organization–stakeholder fit: A dynamic
theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its
stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 476-501.
Cadle, J., Paul, D. and Turner, P., 2014. Business analysis techniques. Chartered Institute for IT.
Caemmerer, B., & Dewar, A. (2013). A comparison of private and public sector
performance. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 29(5), 1451-1458.
Caramela, S. 2018. The Types of Legal Structures for Business. Retrieved October 7, 2019, from
https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/8163-choose-legal-business-structure.html
Charles Jr, O.H., Schmidheiny, S. and Watts, P., 2017. Walking the talk: The business case for
sustainable development. Routledge.
Crane, A. and Matten, D., 2016. Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and
sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Edvardsson, I. R., & Teitsdóttir, U. D. (2015). Outsourcing and financial crisis: Evidence from
Icelandic service SMEs. Employee Relations, 37(1), 30-47.

Student’s Last Name 11
Groeneveld, S., & Verbeek, S. (2012). Diversity policies in public and private sector
organizations: An empirical comparison of incidence and effectiveness. Review of Public
Personnel Administration, 32(4), 353-381.
Gürel, E. and Tat, M., 2017. SWOT analysis: A theoretical review. Journal of International
Social Research, 10(51).
Harraf, A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K., & Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational agility. Journal of
Applied Business Research, 31(2), 675.
Hassan, A. T. (2018). Organizational Change Management: A Literature Review. Available at
SSRN 3135770.
Hillary, R. ed., 2017. Small and medium-sized enterprises and the environment: business
imperatives. Routledge.
Kasemsap, K. (2017). Organizational learning: Advanced issues and trends. In Knowledge
management initiatives and strategies in small and medium enterprises (pp. 42-66). IGI Global.
Kokemuller, N. 2017. What Are Organizational Functions? Retrieved October 7, 2019, from
https://bizfluent.com/info-8453523-organizational-functions.html
Lonial, S. C., & Carter, R. E. (2015). The impact of organizational orientations on medium and
small firm performance: A resource‐based perspective. Journal of Small Business
Management, 53(1), 94-113.
Nigam, R., & Mishra, S. (2018). Performance Management System Effectiveness: A
Comparitive Study of Public & Private Sector. IJAME.

Student’s Last Name 12
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Human resource
management: Gaining a competitive advantage. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Raharjo, H. and Eriksson, H., 2017. Exploring differences between private and public
organizations in business excellence models. International Journal of Operations & Production
Management, 37(12), pp.1795-1816
Rostamkalaei, A. and Freel, M., 2016. The cost of growth: small firms and the pricing of bank
loans. Small Business Economics, 46(2), pp.255-272.
Steiss, A. W. (2019). Strategic management for public and nonprofit organizations. Routledge.
Storey, D.J., 2016. Understanding the small business sector. Routledge.