Business Finance 1: Project Evaluation, Stock Valuation, Portfolio

Verified

Added on  2023/06/03

|7
|989
|382
Homework Assignment
AI Summary
This assignment delves into various aspects of business finance, starting with a comparative analysis of project investment decisions using methods such as payback period, net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and profitability index, ultimately favoring NPV for its comprehensive consideration of time value of money. It further explores stock valuation, demonstrating the inverse relationship between required return and share price, and discusses investor motivations for purchasing non-dividend paying stocks. The assignment also covers portfolio theory, emphasizing risk reduction through diversification, and calculates expected portfolio return and standard deviation. Finally, it addresses bond valuation, weighted average cost of capital (WACC), and the advantages and disadvantages of debt versus equity financing, highlighting the tax benefits of debt and the control implications of equity.
Document Page
Business Finance 1
By Name
Course
Instructor
Institution
Location
Date
Question 1
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Business Finance 2
(a) The payback period defines the time required for a project to generate cash flow that covers
the initial capital outlay (Sharpe & Litterman, 2014). The payback period for project A is 3.31
years while that of project B is 1.76 years. Under this criterion, the project B is preferred since it
has a lower payback period.
Figure 1
(b) Net Present value is the current value of all future cash flows. The NPV of project A is
$78,055.06 while that of project B is $8094.85. Both investments are desirable because they have
positive NPV. However, Investment A is preferred because its NPV is higher.
Figure 2
(c) The internal rate of return is the discount rate at which the net present value is equal to zero
(Rank, Unger & Gemünden, 2015). Project A has an IRR of 27% while project B has NPV of
Document Page
Business Finance 3
38%. Since the firms cost of capital is 15%, both investments are worthwhile. However, B is
more preferable than A.
Figure 3
(d) Profitability index measures value generated per unit of investment. Project A has a
profitability index of 1.37 while project B has Profitability index of 1.40. Investment B is
preferred under this criteria because it generates greater value per unit of inflow.
(e) The four methods yield different conclusions. Payback period, internal rate of return and
profitability index support the selection of project B while internal rate of return result prefers
selection of project A. However, the net present value is most preferred by investors because it
considers time value of money and takes in to account all cash flows generated by the
investment.
Question 2
(a) I will be willing to pay $40 for each Wombat share if the required return is 15%.
(b) I will be willing to pay $80 for each Wombat share if the required return is 10%.
Document Page
Business Finance 4
Figure 4
(c) Required return and share price are inversely proportional. Lowering the required return
increases the price that the investor will have to pay for the stock.
(d) Normally, shares yield returns in form of capital growth and dividends paid (Pedersen &
Peskir, 2017). Investors would be willing to purchase shares of companies that do not pay
dividends in anticipation of gaining returns through capital growth.
Question 3
Figure 5
(a) The required return of pacific blue stock is 5.3%.
(b)When 0<beta<1, it implies that beta lies between 0 and 1 and hence stock is less volatile than
market. 1% change in market index return causes a less than 1% variation in return of the stock.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Business Finance 5
(c) Beta is a measure of volatility of stock or portfolio
(d) Portfolio theory aims at reducing the risk of investments through diversification (Al-Afeef,
2017). Through diversification, losses in one stock is compensated by gains in another stock.
Question 4
Figure 6
The expected return of the portfolio is 9.325% while standard deviation is 4.179%.
Question 5
The value of the bond is $928.24
Question 6
(a)
Document Page
Business Finance 6
Figure 7
The Weighted average cost of capital is 0.0893
(b) Cost of capital is the opportunity cost of undertaking an investment (Chandra, 2017).
Investors calculate the cost of capital in order to determine the viability of an investment. Before
undertaking long term investments, the investor first determines whether the intended cost of
funding is appropriate.
(c) Debt financing is accompanied by tax advantages which are not available in share financing.
Firms also have limited obligations to creditors since its limited to the debt financing agreement.
Equity financing empowers the investors to influence company decision making.
(d) Portfolio theory is motivated by the intention to reduce risk of investments through
diversification. Through diversifying investments by investing in different stocks or a mixture of
stocks, bonds and debentures, investors reduce their risk exposure since loss incurred in one
security is offset by profits generated from another investment (Cejnek & Randl, 2016).
Document Page
Business Finance 7
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY Al-Afeef, M. A., 2017. Capital Asset Pricing Model, Theory and Practice: Evidence from
USA (2009-2016). International Journal of Business and Management, 12(8), p. 182.
Cejnek, G. & Randl, O., 2016. Risk and return of short-duration equity investments. Journal of
Empirical Finance, pp. 181-198.
Chandra, P., 2017. Investment analysis and portfolio management. New York: McGraw-Hill
Education.
Pedersen, J. L. & Peskir, G., 2017. Optimal mean-variance portfolio selection. Mathematics and
Financial Economics, 11(2), pp. 137-160.
Rank, J., Unger, B. N. & Gemünden, H. G., 2015. Preparedness for the future in project portfolio
management: The roles of proactiveness, riskiness and willingness to cannibalize. International
Journal of Project Management, pp. 1730-1743.
Sharpe, W. F. & Litterman, R., 2014. Past, present, and future financial thinking. Financial
Analysts Journal, 70(6), pp. 16-22.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 7
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]