This business law assignment addresses two problem questions using the ILAC (Issue, Law, Application, Conclusion) method. The first question examines the legal implications of a restraint of trade clause, focusing on a former employee, David, who started a competing business, Hair Glo Pty Ltd, after leaving Nu Shampoo. The analysis covers the Restraint of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) and relevant case law, such as Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne. The second question deals with partnership liabilities within Your Local Doctor, focusing on the actions of partners Jane and Sarah, including breaches of the partnership agreement. It examines the application of the Partnership Act 1892 (NSW), specifically sections 9, 10, 11, 12, 25, and 35, along with relevant cases like Polkinghorne v Holland & Whitington and Christie v Harcourt. The assignment concludes with the legal outcomes for each scenario, including potential injunctions, liabilities, and remedies.
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
