BUSN20017 Effective Business Communications Assessment 3 Report

Desklib provides solved assignments and past papers to help students succeed.

BUSN20017 EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS
ASSESSMENT 3
Student’s full name:
Student ID:
Tutor’s name:
Campus:

Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................2
Purpose, Process and Methods of writing literature review............................................................3
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................8
References........................................................................................................................................9
1

Introduction
The objective to write literature review is based upon a penetration evidence for examination of a
topic. The literature review is an essence of the current important issues and collective
significant knowledge data on a material. A literature review about a subject should be a
knowledgeable, informative, and individual but it must be impartial synopsis of the subject and
moreover providing an unbiased and balanced assessment that contains conflicting results,
contradictions, established and current knowledge. A literature review has different parameter as
compare to systematic review, which assess a specific quantifiable question by joining the
outcomes of multiple scientific judgments. An official literature review is based upon the
collection of extension information which might be to contain a personal vision to the topic
background and needs more than a rapid scan of the literature. The research will discuss about
the meaning of literature review, Purpose, Process, and Methods of Writing a Literature Review,
and its preparation process. The study further provides different methods to conduct literature
review in effective manner (Baker, 2016).
2

Purpose, Process and Methods of writing literature review
Directing a literature review is basically essential aspect for developing research knowledge, to
consolidate about current available information about subject and to identify and examine any
knowledge gaps and research contribution to get additional understanding (Baker, 2016). A
literature review enables us to examine other research that contradicts or supports our finding
outcomes and documents that differ, and also enable us to understand and judge the position of
our research in field. The distribution of our research outcomes, whether by journal publication
in reviewed paper uses the collective information about a literature review, by giving the
reference points for our new research will help us to identify and examine the possible influence
of our research. In this essay it will discuss four significant elements that include objective
procedure category and techniques of literature review.
The aim of a literature review is to develop an understanding and present this knowledge as a
written report, of current studies and discussions appropriate for a specific subject or field of
study. A literature review helps build understanding in a particular field. This helps to learn
significant ideas, methods of studies and experimental methods used in the field. The person can
learn how investigators use the ideas and learning together in order to deal with issues of the
actual globe. A further major advantage of literature reviews is that when an individual reads the
findings of a particular discipline will get an understanding of the way they are presented and
discussed. Bearing in mind what is read, the person will succeed in writing for your discipline
and attempt to accomplish a comparable style.
3

[Source: Hempel, et. al., 2016]
The process of literature review starts with very basic aspect to clearly define question for
research topic. By focusing on the significant research question that is reducing the mediation
faults it can avoid from irrelevant searching and reading material to make results more effective.
Acknowledge the result of mediation to examine the health issues in various people disease and
set proper health care centre for them. The question for the problem statement includes generally
involvement of participants during investigation and control comparative mediation. Preparation
of process consists of three significant assessment steps like searching for relevant data,
evaluating and appraising the process step and synthesizing the conclusions. By searching and
researching articles of literature review it can get valuable and informative data for examine the
critical and significant aspect of literature development process (Roush, 2015).
Duration for review the literature must be defined. It is essential to examine the update and fresh
research but it is also imperative to analysis the basic old informative statistics and knowledge.
The basically three various results come out from searching step that are common collective
consensus aspect about topic, capacity of disagreement and question about literature gaps. The
evaluating and appraising steps are needed to be done for applying for providing a consistent
analysis method and deconstruction of literature articles (Nurul, 2016). Reviewers should find
4

the weak and strong aspects evidence existing in the literature. For evaluation of research studies
ARON tool is developed to examine the consideration variation (Short, et. al., 2013).
There are number of kind of literature review but here two type of literature review were
discussed that narrative literature and systematic literature and their individual methods for
conduction literature review were elaborated which included meta-analysis of literature review
and fixed method of literature review. There are basically two sort of narrative review first one is
to deliver the over review foundation and significant manuscript for solution of problem. In over
review foundation kind is to analysis the current literature and illustrated the considerable gaps in
literature review while in manuscript for solution is to individual examine the literature,
summarized the structure body of literature and illustrated the conclusion. The narrative review
reviews the literature and summarizes the literature collection. The narrative analysis also draws
conclusions on the subject and identifies gaps or incoherence’s in a knowledge group. To
perform a story literature review, researchers have to have a adequately oriented research
question.
Systematic review is the detail studied about literature and dragged out the detail significant and
effective conclusion about literature. Step by step a complex and time consuming method is
constructed for detail evaluation of literature. Directing the examination by using numerous
electronic catalogues is authoritative. These records may be contained various subsequent
parameters that are not restricted Medline, the Increasing progress for Treatment and Health
centre, Scholar for research purpose, direction of Science and the collaboration of Cochrane
(Baker, 2016). Manufacturing the accessible literature consequences from significant assessment
for the different causes and directs to a brief of information on the given subject. It is significant
literature review that identifies and seeks subjectivity. This provides reliability to the effort for
publication, when it can be able to justify clearly for the reader. It contains previously available
works yet, objectivity develops precarious as the journalist transcribes the literature review. It is
significant to be precarious for both negative results and positive outcomes and relate reliable
methods. Thus, it needs a more strict strategy than most other literature reviews and more
definite approach (Ortiz, 2013). The systematic review of literature is exhaustive, detailing the
schedule for selecting the literature. The systematic review of literature is split into two
5

classifications, meta-analysis and methodology. In the meta-analysis, it use standardized
statistical processes to evaluate the results of several research on one topic. Patterns and
relationships of meta-analysis are identified and conclusions drawn. A deductive study method is
connected with meta-analysis.
On the other side, meta-synthesis is based on non-statistic methods. In this procedure, results
from several qualitative research studies are integrated, assessed and interpreted (Holmes, et. al.,
2019). The literary analysis of meta-synthesis generally takes place when following an inductive
strategy to studies
Meta-analysis is based upon only statistical and quantitative investigation of literature for similar
assessments. When critical report exists in literature, meta-analysis is required for author and
consultants to examine the similar aspect or assessments in literature. But retain deliberate
sample aspect that avoids the authors from developing the assumptions that can be summarized
to the huge inhabitants. This method can be significantly commanding if the assessments under
review are actually same in their production. There are various eight steps of meta-analysis
included in systematic review that are Verbalize the review interrogation, describe the criteria for
inclusion and exclusion the results, construction of the search scheme, choice of inquiry aspect,
extract informative knowledge, evaluate study reputation, examine and interpret the conclusion
and distribute the final results (Liton, 2015).
In addition to these techniques, theoretical analysis of literature also helps efficiently conduct
literature review. Theoretical examination focuses on an accumulated pool of theory in relation
to a problem, idea, theory, physicality. In defining what theories already exist, the connections
between them, to what extent current theories have been explored and in developing fresh
hypotheses that are tested, theoretical literature reviews play a decisive role. It needs to indicate
the sort of your literature review and provide reasons for decision in previous sections of the
literature review section. The selection of a particular kind of literature review should be based
on study areas, study issues and techniques of studies. It can also address briefly other common
literature review kinds listed above (Garret, 2016).
6

Mixed method consists on both quantitative and qualitative investigation of literature. The mixed
method review is suitable when trainings based upon interpolation comparative judgments,
estimates of effectiveness and to practice these interventions. For development of mixed method
literature review a numerous of frame works can be recycled non-statistical method;
participates, assesses, and construes results of numerous qualitative information, recognizes joint
core fundamentals and subjects; may use to get conclusions by phenomenological knowledge,
reference concept and ethnographic informative data that includes investigation of combining
essential important elements (Apparaju, 2016).
For future literature review should be designed in such aspect which provides proficient and
operative sources of overview for researching article. Direct overview of operative sources
describes systematic review of literature and also expresses which mediations have positive
effects or negative effects By spending maximum time with patient it can identify the best
observation for clinical policy. It can improve nurses’ service and supervision of health care
consultants by using complete detail of literature review on specific clinic topic. To examine the
literature successively in order to get supporting points according to that research topic For the
development in process and method of literature review it must modify these four steps that
contain identification and formulation of problem, finding relevant research material for
literature review, calculation and evaluation for required informative data and interpretation the
conclusions (Baker, 2016).
7

Conclusion
From the above study it has been concluded that Reviews of literature that augment is based
upon scientific preparation by linking research aspect and exercise. Direct conclusion of
systematic review of literature shows which mediation has positive effects and negative effects.
Scientific application and research gap both are completely used for review of literature. For the
review of literature some basic aspect delivers a knowledgeable perception or a complete
synopsis of the information for given existing topic. This significant comprehensive indication
might be transcribed to offer simplicity and stimulate sympathetic by the researchers practice
literature reviews in conclusion, identification, justification, and improve assumptions and to
distinguish research. Finally, it should be noted that a researcher as a literature reviewer should
know his identity as a culturally responsible and ethical scientist and that an in-depth literature
review could become a foundation for somebody else's future studies or for the development of
best practices in a given area. In fact, a review of literature is a methodology. The literature
review thus occupies an significant role in "literature" and can have a bearing upon stakeholders
in field or discipline as a methodology, process and more.
8

References
 Apparaju, H., 2016. How effective are the persuasive and other communication abilities
of MBA students in India implications for business communication courses. The IUP
journal of soft skills: IJSS, 10(3), pp.24–47.
http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=a9afec84-39a4-4aad-
b223-a2b97f57e477%40pdc-v-sessmgr01
 Baker, J.D., 2016. The Purpose, Process, and Methods of Writing a Literature Review.
AORN Journal, 103(3), pp.265–269.
http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/10.1016/j.aorn.2016.01.016
 Garrett, J.H., 2016. Effective Perioperative Communication to Enhance Patient Care.
AORN Journal, 104(2), pp.111–120.
http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/10.1016/j.aorn.2016.06.001
 Holmes, Amy F., Zhang, Shage & Harris, Benjamin, 2019. An Analysis of Teaching
Strategies Designed to Improve Written Communication Skills. Accounting Education,
28(1), pp.25–48. https://doi-org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/10.1080/09639284.2018.1477055
 Liton, H.A.A., 2015. ESP learners' needs related learning for the workplace: A pragmatic
study for business school. International Journal of Instruction, 8(2), pp.4–16.
http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=846fe5ab-4c83-46b7-
8bbd-fe14bf8fca4f%40sessionmgr4007
 Manisaligil, Alperen & Bilimoria, Diana, 2016. Taking Your Talents to Business
Communications: Analyzing Effective Communication through LeBron James's Career
Moves. Journal of Management Education, 40(6), pp.769–793. https://doi-
org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/10.1177%2F1052562916665657
 Mikaelian, C., 2013. Lost in translation: a case study in effective communication.
Contract Management, 53(10), p.68.
https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/docview/1504068172?accountid=10016
 Nurul `Izzati Mohmad Adnan & Dian Indrayani Jambari, 2016. Mutual Understanding
Determinants for Effective Communication in Business and IT Strategic Alignment
Planning. International Journal on Advanced Science, 6(6), pp.914–921. https://cqu-
9

primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?
docid=TN_doaj_soai_doaj_org_article_6804ac035d0547268f55778fa0467019&context=
PC&vid=61CQU&lang=en_US&search_scope=61CQU_Library&adaptor=primo_central
_multiple_fe&tab=61cqu_library&query=any,contains,%EF%83%98%09effective
%20business
%20communication&facet=rtype,exclude,newspaper_articles&facet=rtype,exclude,revie
ws&mode=Basic,Basic
 Onwuegbuzie, A. & Weinbaum, R., 2017. A Framework for Using Qualitative
Comparative Analysis for the Review of the Literature. The Qualitative Report, 22(2),
pp.359–372. https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/docview/1867930932/
abstract/509A5F27A4D84AABPQ/1?accountid=10016
 Ortiz, Lorelei A., 2013. A Heuristic Tool for Teaching Business Writing: Self-
Assessment, Knowledge Transfer, and Writing Exercises. Business Communication
Quarterly, 76(2), pp.226–238. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?
vid=1&sid=3bd55d36-5be2-412c-a729-ea40a8508708%40sessionmgr4006
 Short, Jeremy C., Randolph-Seng, Brandon & McKenny, Aaron F., 2013. Graphic
Presentation: An Empirical Examination of the Graphic Novel Approach to
Communicate Business Concepts. Business Communication Quarterly, 76(3), pp.273–
303. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=63001f4c-51ad-
4a65-a5d4-e01369d8b50f%40pdc-v-sessmgr01
 Soegoto, E., 2018. Effective Enterprise Communication and Learning Attitude in
Business Performance: A Case Study on SMEs. European Research Studies, 21(4),
pp.55–68. https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/docview/2135077092?
accountid=10016

10