Stakeholder Analysis Report: Cancer Healthcare Business in Ireland

This report provides a thorough stakeholder analysis of the cancer healthcare sector in Ireland. It begins by identifying key stakeholder groups, including local health districts, government bodies, health professionals, and patient organizations. The report details the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder, followed by a RACI matrix outlining decision-making roles. A power/influence matrix assesses stakeholder impact, and a communication plan specifies interaction frequencies. The business need is identified as the rising incidence of cancer and the potential for innovative healthcare solutions. The report addresses capability gaps, such as the need for advanced technologies and international collaboration. A solution approach emphasizes treatment, awareness, and collaboration. The scope focuses on establishing effective cancer care, utilizing information technology, and securing government funding. The report emphasizes the profitability of the business, and the potential for reduced costs and greater efficiency, as well as the importance of using IT to empower the project. The document concludes with a list of references and a bibliography to support its analysis.

Running head: STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
Stakeholder Analysis
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
Table of Contents
PART A...........................................................................................................................................2
1. Stakeholder List...........................................................................................................................2
2. Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities.......................................................................................3
3. RACI Matrix................................................................................................................................4
4. Power/Influence Matrix...............................................................................................................5
5. Communication Plan...................................................................................................................6
6. Business Need..............................................................................................................................6
7. Potential Capability Gaps............................................................................................................7
8. Solution Approach.......................................................................................................................7
9. Solution Scope.............................................................................................................................8
10. References..................................................................................................................................9
11. Bibliography..............................................................................................................................9

2
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
PART A
1. Stakeholder List
Stakeholder Group Organizations or Groups
Local health districts/networks Management and executive
State/Territory government Minister’s advisors
Health minister
Health Department including cancer controlling staffs
Health professionals and
professional groups
Health professionals and cancer clinicians
Territory/State faculties or branches of health professional
societies and associations that include the followings:
Cancer Nurses Society
Ireland Association of Practice Managers
Territory/State Clinical Trials Groups
Territory/state Cooperative Oncology Groups
Cancer networks Directors of cancer services and Private Hospital CEOs
Directors of cancer services and Public hospital CEOs
Private healthcare
Identified cancer care
Multidisciplinary teams
Service data managers
General practitioners and
primary care
General practitioners
Primary Health Networks
Aboriginal medical services
Community primary care services

3
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
Consumer organisations Network group supporting Territory/state cancer
Consumer or advocacy groups for Territory/State cancer
Non-government organisations Territory/state Indigenous health organisations
Territory/state Cancer Council
Territory/state branch of cancer organisations
Carers/patients Carers of patients, family members, and Cancer patients
2. Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities
Sl.
No.
Stakeholder Group Roles Responsibilities
1. Local health
districts/networks
Refer the cancer patients who need
intensive care
Increase the number of participants or
consumers.
Provide local and
emergency services
Distribute the medicines
Increase awareness among
local peoples
2. State/Territory
government
Promote and increase the treasure for
more advance technologies and tools
Help in availing services at
cheap rate for the consumers
or the patients.
3. Health professionals and
professional groups
Take care of patients
Identify and put the patients in
different categories in manner to
provide them the needed care
Curing and taking care of
the patients
Helps in making Ireland a
cancer free country
4. Cancer networks Specialized technology and ways of
treatment for the patients
Better output and efficient
and effective care for the

4
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
patients
5. General practitioners and
primary care
Additional care and safety of the
patients
Increasing number of employees
Improving the facilities in
the healthcare
More attention on the caring
of the patients
6. Consumer organisations Supplying rest of the supplies and
managing the stakeholders
Better and enhancement in
the output
7. Non-government
organisations
A boost for the treasure of the
healthcare
Increasing funds
Better technologies,
facilities and other services
at cheap price for the
consumers
8. Carers/patients Motivating the patient Taking benefits of the
organization
3. RACI Matrix
Decision Roles
Enterprise
Analytics
Group
Health System
Leadership
Finance Clinical Technology
Maintain and Set
Data standard
I I R R A/R
Setting health system
analytics metrics
and goals
R A C C C
Determination of I C I A/R C

5
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
clinical outcomes for
the measurement
Allocating analytic
resources
A/R I C C I
Determining
analytics project for
resourcing
R A R R R
4. Power/Influence Matrix
Influence of Stakeholder
High
Communication models
Professionals and managers of other
health systems
Health Ministry
Health Ministry’s advisor
Auditing Bodies
Cancer treatment service
Government of Ireland
Private donors
Local healthcare organizations
Scientific societies
Irish Cancer Society
Patients
Citizens
Professional associations
Safety and quality observations
External healthcare accreditation agencies
Low
Low High
Impact on Stakeholder

6
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
5. Communication Plan
Sl. No. Stakeholder Group Frequency
1. Local health districts/networks Weekly
2. State/Territory government Monthly
3. Health professionals and professional groups Alternative days
4. Cancer networks Daily
5. General practitioners and primary care Twice a day
6. Consumer organisations Weekly
7. Non-government organisations Monthly
8. Carers/patients Daily
6. Business Need
Currently the rate of growth in number of cancer patients is increasing rapidly and as per
the current situation, 40,000 people are going to be announced as cancer infected. However, it is
not a life taking disease anymore, thus healthcare for cancer patients, could be an innovative way
of business. More than 150,000 people of the total population are being infected by cancer in
Ireland. Many investments are being made and almost 20 million Euros are already invested in
this area. More than 100 care researchers are still working on curing this and as the numbers of
cancer patients are increasing, there will be more such research (Vasilievich and Vladimirovna
2015). Technology is evolving and so negative effects are spreading with the advancement in
such technologies. It will be a demanding sector for the business in the future. Most of the
population are not getting valuable resources or cures for this disease and according to the

7
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
researchers, sixty percent of the cases can be controlled (Various and Barman 2008). Customers
of this sector are not much satisfied with the services that general hospitals or healthcare
facilities are providing them. There is also a better profit for the health ministry in both sectors
financial and a good environment for the people of Ireland. Since, the government has already
spent that much amount of money only spending will be made on the resources for the hospital
not for the research. This implementation could be completed within six months and all the
infrastructures and resources could be easily maintained in that much time. However, doing
nothing will result in loss only as the spending made on the research will be for no cause and
someone else will start making money with this idea.
7. Potential Capability Gaps
Latest technologies that are being practiced in the U.S.A can be implemented for the
betterment and advancement in the technology. Although researchers are making growth in their
research, it is the need of the time to be collaborative with other countries in manner to fight such
big disease. Taking the research with only personal findings might led to certain late results but
collaborating with other countries and research groups could provide pace to the research and the
output (Hughes 2014). This could be added to the current situation in manner to boost up the
output and productivity of the organization.
8. Solution Approach
Proper treatment and care is needed for the cancer patients with safety and guarantee of
being cured (for the 60% people who can be cured) by the healthcare facilities. The research is
already going on so the only need for the situation is the infrastructure and components through
which such patients could be handled (Florez, Sánchez, and Villalobos 2014). A website can also

8
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
be implemented in manner to increase awareness among the customers and for the better
communication with the consumers. Talking about awareness, it can be said that social media
platform could be a reasonable place for the crowd of audience and aware them with the facilities
and solution that could be provided through these healthcare. Regarding the future, it can be
stated that these techniques and tools are going to be much advanced and researchers will find a
way to cure the rest 40% of the cancer patients and this business will not going to be closed in
any way (Grant 2016). Collaborating with the international researchers could be a beneficial
aspect for the organization as stated earlier it will pace the research and provide innovative way
for implementing new ideas.
9. Solution Scope
Healthcare is a profitable business but effective and efficient specialized in cancer cure
healthcare will be an innovative and new capability for the ministry of health in manner to assure
the safety and healthy life living for the people of Ireland. Since the investment is also not much
the payback period for this project will be less than two years and future scope is also leading the
path for this project to be successful (Kaganski et al. 2017). Using information technology will
empower the pillars of this project. The business environment will also be in the favour as there
will not be any competitor as the government will be funding the services could be offered at
very less price.

9
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
10. References
Florez, H., Sánchez, M. and Villalobos, J., 2014, September. Extensible model-based approach
for supporting automatic enterprise analysis. In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing
Conference (EDOC), 2014 IEEE 18th International(pp. 32-41). IEEE.
Grant, R.M., 2016. Contemporary Strategy Analysis Text Only. John Wiley & Sons.
Hughes, M.D., 2014. Molecular Diagnostics Market Trends and Outlook [webpage on the
Internet]. Enterprise Analysis Corporation; 2013.
Kaganski, S., Majak, J., Karjust, K. and Toompalu, S., 2017. Implementation of key performance
indicators selection model as part of the Enterprise Analysis Model. Procedia CIRP, 63, pp.283-
288.
Various, I.I.B.A. and Brennan, K., 2008. A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge
(BABOK).
Vasilievich, B.A. and Vladimirovna, V.Y., 2015. Methods for the assessment of the economic
potential of an industrial enterprise: Analysis and characterization. In Proceedings of the 25th
International Business Information Management Association Conference-Innovation
Vision (Vol. 2020, pp. 1294-1302).
11. Bibliography
Elgin, D.J. and Weible, C.M., 2013. A stakeholder analysis of Colorado climate and energy
issues using policy analytical capacity and the advocacy coalition framework. Review of Policy
Research, 30(1), pp.114-133.