Debate on CASP Paper: Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis

This report provides an analysis of the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) paper, focusing on the differences and debates between systematic reviews and qualitative research methodologies. It reflects on the application of CASP checklists for both qualitative and systematic reviews, highlighting how each tool aids in critical appraisal, skill training, and ensuring the trustworthiness of research results. The report discusses the use of CASP in designing recruitment strategies, addressing research questions, and assessing the overall quality of research. By comparing the two approaches, the analysis aims to illuminate the strengths and limitations of each method within the context of healthcare research, offering insights into their respective roles in evidence synthesis and knowledge appraisal. Desklib offers a range of resources, including similar solved assignments and past papers, to support students in understanding and applying these concepts.

Describe the CAPS paper then debate with the
Systematic with one Systematic and Qualitative with
one Qualitative just from the attach paper

Table of Contents
REFLECTION ..........................................................................................................................3
CASP Qualitative Checklist.......................................................................................................3
CASP Systematic Review Checklist..........................................................................................3
REFERENCES ..........................................................................................................................5

REFLECTION
CASP Qualitative Checklist
CASP research methods are associated with executing the study in free and unbiased
manner so that research can be executed in desired manner. This is a generic tool which is
used for appraising strengths and limitation within qualitative research methodology. With
the help of CASP qualitative and quantitative researches can be executed and this is regarded
as the philosophy which is related with sharing of knowledge and appraising the published
paper. On the other hand, this tool has helped in selecting qualitative research methodology in
appropriate manner so that subject of the research can be illuminated. Qualitative research
methodologies can be used in order to address research goals so that actions and needed
aspects can be added into the research. Using CASP model I was able to design aim and
objectives within research so that I executed the overall research in attaining manner.
There are different appraisal methods used within the research and CASP checklist is
used along with systematic review, randomised controlled trials, case studies and qualitative
studies. This is related with a review in which evidence is collected on the topic of research
and the same is summarised as accordance with predetermined criteria. When it is compared
with any other methods of CASP. The checklist is designed for the major purpose of
educational pedagogic and would help the researcher in setting up clear aim and objectives
within executed research. On the other hand, CASP checklist is related with developing
research methodologies in such a way that I was able to attain my research objectives in
prompt manner.
CASP Systematic Review Checklist
CASP Systematic Review Checklist helps in providing critical appraisal as in term of
skill training and trustworthiness so that relevant results can be provided. During execution of
my research I have analysed that using CASP checklist systematic review methodological
aspects can be managed with higher quality so that to attain research objectives.
The CASP tool is regarded as one of the appraising method which is used within the
research for gaining research objectives. Using CASP tool recruitment strategies were
designed by me in appropriate manner so that aim and objectives within research can be
gathered and in the same manner research objectives can also be attained. By using CASP
tool I addressed the research questions in clearly focused manner so that appropriate
outcomes were considered by me. In the research, author took appropriate selection for the

paper and firm this reviewing of research question was easy and could lead into designing the
research in appropriate manner. Using the tool within the research this is easier that to add all
the relevant studies so that aim and research objectives can be attained within the research.
CASP is a tool which is used in order to assess quality within the research so that all the
dimensions can be seen within the research. Using CASP model I reviewed the research from
bottom line so that using different ratios I presented the same. CASP Systematic Review
Checklist helps me in critically review the information regarding the three online appraisal
instruments.

REFERENCES
Books and journals
Majid, U., & Vanstone, M. (2018). Appraising qualitative research for evidence syntheses: a
compendium of quality appraisal tools. Qualitative health research. 28(13). 2115-
2131.
Sapthiang, S., Van Gordon, W., & Shonin, E. (2019). Health school-based mindfulness
interventions for improving mental health: a systematic review and thematic
synthesis of qualitative studies. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 28(10). 2650-
2658.
Williams, V., Boylan, A. M., & Nunan, D. (2020). Critical appraisal of qualitative research:
necessity, partialities and the issue of bias. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 25(1). 9-
11.