A Comprehensive Analysis of the Vietnam War: Causes and Impacts

This essay provides a comprehensive analysis of the Vietnam War, examining its origins, American involvement, military tactics, and the domestic response to the conflict. The essay traces the war's roots to the Second World War and the subsequent Indochina War, highlighting the role of key figures like Ho Chi Minh and the influence of the Domino Theory. It details the escalating involvement of the United States, the military tactics employed by both sides, including guerrilla warfare and attrition warfare, and the impact of the war on American society. The essay also explores the anti-war movement, the eventual withdrawal of American troops, and the lasting consequences of the war, including the high casualties and the enduring impact on both the United States and Vietnam. The essay concludes by emphasizing the war's significance as a pivotal event in American history and a lesson in international relations.

Student’s Last Name 1
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Subject
November 3, 2018
The Vietnam War
According to the American history, the Vietnam War lasted longer before the war in
Afghanistan. The involvement and the presence of the United States in the war were strongly felt
by the citizens as a memorable gesture. In that case, this essay critically explores the Vietnam
War defining its causes, America’s involvement, catalysts, military tactics and the domestic
responses. Regarded as the only fight the USA lost, this war was over when the country
withdrew its forces in the early 1970s following a seizer of Saigon by the communist party in
1975 (Alva 70). Referring to the second Indochina War, the Vietnam War took place from 1954
to 1973, in which the United States and the SE Asia Treaty Association members scrapped with
the Southern Republic of Vietnam.
The Communist Force that included the Viet Cong was contesting with South Vietnam.
The Cong was a group of Vietnamese army in the north and the guerillas. Hence, the war was a
consequence of the initial war of the Indochina, which lasted from 1946 to 1954; whereby France
ended up trying to claim Vietnam a colony before meeting an opposing force from the
communists (Copper 73). The vital issues over the causes of the Vietnamese War started from
the Second World War with an invasion of Japan claiming occupancy in Vietnam. During that
time, Vietnam was under the rule of the French dating in the late 1800s. The presence of the

Student’s Last Name 2
Japanese led to collaboration of between the Chinese communists and the Soviet Union, under
the influence of Ho Chi Minh to form the league for Independence in Vietnam or the Viet Minh.
The Second World War was a catalyst to the war in Vietnam. The fundamental purpose
of the Viet Minh was to partition for both the French administration and the Japanese to
formulating a communist league in Vietnam. Resultantly, the Viet Minh were able to force Japan
to withdraw its activities in 1945 (Edwards 125). The aftermath of Japan’s withdrawal led to a
Viet Minh’s rise and control over Hanoi to declare Ho as the Vietnamese Republican’s president,
as the French were now the remaining colonizers to eliminate. However, the French continued to
take the leadership of Vietnam from 1949 and launched the South Vietnam declaring Saigon as
its capital. This meant that the country was now under the control of two groups (the Viet Minh
and the French) which struggled for control until the Dien Bien Phu battle ended in 1954 with
the French leading (Starr 241). Therefore, this formed a Geneva agreement that meant
independence for Laos and Cambodia who had been under the colony of France.
When the Vietnam War was becoming more ferocious, the United States (under the
leadership of President Kennedy) got involved by sending a team to analyze and report on the
exact condition of the war. Moreover, the American troop from the president came to Vietnam to
offer technical and economic assistance in the battle over the Viet Cong. The American president
increased the count of troops sent to Vietnam to 9,000 compared to the number sent in the
previous decade (Gates 340). This military step was due to the fear of the Domino Theory effect,
which meant that when SE Asia was subjected under the communist control, and then many
other nations will be rule thereafter. Unfortunately, President Kennedy was assassinated and his
successor (Lyndon Johnson) and Robert McNamara, the defense secretary decided that more
soldiers will be deployed in the Vietnamese war. On August 2, 1964, two torpedoes in the

Student’s Last Name 3
Northern Vietnam attacked the American destroyers in Tonkin. In reaction, the American
congress approved the resolution of the Gulf Tonkin hence broadening and power of the
president in battle making.
By the end of 1964, 23,000 United States troops had occupied the Southern Vietnam,
which resulted in constant bombing of raids until the end of February, the following year. Both
the forces in Northern Vietnam and the American Military Troops came to a pursuit of a
common goal i.e. a firm escalation of the Vietnam War to assure victory. The military tactic of
increasing the troop’s count and assuming the rule was American form of ending the battle.
Meanwhile, the Northern Vietnam believed in American casualties to decreasing assistance of
America’s involvement hence forcing the withdrawal of its military forces. About 82,000
American troops were posted in Vietnam by June 1965, whereby 100,000 of them were
dispatched a month later and the same amount by 1966. In 1967, Vietnam had stationed about
5,000 US military members, whereas death toll had exceeded 15,000.
By the end of January 1968, the Northern Vietnam started a couple of brutal attacks on
the Southern Vietnamese cities (Taylor 57). Notwithstanding the invasion, the Americans and
Southern Vietnamese forces started its strike backs, which forced the communists to be unable to
uphold the conquest on their respective targets. The America’s support over the war plummeted
upon confirmation of the attack and the addition of 2,000 military troops, which caused President
Johnson to halt the bombing of Northern Vietnam and started a peace campaign over the
remaining team members. This military step was fulfilled through talks between the Northern
Vietnam and the United States (Hoenisch 174). Johnson’s successor (Nixon) sought after serving
the ‘quiet’ majority believed to have participated in the war.

Student’s Last Name 4
In an aim to minimize the casualties from United States, Nixon started a program that
withdrew the military troops and increased aerial and artillery invasions. Resultantly, this
exercise rendered more control to Nixon to operate in Northern Vietnam (Oldham 55). However,
the speculated peaceful negotiations were no taking place as required since the Northern
Vietnam continued its claim of America’s withdrawal as a form of peace campaign. This
continued claim resulted in abundant bloodshed and carnage in the following years. At that
moment, the anti-battles movements in America were taking place as countless citizens gathered
to contest over the USA’s continued engagement in the battles. Individuals matched in-person
and wrote reports to reflect their views on the Vietnamese War hence supporting the American
protests. This forced Nixon to end the drafted calls in 1972 since a number of troops had been
discharged for draft dodging and desertion, which increased rapidly.
By the end of 1972, the Northern Vietnam was ready for a compromise after rejecting the
initial agreement on peace. This led to an authorization of bombings to cities in Northern
Vietnam by Nixon. Aftermath, the troops from American were finally dismissed in 1973,
however, the battle between the Southern and Northern Vietnamese forces still continued until
the unification by the Socialist Republic of Vietnam two years later. The total count of
Americans killed because of the war exceeded 58,000 whereas the count for slaughtered
Vietnamese surpassed 2.5 million (Guttmann 61). Resultantly, the Vietnam War would be
regarded as the United States’ bloodiest battle since its civil wars even a century later.
The military frontrunners once had a presumption that the military rules in Germany
during the World War II were deceiving until Viet Cong began using their strategy tactic (Ekins
21). The Guerilla Warfare was the most prominent tactic and style of warfare in the Vietnam
War. This military tactic included surprise and stealthy attacks to an opponent with an ambition

Student’s Last Name 5
to eliminate them. Completely utilized by the Viet Cong, the technique enabled the fighters to
sneak into the territories of the opponents catching, killing them and escaping without causing
much alarm (Harish 1505). Moreover, the fighters posed as civilians or farmers before carrying
out an attacked onto the uniformed opponents.
Although the tactic was executed in favor of the Viet Cong, it led to the loss of innocent
lives. Viet Cong fighters killed innocent Vietnamese settlers accidentally. The Viet Cong
executed the rapid killings due to earlier access of machine guns in 1965. The guns were also
utilized to shoot opponents’ helicopters from the sky. The undetonated land mines that belonged
to the Americans were also stolen and utilized by the Viet Cong fighters. Over one year, the
enemy forces in Vietnam had accessed over 20,000 tons of explosives that belonged to the
Americans (Guan 371). Despite the fact that American troops had initially targeted to utilize
traditional means of warfare, i.e. that claiming of more portions of land, it was agreed upon that
the elimination of enemy troops was the only form winning the battle. This military tactic was
known as an attrition warfare style.
The vital position of the American federal government and its engagement in the
Vietnamese War was that the troops were to appeal to the Southern Vietnamese to withdraw
communist troops that were multiplying during the Cold Wars. However, it never took long
before the American citizens began feeling dissatisfied with the government’s continued
availability in SE Asia. Although some Americans believed that total forces were needed to
effectively defeat the opposition, there were others who believed that the battle in Vietnam was
on a civil dimension and getting engaged in such fights was irrelevant (Fisher 149). When it was
noticed that the United States’ troops had destroyed the civilians’ entire village, the
demonstrations (both peaceful and violent ones) on anti-wars began throughout America.

Student’s Last Name 6
The demonstrations and protests intensified to violence whereas draft boards were
destroyed and raided. Moreover, production facilities were also sabotaged and attacked due to
the ruthless altercations between the police and the civilians that were increasing in frequency.
The American citizens were assessing the war through the perspective of morality and justice
with an inclusion of cynicism on the nation’s military force (Connable 98). Fortunately, the
American Civil Liberties and Leaders therefore called for America’s withdrawal from the
Vietnam War. During that moment, Nixon recalled the United States’ troops in 1973 when the
antiwar propaganda were irresistible as the opposition of the federal government administrated.
The proof for displeasure and disdain from the public on America’s involvement in warfare has
never occurred as before.
In conclusion, the overall assumptions and feelings over the Vietnam War were negative
despite the backing up from Americans. It was globally assumed that the veterans were the actual
victims of the War in Vietnam since thousands of Americans drafted obligatorily to participate in
the war. On the other hand, millions of Vietnam citizens became cast-apart casualties as a
byproduct of the Vietnam War. The American troops had initially aimed at squashing the rapid
increase of communists in Asia; however, they resulted in constantly participating in the
lengthiest and the bloodiest battle in the history of America. Irrespective of their defense for the
engagement, America continues to uphold the war as an example and a lesson for how a nation
should conduct itself during wars and national conflicts. In that case, the aftereffects and
memories of the Vietnam War will linger as a cue for centuries ahead.

Student’s Last Name 7
Work Cited
Alva, Chittaranjan. “Ideology and the Vietnam war.” Social Scientist 1.3 (1972): 68–75. Web. 31
Oct 2018. <www.jstor.org/stable/3516400>.
Connable, Ben. “Vietnam-Era assessment.” Embracing the Fog of War: Assessment and Metrics
in Counterinsurgency, RAND Corporation (2012): 95–152. Web. 02 Nov 2018.
<www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg1086dod.14>.
Copper, John F. “The sino-vietnam war's thirtieth anniversary.” American Journal of Chinese
Studies 16.1 (2009): 71–74. Web. 02 Nov 2018. <www.jstor.org/stable/44289310>.
Edwards, Peter. “The Ambassador during the Vietnam War: Keith Waller, 1964–70.” Australia
Goes to Washington: 75 Years of Australian Representation in the United States, 1940–
2015, edited by David Lowe et al., ANU Press, Australia (2016): 123–136. Web. 31 Oct
2018. <www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1q1crhz.12>.
Ekins, Ashley. “Vietnam: A Winnable War?” War, Strategy and History: Essays in Honour of
Professor Robert O’Neill, edited by DANIEL MARSTON and TAMARA LEAHY, ANU
Press, Acton, Australia (2016): 15–30. Web. 02 Nov 2018.
<www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1dgn5sf.6>.
Fisher, Christopher T. “Nation Building and the Vietnam War.” Pacific Historical Review 74.3
(2005): 441–456. Web. 02 Nov 2018.
<www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/phr.2005.74.3.441>.
Gates, John M. “People's War in Vietnam.” The Journal of Military History 54.3 (1990): 325–
344. Web. 03 Nov 2018. <www.jstor.org/stable/1985938>.

Student’s Last Name 8
Guan, Ang Cheng. “Singapore and the Vietnam War.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 40.2
(2009): 353–384. Web. 02 Nov 2018. <www.jstor.org/stable/27751567>.
Guttmann, Allen. “Protest against the War in Vietnam.” The Annals of the American Academy of
Political and Social Science 38.2 (1969) 56–63. Web. 31 Oct 2018.
<www.jstor.org/stable/1037114>.
Harish Chandola. “Vietnam War Becomes Secret.” Economic and Political Weekly 7.31/33
(1972): 1505–1507. Web. 02 Nov 2018. <www.jstor.org/stable/4361657>.
Hoenisch, Michael. “1960s Documentary Film: Perceptions of the Vietnam War in the USA and
in Germany.” The Transatlantic Sixties: Europe and the United States in the
Counterculture Decade, edited by Grzegorz Kosc et al., Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld
(2013): 174–201. Web. 31 Oct 2018. <www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1wxt2b.10>.
Oldham, Perry. “On Teaching Vietnam War Literature.” The English Journal 75.2 (1986): 55–
56. Web. 01 Nov 2018. <www.jstor.org/stable/817886>.
Starr, Jerold M. “Teaching the Vietnam War: A Sociological Approach.” Teaching Sociology
23.3 (1995): 241–251. Web. 01 Nov 2018 <www.jstor.org/stable/1319216>.
Taylor, Sandra C. “Teaching the Vietnam War.” The History Teacher 15.1 (1981): 57–66. Web.
31 Oct 2018. <www.jstor.org/stable/493777>.