Accounting for Impairment Loss: Analysis of Cash Generating Units

This report provides an overview of accounting for impairment loss on cash-generating units (CGUs) as per AASB 136 and IAS 36. It discusses the indicators of impairment, determination of recoverable value, and allocation of impairment loss. The report also covers specific judgments for identifying CGUs, the treatment of goodwill, and the annual impairment testing requirements for certain assets. Furthermore, it explains the journal entries for recording impairment loss and includes a practical example with calculations. The report concludes by emphasizing the importance of complying with accounting standards to accurately reflect the financial position of an entity. It also includes a discussion of disclosures that are required regarding impairment of loss like goodwill amount per CGU, impairment amount, method of valuation used for determining value in use and fair value, assumptions used to value the assets and the sensitivity analysis, if any, applied.

Running Head: Accounting for Impairment Loss
Impairment Loss on Cash
Generating Unit

Accounting for Impairment Loss 1
Introduction:
An entity must assess the indicators of impairment, if any, on each reporting rate.
The information that indicates the chances of impairment could be collected from both
internal as well as external sources. The external source of information that indicates
impairment possibility can be market interest rates, lowering of market capitalization
than the net assets, adverse changes in the technological, economic or market
environment. Internal sources of information include evidences of asset obsolescence
or damage and internal restructurings. Whenever any information indicates impairment
chances of any asset or any cash generating unit, the entity must determine the actual
value of impairment loss so that it can be immediately transferred to the Profit and Loss
Account of the entity.
Impairment is the loss on asset that arises when the recoverable amount of any
asset or cash generating unit (CGU) is lower than the carrying amount of such assets or
CGU. AASB 136 sets out the method of determining the recoverable value of an asset
or a CGU. As per this standard recoverable value is the asset’s or CGU’s value in use
or its fair value less disposal expenses, whichever is higher. There are situations when
the determination of the recoverable value of an individual asset is not possible then the
entity must determine the recoverable value of the cash generating unit to which such
asset belongs (Raubenheimer, 2017). These situations arise when asset’s value in use
cannot be determined to be close to the asset’s fair value less disposal costs or when
the asset is not generating the cash inflows which are significantly independent of that
of other assets. International Accounting Standard- 36 (IAS 36) acknowledges certain
specific judgments to identify any division of the entity as a cash generating unit. It

Accounting for Impairment Loss 2
suggests that decision of identification of CGU is influenced how are the entity’s
operations (like product lines, regional areas, businesses or individual location) are
controlled by the management or on the basis of management’s decision making about
the continuance or disposal of assets or operations of entity. Though management’s
monitoring can help in identification of CGU, it does not overrule the requirement that
CGU’s identification is majorly dependent on its cash inflows. Carrying amount of CGU
includes the carrying values of the individual assets that are directly attributed or
reasonably allocated on a consistent basis to the cash generating unit (such as
corporate assets). However, it specifically excludes the carrying value of any liability
that is recognized unless the recoverable amount of such CGU is not determinable
without taking into account that particular liability.
For the impairment testing purpose, the goodwill that is acquired by the business
combination is allocated to the CGU’s or group of CGU’s of the acquirer that are
anticipated to benefit from the combination’s synergies. This allocation is done
irrespective of assignment of other assets or liabilities to the CGU (Carlin, Finchand
Ford, 2008). If the goodwill is not allocable to the individual CGU on a particular basis
(non-arbitrary) then it is tested for the impairment at the level which is lowest within the
entity where goodwill is monitored the purposes of internal management and may be
constituted of group of CGUs. Goodwill allocation to a group of CGUs may cast a
requirement of more than one test of impairment. For instance, testing of both
individual’s CGU and group of CGUs on which goodwill is allocated.
There are certain assets on which impairment test must be conducted annually.
These assets are: goodwill, intangible asset’s having indefinite useful lives or the

Accounting for Impairment Loss 3
intangible assets which are not yet available for the purpose of use (Wines, Dagwell, &
Windsor, 2007). Every year, the carrying amount of the assets or CGUs must be
compared with the recoverable value of those assets so as to determine an impairment
loss, if any. The above mentioned assets are to be tested on the yearly basis
irrespective of the fact that there exists or not any impairment indications. Moreover,
said assets are to be tested even more frequently when the circumstances or events
requires so (Petersen & Plenborg, 2010). However for intangible assets that has
indefinite useful lives asset and goodwill forming part of CGU or a group of CGUs, an
entity may use impairment calculation of previous periods if all the necessary criteria are
met. The required for this purpose are: no significant change in the CGU’s assets and
liabilities, since the recent most recoverable amount calculations, previously determined
recoverable value substantially exceeds the carrying amount and when there is remote
likelihood that revised calculation of recoverable amount of CGU or group of CGUs
(Linnenluecke, Birt, Lyon & Sidhu, 2015).
Impairment loss on the assets of CGU is recognized to a certain extent i.e. up to
the value from which carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount thereon. For the
assets that are carried at historical costs in the books of accounts, loss on impairment is
charged directly and immediately to the profit and loss accounts (Impairment
Accounting, 2010). However, for those assets that have been revalued and revaluation
reserve exists for them, the loss on impairment must be charged to revaluation account
considering it as a decrease in value of asset by reducing the surplus in revaluation
account of such asset. When the impairment loss is exceeded by the revaluation
surplus, then such remaining impairment loss is taken to profit and loss account as an

Accounting for Impairment Loss 4
expense. When the CGU to which goodwill is allocated is taken for the impairment test
then the impairment loss on that CGU is firstly allocated to goodwill by reducing its
carrying value. Then the remaining loss on impairment is taken to the other assets
(excluding inventory) on the pro-rata basis of their individual carrying amounts.
However, the carrying value of the asset will never be lowered down below the
recoverable value and zero. There are certain assets that are specifically kept outside
the purview of IAS 136 and AASB 136, Impairment of assets. Inventories are part of
such exclusions and hence the loss on impairment is not allocated to it ( AASB 136,
2010).
For the purpose of fulfilling the disclosure requirements of accounting standard
regarding the impairment of loss, certain disclosures are to be made such as: goodwill
amount per CGU, impairment amount, method of valuation used for determining value
in use and fair value, assumptions used to value the assets and the sensitivity analysis,
if any, applied (Carlin & Finch, 2008).
Conclusion:
It is easy to now conclude that the recognition of impairment loss on any CGU
requires due compliance with the requirements of IAS 136 and AASB 136 as they sets
out the basis of identification of CGU and the impairment loss thereupon. Also, the
impairment loss on CGU must be dealt in the manner prescribed by the accounting
standard setters. The loss must be immediately charged as an expense to the profit and
loss account to account for the sudden fall in the market value of the asset or CGU

Accounting for Impairment Loss 5
otherwise the financial statements of the entity would not depict the true picture of its
financial position.
Impairment Journal Entries in the books of Alex Ltd as on 30th June, 2015
Date Particulars Dr. Cr.
30.06.2015 Loss on Impairment $ 51,000.00
To Factory $ 24,758.44
To Trademarks $ 5,664.18
To Vehicle $ 3,577.38
To Goodwill $ 17,000.00
(Being Impairment Loss charged to
individual Asset)
30.06.2015 Profit and Loss A/C $ 51,000.00
To Impairment Loss $ 51,000.00
(Being Impairment Loss transferred to
Profit and Loss Account)
Workings:
Account Carrying Amount
Factory $ 332,200.00
Trademark $ 76,000.00
Vehicle $ 48,000.00
Inventory $ 21,000.00
Goodwill $ 17,000.00
Total Carrying Amount $ 494,200.00
Impairment Loss:
Carrying Amount $ 494,200.00
Less Recoverable Value $ 443,200.00
Impairment Loss: $ 51,000.00
Recoverable value= $ 443,200.00

Accounting for Impairment Loss 6
Value in Use $ 443,200.00
Fair Value less disposable costs $ 319,821.00
(Whichever is Higher)
Impairment
Allocation Factory Trademark Vehicle Inventory
Good
will Total
$ 332,200 $ 76,000 $ 48,000
$
21,000
$
17,000
$
494,200
Less
Impairment
Loss
Allocation
$
17,000
$
17,000.00
$ 332,200 $ 76,000 $ 48,000
$
21,000
$
-
$
477,200
Remaining
Impairment
Allocation
Less 34000
$
24,758.44
$
5,664.18
$
3,577.38
$
-
$
477,200
Revised
Carrying
Value
$
307,441.56
$
70,335.82
$
44,422.62
$
21,000
$
-
$
443,200

Accounting for Impairment Loss 7
References:
Wines, G., Dagwell, R. and Windsor, C., 2007. Implications of the IFRS goodwill
accounting treatment. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(9), pp.862-880.
Carlin, T.M. and Finch, N., 2008. Advance Australia Fair: The quality of AASB 136 fair
value disclosures down under.
Carlin, T.M., Finch, N. and Ford, G.W., 2008. Fair value impairment testing under IFRS:
Examining Australia’s disclosure quality. Financial Reporting, Regulation and
Governance, 7(1), pp.1-25.
Impairment Accounting, 2010. The basics of IAS 36 Impairment of Asset. Retrieved
from: <
http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Impairment_accounting_the_basics_of_IAS
_36_Impairment_of_Assets/$FILE/Impairment_accounting_IAS_36.pdf> Accessed on:
02.06.2018
Petersen, C. and Plenborg, T., 2010. How do firms implement impairment tests of
goodwill?. Abacus, 46(4), pp.419-446.
AASB 136, 2010. Impairment of Asset. Retrieved from: <
http://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content102/c3/AASB136_07-04_ERDRjun10_07-
09.pdf > Accessed on: 02.06.2018
Raubenheimer, E., 2017. Recognizing and measuring an impairment loss for a cash-
generating unit. Retrieved from: https://accountingweekly.com/recognising-measuring-
impairment-loss-cash-generating-unit/ Accessed on: 02.06.2018

Accounting for Impairment Loss 8
Linnenluecke, M.K., Birt, J., Lyon, J. and Sidhu, B.K., 2015. Planetary boundaries:
implications for asset impairment. Accounting & Finance, 55(4), pp.911-929.