Criminal Law Assignment: Research Fraud at Chalkman University

This assignment delves into the complexities of research fraud within the framework of criminal law, using a hypothetical case involving Professor Jahnhoff from Chalkman University. The assignment examines the advantages and disadvantages of involving criminal law and reporting the matter to the police if the professor is found to have obtained grants or fabricated reports. The student analyzes the legal implications of the professor's actions, considering potential defenses and advice for representing his interests. The assignment highlights the severity of research misconduct, the impact on various stakeholders, and the ethical considerations of prosecution. The student references relevant literature and applies APA guidelines throughout the paper.

Running head: CRIMINAL LAW
CRIMINAL LAW
Name of the student
Name of the university
Author note

1CRIMINAL LAW
Answer to question 1
The concern regarding the ramification and extent of the commission of the crime of
research fraud in biomedical science that is constructed for some ages. The multiple instances of
gross dishonest behavior of the research that are vulnerable involving oncology. The fraud has
required refutations in the scholarly journals in the unparalleled margin. They have stimulated
anxious arguments regarding the research integrity as well as an instrument for inquiry of
accusation of misconduct (Freckleton, 2016). They have precipitated eradication of the
committers from a list of whom that are qualified for the governmental body funding source and
impacted in researchers until they are well-considered losing the academic positioning.
Nevertheless, the issues evolve as whether authorizations have been regarded are adequate when
the severity of the impact of behavior is determined into consideration. The ethical
reconsideration instances of prosecution examine the impact in the cases which have concluded
and raises argument in regard of observing research fraud as the method of the white-collar
crime at danger of involving in unscrupulously by the individual of greater standing within the
scholarly community(White, Gaub & Todak, 2018). It is contended that consequences of the
fraud id extremely damaging for the patient, supervisor, co-author in addition to that discipline
concentrated and that danger of damage along with that considerable amount of money that
engaged, rationalize the interruption of criminal law. The preface “research” relax fraud in
addition to that intentionally adopt public money by deceptive practice to obtain the labeled

2CRIMINAL LAW
misconduct is among the other matter. This mirrors the factual aspect that offense is considered
as against the professional standards somewhat than against the legislation of extensive
community. The academic inquiry can be observed from the policing method tackling with the
accusation of the severe misconduct (Murphy, 2015). The researchers may be fewer tempted to
become careless with the truth. The occurrence of the research fraud has arrived in troubling
margins. The peer reconsideration has miscarried to eradicate it (Farahany, 2016). The damage
that occurs by such behavior expands to the co-authors, patient, employing, supervisors, journals,
funders, and significantly the direction and area of research itself as well as potential stimulation
are tarnished.
Answer to question 2
Professor Jahnhoff is the reputed researcher of oncology at Chalkman University. Therein
a complaint is made by a whistleblower named Dr. Grosvenor, alleging that the professor faked
data that inclined to groundbreaking and surprising research impact that might not be held to be
legitimate.it has been alleged that the professor has obtained a grant under a fabricated report to
the funders, it is evident from the case record that police are engaged in evidence falsification.
The research misconduct is treated as a severe crime, but in order to prove that the professor is
guilty of the crime, the other party has to prove that behavior of him attract the definition of
research fraud and thus entitle to get severe punishment. Therefore though criminal justice and
law enforcement authority affords justice to individuals; however, it should be exercised by the
police officer in a reasonable and fair manner. Furthermore, the professor can raise defense by
stating that his behavior does not come with the ambit of research fraud.

3CRIMINAL LAW
References
Freckleton, Scholarly Misconduct (Oxford University Press, 2016). Chaps 3
Farahany, N. A. (2016). Neuroscience and behavioral genetics in US criminal law: an empirical
analysis. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(3), 485-509.
White, M. D., Gaub, J. E., & Todak, N. (2018). Exploring the potential for body-worn cameras
to reduce violence in police–citizen encounters. Policing: a journal of policy and practice, 12(1),
66-76.
Murphy, K. (2015). Does procedural justice matter to youth? Comparing adults’ and youths’
willingness to collaborate with police. Policing and society, 25(1), 53-76.