Charlotte's Web: A Comparative Analysis of Novel and Play Versions

This report provides a detailed comparison between E.B. White's novel, *Charlotte's Web*, and its play adaptation. The analysis focuses on key differences in character development, plot, and thematic elements. The report highlights how the play adaptation simplifies certain aspects of the novel while emphasizing others, such as Fern's character. It explores the significance of Charlotte's web messages, the role of friendship and love, and the use of language as a central theme. Furthermore, the report examines the inclusion or exclusion of minor characters, the alteration of events, and the overall structural patterns of the story. The report also discusses the two-part structure common in children's literature, comparing *Charlotte's Web* to other works with similar narrative approaches and concluding with the potential reasons for such structures, including the need for narrative competence in young readers.

Running Head: COMPARSION BETWEEN NOVEL AND PLAY CHARLOTTE’S WEB
Comparsion between novel and play Charlotte’s Web
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:

1COMPARSION BETWEEN NOVEL AND PLAY CHARLOTTE’S WEB
Introduction
E.B White's Charlotte's Web is a well-known kids' book about a spring pig named
Wilbur who becomes a close acquaintance with Charlotte, a creepy-crawly who possesses the
stable he lives in. Wilbur discovers that one day he may become supper to the family who
possesses him. Charlotte helps Wilbur in any capacity she can to stay away from that destiny.
The creepy crawly delivers numerous networks that write different positive modifiers to
depict Wilbur. Charlotte's Web has been transformed into two film adjustments after some
time, most broadly it is 2006 real to life variant. The film appears differently in relation to the
book in different ways. It tones down the topic, however not to the impediment of the story.
We despite everything get the inspiring sentiment of kinship and the gratefulness for the
intensity of words that are the principal subjects of the book.
Discussion
A component that consistently remains the equivalent from book to film is the words
engraved in Charlotte's web. The words that speak to Wilbur would never be changed as they
mirror the tone of the story. It would remove a significant part of the book if the words were
changed (Dessner). These descriptors may not be notable to youngsters perusing in the books.
These ground-breaking words are intended to arrange Wilbur who is still too youthful to
possibly be acquainted with himself.
The significant topic of companionship rules every adjustment. The fellowship is a
significant subject which establishes the pace of the story. Charlotte and Wilbur have an
amazing kinship—fellowship, however, love likewise assumes an important job in the story.
Such a large number of individuals accept that affection is just between two individuals in a
relationship. Love has a lot greater translation than this. We love our family. Also, we love
our companions (Dessner). Love is amazing, particularly inside a kinship. Charlotte makes

2COMPARSION BETWEEN NOVEL AND PLAY CHARLOTTE’S WEB
these words in her web so as to help Wilber endure and to live to consider to be snowfall as
spring pigs are generally butchered before the winter. As referenced in the passage above in
regards to the amazing words which were rarely worked out or changed, language is likewise
a significant topic (Dessner).
There are progressively, different contrasts between the book and the film than one
anticipates. For instance, Fern's character has an alternate character and by and large voice
inside the story. Greenery safeguarded Wilbur from being executed and raised him as a pet.
And afterward she needed to surrender him to her uncle's homestead and life in the
outbuilding. She goes to her uncle's homestead every day to visit her pig. When the
reasonable comes around, that is the place her character changes (Dessner). She's growing up.
In the book, Fern was never there to see the pig she spared from death win a decoration. She
disregards Wilbur when they're at the reasonable. In the film, Fern has to a greater extent a
section in sparing Wilber and needing him to live. Be that as it may, she does spill over in the
reasonable with Henry, a kid whom she loves, yet at the same time invests energy with
Wilber and sees him win his award. Initially, E.B White didn't join Fern into the story until
the last draft. He was kept up with how start his account. Greenery has a greater amount of an
effect in sparing Wilbur in the film than in the book (Dessner). While the book centres on
Wilbur and Charlotte's fellowship, the film makes Fern's character increasingly fundamental
to the plot. Maybe, they needed to dig more into her character since she has a significant job
which can't be overlooked through the total of the story. The film needed to coordinate her
character more as she was the one to have spared Wilbur, regardless. To them, it seemed well
and good on the grounds that being there, at last, demonstrated her undying affection and
commitment for Wilbur. White's expectation was the show something else. She was distinctly
there to begin the entire story (Dessner).

3COMPARSION BETWEEN NOVEL AND PLAY CHARLOTTE’S WEB
The screenwriters gave a portion of the minor characters, for example, dairy animals
and sheep greater character and discourse. Likewise, they incorporated a pony named Ike,
who is absent in the book. His motivation in the film is frequently for humour and to get a
snicker. Two crows, which are not some portion of the first story, are additionally
remembered for the film for entertainment (Nodelman). A couple of minor characters were
likewise discarded. The youthful sheep that Wilbur experiences when he first moves to the
animal dwelling place and the pooch that is associated with the story when Wilbur gets away
from his pen is excluded from the film.
Various minor contrasts are additionally present. The conduct of Templeton, the
rodent, isn't in every case consistent with the portrayal in the book. A portion of the occasions
happen prior or later in the film than in the first story (Nodelman). For instance, the
presentation of the reasonable and the way that Charlotte is going to kick the bucket is
included before in the film than in the book. The part managing Fern's visit to the specialist is
isolated into two unique sections in the film.
The essential auxiliary example of Charlotte's Web is the rundown. The book is
loaded with records, records that recommend both the sublime huge number and the great
assortment of everything (Nodelman). After he meets her, Wilbur records Charlotte's
characteristics; later, Charlotte gives him a rundown of the pieces of a creepy crawly's leg.
Templeton, who records his exercises as eating, chewing, spying and covering up, later says
to Wilbur, he would prefer not to be stepped on, or kicked in the face, or beat, or squashed in
any capacity, or squashed, or pounded about, or wounded, or cut, or scarred, or biffed
(Nodelman). At the point when it downpours, White records all the things the downpour falls
on; when Charlotte murders flies, he records all the animals who aversion flies, and when
individuals come to see the word in her web, he records the various types of vehicles they
come in. White even gives a rundown of the amazing heap of things one can discover at the

4COMPARSION BETWEEN NOVEL AND PLAY CHARLOTTE’S WEB
landfill. He records the sounds made by feathered creatures in late-spring and all the
individuals who hear the cricket's tune in fall. He gives Charlotte a rundown of things that
will occur in spring: winter will spend, the days will protract, and the ice will soften in the
field lake (Nodelman). The tune sparrow will return and sing, the frogs will conscious, and
the warm wind will blow once more. Most importantly, there are arrangements of what
different animals eat, from Charlotte's flies, bugs, grasshoppers, delicious cockroaches, gnats,
midges, daddy longlegs, centipedes, mosquitoes, crickets to what Templeton will discover at
the reasonable: an authentic fortune of popcorn pieces, solidified custard dribbling’s, candy-
coated apples surrendered by tired youngsters, sugar cushion precious stones, salted almonds,
popsicles, somewhat chewed frozen custards and the wooden sticks of lollypops. There are
no under three records that delight over the appalling substance of Wilbur's nourishment
trough (Nodelman).
Indeed, even the activity of Charlotte's Web frequently continues by methods for
records—arrangements of exercises. The initial segment of section 4 is a rundown of the
exhausting occasions of Wilbur's day. White's depiction of the rope swing in the horse shelter
records the grouping of occasions that comprise swinging on it. At a certain point, Charlotte
calls the move of the animals in the stable, and at another she records the activities she
performed while writing in the web (Nodelman).
A significant number of the books small kids’ first experience have comparative two-
section structures. In A. A. Milne's Pooh books, the extents are turned around; there are
various scenes in which blameless animals play at having undertakings while never
recognizing or encountering genuine agony, and afterward one last section in which
Christopher Robin, having encountered the genuine experience of going to class, uncovers
that he has moved past minor euphoria (Martin). Kenneth Grahame's The Wind in the
Willows starts with Mole venturing out from home and finding the great existence of the

5COMPARSION BETWEEN NOVEL AND PLAY CHARLOTTE’S WEB
waterway bank; yet from that point onward, every time one of the creatures ventures out from
home, or is even enticed to leave, he should confront the merciless ramifications of life in
reality. As in Charlotte's Web, the primary arrangement is paradise, the later ones show the
ramifications of life past heaven (Martin).
Maybe shockingly, a significant number of the books more established youngsters
read themselves likewise have two-section structures, in which characters first guiltlessly
play at undertakings and afterward should confront genuine renditions of what they
previously played at. Jim Hawkins has great longs for privateers and fortune before he
encounters the loathsomeness of the genuine article (Martin). In L. M. Montgomery's Anne
of Green Gables, Anne plays at sentimental dreams including profound, excruciating
feelings; yet then she should confront agony and passing in her own reality, as her stepfather
kicks the bucket and she should surrender her arrangements for what's to come. What's more,
in Louise Fitzhugh's Harriet the Spy, Harriet spends the greater part the book playing at being
a covert operative and afterward should confront the agonizing ramifications of her game
(Martin).
Conclusion
There are two potential reasons why such a large number of famous kids' books
present similar occasions first in quite a while of guiltlessness and afterward as far as
experience. The first is that youngsters, being new in their anecdotal capabilities, need
consolation about them; having taken in complex perusing strategies from books with two-
section structures, they keep on discovering delight in comparable books (Martin). The
second is basically that a two-section structure of this sort is a set up example of kids' fiction,
and youngsters' writers might be attracted to such structures from their cognizant or oblivious
information on other kids' books. In either case, a two-section structure of this sort allows

6COMPARSION BETWEEN NOVEL AND PLAY CHARLOTTE’S WEB
peruser the chance of making the change between two very various methods for getting
stories; every one of these writings may go about as instructors of account competences
(Martin). Second is basically that a two-section structure of this sort is a built up example of
youngsters' fiction, and kids' authors might be attracted to such structures from their
cognizant or oblivious information on other kids' books. In either case, a two-section
structure of this sort allows peruser the chance of making the change between two very
various methods for getting stories; every one of these writings may go about as educators of
story abilities (Martin).

7COMPARSION BETWEEN NOVEL AND PLAY CHARLOTTE’S WEB
Work Cited
Dessner, Lawrence Jay. The homely web of truth: A study of Charlotte Brontë’s novels. Vol.
108. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2018.
Huck, Charlotte S. "I. Children's Literature—Defined." Elementary English 41.5 (1964): 467-
470.
Martin, Cathlena Ann. Charlotte's web site: The convergence culture of children's print and
digital literature. University of Florida, 2010.
Nodelman, Perry. "Defining children's literature." Children's Literature 8.1 (1980): 184-190.