Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and Philippine Education

This report provides an analysis of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) in the Philippines, focusing on its role in improving higher education. It addresses key issues such as the high cost of private education, quality concerns, and the mismatch between industry needs and trained manpower. The report also discusses the importance of accreditation in maintaining quality standards in higher education institutions and CHED's role in uplifting the economic and social status of Filipino people. Furthermore, it highlights the benefits of the Higher Education Act of 1994 in promoting affordable and quality education. The report concludes that CHED plays a crucial role in evaluating and improving the learning system in both public and private higher education institutions.

Running Head: Commission on Higher Education 1
Commission on Higher Education

Commission on Higher Education 2
Introduction
The main aim of this report is to increase the better understanding of the entire concept of the
Commission on Higher Education (CHED). The role of CHED in improving the `education is
huge as it promotes the right of citizens.
1- If I was given the power to enhance the program of CHED, it should be an improvement
in the cost issues because I have found that in the government’s Council of Higher
education estimates that a student in the private school has to pay around 237,600 pesos
(€ 4,200). The income of the family is entirely affected due to increase fees and excess
cost of tuition fee force student to leave education. Apart from the cost issues, there is
also the matter of quality because it has been found that colleges are denied to keep books
in the library as the trust of them is increased towards a downloaded subject that being
the major concern of quality (Frenk, et. al., 2010).
2- I have observed that mismatch between industry needs and supply of trained manpower
in two conditions in which I have found that vertical mismatch and credentialism are a
major factors that increases the issues of mismatch between industry needs and supply of
trained manpower. The vertical mismatch is a situation in which the scope of the
education is less or sometimes more in comparison of the needed level of education or
skill. Along with that, I have observed that Credentialism is a situation in which the
height of the education needed to attain the job exceeds the height of education needed to
perform the job in an adequate manner (British Council, 2016).
3- The role of accreditation for the higher institutions of both public and private sector is
huge as it helps to determine that both sectors meet the set minimum standard of quality
or not. This process is helpful in evaluating the system of learning in colleges,
universities and other institutions of higher learning (Laguador, Dotong and De Castro,
2014). Yes, accreditation do help in evaluating the education and learning in the system.
4- The role of CHED in uplifting the economic and social status of Filipino people is high as
it is mandated make sure the rights of labor as provided in the constitution that helps in
the economic condition of the Philippines. It helps to improve the social status of the
Philippines to provide the learning throughout life that would facilitate in living
meaningfully (Newman, Couturier and Scurry, 2010).
5- There are a lot of benefits of Higher Education Act of 1994 as it promotes the right of
citizens to affordable quality education at all levels. It is providing equality in academic
freedom for the constant intellectual growth. It is covered both institutions of public and
private for the purpose of evaluating the entire system of learning of colleges (Shumar,
2013).
In the limelight of above discussion, it can be concluded that the role of CHED in improving the
higher education is huge as it provides the evaluation of the learning system not only in schools
but also in higher education.

Commission on Higher Education 3

Commission on Higher Education 4
References
British Council, 2016. Transnational education in the Philippines. Available [online]
https://www.britishcouncil.ph/sites/default/files/transnational_education_in_the_philippines_opp
ortunities_and_challenges.pdf. Accessed on 3rd June 2018.
Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z.A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., Fineberg, H., Garcia, P., Ke,
Y., Kelley, P. and Kistnasamy, B., 2010. Health professionals for a new century: transforming
education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The lancet, 376(9756),
pp.1923-1958.
Laguador, J.M., Dotong, C.I. and De Castro, E.A., 2014. The experience of Lyceum of the
Philippines University-Batangas in getting ahead of accreditation and certification. International
Journal of Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, 2(2), pp.56-61.
Newman, F., Couturier, L. and Scurry, J., 2010. The future of higher education: Rhetoric, reality,
and the risks of the market. John Wiley & Sons.
Shumar, W., 2013. College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education.
Routledge.