Psychology and Law: Analysis of a Child Interview Report
VerifiedAdded on 2022/09/28
|4
|676
|19
Report
AI Summary
This report analyzes a child interview within a legal context, identifying two key problems: the use of double-barreled questions and yes/no questions. Double-barreled questions, which combine multiple inquiries into one, often lead to confusion and incomplete answers, as illustrated by examples from the interview transcript where the child's responses are unclear or missing essential details. The report references empirical studies, including one on the impact of double-barreled questions on survey accuracy, to explain why these questions are problematic. Additionally, the report addresses the issue of yes/no questions, which limit the child's ability to provide detailed responses and may not accurately reflect their experiences. The analysis cites research highlighting the tendency of children to provide a 'yes' or 'no' answer even when they do not fully understand the question, potentially leading to misinterpretations. The report suggests using open-ended questions to elicit more comprehensive and accurate information from child witnesses. The goal is to provide insights into improving child interview techniques for legal purposes.
1 out of 4