Argosy University: Child Welfare League Program Evaluation Report
VerifiedAdded on 2023/06/04
|12
|3103
|478
Report
AI Summary
This report presents a comprehensive evaluation plan for the Child Welfare League of America program, which aims to improve the lives of vulnerable children and families in America. The program's mission is to lead and engage a network of agencies to address issues such as violence, unfair treatment, and social injustices. The evaluation assesses the program's effectiveness, focusing on stakeholder engagement, data collection methods (interviews, surveys, observations), and dissemination strategies. The report highlights the program's goals, target groups, environmental influences, and expected effects, including increased awareness and reduced vulnerability rates. The findings, based on multiple data sources, provide insights into the relationship between children's vulnerability and social vices, as well as the importance of stakeholder collaboration. The report concludes with recommendations for policy and decision-making to improve children's welfare.

Running Head: EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA 1.
Program evaluation plan for Child Welfare League of America
Name
Institution
Program evaluation plan for Child Welfare League of America
Name
Institution
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA
2
Introduction
Majority of children and youths in America have become more vulnerable to various
issues in the society including unfair treatment, violence and social injustices which have
affected their growth and development. The rate of children vulnerability to abuse as well as
exploitation in the country has been increasing year after the other and hence raising concern to
the US states departments responsible in handling children welfare in the country (Mertens,
2014). In response to these growing statistics on cases of children exploitation, exposure to
violence and increased social injustices, a Child Welfare League of America Program was
developed to help in improvement of lives of the millions of children as well as their families
who are vulnerable to such injustices which are very prevalent in the society.
Mission and Objectives of the Program
The purpose of the program was to lead and engage a network of private and public
agencies as well as parties in the advancement of policies, collaborative efforts as well as the
development of the best practices. The aim objective of the program was to help in identification
of issues in the community that impact the youths, children and their families negatively by the
use of different experts in matters concerning children welfare (van der Put, C. E., Assink,
Gubbels & Solinge, 2018). It is also the objective of the program to reduce children vulnerability
rates to below 5% or zero rate cases in America.
Target Group
The program targeted to reach out to the young people, children as well as their families
who are vulnerable to violence, injustices, exploitation and unfair treatment in America. The
2
Introduction
Majority of children and youths in America have become more vulnerable to various
issues in the society including unfair treatment, violence and social injustices which have
affected their growth and development. The rate of children vulnerability to abuse as well as
exploitation in the country has been increasing year after the other and hence raising concern to
the US states departments responsible in handling children welfare in the country (Mertens,
2014). In response to these growing statistics on cases of children exploitation, exposure to
violence and increased social injustices, a Child Welfare League of America Program was
developed to help in improvement of lives of the millions of children as well as their families
who are vulnerable to such injustices which are very prevalent in the society.
Mission and Objectives of the Program
The purpose of the program was to lead and engage a network of private and public
agencies as well as parties in the advancement of policies, collaborative efforts as well as the
development of the best practices. The aim objective of the program was to help in identification
of issues in the community that impact the youths, children and their families negatively by the
use of different experts in matters concerning children welfare (van der Put, C. E., Assink,
Gubbels & Solinge, 2018). It is also the objective of the program to reduce children vulnerability
rates to below 5% or zero rate cases in America.
Target Group
The program targeted to reach out to the young people, children as well as their families
who are vulnerable to violence, injustices, exploitation and unfair treatment in America. The

EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA
3
understanding of this target group due to the sensitivity of the issues of analysis in the program
required the integration of experts in various medical and psychological fields.
Environmental influences within which the program operates
The primary ecological controls within which the program works include; increased
violence and family abuse, expanded unfair treatment for children or increased injustices among
the youths, children and their families.
Evaluation Goal/purpose
The primary purpose of this program evaluation is to establish the effectiveness of the
Child Welfare League of America program in the improvement or transformation of the lives of
children and their families in America. The evaluation will investigate the critical aspects of the
program that is key to the development of effective policies to address children welfare as well
as help the organizations or agencies concerned to develop effective strategies to fight and
advocate for the rights of children (Bailhache, Leroy, Pillet & Salmi, 2013). The evaluation will
also determine the funding necessary to help in improving the lives of vulnerable children and
their families.
Expected Effects
For the success of the program, it is expected that increased awareness would be done to
different families on the importance of available opportunities for child development as a short-
term measure.
3
understanding of this target group due to the sensitivity of the issues of analysis in the program
required the integration of experts in various medical and psychological fields.
Environmental influences within which the program operates
The primary ecological controls within which the program works include; increased
violence and family abuse, expanded unfair treatment for children or increased injustices among
the youths, children and their families.
Evaluation Goal/purpose
The primary purpose of this program evaluation is to establish the effectiveness of the
Child Welfare League of America program in the improvement or transformation of the lives of
children and their families in America. The evaluation will investigate the critical aspects of the
program that is key to the development of effective policies to address children welfare as well
as help the organizations or agencies concerned to develop effective strategies to fight and
advocate for the rights of children (Bailhache, Leroy, Pillet & Salmi, 2013). The evaluation will
also determine the funding necessary to help in improving the lives of vulnerable children and
their families.
Expected Effects
For the success of the program, it is expected that increased awareness would be done to
different families on the importance of available opportunities for child development as a short-
term measure.
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA
4
The expected long-term effect of the program is increased support from the community and the
relevant private and public networks in the fight against children and youth vulnerability and
achieves zero rates for vulnerability cases in the country.
Stakeholder Assessment and Engagement
The findings of the program will be utilized by various groups of people in the
implementation of favorable policies to improve the welfare of children, youths and their
families who are vulnerable. At the start of the program, we identified two main stakeholders
who form a partnership to build upon this program and its implementation (Arthur et al., 2017).
The two main stakeholders include the private and public agencies which are concerned with the
increased vulnerability. Due to the sensitivity of the issues analyzed under the program, the
program will consist of other stakeholders, who are experts and professionals in social injustices
cases, unfair treatment for children, violence as well as discrimination and alienation. These
experts will include pediatricians, child and drug counselors.
The private and public agencies involved as stakeholders will help in the determination of
whether the program should be funded by both agencies and how much funds will be required to
support the program based on how the program is involving (Chronis-Tuscano et al., 2015). On
the other hand, the different field experts will help in developing an understanding of the impact
of variables such as violence, unfair treatment and injustices impact child development and
provide feasible solutions from their field of expertise to promote the success of the program.
Pediatricians are specialists in matters concerning children, and therefore they will guide
the program directors in understanding children vulnerability to issues such as family violence,
injustices and how it impacts their growth and development (Chen & Chan, 2016). The drug and
4
The expected long-term effect of the program is increased support from the community and the
relevant private and public networks in the fight against children and youth vulnerability and
achieves zero rates for vulnerability cases in the country.
Stakeholder Assessment and Engagement
The findings of the program will be utilized by various groups of people in the
implementation of favorable policies to improve the welfare of children, youths and their
families who are vulnerable. At the start of the program, we identified two main stakeholders
who form a partnership to build upon this program and its implementation (Arthur et al., 2017).
The two main stakeholders include the private and public agencies which are concerned with the
increased vulnerability. Due to the sensitivity of the issues analyzed under the program, the
program will consist of other stakeholders, who are experts and professionals in social injustices
cases, unfair treatment for children, violence as well as discrimination and alienation. These
experts will include pediatricians, child and drug counselors.
The private and public agencies involved as stakeholders will help in the determination of
whether the program should be funded by both agencies and how much funds will be required to
support the program based on how the program is involving (Chronis-Tuscano et al., 2015). On
the other hand, the different field experts will help in developing an understanding of the impact
of variables such as violence, unfair treatment and injustices impact child development and
provide feasible solutions from their field of expertise to promote the success of the program.
Pediatricians are specialists in matters concerning children, and therefore they will guide
the program directors in understanding children vulnerability to issues such as family violence,
injustices and how it impacts their growth and development (Chen & Chan, 2016). The drug and
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA
5
child councilors will prove council or guide on best counseling strategies for children and youths
who might have been affected by their vulnerability of the environment they live in. The doctors
will contribute to improved efficiency of the program by guiding the program directors on the
medical perspectives on children and youth vulnerability and guide their families on the
appropriate steps or measures to reduce the impact on their children.
Stakeholder Needs
Other than their engagement on the program, the stakeholders have needs that need to be
met by successful implementation of the program. The public and private agencies who are the
program directors would want to know how they would enhance the program to achieve the
desired objectives as well as the determination of whether the project is working or not (Selph,
Bougatsos, Blazina & Nelson, 2013). The clinical experts would want to establish the clinical
outcomes from the program to enable them to adjust their clinical practices if the need arises or
gap in addressing the vulnerability of children on the variables under analysis.
Evaluation Design and Framework
For the effectiveness of the evaluation program, the evaluation team decided to use
multiple data sources to enhance the reliability of the findings or results. The decision to use
various sources of data for this program was due to the increasing demand for the information
from different stakeholders and hence required a comprehensive analysis (Euser et al., 2015).
Secondly, sufficient understanding of the sensitive issues among children and youths who are
vulnerable as well as their families requires in-depth information. Secondary sources of data
were also considered in the program evaluation to determine how compelling the current
findings of the existing data through a comparative analysis are. However, the secondary data
5
child councilors will prove council or guide on best counseling strategies for children and youths
who might have been affected by their vulnerability of the environment they live in. The doctors
will contribute to improved efficiency of the program by guiding the program directors on the
medical perspectives on children and youth vulnerability and guide their families on the
appropriate steps or measures to reduce the impact on their children.
Stakeholder Needs
Other than their engagement on the program, the stakeholders have needs that need to be
met by successful implementation of the program. The public and private agencies who are the
program directors would want to know how they would enhance the program to achieve the
desired objectives as well as the determination of whether the project is working or not (Selph,
Bougatsos, Blazina & Nelson, 2013). The clinical experts would want to establish the clinical
outcomes from the program to enable them to adjust their clinical practices if the need arises or
gap in addressing the vulnerability of children on the variables under analysis.
Evaluation Design and Framework
For the effectiveness of the evaluation program, the evaluation team decided to use
multiple data sources to enhance the reliability of the findings or results. The decision to use
various sources of data for this program was due to the increasing demand for the information
from different stakeholders and hence required a comprehensive analysis (Euser et al., 2015).
Secondly, sufficient understanding of the sensitive issues among children and youths who are
vulnerable as well as their families requires in-depth information. Secondary sources of data
were also considered in the program evaluation to determine how compelling the current
findings of the existing data through a comparative analysis are. However, the secondary data

EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA
6
would not be used to inform decision making by the stakeholders as well as the program
directors and partners. The information collected will be subjected to analysis under the
established benchmark by the program.
Resource Requirement for the Evaluation
Different resources have been availed for the program evaluation in which the most
critical of all is manpower. The assessment will enjoy the full-time participation of the
stakeholders as well as part-time services of another stakeholder such as doctors who will only
devote limited time to carry out the program assessment as a result of their engagement in other
clinical activities (Casillas, Fauchier, Derkash & Garrido, 2016). However, the evaluation will
enjoy the services of two full-time clinical officers to help in understanding the critical clinical
issues in children, the youth as well as their families due to their increased vulnerability.
Stakeholders in the program evaluation will have frequent meetings for the evaluation process of
the program. Secondary data resources such as clinical data records for children and the youth
will also provide great insights on the program evaluation process. Participant’s perspectives on
various issues such as to what extent has health care and counseling services been of help to
them and their families as well as their perspectives on state or government contribution to
children welfare development. This information from past data records and experiences will be
used in the development of the program (Vlahovicova et al., 2017). The information collected
from the population sample will be confidential. The evaluation team also decided that some
information would be judged based on the willingness to respond to the request and the issues at
hand.
6
would not be used to inform decision making by the stakeholders as well as the program
directors and partners. The information collected will be subjected to analysis under the
established benchmark by the program.
Resource Requirement for the Evaluation
Different resources have been availed for the program evaluation in which the most
critical of all is manpower. The assessment will enjoy the full-time participation of the
stakeholders as well as part-time services of another stakeholder such as doctors who will only
devote limited time to carry out the program assessment as a result of their engagement in other
clinical activities (Casillas, Fauchier, Derkash & Garrido, 2016). However, the evaluation will
enjoy the services of two full-time clinical officers to help in understanding the critical clinical
issues in children, the youth as well as their families due to their increased vulnerability.
Stakeholders in the program evaluation will have frequent meetings for the evaluation process of
the program. Secondary data resources such as clinical data records for children and the youth
will also provide great insights on the program evaluation process. Participant’s perspectives on
various issues such as to what extent has health care and counseling services been of help to
them and their families as well as their perspectives on state or government contribution to
children welfare development. This information from past data records and experiences will be
used in the development of the program (Vlahovicova et al., 2017). The information collected
from the population sample will be confidential. The evaluation team also decided that some
information would be judged based on the willingness to respond to the request and the issues at
hand.
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA
7
Selection Methods and Data collection
The selection criteria will depend on the data collection techniques or methods utilized
under the program. The evaluation team, therefore, use some data collection methods to enhance
the reliability of the findings. The team will employ the use of interviews, surveys, observations
as well as a review or existing records on the subject of discussion. Children, youths and
representatives from their families especially their parents or caregivers would be interviewed to
obtain their perspective on the prevalence of violence, injustices, unfair treatment as well as
alienation and how it influences their vulnerability. Surveys would be used to collect more
information about children vulnerability in depth compared to the use of interviews (Walsh,
Woolfenden & Shlonsky, 2015). Observation techniques will be used mostly by the clinical
experts in stabling the causal factors to their response behaviour. How they express their
emotions on different variable impacts such as violence and the stigma associated will be critical
in understanding their effects on childhood development and improved health. Lastly, the
evaluation team will also rely on the review of records to obtain information relating to children
vulnerability and compares them against the findings of the program and increase the reliability
of the information provided to the stakeholders for effective decision making and policies and
strategy development (Poole, Seal & Taylor, 2014). Both qualitative and quantitative data
collection techniques will be required in
Findings from the evaluation
The evaluation provides the stakeholders in the program with reliable information on the
prevalent cases of children vulnerability with increased rates of violence, increased social
injustices as well as increase discrimination. According to the clinical experts used for the
7
Selection Methods and Data collection
The selection criteria will depend on the data collection techniques or methods utilized
under the program. The evaluation team, therefore, use some data collection methods to enhance
the reliability of the findings. The team will employ the use of interviews, surveys, observations
as well as a review or existing records on the subject of discussion. Children, youths and
representatives from their families especially their parents or caregivers would be interviewed to
obtain their perspective on the prevalence of violence, injustices, unfair treatment as well as
alienation and how it influences their vulnerability. Surveys would be used to collect more
information about children vulnerability in depth compared to the use of interviews (Walsh,
Woolfenden & Shlonsky, 2015). Observation techniques will be used mostly by the clinical
experts in stabling the causal factors to their response behaviour. How they express their
emotions on different variable impacts such as violence and the stigma associated will be critical
in understanding their effects on childhood development and improved health. Lastly, the
evaluation team will also rely on the review of records to obtain information relating to children
vulnerability and compares them against the findings of the program and increase the reliability
of the information provided to the stakeholders for effective decision making and policies and
strategy development (Poole, Seal & Taylor, 2014). Both qualitative and quantitative data
collection techniques will be required in
Findings from the evaluation
The evaluation provides the stakeholders in the program with reliable information on the
prevalent cases of children vulnerability with increased rates of violence, increased social
injustices as well as increase discrimination. According to the clinical experts used for the
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA
8
analysis, the program evaluation provided a direct relationship between children vulnerability
and the growing social vices in the community (Knerr, Gardner & Cluver, 2013). The finds from
clinical experts proved that children vulnerability affects their growth and development in
various aspects of their life. The findings also provided the understanding of less engagement
between the private and public agencies in addressing children vulnerability. The interpretation
of the findings will be made through assessment by all stakeholders in the program evaluation in
a meeting. Once the results have been interpreted, they will then be submitted to the relevant
authorities or stakeholders for policy and decision making by implementing the Child Welfare
League of America program (Filene, Kaminski, Valle & Cachat, 2013). However, the decision to
apply will be based on the contribution of the program after the evaluation of the improvement of
the lives of children, youths and their families from their unsafe conditions.
Dissemination
The findings of this evaluation will be disseminated by use of various channels based on
the targeted users of the information. A presentation will be conducted in a meeting which will
involve all the stakeholders to the program. Each group of stakeholders will also receive a copy
of short reports made from the findings. For the sake of the public and private agencies, the short
letter of the report will also be published under state or federal healthcare reports. The clinical
experts will also have a report and short presentation which will be presented to the state health
departments to help in proving support for the program. The reports and presentations will be
disseminated by a representative from each category of stakeholders in the program.
8
analysis, the program evaluation provided a direct relationship between children vulnerability
and the growing social vices in the community (Knerr, Gardner & Cluver, 2013). The finds from
clinical experts proved that children vulnerability affects their growth and development in
various aspects of their life. The findings also provided the understanding of less engagement
between the private and public agencies in addressing children vulnerability. The interpretation
of the findings will be made through assessment by all stakeholders in the program evaluation in
a meeting. Once the results have been interpreted, they will then be submitted to the relevant
authorities or stakeholders for policy and decision making by implementing the Child Welfare
League of America program (Filene, Kaminski, Valle & Cachat, 2013). However, the decision to
apply will be based on the contribution of the program after the evaluation of the improvement of
the lives of children, youths and their families from their unsafe conditions.
Dissemination
The findings of this evaluation will be disseminated by use of various channels based on
the targeted users of the information. A presentation will be conducted in a meeting which will
involve all the stakeholders to the program. Each group of stakeholders will also receive a copy
of short reports made from the findings. For the sake of the public and private agencies, the short
letter of the report will also be published under state or federal healthcare reports. The clinical
experts will also have a report and short presentation which will be presented to the state health
departments to help in proving support for the program. The reports and presentations will be
disseminated by a representative from each category of stakeholders in the program.

EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA
9
Follow Up Activities
The program directors or the significant partners in the program development that is the
private and public agencies will be responsible for conducting follow up activities with the help
of a clinical expert. They will monitor the implementation process of the program to ensure that
different affected groups have taken appropriate measures to address the issues of children,
youths and their families’ vulnerability. The monitoring activities will be regular to avoid
chances of failure to meet its objectives as well as to provide support to the implementation team
where necessary.
9
Follow Up Activities
The program directors or the significant partners in the program development that is the
private and public agencies will be responsible for conducting follow up activities with the help
of a clinical expert. They will monitor the implementation process of the program to ensure that
different affected groups have taken appropriate measures to address the issues of children,
youths and their families’ vulnerability. The monitoring activities will be regular to avoid
chances of failure to meet its objectives as well as to provide support to the implementation team
where necessary.
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA
10
References
Altafim, E. R. P., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2016). Universal violence and child maltreatment
prevention programs for parents: A systematic review. Psychosocial Intervention, 25(1),
27-38.
Arthur, L., Beecher, B., Death, E., Dockett, S., & Farmer, S. (2017). Programming and Planning
in Early Childhood Settings with Student Resource Access 12 Months. Cengage AU.
Bailhache, M., Leroy, V., Pillet, P., & Salmi, L. R. (2013). Is early detection of abused children
possible?: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of abused
children. BMC pediatrics, 13(1), 202.
Barlow, J., Johnston, I., Kendrick, D., Polnay, L., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2006). Individual and
group-based parenting programmes for the treatment of physical child abuse and neglect.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3.
Casillas, K. L., Fauchier, A., Derkash, B. T., & Garrido, E. F. (2016). Implementation of
evidence-based home visiting programs aimed at reducing child maltreatment: A meta-
analytic review. Child abuse & neglect, 53, 64-80.
Chen, M., & Chan, K. L. (2016). Effects of parenting programs on child maltreatment
prevention: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(1), 88-104.
Chronis-Tuscano, A., Rubin, K. H., O'Brien, K. A., Coplan, R. J., Thomas, S. R., Dougherty, L.
R., ... & Menzer, M. (2015). Preliminary evaluation of a multimodal early intervention
program for behaviorally inhibited preschoolers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 83(3), 534.
10
References
Altafim, E. R. P., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2016). Universal violence and child maltreatment
prevention programs for parents: A systematic review. Psychosocial Intervention, 25(1),
27-38.
Arthur, L., Beecher, B., Death, E., Dockett, S., & Farmer, S. (2017). Programming and Planning
in Early Childhood Settings with Student Resource Access 12 Months. Cengage AU.
Bailhache, M., Leroy, V., Pillet, P., & Salmi, L. R. (2013). Is early detection of abused children
possible?: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of abused
children. BMC pediatrics, 13(1), 202.
Barlow, J., Johnston, I., Kendrick, D., Polnay, L., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2006). Individual and
group-based parenting programmes for the treatment of physical child abuse and neglect.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3.
Casillas, K. L., Fauchier, A., Derkash, B. T., & Garrido, E. F. (2016). Implementation of
evidence-based home visiting programs aimed at reducing child maltreatment: A meta-
analytic review. Child abuse & neglect, 53, 64-80.
Chen, M., & Chan, K. L. (2016). Effects of parenting programs on child maltreatment
prevention: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(1), 88-104.
Chronis-Tuscano, A., Rubin, K. H., O'Brien, K. A., Coplan, R. J., Thomas, S. R., Dougherty, L.
R., ... & Menzer, M. (2015). Preliminary evaluation of a multimodal early intervention
program for behaviorally inhibited preschoolers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 83(3), 534.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA
11
Euser, S., Alink, L. R., Stoltenborgh, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M.
H. (2015). A gloomy picture: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals
disappointing effectiveness of programs aiming at preventing child maltreatment. BMC
public health, 15(1), 1068.
Filene, J. H., Kaminski, J. W., Valle, L. A., & Cachat, P. (2013). Components associated with
home visiting program outcomes: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 132(Supplement 2), S100-
S109.
Ji, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2015). A meta-analysis of child physical abuse prevalence in China.
Child abuse & neglect, 43, 61-72.
Knerr, W., Gardner, F., & Cluver, L. (2013). Improving positive parenting skills and reducing
harsh and abusive parenting in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review.
Prevention science, 14(4), 352-363.
Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating
diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.
Poole, M. K., Seal, D. W., & Taylor, C. A. (2014). A systematic review of universal campaigns
targeting child physical abuse prevention. Health education research, 29(3), 388-432.
Selph, S. S., Bougatsos, C., Blazina, I., & Nelson, H. D. (2013). Behavioral interventions and
counseling to prevent child abuse and neglect: a systematic review to update the US
Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(3),
179-190.
11
Euser, S., Alink, L. R., Stoltenborgh, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M.
H. (2015). A gloomy picture: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals
disappointing effectiveness of programs aiming at preventing child maltreatment. BMC
public health, 15(1), 1068.
Filene, J. H., Kaminski, J. W., Valle, L. A., & Cachat, P. (2013). Components associated with
home visiting program outcomes: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 132(Supplement 2), S100-
S109.
Ji, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2015). A meta-analysis of child physical abuse prevalence in China.
Child abuse & neglect, 43, 61-72.
Knerr, W., Gardner, F., & Cluver, L. (2013). Improving positive parenting skills and reducing
harsh and abusive parenting in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review.
Prevention science, 14(4), 352-363.
Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating
diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.
Poole, M. K., Seal, D. W., & Taylor, C. A. (2014). A systematic review of universal campaigns
targeting child physical abuse prevention. Health education research, 29(3), 388-432.
Selph, S. S., Bougatsos, C., Blazina, I., & Nelson, H. D. (2013). Behavioral interventions and
counseling to prevent child abuse and neglect: a systematic review to update the US
Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(3),
179-190.

EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE AMERICA
12
van der Put, C. E., Assink, M., Gubbels, J., & van Solinge, N. F. B. (2018). Identifying effective
components of child maltreatment interventions: a meta-analysis. Clinical child and
family psychology review, 21(2), 171-202.
Van Dijken, M. W., Stams, G. J. J., & De Winter, M. (2016). Can community-based
interventions prevent child maltreatment?. Children and youth services review, 61, 149-
158.
Vlahovicova, K., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Leijten, P., Knerr, W., & Gardner, F. (2017). Parenting
programs for the prevention of child physical abuse recurrence: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Clinical child and family psychology review, 20(3), 351-365.
Walsh, K., Zwi, K., Woolfenden, S., & Shlonsky, A. (2015). School-based education
programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse. Cochrane database of systematic
reviews, 2015(4), Art-No.
12
van der Put, C. E., Assink, M., Gubbels, J., & van Solinge, N. F. B. (2018). Identifying effective
components of child maltreatment interventions: a meta-analysis. Clinical child and
family psychology review, 21(2), 171-202.
Van Dijken, M. W., Stams, G. J. J., & De Winter, M. (2016). Can community-based
interventions prevent child maltreatment?. Children and youth services review, 61, 149-
158.
Vlahovicova, K., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Leijten, P., Knerr, W., & Gardner, F. (2017). Parenting
programs for the prevention of child physical abuse recurrence: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Clinical child and family psychology review, 20(3), 351-365.
Walsh, K., Zwi, K., Woolfenden, S., & Shlonsky, A. (2015). School-based education
programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse. Cochrane database of systematic
reviews, 2015(4), Art-No.
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide
1 out of 12
Related Documents

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
Copyright © 2020–2025 A2Z Services. All Rights Reserved. Developed and managed by ZUCOL.