Chipotle Case Study: Analyzing Supply Chain Issues and Solutions

This case study analyzes the Chipotle Mexican Grill crisis, which stemmed from a series of foodborne illness outbreaks linked to its supply chain. The assignment delves into the parties affected—Chipotle, its suppliers, and its customers—and explores the extent of the damage, including financial losses and erosion of brand trust. It examines the absence of criminal intent, attributing the outbreaks to the complex supply chain structure and the use of fresh ingredients from various sources. The case study also addresses the potential for civil action, the allocation of blame across different levels of the supply chain, and the possibility of positive outcomes, such as improved supply chain management. Solutions are proposed, including centralizing operations and enhancing quality control. The study also evaluates Chipotle's handling of the crisis, acknowledging its acceptance of responsibility, and assesses whether the supply chain could have been effective with better management. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of quality control and accountability within the supply chain to prevent future crises.

Running head: CHIPOTLE CASE STUDY 1
Chipotle Case Study
Name
Institution

CHIPOTLE CASE STUDY 2
Introduction
The chipotle situation is a case of an erroneous supply chain in which the products
reaching consumers are defective and result in adverse effects on the consumers. There is a need
for an investigation in the situation.
Question 1: Who was affected, and how much - badly? Was there criminal intent?
The outbreaks affected all the three parties involved in the supply chain, the suppliers, the
company, and the customers. Chipotle was most affected by the outbreaks. The situation was a
direct contradiction of their guiding motto. The company prides itself on providing healthy
foods. The outbreak of a disease resulting from its supply chain is the ultimate proof of failure
from Chipotle. The customers have always trusted the company to provide safe and healthy food
(Tuttle). The occurrence shattered any trust that customers might have had o the company. The
company ended in the customers to generate revenue. This relationship is maintained by years of
business that have earned the company a reputation. When the outbreaks went wide, the
company suffered a loss of clientele and the destruction of brand identity. It will take years of
careful supply chain management to recover the loss in terms of customer loyalty, client, and
sales. The effects of the outbreak were nasty and frustrating for the business. They destroyed a
performing business establishment and sent it on a downward spiral in terms of profitability. At
the end of it, all the company is counting both financial and brand losses.
Customers were also affected, though, to a lesser extent. They lost their trusted source of
food. After the occurrence, the customers are forced to look for other places at which they can
get their meals. The suppliers lost business in the sense that, Chipotle had reduced sales volume

CHIPOTLE CASE STUDY 3
and consequently did not ore der from their suppliers (Distribution Options for Retailers, 2010).
In either perspective, the supply chain suffered financial looses and lost its positive reputation.
Was there Criminal Intend?
There was no criminal intent in the activities. Mainly because the investigations
conducted by both the company and the center for disease control revealed no known cause, if
there had been a criminal intent, they would have quickly followed the human resource factors to
trace the problem to its cause. It is highly likely that the supply chain acquired the condition from
one of the many nodes without being planned for by nay person. Chipotle uses fresh ingredients
that are obtained from different suppliers. The company uses the skills and procedures known by
chefs from different places. The supply has a lot of possibilities for contamination, but its I
impossible to decipher which. The outbreaks did not follow any specific pattern hence cannot
have been intended.
Question 2: Will there be civil action?
Chipotle is facing several cases. Victims of the supply chain collapse and the outbreak
have filed a total of 9 suits as per the case study, and probably the number will go higher with
time. Investors got vexed with the alleged lies that the company proclaimed to have total control
over the supply chain. The outbreaks have proved that the company's supply chain is vulnerable
to contamination, and the total quality management is not as extensive as it should be. Investors
feel that the company used false information to convince them to invest in it.
Question 3: Who was to blame.
The blame cuts across all levels of the supply chain. The management, if the company
bears much of the blame because it is responsible for coordinating production planning and total

CHIPOTLE CASE STUDY 4
quality control (Tallent, 2010). The management is to blame because it did not pay attention to
details in the supply chain . for instance, it did not thoroughly inspect the ingredients, it did not
inspect the cooks and standardize the cooking procedures (Siba & Omwenga, 2015). The lack of
attention to detail and close control left the supply chain vulnerable to contamination at any point
along the value chain.
Question 4: Is there any good to come out of this situation?
The only positive outcome of this scenario is the lessons that Chipotle will learn. If the
company survives the heat of the lawsuits and the public, they will be more attentive to details in
the supply chain. One can be sure that they will develop very effective control strategies that will
see the company become one of the safest food dealers.
Question 5: Can you see a solution or solutions to the situation - what would you do?
The primary solution lies in the total overhaul of the current supply chain. The company
should centralize its operations. For example, rather than obtaining ingredients from different
small-scale suppliers and combining them during cooking, the company should receive each
genre of ingredients from a particular certified dealer. This will make it easier to control and
monitor raw materials. Such an arrangement will see to it that each party is responsible and
accountable for their role in the supply chain (Ho, Zheng, Yildiz, & Talluri, 2015; Chopra &
Sodhi, 2014).
To cushion the effect of negative public image, Chipotle should foot the hospital bills of
the customers who developed complications resulting from the outbreak. This will serve to
restore the faith their customers had in them and show a sense of responsibility, which can play a
crucial role in recovering customer’s loyalty.

CHIPOTLE CASE STUDY 5
Question 6: Did Chipotle handle any part of this fiasco properly?
The company accepted the role it had to play and apologized to the public and its clients
specifically for the situation. This was the right move because it portrayed the kind of
responsibility the management had. Accepting their mistakes proves to the market that the
company is about to spearhead a correction.
Question 7: Could the supply chain have worked here or not?
The supply chain could have worked. For the supply chain to work, their company should
have centralized its procurement and put in place quality and safety management systems with
strict requirements and operating guidelines (Hasan, 2013; Awudu & Zhang, 2012).
Conclusion
Chipotle can be a very safe service provider if it pays closer attention to quality control.
The supply chain failed because it had so many players, and none of them could have been
identified as the source of the problem. The company should reduce the key players in the supply
chain to enhance accountability while centralizing operations.

CHIPOTLE CASE STUDY 6
References
Awudu, I., & Zhang, J. (2012). Uncertainties and sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain
management: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 1359-1368.
Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. (2014). Reducing the risk of supply chain disruptions. MIT Sloan
management review, 72-80.
Distribution Options for Retailers. (2010, May 3). Retrieved from SCM:
https://www.supplychainmusings.com/2008/05/distribution-options-for-retailers.html
Hasan, M. (2013). Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Operational
Performance. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 42-48.
Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: a literature
review. International Journal of Production Research, 5031-5069.
Siba, M. K., & Omwenga, a. (2015). SUPPLY CHAIN RISKS MITIGATION STRATEGIES
SUPPLY CHAIN RISKS MITIGATION STRATEGIES CASE OF COCA COLA
COMPANY (K). CASE OF COCA COLA COMPANY (K), 45-65.
Tallent, J. (2010). Coca Cola; The evolution of supply chain mnagement.
Tuttle, H. (n.d.). Dia De La Crisis: The Chipotle Outbreaks Highlight th risks of Supply chain
failures.