An Analysis of Citizenship, Community, and Welfare: A Report

This report provides a comprehensive overview of citizenship, community, and welfare, examining various theoretical approaches and models. It begins with an introduction to the concept of citizenship, emphasizing rights, membership, participation, and identity as key dimensions. The main body delves into liberal, communitarian, and cosmopolitan perspectives, analyzing their core tenets and implications. The report also explores T.H. Marshall's theory of citizenship and contrasts active versus passive citizenship. The liberal model emphasizes individual rights and goals, while communitarianism highlights community belonging and shared identity. The cosmopolitan model addresses citizenship in the context of globalization. The report also discusses the importance of active citizenship, social leadership, and the relationship between citizenship and mental health. The analysis includes discussions on the role of local governments, the NHS, and the third sector in achieving health goals and promoting democratic values. The report concludes with a summary of the key findings and their significance.

Citizenship, Community and
welfare

Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY..................................................................................................................................3
Liberal theoretical approach........................................................................................................4
Communitarianism approach.......................................................................................................5
Cosmopolitan model....................................................................................................................6
T.H Marshall's Theory of Citizenship.........................................................................................7
Passive v active citizenship.........................................................................................................8
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................9
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................10

INTRODUCTION
Citizenship is the process in which individuals along the more manner of collaborative
groups have become the responsibility level of connection to the different community along with
society. In addition, having the descriptive level of leadership and development activity in more
persistent manner. In order to be the parts of being god citizens, there is need to have the god
work for the positive changes which have the acknowledge the level of the interdependence in
sense of the concern regarding the rights and the welfare which is being affected the group
efforts. In this report, Rights, membership, participation and identity were presented and
operationalized as four main dimensions of citizenship. There is more level of inter relation of
the three respective mode which areas the liberal, communitarian and cosmopolitan. In this
report, there will be more focus on the practical, evidence-based model that is more considered
about the local governments, NHS and the third sector which can be helpful in using the work
with different communities in order to have the achievement of the health goals.
MAIN BODY
Active citizen is having the people who are more level of involved in the local’s
communities along with democracy at all level which can be the part if the small as the campaign
or educating the people regarding the more about the democratic values, skills and the level of
participation. The development of active citizenship can be the enormous topic to be discussed as
this is the major level of contribution in developing the heals factor in a country. As the concept
of citizenship have the major level grounded activity which have the empathises od the
responsibility along with development of democratise values in term of education policy. The
developments have the recent level of transformations have the welfares the states an important
role which is having the unexplored along with potentiality paradoxical roe as the per
developments and the dynamic in more recent way.
The active citizen are the ones who have the properly involved in the local communities
along at all democracy level in order to have to care about. There are considered to be socials
leadership training programmes which is helpful in building trust along understanding and
supporting the people to give the action and agents issues as they have casually care about. The
active citizen ship is the considered to be parts of the flexible approaches which have he clears
3

involvement of the various rights which is enabling the individuals to have the pursuing of the
different aim and objectives.
In addition to the active citizenship have the directs level of relationship in maintaining
the level of combination between community and mental health. This is considered to be have
level of unique combinative of narrative social science theory which have the clear recognition
the citizenship and mental health as the propel who are suffering form the mental illness can
have probability of receiving the effective level of treatments with life in theory respective
community. As to have the proper level of analysis of different theoretical approaches such as
the follows which have the major consideration in more way of understanding that there is
proper level of consideration over the different dimension which are such as the, Rights,
membership, participation and identity were presented and operationalized as four main
dimensions of citizenship. There is more level of inter relation of the three respective mode
which areas the liberal, communitarian and cosmopolitan.
Liberal theoretical approach
On the other hand, the active citizenship haves re-emerged with problem of an issues in
central in order to not only practical political question which are concerning about the access of
different health care system. In more of the considerations the relationship between the
individuals along with political community have ben conceptualized in more of different ways as
there are there different classical conception of citizenship. As per the concept of the liberal’s
level of conception in which the Individuals are taken the are under specials and major focus. As
per the theory of liberal citizenships have the major emphasis of the equality of rights which is
hold citizens along whom these the right is the enable the individuals their aims and goals. The
citizenship which is been under the liberal one is considered under the large aspects. The liberal
model of citizenship emphasizes the importance of letting the individual simply be an individual
with right to pursue his own interests
In another situation while constructing this active citizenship have the major level of
involvements of the in the process od the risk along with rewards the decision making which can
be achieved by the mutual arrived and agreed states. On the other hand, the passive has the level
of bestowing of the statues along with developing more level of rights which is public
irrespective of the degrees to have the unequal level of success along with influencing diverse
level of experience in making best known facts. There are considered to be socials leadership
4

training programmes which is helpful in building trust along understanding and supporting the
people to give the action and agents issues as they have casually care about. In the other hand As
this model of citizen have its major level of connection beyond the implementation of borders as
the connection if been established with person hood rather than the action hold.
Communitarianism approach
As per this view it is termed as the more level of idea perspectives which have the major
level of emphasis on the community belonging. As there is major level of consideration as
society is have the trueing up of group of individuals into community. As per the believe of the
communitarians, there is more level of individuals sense identify which have gentled them t
became their social embedded citizen at they have the feeling o the of being parts of community.
this have the clear addition to the be the part of the active citizenship have the major level of
contribution pf the common welfare with proper understanding the by attaining more level of
rights and responsibilities. As the citizen which have the major belonging as the community at
more large levels in order to have the producing the norm and level of ideals by initiating
citizenship education programs to help my young fellow citizens to realize their God-given rights
and social roles and responsibilities as a member of this community. On the other Hand the
communitarian have the clear level of arguing as the dimension of political participations have
the emphasise over the individual’s right. The model have the clear understanding regarding the
indicial as the active citizens which in contrast as the liberal level of vies which n addition have
the deliberative form of the democracy which is in more have the active participation .
This model has the four different level of dimensions which is consider to the rights,
membership, participation and identity. As per the section of right, in the former model there is
right in terms of cultural, collectives’ goods and benefits in order to have the development of
various culture through their active participation. Next to that their membership is being
connected to the cultural defined community which is exclusive to their part. On the other hand.
with the considerations with the respect of duty, the politically active citizen has the
development of citizen practices. The identity of an individuals as per this model is that’s all the
ones are born as cultural identity in more defined territory which have the more level of
foundations for citizenship. On the other hand, it has been stated that’s there the commission
should have clear rejection regarding the liberal notion by paying major level of emphasis on the
culture and shared identity.
5

At last this model have the clear assumption which is regarding the notion of
individualism along with personal identity which is focusing solely on the level of collective
identity and acceptability of human culture. As this model of citizen have its major level of
connection beyond the implementation of borders as the connection if been established with
person hood rather than the action hodd.as this theory have the strong level of defending along
with believing the establishment of lobal level of challenges in order to have the became to be
beyond the city or state capacity in order to have the regulation of fates in the more level of
world community.
Cosmopolitan model
In the ear of globalization , this have the enforced to have the rethinking over the process
citizenship in which the society is considered the growing the new level of the regionals and
globalization in more way to have the rapid increase the level of immigrations which have the
preceptive of the new undemanding of the idea. This model has the is considered to be
alternative model t the transzonal states of the model of liberalism and communitarianism. This
have the proper limitation which have the removing the citizenship formed the specific
territories. On the other hand, the, it has been contradicted that’s there is challenges have the
notion which is been allocated with rights along with duties of the fellow citizens within
developing nations which have the morale level of obligations. this is considered to be ethical
level of responsibility which is considered to be the parts of the whole world. In this citizen are
not be found in fellow citizens concrete rights along with duties within community which have
the effectives shared role.
There is more level of civic partnership which is considered to be less level of important with
the resection of idealizations will be able to lead to better health or healthier people are more
likely to volunteer, the public health implications are that barriers to volunteering should be
removed. In addition to taking part in the community leadership leads to have the reprobation of
the highly successful citizen activism on public health issues, from demands for access to
contraception in the early 20th century to later campaigns on disability rights.
A cosmopolitan citizen is highly influenced by new trends, be it cultural, social or political,
whose loyalties are no longer limited their own state. Being a cosmopolitan citizen living in a
world community implies having a set of multiple identities; individuals are attached to their
local, regional or national affiliations, but as a citizen of the world community with
6

responsibilities towards other humans one must constantly rethink one’s sense of identity and
place within society.
T.H Marshall's Theory of Citizenship
As per the major consideration of the modern theory of citizenship have attempted
to prove the level of the universal notion which is based on equality and historical development.
As per the T.H Marshall's have the related the concept with social class as being the full and
equivalents member of the political community which is the process of expansions against the
inequality of social class. The active citizen ship is the considered to be parts of the flexible
approaches which have he clears involvement of the various rights which is enabling the
individuals to have the pursuing of the different aim and objectives.
On the other hand () states that this theory has the clear level of dependence on the 3
diverse ranges of the arrangements which areas more level been created as the unique level of
occasion in history, the next is about the political right along with social right. In next to that’s
the author also states that’s the first one is regarding the civil right of 18th century, political one
of 19th century and the last one in the social right as in 20th century which is major
corresponding with the developments of the specific states structure.
Wellbeing is the key level of concepts which is working for the functioning as the
flourishing the society along with community with social connection tasking active citizens. As
the former have the proper level of enhancing the informal ways offering assistances to bring up
the positive changes in society health care. on the other hand (), contradict that’s there the active
citizenship or volunteering will be able to lead to better health or healthier people are more likely
to volunteer, the public health implications are that barriers to volunteering should be removed.
In addition to taking part in the community leadership leads to have the reprobation of the
highly successful citizen activism on public health issues, from demands for access to
contraception in the early 20th century to later campaigns on disability rights.
On the other hand, the () also states that’s the active citizenship is all about the
campaigning and lobbying which is not representing the family which is underpinning the
healthy society. There is major level of focus on the practical, evidence-based model that is more
considered about the local governments, NHS and the third sector which can be helpful in using
the work with different communities in order to have the achievement of the health goals.
7

On the other hand, as per the T.H. Marshall. The will level of citizenship has the first
level of consolidations with the proper level of ruling of law along with equality which is
considered to be an essentials part of the freedom. on the other hand, it is considered to be
negative as the rights are more to be place before the restriction of government in more particular
way. As per the consideration of the political rights which is have it level of emergence mid-19th
century which have been the reformed to have the political right to walks. These are the rights
which are the formed out of the rights to the vote in order to have the participations in the
exercise political power.
On the other hand, social level of citizenship is considered to have the privileges n the
right to believe to live the life of been a civilized as the living standard of the society. As the per
the author, these straights have the proper level of allocations regarding the institution homes in
welfare states, theses social right have the immigration along with eliminating the dispersity
which is more ever produced by the market economy. In addition to that’s the author also stated
that’s there is the insurance that’s the individual has the minimum level of social rights which is
giving its premise to have the exercising of both civil and political right. On the other hand, there
is more level of critical evaluation that’s the form the point of view of the T.H. Marshall once the
citizen is been voided with the full level of individuality in the society will be have the same
level of status along with right to vote and the rule of law. The active citizen are the ones who
have the properly involved in the local communities along at all democracy level in order to have
to care about.
Passive v active citizenship
The existence of the active citizenship is carded regarding been the participatory
approaches which have the work on the oppositions as there is consensuses of the values along
with being concepts to be achieved by the objective of common goods. On the other hand, the
passive citizenship is regarding the premised level of data in the idea of separation as the
distinctive level of public and private spheres. As the later one is more level of concern to have
the pursue its more level of own goals along with interest in level of protection of the property
and liberty with the responsibility of states. In order to the passive citizen have they been
considered as the arguable individualities along with liberty of responsibility of estate. There are
considered to be socials leadership training programmes which is helpful in building trust along
8

understanding and supporting the people to give the action and agents issues as they have
casually care about.
CONCLUSION
From the above report, it can be concluded as there is need to have the god work for the positive
changes which have the acknowledge the level of the interdependence in sense of the concern
regarding the rights and the welfare which is being affected the group efforts. Rights,
membership, participation and identity were presented and operationalized as four main
dimensions of citizenship. As per the concept of the liberal’s level of conception in which the
Individuals are taken the are under specials and major focus. As the citizen which have the major
belonging as the community at more large levels in order to have the producing the norm and
level of ideals by initiating citizenship education programs to help my young fellow citizens to
realize their God-given rights and social roles and responsibilities as a member of this
community. In next to that’s the author also states that’s the first one is regarding the civil right
of 18th century, political one of 19th century and the last one in the social right as in 20th
century which is major corresponding with the developments of the specific states structure. In
order to the passive citizen have they been considered as the arguable individualities along with
liberty of responsibility of estate
9

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Online
Iordachi, C., 2019. Liberal Citizenship: an Interdisciplinary Approach. In Liberalism,
Constitutional Nationalism, and Minorities (pp. 1-28). Brill.
Maxwell, B. and Tanchuk, N., 2017. SCHOOL COUNCILS AS SEEDBEDS OF CIVIC
VIRTUE? LIBERAL CITIZENSHIP THEORY IN DIALOGUE WITH EDUCATIONAL
RESEARCH.
Pélabay, J. and Sénac, R., 2019. Citizenship revocation: a stress test for liberal democracy.
Citizenship Studies, 23(4), pp.388-405.
Gerbaudo, P., 2017. The indignant citizen: anti-austerity movements in southern Europe and the
anti-oligarchic reclaiming of citizenship. Social movement studies, 16(1), pp.36-50.
Birt, L., Poland, F., Csipke, E. and Charlesworth, G., 2017. Shifting dementia discourses from
deficit to active citizenship. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(2), pp.199-211.
Reichert, F., 2017. Active Citizenship in the Political Realm: The Case of Australian Secondary
School Students. Citizenship Education Research Journal/Revue de recherche sur l'éducation à
la citoyenneté, 6(1), pp.51-67.
Charlesworth, G., 2017. Shifting dementia discourses from deficit to active citizenship Linda
Birt, Fiona Poland, Emese Csipke and. Ageing, Dementia and the Social Mind, p.24.
Akar, B., 2016. Learning active citizenship: conflicts between students’ conceptualisations of
citizenship and classroom learning experiences in Lebanon. British Journal of Sociology of
Education, 37(2), pp.288-312.
Osler, A. and Starkey, H., 2018. Extending the theory and practice of education for cosmopolitan
citizenship. Educational Review, 70(1), pp.31-40.
Muldoon, P., 2017. Contesting Australian Asylum Policy: Political Alienation, Socratic
Citizenship, and Cosmopolitan Critique. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 63(2), pp.238-
253.
Starkey, H.W., 2017. Globalization and education for cosmopolitan citizenship. American
Educational Research Association.
10

Unangst, L. and Choi, E., 2018. Global citizenship and higher education. In Encyclopedia of
International Higher Education Systems and Institutions (pp. 1-6). Springer, Dordrecht.
11

12

13