Civil Law Case Study: Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Act 2018
VerifiedAdded on 2022/11/11
|6
|1184
|62
Case Study
AI Summary
This document presents a civil law case study that examines whether Amelia is liable under Section 57(3A) of the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Act 2018 (Cth). The case involves Amelia's support for a viewpoint regarding the eviction of non-Australians from the Mawson base in Antarctica. The analysis involves statutory interpretation, focusing on the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) and relevant provisions of the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Act. The document explores the purpose rule, literal rule, golden rule, and mischief rule of interpretation. It concludes that Amelia's actions, including expressing her opinion, do not constitute a violation of the Act, emphasizing her freedom of speech as an Australian citizen and the absence of direct involvement with a foreign principal. The conclusion is supported by references to relevant legislation, books, and websites.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
1 out of 6