Detailed Report on Civil Litigation and Dispute Resolution in Austria

Verified

Added on  2022/09/02

|4
|911
|14
Report
AI Summary
This report examines the principles of civil litigation within the Austrian legal system, which is based on civil law. It details the structure of the Austrian court system, including district and regional courts, and outlines jurisdictional considerations. The report covers the essential steps in initiating a civil suit, including the statement of claim and the defense statement, and emphasizes the importance of evidence and submissions. It highlights key characteristics of civil litigation, such as the limited public access to court files and the role of juries in settlement discussions. The report also discusses the availability of alternative dispute resolution methods, such as mediation, and the types of interim and final judgments issued by Austrian courts. Furthermore, it provides insights into the average duration of proceedings and the standards of evidence applied in civil suits, using examples such as a dispute between a Viennese hotel and a UK-based refrigerator producer to illustrate the practical application of these principles. The document concludes with a reference to the relevant legal framework governing commercial disputes in Austria.
Document Page
Running head: CIVIL LITIGATION
CIVIL LITIGATION
Name of the student
Name of the university
Author note
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
1CIVIL LITIGATION
The constitution of Austrian facilitates the division of powers. That implies that the court
of Austrian is strictly autonomous of the executive and legislative branches. Commercial and
civil proceedings with be performed before one of 116 district court. If the quantum of civil
litigation is greater than that of 15,000, then the case is heard by one of twenty regional courts. In
the context of venue and jurisdiction, if the court of Austrian does not have global jurisdiction,
then the legal or natural individual can sue beforehand court of legal or domicile seat. In regard
to the pendency of the civil suit in another court, then a similar matter, which is the subject
matter of the suit, cannot be heard by another court, and thus the claim is dismissed. The
essential for filing a civil suit is a statement stating the claim, and the same indicate the quantum
of dispute along with that the relief prayed for included in it. The essentials for answering to the
assertion in a civil proceeding is defense statement that is identical as that of claim statement.
The defense statement involves the appeal by the opposite party to dismiss the claim, the
concise, factual statement upon which the appeal is rest and also entails the evidence that is
relied upon by the defendant. The defendant can also include the objection as to the jurisdiction
of the court. In respect of submission, the parties are at liberty to file the second submission prior
to the initial oral hearing or within a reasonable time as allowed by the court. The legislation
restricts additional written statements after initial oral hearing; however, in the exceptional
circumstances, the parties to the dispute may appeal for allowing by stating the reasonable and
Document Page
2CIVIL LITIGATION
just cause that prevents him from foiling the written statement within that specific time. The
significant characteristic of civil litigation concerning the degree the litigation made to the
public. The file of the court involving the parties' submission and the evidence that is submitted
is not accessible by the public; however, it is only open to the parties of proceeding (Brand,
2016). In civil litigation, the Austrian juries are statutorily obliged to discover the options of
settlement on primary preparatory hearing (Javornik et al., 2019). There is no compulsory
alternative dispute resolution or mediation for commercial subjects. The parties to the dispute are
liberal to involve in the process of mediation or ADR during the continuing litigation. The
interim relief that is provided in civil proceedings comprises of regulatory measures, preventive
measures, performance measures (Thomas, 2016). There are four categories of judgment that are
pronounced by the Austrian Court that is the final judgment, partial judgment, interim judgment,
supplementary judgment. The court is under obligation to deliver final judgment as the civil
litigation is ready for decision. The default judgment might be delivered by the court in the
extraordinary circumstances on the application made by parties (Chase et al., 2017). The average
duration of proceedings is eight months before district courts, as well as 16 months before the
regional court. The Austrian legislation affords that the parties may join the proceedings if he has
an interest as an achievement of one of the contesting parties. The standard of evidence that
applies in the civil suit is if the claim can be determined to the extremer grade of possibility.
The examples of civil proceedings are as follows. The Viennese hotel gives order 200
refrigerators from the producer who is located in the United Kingdom. The civil suit initiated
between Viennese and producer as the refrigerators did not operate properly. For example, in
regard to the jurisdictional clause, all civil disputes that evolve in relation to the present
Document Page
3CIVIL LITIGATION
agreement involving the issue relating to validity, existence, or termination must be submitted
exclusively to Budapest court.
Reference
Brand, P. (2016). Judges and Juries in Civil Litigation in Later Medieval England: The Millon
Thesis Reconsidered. The Journal of Legal History, 37(1), 1-40.
Chase, O. G., Hershkoff, H., Silberman, L., Sorabji, J., Stürner, R., Taniguchi, Y., & Varano, V.
(2017). Civil litigation in comparative context.
Javornik, J., Oliver, L., Yerkes, M. A., Javornik, J., & Kurowska, A. (2019). Converting shared
parental leave into shared parenting: The role of employers and use of litigation by
employees in the UK. Social Policy and the Capability Approach: Concepts,
Measurements and Application, 61.
Thomas, R. (2016). From “Adversarial v inquisitorial” to “Active, enabling, and investigative”:
developments in UK administrative tribunals. In The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in
Administrative Regimes (pp. 65-84). Routledge.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 4
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
logo.png

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]