An Analysis of Civil Rights, Civil Liberties, and Homeland Security

This essay collection delves into the intricate relationship between civil rights, civil liberties, and national security within the American context. The essays explore the fundamental differences between civil rights and liberties, examining specific legal cases and constitutional provisions like the Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment. They analyze the challenges in balancing individual freedoms with the need for national security, especially in the face of terrorism, discussing the role of government agencies like DHS and their impact on privacy and security. The essays also address the safeguards in place to protect civil rights and liberties, highlighting the role of the judiciary in interpreting these rights and the ongoing debate about the extent of government intervention to protect minorities and ensure equality. The final essay focuses on the homeland security enterprise, examining its ability to meet emerging challenges while balancing civil liberties, emphasizing the importance of collaboration between government agencies, private sectors, and international partners.

Running head: ESSAY 1
CIVIL LAW
STUDENT DETAILS:
7/11/2019

ESSAY 2
ESSAY 1:
The people have rights to stay silent. The people have a right to the just and reasonable trial in court.
They also have a right to vote. In the addition of this, they are also entitled for the right to privacy. The citizens
of America are well-known these rights, however the question is that are they considered civil liberties or civil
right? The civil liabilities and civil rights are the expressions that are frequently utilized interchangeably,
synonymously, although these terms civil rights and civil liberties are really very different. In following parts,
the differences between the civil liberties as well as civil rights is discussed and critically examined with
specific law corresponding to each expression.
The civil rights concern fundamental rights to get free from unsatisfactory action as according to the
some secured features like gender, disability and race in setting like academic facilities, occupation,
accommodation facilities, and access to public amenities. The violation of rights takes place in chosen
conditions where the individual are discriminated against on the basis of secured features. Most of the civil
right laws are developed by the central government by federal legislature and various case laws. Conversely,
civil liberties concern freedom and the fundamental rights that are assured either clearly identified in Bill of
Rights, or construed or incidental throughout years by court and law. Civil liberties involve right to privacy,
right to speech freely, right of voting, right to stay and marry soundless in the questioning by police, right to
hearing in court and right to be free from unreasoning search of the house (Martin, 2019).
Further, the laws differentiate between the civil rights. It means that the right of freedom from
discrimination is depended upon some individual features like sexual category, race, incapacity, as well as the
civil liberties that are basic freedom. The civil liberties also disquiet real fundamental freedoms. The civil rights
concern the actions of a person in relation to some rights. Contrasting the civil liberties, where governments
grant broad-based right to individuals, the civil right is not only permitted through government however also
comprise the secured feature of the rights depended on some features (Weissberg, 2017). One manner to regard
as differences amid civil liberties and civil rights is to observe at what rights are influenced as well as whose
rights are influenced. For instance, the worker do not have legal rights to promotion, majorly because attaining

ESSAY 3
promotion is not assured the civil liberties. Though, as the woman worker it is required to have right of freedom
from perception in being considered for a promotion that may not officially be repudiated promotion on the
basis of race, incapacity and sexual category. By selecting not to encourage the woman employee exclusively
due to the gender of worker, a manager has made the violation of civil rights as well as involved in illegal
employment discernment activities on the basis of gender and sexual category. The best instance is that right to
marry is considered as civil liberty. On the other hand, the marriage of gay is the matter of civil rights
(Donohue, 2017).
As per the above analysis, it can be concluded that Looking at what rights are influenced and whose
rights are influenced, may assist a person to have the knowledge of differences between the civil liberties and
civil rights. The Civil liberties involve fundamental freedoms when the civil rights include how the individuals
are considered regarding some rights.

ESSAY 4
Essay 2:
In seeing at civil liberties as well as the reconciliation with a state’s security, the inconsistency is
obtainable: this is that the act of terror prospers in a freedom of democracy. The countless theme is explanatory
of a complex association of the national security as well as civil liberties, where the delicate balance can be
lesser within evidence than the fervor to loss of the civil liberties in relation to professed emergencies.
Detention without charge for years for suspect as well as extensive privacy incursions for normal residents have
regarded essential through the states included within wars on the intangible enemies fear. However, the
enemies are imperceptible so too are the contour of front line. In the following parts, the challenges in making
balance between civil liberties and security is discussed and critically examined.
There are no conflicts at root amid values of security and liberty. The security as well as liberty is not
contrasting objectives; to opposing, the second is mean to a first. The government is present to secure the
freedom of the people, by protecting the personal rights. The freedom of expression, freedom of connection as
well as freedom of undertaking enjoyed within liberal democracy is favorable to a planning as well as
performance of gross activities of fierceness, framed to destabilize or end a structure of state, and to develop
specific philosophical end. In the rush for making response to a very actual and original set of fears, a risk of
administration over-reach the chances that the people lose certain of the core liberties in chasing the security,
also became so distinct. The people saw in instant result of 9/11 that the governments are involved in increased
methods of questioning that denied values. There were various critical of different methods like warrantless
wiretap (Conte & Burchill, 2016).
Further, the major challenge is that the democratic states do struggle for securing the residents. The
collective security needs cooperating certain separate freedom. The people acknowledge that the people have
no right to scream ‘fire” in the congested auditorium, however certain nations take restriction upon expression
as well as speech much more. Moreover, the small miracle law enforcement has resorted to the tools like
Stingray, the scanner that mimics tower of cell phone tower, vacuuming up communication through mobile in

ESSAY 5
the chosen areas, or the intelligence organisations desire access to Facebook. The terrorists as well as offenders
make wide-ranging use of cell phone as well as internet. The services related to security are scrambled for
catching up with them. Unluckily, the threatened states every so often hire new law application of counter
terrorism techniques. These states also assess without proper public conversation about the advantages and cost
as well as sometimes even without public knowledge (Riches, 2017).
As per the above analysis it can conclude that the elected officials are required to consider considerately
as well as prudently the relation between security and liberty. A main fact is that the liberty is based upon
security as well as in USA; the freedom is based on ending a fear of terrorism from the lives.

ESSAY 6
Essay 3:
Protection of civil rights and civil liberties is possibly the most basic political value in a society of
America. Protection of civil rights as well as liberties is fundamental to the values of American politics;
however a procedure is far from simple. Protecting the rights of an individual can include breaching those of
one more. How far must be government goes to have effective actions to provide protection to minorities? The
replies often come from the people who skirmish very closely with laws, whose case helps to repeatedly
redefine American civil rights as well as liberties. In the following parts, the safeguard in place to secure civil
rights as well as liberties are discussed and assessed.
The civil liberties are safeguards in against of actions of government. For instance, first amendment of
the Bill of Rights assures people the rights for practicing whatsoever belief they gratify. The governments may
not affect the freedom of worship of people. Conversely, the civil rights are considered as effective action of
governments, which are required to create same situations for all the residents (Karatnycky, 2018).
Further, the overpowering majority of the decision of court that describes the civil liberties of America
is depended on a Bill of Rights; first 10th amendments are included in Constitution in year 1791. The civil
liberties safeguarded in Bill of Rights can be categorized in 2 broader fields such as freedom and right assured
in First Amendment as well as liberties along with rights connected with crimes and outstanding procedures.
The civil rights are safeguarded by 14th Amendment that secures the right’s violation and liberties through the
government of state. Furthermore, most of the civil rights and liberties court cases include the right of plaintiff
vs. rights of others, which are claimed by defendant, have been breached. For instance, in year 1971, ‘Pentagon
Papers’ is published by New York Times that disclosed certain adverse activities of the government at time of
Vietnam War. The governments took action in against of the newspaper, demanding that the report threatened
the security of nation. The New York Times made counter with arguments that the people had rights to see and
that the press’s freedom must be endorsed. For that reason, the condition was national security v. the press’s
freedom (Bakers, et. al, 2018).

ESSAY 7
As per the above analysis it can be concluded that Most of the people of America consider the civil
liberties as well as civil rights as principle, which secure freedom every time. However, a fact is that rights
mentioned in the Bill of Rights and Constitution is normally opposing rights. The expression civil rights is
connected with a security of minority people, like people of America and people of Africa, Hispanics, as well
as females. The governments counter balance a majority rule tendency in the democracy, which regularly
searches the minorities outvoted (Weinrib, 2015).

ESSAY 8
Essay 4:
Getting the central homeland security enterprise right is amongst most problematic issues in America
because the issues in securing the homeland are rooted in over concentration, pervasive gratification, as well as
rooted issues related to politics, which often cause USA to not work in a proper manner. This report creates a
way by the difficult course. In the following parts, the ability of homeland security organization to meet
emergent upcoming challenges at the time of balancing civil liberties is discussed and critically examined.
Over the numerous previous years, DHS as well as the partners have developed as well as supported the
homeland security enterprise for defending positively in against of developing the threats of terrorists. The
homeland security enterprise expands afar DHS and the various sectors as well as entities that provide
contribution to homeland security missions. The main part involve the doing work with directly with
application of laws, state leaders as well as domestic leaders, organization based on community, private
department and international partner (Clutterbuck, 2016). This enterprise does not only search the new
opportunities to integrate data rendered through a private sector, however keeping private business as well as
organization well-versed of probable fears in a timely and useful manner when remaining cognizant of secrecy
as well as concerns of civil liberties. Further, the union centers have the prospective to continue to have the
dynamic role in securing the country however will be hampered in the task if the departments and the partners
may come together for stating issues related to the balance between civil liberties (Ormsby, 2017).
Moreover, DHS does work closely with international partners, involving main multilateral corporations
as well as international business to support protection of network of international trading and travelling on that
the economy of nation and groups depend on. DHS has increased security of aviation system, not just inside
airport through USA, however also in airport out of country, by doing work directly with international
governments, international corporations, as well as the aviation sector to raise the aviation security. The
international supply chain initiative of government is creating on different partnerships, involving work with

ESSAY 9
World Customs Organization, International Maritime Organization and International Civil Aviation
Organization (Celikates, 2016).
As per the above analysis, it can be concluded that the homeland security enterprise defends against
developing terrorist fears. The private sector is the main element of homeland security enterprise, as well as by
private sector office of department, DHS has advanced the management of private sector commitment by the
division, assisting actual as well as quick interaction with main organizations and boosting locally focused data
sharing determinations.

ESSAY 10
References
Barker, L. J., Combs, M., Lyles, K., Perry Jr, H. W., & Barker, T. (2018). Civil liberties and the Constitution:
cases and commentaries. New York: Routledge
Celikates, R. (2016). Rethinking civil disobedience as a practice of contestation—Beyond the liberal
paradigm. Constellations, 23(1), 37-45.
Clutterbuck, R. (2016). Public safety and civil liberties. USA: Springer.
Conte, A., & Burchill, R. (2016). Defining civil and political rights: The jurisprudence of the United Nations
Human Rights Committee. New York: Routledge
Donohue, W. A. (2017). The Politics of the American Civil Liberties Union. New York: Routledge
Greene, A. S. (2015). Religious Freedom and (other) Civil Liberties: Is There a Middle Ground. Harv. L. &
Pol'y Rev., 9, 161.
Karatnycky, A. (2018). Freedom in the World: 2001-2002: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil
Liberties. New York: Routledge
Martin, J. F. (2019). Civil Rights and the Crisis of Liberalism: The Democratic Party 1945-1976. New York:
Routledge
McClain, L. C. (2015). Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Legislating Morality: On Conscience, Prejudice, and
Whether Stateways Can Change Folkways. BUL Rev., 95, 891.
Ormsby, E. A. (2017). The refugee crisis as civil liberties crisis. Colum. L. Rev., 117, 1191.
Riches, W. (2017). The civil rights movement: Struggle and resistance. UK: Macmillan International Higher
Education.
Weinrib, L. M. (2015). Civil Liberties Outside the Courts. The Supreme Court Review, 2014(1), 297-362.

ESSAY 11
Weissberg, R. (2017). Pernicious tolerance: How teaching to accept differences undermines civil society. New
York: Routledge