Marketing Strategies and Product Differences: Coke Versus Pepsi

This essay provides a comparative analysis of Coca-Cola and Pepsi, two of the most recognizable brands in the beverage industry. It begins by tracing the origins of both companies, highlighting their initial product formulations and early marketing efforts. The essay then delves into the key product differences, including ingredients, taste profiles, and caffeine content. It further examines the contrasting marketing strategies employed by each company, such as branding, advertising campaigns, and product diversification. The analysis includes an overview of how both companies have adapted to changing market trends and consumer preferences, including the shift towards healthier beverage options. The essay also discusses the financial performance of both companies, comparing their stock values and market shares. Finally, the conclusion synthesizes the key findings, offering insights into the enduring rivalry between Coke and Pepsi and their continued influence on the global beverage market. The work cited section provides a list of sources used to support the essay's claims.

Surname 1
Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Coke
Coke was invented in 1886 by John Pemberton when he was trying to create anesthetic
syrup. Regardless of the plan he had, what the chemist invented was a combination of cola leaf
and cola nut that had pharmaceutical benefits. Customers did not love it as a medicine when it
was mixed with tonic water to make soda (Brick, Gràinne, and Tanya 27). The original
ingredients had cocaine in it, and hence only a small change was done. Up to date, the firm uses
a non-narcotic leaf extract (Li, Chengkun, and Haitao 117).

Surname 2
Pepsi
A pharmacologist, Caleb Pradhan developed Pepsi, and he named it ‘Brad’s Drink’ (Benstead
and Megan 176). He later rebranded his product Pepsi since it assisted in dyspepsia. The original
formula in the production included various ingredients and flavors, including nutmeg, lemon oil,
and sugar, among others. After Pepsi cola was declared bankrupt, the loft candy firm revived the
firm since Coca-Cola could not give them a discount on syrup.
Most customers prefer coke over Pepsi. Recent research shows that Pepsi stock sold for $
119.9 while coke sold $ 48.93. The reasons for the latter are diverse (Knoebel and Richard 90).
In the recent past, markets turned away from sugary drinks, and this made Pepsi dominate with
brands like Lipton, pure leaf, and research its carbon-based drinks. The firm has worked harder
compared to Pepsi in establishing a universal trademark and has been very efficacious in
promoting its core product line (Reddy 89).
On the other hand, after Pepsi merged with Frito Lay, the firm started promoting snacks
like potato chips, oatmeal, and hummus, a move that Coca-Cola has never made.
Pepsi has two fundamental merits over Coca-Cola. Firstly, its products have size since the snack
market is progressively growing at a faster rate than the carbonated drinks. Due to this, Pepsi has
had a wider footmark than that of its rival, including high growth areas (Ozoagu 113).
Pepsi also has harmonizing or synergistic corporate lines. The consumers who purchase
nibbles will need to buy a complimentary drink and vice versa. Purchasing a snack or a drink
will inspire the consumer to buy the other even if they had not planned to purchase the
complement. This has assisted Pepsi in converting customers to double purchasers with minimal
overheads (Brick, Gràinne, and Tanya 134).

Surname 3
Product Differences
Part of the difference between these two firms is the single ingredient. Coca-Cola can be
made using a single ingredient while Pepsi cannot. The Coca-Cola import leaves stripped from
narcotic properties via New Jersey. The leaves are sourced from Peru, where vacationers drink
them as part of the cola tea. Pepsi covers that by using citric acid, which is not used by coke
(Brick, Gràinne, and Tanya 153).
Coca-Cola has a vanilla raisin, and almost molasses taste to it. On the other hand, Pepsi
contains a lemony citrus flavor.
The flavor that Pepsi has is sweeter and stranger at first taste. It is, therefore, more
comfortable for consumers to taste it faster. On the other hand, the flavor for coke is not sweeter
than Pepsi in the first taste; hence cannot be tested more quickly (Ozoagu 167).
Pepsi is sweeter than coke, and it cannot match the smoothness that coke has. Pepsi also
has more caffeine (Knoebel and Richard 154).
Conclusion
Pepsi and cola became well known since their invention in the 19th century.. Cola and
Pepsi have been in deep cold wars, and this has made the competitors become part of the
American culture. The two firms make up a considerable fraction of the drinks and snacks that
people may have daily. The two firms claim more than 1000 brands globally, and all are different
from each other, depending on the firm that made them.

Surname 4
Work cited
Benstead, Lindsay and Reif Megan . ""Coke, Pepsi or Mecca Cola? Why product characteristics
affect the likelihood of collective action problems and boycott success."." Politics,
Groups, and Identities 5, no. 2 (2017): 220-241.
Brick, Danielle , Fitzsimons Gràinne and L Tanya. ""Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand compatibility,
relationship power, and life satisfaction."." Journal of Consumer Research 44.5 (2018):
991-1014.
Knoebel, Randall and Larson Richard. ""Pepsi® or Coke®? Influence of acid on dasatinib
absorption."." Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice 24, no. 2 (2018): 156-158.
Li, Shen, et al. ""Fluorescent nanoparticles present in Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola: physiochemical
properties, cytotoxicity, biodistribution and digestion studies."." Nanotoxicology 12, no.
1 (2018): 49-62.
Ozoagu, Obiora Emmanuel. ""A Study of Consumer Preference of Soft Drink Beverages in
Enugu Metropolise and Ninth Mile Corner Ngwo: A Case Study of Coke, Sprite and
Pepsi Cola."." PhD diss 13.6 (2016): 243-265.
Reddy, Allan . "An Experiment in Self and Product Concept Congruity: Self-Coke-Pepsi."." In
Marketing Horizons: A 1980's Perspective 13.4 (2015): 331-331.