Commercial Law (LGST 369) Assignment: Starbucks Case Analysis
VerifiedAdded on 2022/11/23
|6
|1367
|234
Homework Assignment
AI Summary
This commercial law assignment analyzes the case of Sataur v Starbucks Coffee Canada Inc., focusing on the issue of whether an employee can be held personally liable for injuries related to lawsuits filed against the company. The assignment examines the concept of vicarious liability, referencing key cases such as Bazley v Curry, London Drugs Ltd. v Kuehne & Nagel International Ltd., and Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd. The analysis applies these legal principles to the Starbucks case, where a barista's negligence resulted in injury to a customer. The assignment concludes that the barista can be held personally accountable for the injury, emphasizing the importance of employee awareness regarding their potential liability for negligence during their employment. The analysis incorporates the Salmond test, the two-step process from London Drugs, and the 'relative closeness' principle from Lister to determine the extent of liability.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
1 out of 6