Assessment 3: Reflective Practice Essay on Communication Skills
VerifiedAdded on 2020/03/16
|13
|3880
|105
Essay
AI Summary
This reflective essay analyzes a student's communication skills, using diagnostic tools to identify strengths and weaknesses. The essay explores communication apprehension in public speaking and intercultural interactions, highlighting personal experiences and relevant research. The st...
Read More
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.

qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui
opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfgh
jklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvb
nmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwer
tyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas
dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx
cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq
wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuio
pasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj
Effective Business Communication
Assessment 3: Reflective Practice Assessment-Developing your
Communication Competency
03-Oct-17
(Student Details: )
opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfgh
jklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvb
nmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwer
tyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas
dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx
cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq
wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuio
pasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj
Effective Business Communication
Assessment 3: Reflective Practice Assessment-Developing your
Communication Competency
03-Oct-17
(Student Details: )
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

ESSAY 2 | P a g e
A reflective essay, as the name suggests, reflects upon the person writing the essay on a
particular criteria or aspect, which they analyse themselves, through the use of some tool or
module. These reflective essays help in providing a self reflection of the person who undertakes
the particular module or tool. The present reflective essay is based on the self reflection of the
writer where the communication skills of the writer have been analysed. This would help the
writer in getting a clarity regarding the communication skills which they presently have, and
more importantly, the communication skills which are needed for the writer to have a successful
business life. In order to analyse these skills, the writer would use four distinctive diagnostic
tools which were presented to the writer while undergoing the tutorials. These would highlight
the different shortfalls of the writer in the communication skills area which would help the writer
in working on these issues. The efforts put into improving the shortfalls in communication skills
has been highlighted through drawing up an action plan through Gantt chart drawn at the end of
this reflection. As this is a reflective essay, the discussion would not be based on first person.
For analysing the communication skills which I presently have, I have applied five
diagnostic tools, which had been properly approved by my tutor. In this regard, the first tool
which I had used was one which is commonly used to analyse the communication apprehension
of an individual and this was SPCC, which stands for Self-Perceived Communication
Competence Scale. This tool helped me in analysing my communications capabilities, when
dealing with diversified situations of communications and where the receivers are also present in
a wide range (McCroskey & McCroskey, 1998). The second tool which I used for the purpose of
this analysis was PRICA, i.e., Personal Report of Intercultural Communication Apprehension,
which helped me in analysing the feelings I get when communicating with a person of different
culture. This shows the different circumstances which I would be faced with and the manner in
A reflective essay, as the name suggests, reflects upon the person writing the essay on a
particular criteria or aspect, which they analyse themselves, through the use of some tool or
module. These reflective essays help in providing a self reflection of the person who undertakes
the particular module or tool. The present reflective essay is based on the self reflection of the
writer where the communication skills of the writer have been analysed. This would help the
writer in getting a clarity regarding the communication skills which they presently have, and
more importantly, the communication skills which are needed for the writer to have a successful
business life. In order to analyse these skills, the writer would use four distinctive diagnostic
tools which were presented to the writer while undergoing the tutorials. These would highlight
the different shortfalls of the writer in the communication skills area which would help the writer
in working on these issues. The efforts put into improving the shortfalls in communication skills
has been highlighted through drawing up an action plan through Gantt chart drawn at the end of
this reflection. As this is a reflective essay, the discussion would not be based on first person.
For analysing the communication skills which I presently have, I have applied five
diagnostic tools, which had been properly approved by my tutor. In this regard, the first tool
which I had used was one which is commonly used to analyse the communication apprehension
of an individual and this was SPCC, which stands for Self-Perceived Communication
Competence Scale. This tool helped me in analysing my communications capabilities, when
dealing with diversified situations of communications and where the receivers are also present in
a wide range (McCroskey & McCroskey, 1998). The second tool which I used for the purpose of
this analysis was PRICA, i.e., Personal Report of Intercultural Communication Apprehension,
which helped me in analysing the feelings I get when communicating with a person of different
culture. This shows the different circumstances which I would be faced with and the manner in

ESSAY 3 | P a g e
which I face them when communication with people of different ethnic or cultural backgrounds
(Neuliep & McCroskey, 1997). The third diagnostic tool which I used was the NIS-S, i.e.,
Nonverbal Immediacy Scale-Self Report which depicts the person’s immediacy when they
communicate with others and use non-verbal immediate behaviour with others. This non verbal
behaviour helps in determining the positivity of a person by engraining in non verbal
communication (Richmond, McCroskey & Johnson, 2003). The next tool which had been used
for the purpose of this self reflection was Willingness to Listen Diagnostic which helps in
determining the individual’s orientation when they have to listen to others, which again is a
crucial aspect of communication skills, because listening to others is as important as is
communicating verbally or non verbally with others (Richmond & Hickson, 2001). The last tool
which I used was the Talkaholic Scale, which was to help me in understanding if I, as a person,
talk a lot or not and would also show if I was a compulsive talker (McCroskey & Richmond,
1995).
Once I successfully finished filing and calculating my scores for the five diagnostic tools,
I was able to examine and study the strengths, as well as, the weaknesses in my communication
skills. The first used tool was SPCC where I attained an overall score of 58.33. This score was on
the low side of SPCC which highlights upon my acute stage fright and the anxiety which I get
when I have to speak in groups. I scored 33.3 in public, 0 in meeting, 100 in group, 100 in dyad,
scored 50 in stranger, 50 in acquaintance and 75 in friend. The majority of these show that in
public, with friends and even in meetings I am not very comfortable in putting forward my views
and an apprehensive about communicating with them. The second tool I used was PRICA where
I got a score of 32 and this indicated a low intercultural cultural awareness. This denoted that I
which I face them when communication with people of different ethnic or cultural backgrounds
(Neuliep & McCroskey, 1997). The third diagnostic tool which I used was the NIS-S, i.e.,
Nonverbal Immediacy Scale-Self Report which depicts the person’s immediacy when they
communicate with others and use non-verbal immediate behaviour with others. This non verbal
behaviour helps in determining the positivity of a person by engraining in non verbal
communication (Richmond, McCroskey & Johnson, 2003). The next tool which had been used
for the purpose of this self reflection was Willingness to Listen Diagnostic which helps in
determining the individual’s orientation when they have to listen to others, which again is a
crucial aspect of communication skills, because listening to others is as important as is
communicating verbally or non verbally with others (Richmond & Hickson, 2001). The last tool
which I used was the Talkaholic Scale, which was to help me in understanding if I, as a person,
talk a lot or not and would also show if I was a compulsive talker (McCroskey & Richmond,
1995).
Once I successfully finished filing and calculating my scores for the five diagnostic tools,
I was able to examine and study the strengths, as well as, the weaknesses in my communication
skills. The first used tool was SPCC where I attained an overall score of 58.33. This score was on
the low side of SPCC which highlights upon my acute stage fright and the anxiety which I get
when I have to speak in groups. I scored 33.3 in public, 0 in meeting, 100 in group, 100 in dyad,
scored 50 in stranger, 50 in acquaintance and 75 in friend. The majority of these show that in
public, with friends and even in meetings I am not very comfortable in putting forward my views
and an apprehensive about communicating with them. The second tool I used was PRICA where
I got a score of 32 and this indicated a low intercultural cultural awareness. This denoted that I

ESSAY 4 | P a g e
am not very comfortable when I have to interact with the people from different cultural
backgrounds.
The next tool which I used was NIS-S where I got a score of 81 which is again on a low
side which denotes that I do not use body language when it comes to interactions using non
verbal cues. I tend to have a closed personality where I talk without using hand gestures. The
fourth tool which I used was Willingness to Listen Diagnostic where I scored 81 which
highlights that I am a good listener and I am eager to listen to others without getting bored. This
would help me in the long run as I am able to absorb information effectively. The last tool which
I used was Talkaholic Scale where I obtained 24 as my final score which highlights that I am not
a talkative person, so I do not over indulge in talks, which is goes hand in hand with my
apprehensions about public speaking.
The two key shortfalls which I face are related to communication apprehension, i.e., the
ability to speak in public and the ability to communicate with people of different cultural
backgrounds. This can be depicted from two of the incidents where I got very uncomfortable. As
a part of our college curriculum, I was asked to prepare a presentation and deliver it before my
classmates. I did thorough research and prepared a presentation and as I knew that I have a stage
fright, I even wrote word by word of what I had to speak in front of my classmates. However,
once I took the centre stage and the projector projected my slide over the screen, I got numb and
my heart started beating very fast. I could only finish two slides in the 15 slides I had prepared
and my teacher asked me to take a break. I could not resume the stage and lost good scores
which I could have otherwise got, had I just read the script I prepared. There is another incident
which embarrassed me. While I was working in a barista, I had to serve an Indian customer a
am not very comfortable when I have to interact with the people from different cultural
backgrounds.
The next tool which I used was NIS-S where I got a score of 81 which is again on a low
side which denotes that I do not use body language when it comes to interactions using non
verbal cues. I tend to have a closed personality where I talk without using hand gestures. The
fourth tool which I used was Willingness to Listen Diagnostic where I scored 81 which
highlights that I am a good listener and I am eager to listen to others without getting bored. This
would help me in the long run as I am able to absorb information effectively. The last tool which
I used was Talkaholic Scale where I obtained 24 as my final score which highlights that I am not
a talkative person, so I do not over indulge in talks, which is goes hand in hand with my
apprehensions about public speaking.
The two key shortfalls which I face are related to communication apprehension, i.e., the
ability to speak in public and the ability to communicate with people of different cultural
backgrounds. This can be depicted from two of the incidents where I got very uncomfortable. As
a part of our college curriculum, I was asked to prepare a presentation and deliver it before my
classmates. I did thorough research and prepared a presentation and as I knew that I have a stage
fright, I even wrote word by word of what I had to speak in front of my classmates. However,
once I took the centre stage and the projector projected my slide over the screen, I got numb and
my heart started beating very fast. I could only finish two slides in the 15 slides I had prepared
and my teacher asked me to take a break. I could not resume the stage and lost good scores
which I could have otherwise got, had I just read the script I prepared. There is another incident
which embarrassed me. While I was working in a barista, I had to serve an Indian customer a
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

ESSAY 5 | P a g e
coffee. I was able to give him his order but when he indulged in a conversation, I again got numb
and my hands got cold. My manager had to take over and he then dealt with the customer.
Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope (1991) were of the view that speaking was one of the most
difficult tasks for the general public, particularly for the students as they get anxious when they
have to speak before their class. When such happens, the student faces difficulty in making
differentiations between different sounds and structures and even the simple words become
inapprehensible. In this regard, the views of Dunbar, Brooks and Miller (2006) were quiet
similar where they presented that an important aspect of the life of the student was
communication skills, which also was a crucial factor when they translated from college life to
workplace. This view has been supported in the literature of Beatty (1988) and also in that of
Beatt, Balfantz and Kuwabara (1989) where they showed that there is an emotional
predisposition regarding anxiety stemmed from public speaking. There were two types of
reactions of anxiety which were stated by Woodrow (2006) in which the first was psychological
reasons and the other was cognitive reactions. When it came to the psychological reactions, the
body reacted in such a manner that the person started stammering or his heart started beating
very fast. When it came to the cognitive reactions, the brain starts working in a disoriented
manner, where the person would get negative or irrelevant thoughts which would not only be
self-depreciating, but would also increase the anxiety levels.
Public speaking is deemed as a leading issue which is faced by nearly every person due to
the apprehensions that one faces when they have to deal with a public (Jaffe, 2015). North and
Rivers (2001) stated that when a person is made to speak in public, they get anxious about it.
They stated that when faced with public speaking, people get anxious and they show signs of
discomfort, confusion, palpitation, gastrointestinal discomfort, muscle tension, sweating and the
coffee. I was able to give him his order but when he indulged in a conversation, I again got numb
and my hands got cold. My manager had to take over and he then dealt with the customer.
Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope (1991) were of the view that speaking was one of the most
difficult tasks for the general public, particularly for the students as they get anxious when they
have to speak before their class. When such happens, the student faces difficulty in making
differentiations between different sounds and structures and even the simple words become
inapprehensible. In this regard, the views of Dunbar, Brooks and Miller (2006) were quiet
similar where they presented that an important aspect of the life of the student was
communication skills, which also was a crucial factor when they translated from college life to
workplace. This view has been supported in the literature of Beatty (1988) and also in that of
Beatt, Balfantz and Kuwabara (1989) where they showed that there is an emotional
predisposition regarding anxiety stemmed from public speaking. There were two types of
reactions of anxiety which were stated by Woodrow (2006) in which the first was psychological
reasons and the other was cognitive reactions. When it came to the psychological reactions, the
body reacted in such a manner that the person started stammering or his heart started beating
very fast. When it came to the cognitive reactions, the brain starts working in a disoriented
manner, where the person would get negative or irrelevant thoughts which would not only be
self-depreciating, but would also increase the anxiety levels.
Public speaking is deemed as a leading issue which is faced by nearly every person due to
the apprehensions that one faces when they have to deal with a public (Jaffe, 2015). North and
Rivers (2001) stated that when a person is made to speak in public, they get anxious about it.
They stated that when faced with public speaking, people get anxious and they show signs of
discomfort, confusion, palpitation, gastrointestinal discomfort, muscle tension, sweating and the

ESSAY 6 | P a g e
like. Around 85% people, as per Burnley, Cross & Spanos (1993) had to face this difficulty.
Scovel (1991) stated that only when anxiety is facilitated in a proper manner, did it result in
positive results, otherwise it could result in the individual performing in a poor manner. Rossi
and Seiler (1986) highlighted upon the history of public speaking anxiety and traced it back to
the mid 1930s. And like North and Rivers, he believed that when a person had to speak in public,
they got apprehensive or felt uneasiness as they felt threatened.
Jones (2004) was of the view that there was a need to facilitate anxiety in a manner so
that the individual can adapt to learning from his apprehensions and work towards overcoming
the particular obstacle. When the person is able to do so, the anxiety can be channelled in an
effective manner. It had been identified by Ohata (2005) that by facilitating these, the person
could learn better and his attitude and perception can be changed. Marinho, Medeiros, Gama and
Teixeira (2017) rightly highlighted upon the need and significance of enhancing the public
speaking skills particularly for the business life of an individual. Russ (2012) also showed that
proper communication skills were required for interpersonal work relations.
Rahmani (2017) highlighted that intergroup anxiety was a kind of negative feeling and
restlessness which a person faced when they had to communicate with a person who belonged to
a dissimilar cultural or social identity. Intergroup anxiety, like any other anxiety in Rahmani’s
view had negative results and it hampered the cognitive performance and the social interactions
of an individual. Hackman and Barthel-Hackman (1993), Hsu (2007), and Pederson, Tkachuk
and Allen (2008) have studied that there are different contextual incompatibilities of
communication apprehensions due to the effective cultural, as well as, non cultural elements. The
different communication apprehensions are a result of the difference in the culture of an
individual, for instance, Australia, Arabic nations, East Asian cultures, Western Europe, and US.
like. Around 85% people, as per Burnley, Cross & Spanos (1993) had to face this difficulty.
Scovel (1991) stated that only when anxiety is facilitated in a proper manner, did it result in
positive results, otherwise it could result in the individual performing in a poor manner. Rossi
and Seiler (1986) highlighted upon the history of public speaking anxiety and traced it back to
the mid 1930s. And like North and Rivers, he believed that when a person had to speak in public,
they got apprehensive or felt uneasiness as they felt threatened.
Jones (2004) was of the view that there was a need to facilitate anxiety in a manner so
that the individual can adapt to learning from his apprehensions and work towards overcoming
the particular obstacle. When the person is able to do so, the anxiety can be channelled in an
effective manner. It had been identified by Ohata (2005) that by facilitating these, the person
could learn better and his attitude and perception can be changed. Marinho, Medeiros, Gama and
Teixeira (2017) rightly highlighted upon the need and significance of enhancing the public
speaking skills particularly for the business life of an individual. Russ (2012) also showed that
proper communication skills were required for interpersonal work relations.
Rahmani (2017) highlighted that intergroup anxiety was a kind of negative feeling and
restlessness which a person faced when they had to communicate with a person who belonged to
a dissimilar cultural or social identity. Intergroup anxiety, like any other anxiety in Rahmani’s
view had negative results and it hampered the cognitive performance and the social interactions
of an individual. Hackman and Barthel-Hackman (1993), Hsu (2007), and Pederson, Tkachuk
and Allen (2008) have studied that there are different contextual incompatibilities of
communication apprehensions due to the effective cultural, as well as, non cultural elements. The
different communication apprehensions are a result of the difference in the culture of an
individual, for instance, Australia, Arabic nations, East Asian cultures, Western Europe, and US.

ESSAY 7 | P a g e
So, the individuals who belong to individualist cultures often emphasize on their personal space,
activities and needs.
Merkin (2009), Pederson et al. (2008) and Pryor, Bulter and Boehringer (2005) noted the
difference amongst the high context cultures like the Arabic nations, Korea, China and Japan,
and amongst the low context cultures like that of US, which impacts the communication
apprehensions. Hall (1976) stated that in the high context culture, the majority of information is
shared with the participants and a mutual perception of communication depends on the
communication’s context; however, when it came to low context culture, it is more straight
forward and also covers more information. So, high context cultures are less valued and they are
more apprehensive, as per Pryor et al. (2005). The communication traits, as per Allen, O'Mara
and Long (2014), were highlighted in the oral communication based on this culture context.
Dr. James C. McCroskey, who initiated this concept of communication apprehension,
developed a model of intercultural communication apprehension which was similar to the
thoughts and emotions in other communication apprehensions, but this one was related to the
linguistic and culture barriers (Neuliep, 2014). It could be based on trait, context, situation or
audience. Gumus, Hamarat and Dursun (2005) highlighted that in such situations where the
anxiety was seen only in particular situations like public speaking or job interview was content
based apprehension. Mak et al. (2013) identified that the intercultural communication
apprehension was based on the negative perception with regards to the cultural differences and
which displayed an uncomfortable behaviour where the person came across another person from
another culture, i.e., due to imminent cross cultural interaction.
So, the individuals who belong to individualist cultures often emphasize on their personal space,
activities and needs.
Merkin (2009), Pederson et al. (2008) and Pryor, Bulter and Boehringer (2005) noted the
difference amongst the high context cultures like the Arabic nations, Korea, China and Japan,
and amongst the low context cultures like that of US, which impacts the communication
apprehensions. Hall (1976) stated that in the high context culture, the majority of information is
shared with the participants and a mutual perception of communication depends on the
communication’s context; however, when it came to low context culture, it is more straight
forward and also covers more information. So, high context cultures are less valued and they are
more apprehensive, as per Pryor et al. (2005). The communication traits, as per Allen, O'Mara
and Long (2014), were highlighted in the oral communication based on this culture context.
Dr. James C. McCroskey, who initiated this concept of communication apprehension,
developed a model of intercultural communication apprehension which was similar to the
thoughts and emotions in other communication apprehensions, but this one was related to the
linguistic and culture barriers (Neuliep, 2014). It could be based on trait, context, situation or
audience. Gumus, Hamarat and Dursun (2005) highlighted that in such situations where the
anxiety was seen only in particular situations like public speaking or job interview was content
based apprehension. Mak et al. (2013) identified that the intercultural communication
apprehension was based on the negative perception with regards to the cultural differences and
which displayed an uncomfortable behaviour where the person came across another person from
another culture, i.e., due to imminent cross cultural interaction.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

ESSAY 8 | P a g e
Upon successfully identifying my shortfalls, I have prepared an action plan which I
would undertake in the next six months, in order to win over my apprehensions and improve
upon my communication skills. In this regard, I would start by maintaining a journal in which I
would be writing daily, what I did and this would help me in keeping a track of the things which
I did as per the drawn action plan and the difficulties which I faced in doing so. This would be
my success book, which would help me in looking back and being proud of my progress. The
next step which I would do is joining a book club so that I get to interact with some new people
and try to interact with them. This would be undertaken from Nov 2017 to Jan 2018. I would also
make fortnightly efforts in getting the story of a person of different cultural background, who
visits the barista near the university, so that I can speak up in public and also face my
apprehensions about people from different cultural backgrounds.
I would also seek help from my tutor in this, as in the beginning I would need their help
in learning how to start a communication channel with new people, along with the details on how
to counter my anxiety. I would be interacting with my classmates, by taking centre stage for 5
minutes and speaking with them. This would be done for Jan, in front of my tutor and for Fe, in
their absence. I would also be, at regular intervals, interact with the university students who are
not my classmates, and this would have a mix of interactions with people of different
backgrounds. I would report my interactions to my tutor as an evidence of success. The most
important one is that I would organize a 30 member intercultural program in the university itself
in first half of April. This would make me approach the public and speak with them, particularly
where I interact with people from different cultural backgrounds.
The success of my entire journey is based on the success of this intercultural program,
where I would again take the help of my tutor. Here, I would ask them and my classmates, on the
Upon successfully identifying my shortfalls, I have prepared an action plan which I
would undertake in the next six months, in order to win over my apprehensions and improve
upon my communication skills. In this regard, I would start by maintaining a journal in which I
would be writing daily, what I did and this would help me in keeping a track of the things which
I did as per the drawn action plan and the difficulties which I faced in doing so. This would be
my success book, which would help me in looking back and being proud of my progress. The
next step which I would do is joining a book club so that I get to interact with some new people
and try to interact with them. This would be undertaken from Nov 2017 to Jan 2018. I would also
make fortnightly efforts in getting the story of a person of different cultural background, who
visits the barista near the university, so that I can speak up in public and also face my
apprehensions about people from different cultural backgrounds.
I would also seek help from my tutor in this, as in the beginning I would need their help
in learning how to start a communication channel with new people, along with the details on how
to counter my anxiety. I would be interacting with my classmates, by taking centre stage for 5
minutes and speaking with them. This would be done for Jan, in front of my tutor and for Fe, in
their absence. I would also be, at regular intervals, interact with the university students who are
not my classmates, and this would have a mix of interactions with people of different
backgrounds. I would report my interactions to my tutor as an evidence of success. The most
important one is that I would organize a 30 member intercultural program in the university itself
in first half of April. This would make me approach the public and speak with them, particularly
where I interact with people from different cultural backgrounds.
The success of my entire journey is based on the success of this intercultural program,
where I would again take the help of my tutor. Here, I would ask them and my classmates, on the

ESSAY 9 | P a g e
progress which they think I have made during the six months period. The action plan has more
efficiently been denoted through a Gantt chart below.
Gantt Chart depicting Action Plan
15-11-
17
30-11-
17
15-12-
17
31-12-
17
14-01-
18
31-01-
18
Maintaining a Journal
Book Club
Customer interaction at barista
Seeking help from tutor
Interactions with Classmates
Communicating with University
Students
Organize an intercultural program
Gantt Chart depicting Action Plan
13-02-
18
28-02-
18
15-03-
18
31-03-
18
14-04-
18
30-04-
18
Maintaining a Journal
Book Club
Customer interaction at barista
Seeking help from tutor
Interactions with Classmates
Communicating with University
Students
Organize an intercultural program
progress which they think I have made during the six months period. The action plan has more
efficiently been denoted through a Gantt chart below.
Gantt Chart depicting Action Plan
15-11-
17
30-11-
17
15-12-
17
31-12-
17
14-01-
18
31-01-
18
Maintaining a Journal
Book Club
Customer interaction at barista
Seeking help from tutor
Interactions with Classmates
Communicating with University
Students
Organize an intercultural program
Gantt Chart depicting Action Plan
13-02-
18
28-02-
18
15-03-
18
31-03-
18
14-04-
18
30-04-
18
Maintaining a Journal
Book Club
Customer interaction at barista
Seeking help from tutor
Interactions with Classmates
Communicating with University
Students
Organize an intercultural program

ESSAY 10 | P a g e
Thus, this self reflection has helped me in identifying my shortfalls and this would help
me in working on these issues, so that when I start my business life, I would not be at a
disadvantage.
Thus, this self reflection has helped me in identifying my shortfalls and this would help
me in working on these issues, so that when I start my business life, I would not be at a
disadvantage.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

ESSAY 11 | P a g e
References
Allen, M. & Bourhis, J. (1996). The relationship of communication apprehension to
communication behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Quarterly, 44, 214-226.
Beatty, M. J., Balfantz, G. L., & Kuwabara, A. Y. (1989). Trait-like qualities of selected
variables assumed to be transient causes of performance state anxiety. Communication
Education, 38, 277-289.
Beatty, M.J., & Friedland, M. H. (1990). Public speaking state anxiety as a function of selected
situational and predispositional variables. Communication Education, 39, 142-147.
Burnley, M., Cross, P., & Spanos, N. (1993). The effects of stress inoculation training and skills
training on the treatment of speech anxiety. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 12,
355-366.
Dunbar, N., Brooks, C. & Kubica-Miller, T. (2006). Oral Communication Skills in Higher
Eduation: Using a Performance-Based Evaluation Rubric to Assess Communication
Skills. Inovative Higher Education, 31(2).
Gumus, M., Hamarat, B., & Dursun, M. (2005). Intercultural communication apprehension: An
empirical study on ANZAC people. Journal of Administrative Sciences, 3(1), 179-193.
Hackman, M. Z., & Barthel-Hackman, T. A. (1993). Communication apprehension, willingness
to communicate, and sense of humor: United States and New Zealand
perspectives. Communication Quarterly, 41, 282-291.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York, NY: Doubleday.
References
Allen, M. & Bourhis, J. (1996). The relationship of communication apprehension to
communication behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Quarterly, 44, 214-226.
Beatty, M. J., Balfantz, G. L., & Kuwabara, A. Y. (1989). Trait-like qualities of selected
variables assumed to be transient causes of performance state anxiety. Communication
Education, 38, 277-289.
Beatty, M.J., & Friedland, M. H. (1990). Public speaking state anxiety as a function of selected
situational and predispositional variables. Communication Education, 39, 142-147.
Burnley, M., Cross, P., & Spanos, N. (1993). The effects of stress inoculation training and skills
training on the treatment of speech anxiety. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 12,
355-366.
Dunbar, N., Brooks, C. & Kubica-Miller, T. (2006). Oral Communication Skills in Higher
Eduation: Using a Performance-Based Evaluation Rubric to Assess Communication
Skills. Inovative Higher Education, 31(2).
Gumus, M., Hamarat, B., & Dursun, M. (2005). Intercultural communication apprehension: An
empirical study on ANZAC people. Journal of Administrative Sciences, 3(1), 179-193.
Hackman, M. Z., & Barthel-Hackman, T. A. (1993). Communication apprehension, willingness
to communicate, and sense of humor: United States and New Zealand
perspectives. Communication Quarterly, 41, 282-291.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York, NY: Doubleday.

ESSAY 12 | P a g e
Horwitz, E. K., M. B. Horwitz and J. A. Cope (1991). "Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety" in
E. K. Horwitz and D. J. Young, Language Anxiety, 27-39. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
Hsu, C.-F (2007). A cross-cultural comparison of communication orientations between
Americans and Taiwanese. Communication Quarterly, 55, 359– 374.
Jaffe, C. (2015). Public Speaking: Concepts and Skills for a Diverse Society (8th ed.). Boston,
MA: Cengage Learning.
Jones J.F. (2004). A Cultural Context for Language Anxiety. EA (English Australia), 21(2), 30-
39
Mak, A. S., Brown, P. M., & Wadey, D. (2013). Contact and attitude toward international
students in Australia: Intergroup anxiety and intercultural communication emotions as
mediators. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 491.
Marinho, A. C. F, Mesquita de Medeiros, A., Gama A. C. C, & Teixeira, L. C. (2017). Fear of
public speaking: perception of college students and correlates. Journal of Voice, 31(1),
127.e7–127.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.12.012
McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self-report as an approach to measuring
communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5, 108-11.
McCroskey, J.C., & Richmond, V.P .(1995). Correlates of compulsive communication:
Quantitative and qualitative characteristics. Communication Quarterly, 43, 39-52.
Merkin, R. S. (2009). Cross-Cultural differences in approach-avoidance communication in South
Korea and the US. Human Communication, 12, 199-213.
Horwitz, E. K., M. B. Horwitz and J. A. Cope (1991). "Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety" in
E. K. Horwitz and D. J. Young, Language Anxiety, 27-39. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
Hsu, C.-F (2007). A cross-cultural comparison of communication orientations between
Americans and Taiwanese. Communication Quarterly, 55, 359– 374.
Jaffe, C. (2015). Public Speaking: Concepts and Skills for a Diverse Society (8th ed.). Boston,
MA: Cengage Learning.
Jones J.F. (2004). A Cultural Context for Language Anxiety. EA (English Australia), 21(2), 30-
39
Mak, A. S., Brown, P. M., & Wadey, D. (2013). Contact and attitude toward international
students in Australia: Intergroup anxiety and intercultural communication emotions as
mediators. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 491.
Marinho, A. C. F, Mesquita de Medeiros, A., Gama A. C. C, & Teixeira, L. C. (2017). Fear of
public speaking: perception of college students and correlates. Journal of Voice, 31(1),
127.e7–127.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.12.012
McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self-report as an approach to measuring
communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5, 108-11.
McCroskey, J.C., & Richmond, V.P .(1995). Correlates of compulsive communication:
Quantitative and qualitative characteristics. Communication Quarterly, 43, 39-52.
Merkin, R. S. (2009). Cross-Cultural differences in approach-avoidance communication in South
Korea and the US. Human Communication, 12, 199-213.

ESSAY 13 | P a g e
Neuliep, J. W. (2014). Intercultural communication: A Contextual Approach (6th ed.). Sage
Publications.
Neuliep, J. W., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The development of intercultural and interethnic
communication apprehension scales. Communication Research Reports, 14, 385-398.
North, M., & Rives, J. (2001). Virtual reality therapy in aid of public speaking. International
Journal of Virtual Reality, 3, 2-7.
Ohata K. (2005). Language Anxiety From the Teacher’s Perspective: Interviews With Seven
Experienced ESL/EFL Teachers. Journal of Language and Learning, 3(1), 133-155
Pederson, J., Tkachuk, H., & Allen, M. (2008). How perceived situational frequency and
situational importance affect communication apprehension: A cross cultural
analysis. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37, 189–198.
Pryor, B., Bulter, J., & Boehringer, K. (2005). Communication apprehension and cultural
context: A comparison of communication apprehension in Japanese and American
students. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 247-252.
Rahmani, D. (2017). Apprehension and Anxiety in Communication. DOI:
10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.414
Richmond, V. P., & Hickson, M. III. (2001). Going public: A practical guide to public talk.
Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. D. (2003). Development of the nonverbal
immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy.
Communication Quarterly, 51, 502-515.
Neuliep, J. W. (2014). Intercultural communication: A Contextual Approach (6th ed.). Sage
Publications.
Neuliep, J. W., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The development of intercultural and interethnic
communication apprehension scales. Communication Research Reports, 14, 385-398.
North, M., & Rives, J. (2001). Virtual reality therapy in aid of public speaking. International
Journal of Virtual Reality, 3, 2-7.
Ohata K. (2005). Language Anxiety From the Teacher’s Perspective: Interviews With Seven
Experienced ESL/EFL Teachers. Journal of Language and Learning, 3(1), 133-155
Pederson, J., Tkachuk, H., & Allen, M. (2008). How perceived situational frequency and
situational importance affect communication apprehension: A cross cultural
analysis. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37, 189–198.
Pryor, B., Bulter, J., & Boehringer, K. (2005). Communication apprehension and cultural
context: A comparison of communication apprehension in Japanese and American
students. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 247-252.
Rahmani, D. (2017). Apprehension and Anxiety in Communication. DOI:
10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.414
Richmond, V. P., & Hickson, M. III. (2001). Going public: A practical guide to public talk.
Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. D. (2003). Development of the nonverbal
immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy.
Communication Quarterly, 51, 502-515.
1 out of 13
Related Documents

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.