Peer Critique of Face to Face Communication: Analysis and Insights

Verified

Added on  2023/02/01

|3
|413
|47
Discussion Board Post
AI Summary
This assignment is a peer critique of a discussion board post focusing on the importance of face-to-face communication. The critique acknowledges the original post's comprehensive nature, highlighting the significance of face-to-face communication and its impact on organizational success, supported by academic research. It identifies strengths, such as the inclusion of relevant examples and the alignment with expert opinions, while also pointing out areas for improvement, like the omission of feedback mechanisms and potential disadvantages. The critique emphasizes the value of face-to-face communication in building strong client relationships and provides a balanced assessment of the post's content and insights.
Document Page
Running head: POST CRITIQUE
Peer Post Critique
Student Name
Institutional Affiliation
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
POST CRITIQUE 2
Peer Post Critique
The original post from the student is significantly comprehensive. It covers the essential
attributes as well as the importance of face to face communication. The student carried out
extensive academic research to justify why face to face communication is essential in influencing
organisational success. However, there are a few issues that the student failed to highlight. For
instance, the student should have included how face to face communication influences feedback.
According to Kadushin and Harkness (2014), face to face communication makes it possible to
receive immediate and comprehensive feedback. Besides, I believe that the post could have
included at least one or two disadvantages of face to face communication. Apart from this small
omission, the post is comprehensive and insightful.
Importantly, the post identifies and explains all the plausible attributes of face to face
communication. In essence, the student has done a recommendable job in using opinions from
experts in explaining the key attributes of this mode of communication. According to Kadushin
and Harkness (2014), the precise nature of face to face communication is one of its key strengths.
This view concurs with the opinion highlighted by the student in the spot.
Furthermore, the student has provided one relevant example in the post. The example
entailed in the post agrees with the views of Eisingerich et al. (2015) that face to face
communication makes the customers feel appreciated and respected. Any organisation that needs
to create a strong bond with its clients should utilise face to face communication frequently.
Consequently, this post is comprehensive, educative, and uses relevant illustrations to describe
face to face communication.
Document Page
POST CRITIQUE 3
References
Eisingerich, A. B., Chun, H. H., Liu, Y., Jia, H. M., & Bell, S. J. (2015). Why recommend a
brand facetoface but not on Facebook? How wordofmouth on online social sites
differs from traditional wordofmouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 120-
128.
Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2012). Supervision in Social Work (5th ed.). New York:
Columbia University Press.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 3
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]