BUSN20017: Communication Skills Self-Reflection Essay Analysis

This self-reflection essay analyzes personal communication skills using diagnostic tools like the Self-Perceived Communication Competence Scale and the Nonverbal Immediacy Scale. It identifies two key areas for improvement: intercultural communication apprehension and public speaking competence. The essay reflects on experiences and discusses relevant communication theories, culminating in an action plan to address these issues. The analysis covers various communication situations and aims to enhance overall communication effectiveness in professional settings. The student reflects on their strengths and weaknesses, providing insights into their communication style and strategies for future development, which is available on Desklib along with other solved assignments and resources.

Running head: EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
Effective business communication
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author note

1EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
The essay is an outcome of self-reflection to analyse the personal communication skills
as per the score obtained from the five different diagnostic tools including "Self-perceived
communication competence scale", "Nonverbal immediacy scale", "Talkaholic scale",
"Tolerance for disagreement" and "Personal report of intercultural communication
apprehension". These tools help analyse the communication in various communication
situations. The refection and analysis aim to identify personal communication competencies and
areas for improvement. For personal communication development, two communication issues
are identified. The theories related to the communication issues are discussed explicitly in the
paper. The action plan after literature reviews presents the activities for addressing the
communication issues.
There are different situations of communications, and not everyone is competent in all
situations. Self-perceived communication competence scale contains questionnaires that help
assess the personal competence in communication when interaction with people with diverse
communications style. This tool allows assessing personal competence in communication in 12
different situations such as “present a talk to a group of strangers" (McCroskey &
McCroskey,1988). As per my score in public speaking skills, I am competent to present my
views with little anxiety in public. I am moderately competent in speaking in meetings and need
more confidence. I am nervous when speaking to strangers I have scored 65 instead of 79 and
above. Also, I am not very competent in making acquaintances frequently with people. I can
easily befriend people and do not face anxiety in communicating with a large group of friends. I
am more conformable if I have to present a talk in a small group of acquaintances instead of
large or meetings with them. A score of 87 and above is an indicator of high self-perceived
communication competence. However, I my total score is 77.5, which means moderate

2EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
competence or communication apprehension (McCroskey & McCroskey, 1988). I need to
overcome my anxiety and nervousness to score well in this domain in future. I need to be less
anxious when talking in a small group of strangers as well as a large group of strangers.
As per Bailey (2018), non-verbal skills allow people to describe their personal feelings
when communicating with others. Nonverbal immediacy scale-self report (NIS-S) is
developed in 1970s by Albert Mehrabian. I found this instrument useful to measure personal non
verbal immediacy (Richmond et al., 2003). This instrument when compared to other tools has
higher face validity. The predictive validity is excellent due to diverse items. The difference in
scale or self reports for male and female is statistically significant. Both genders express their
nonverbal immediacy in different manner that makes the scores vary (Richmond et al., 2003).
Getting high score in this tool means that my behaviours and cues are signalling positive feelings
towards others during interaction. Each behaviour is linked to each question that again comes
with five options incusing "Option 1- Never, 2- rarely, 3-Occasionally, 4-Often, 5- very often".
There are 26 statements each for different behaviour such as “I smile when I talk to people”. A
score for even and odd statements are added separately in two steps. The score from each step is
subtracted from the final score. For males, high nonverbal immediacy is evident from the score
greater than 104 and low is evident from score less than 83. My score was 93 which mean I can
better explain my positive feelings which are essential for interpersonal communications. This
skill is also essential for organisational communication and instructional communication
(Richmond et al., 2003). The score is however moderate indicating further improvement. I must
not avoid eye contact with people as may demonstrate my lack of interest and make a relaxed
body position very often. To truly feel confident I must work on it as a tense body position is
sign a person is not at peace. It may signal negative feelings towards others.

3EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
In order to assess my style of compulsive communication I have used Talkaholic scale.
The rationale for using this diagnosis tool is to assess ineffective communication due to
excessive talking. The preference for this tool is because it is unidimensional. This instrument
has good internal and test‐retest reliability. Being highly verbal makes it difficult for other
people in the conversation to talk. High talkers are not open to other’s ideas. However, talking
more incompetent manner instead of incompetent or offensive style is perceived as positive
personality. They are evaluated as leader and competent communicator who speak sensible and
satisfy customers (McCroskey & Richmond, 1995). The statements those are applicable to the
user of the diagnostic tool, can be as “I talk less than I should”. There are total 16 statements and
the responses may be given as per five options such as “strongly disagree (1), disagree (2),
Neutral (3), agree (4), and strongly agree (5)”. The score between 30-39 is indicators of
borderline talkaholic communication style and most people score below 30. However, I have
scored 22 and is within the considerable range of 10-50 ((McCroskey & Richmond, 1993). It
means I am not talkaholic or a compulsive communicator that needs score above 40. I can
control my talking for most of the time and do not over-communicate consistently. There was a
time where I was into conflict with my high school friend. However, I was quiet as at that point
of time it was beneficial for me. It did resolve the conflict without further crisis. However, I
believe to become effective leader I must talk more without being compulsive to facilitate
effective sharing of ideas and opinions.
Tolerating disagreement means speaking skilfully to avoid traumatic ordeal that will
leave people with satisfaction (Teven et al., 1998). Such skills in business environment are
effective in ensuring employee satisfaction. Tolerance for disagreement tool is the measure of
individual capability to communicate effectively when the chances are high for disagreement. It

4EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
is the competence of an individual to interact with people having diverse opinions and views and
yet be open-minded. It is the measure of tolerance power of a person when personal ideas are
challenged by others and yet positively support other’s viewpoint. I found this skill useful, based
on my personal experience in conducting group presentation in college. My proposals were
rejected at times, and sometimes I was successful in convincing my teammates for specific
changes. However, I confirmed to others responses to change even though it was not necessary.
The diagnostic tool consists of 15 items, where each item explains the individual’s feelings and
orientations. For instance one of the statements is “I don’t like to disagree with other people”.
For each item the agreement or disagreement is based on the five options. It includes strongly
disagree (1), disagree (2), Undecided (3), agree (4), strongly agree (5). My overall score was 33
which is moderate tolerance to disagreement. A score above 46 indicate high TFD (Teven et al.,
1998; Richmond, McCroskey & Powell, 2012). I worked better in my college and school level
when I was placed in group where people have beliefs similar to mine. I need to change my habit
of avoiding interaction with people whom I know will disagree with me. I need to develop skills
to work in group and yet tolerate disagreements smartly. My score indicates that I can present
my ideas and tolerate disagreement without getting emotional. It means that I am moderately
argumentative during disagreements with others.
Personal report of intercultural communication apprehension or PRICA developed
by Neuliep and McCroskey is the diagnostic tool for measuring the personal level of fear when
communicating with a group of people with diverse cultural backgrounds. Anxiety in
intercultural communication is the part of the general communication apprehension (Neuliep &
McCroskey, 1997). This tool comprises of 14 statements that are actual comments made by
people on communicating with people with other cultures. My agreement or disagreement to this

5EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
statements is rated from strongly disagree to agree strongly. The overall score is 30 and is
considered as low intercultural communication apprehension. A score above 52 indicates high
intercultural communication apprehension. I believe that the, I need improvement in this area. I
can better present my ideas only if I have cultural awareness. The results from all the diagnostic
tools are accurate and helped me gain in-depth insights into my communication style.
Based on the communication diagnosis, two of my communication issues are low
intercultural communication apprehension and public speaking competence. Reflecting on
playing card game activity in the third semester where I learned different ways to think about
intercultural communications. In this given, I observed how foreigners feel like outsiders in
different cultures. Lack of cross-cultural skills creates language barriers. In the card game after
every round, one member lives the group and enters another group. Each we are to play without
any verbal communication. In each group, the set of instructions were different and used only
nonverbal skills. Not all the groups were equally cooperative. This was however problematic to
accustom to new rules in every round. It was similar to my struggle communicating in class with
people from diverse cultures, norms and values. I had a fear of denial during my first semester as
my traditions were different from others significantly. I must strengthen my cross-cultural skills.
On reflecting on my public speaking skills, I have also experienced anxiety when talking
amidst the group of people about my outstanding award for highest scorer in high school. I was
asked by my teacher to give a speech after accepting the award. All I could say is “thank you for
your support and guidance”. This is not speech. Similarly, I was asked to say make a speech at
my cousin’s wedding. Here I was less anxious based on my reflection as I was surrounded by
well-acquainted people. I would have been speechless if they were all strangers. However, lack
of public speaking competence may hinder my future business communications (German et al.,

6EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
2017). I would be more anxious to speak if I am in group of people with diverse cultural groups.
Cross-cultural awareness is important to be respectful towards each other's values and beliefs and
create social acceptance (Flaherty, 2015). Therefore, I must overcome these two communication
issues.
Communication is the backbone to make connections with people, motivate change and
influence decisions. In a business setting, public speaking is an important skill to win over
crowd The skill to persuade people inside and outside the workplace is required to sell a product
or convince employees for a change (Coopman & Lull, 2014). According to Medeiros, Gama and
Teixeira (2017), public speaking skills increases confidence and enables collected presence in
front of an audience. When presenting a product to the consumer one must have a convincing
language to elicit curiosity and intrigue. Motivating people to change behaviour requires skills to
inspire the audience to work harder to achieve their goals. Public speaking skills must be such
that it should evoke interest and passion among others as well as gain their interest. Therefore,
public speaking is the predominant factor in professional life and familiar the dependability
among subordinates. Fluent communication ensures credibility.
It was argued by Coopman & Lull (2014) that informing is one of the most important
aspects of public speaking skills. It is required while presenting the research paper in colleges, or
ideas to boss. Informative public speaking is essential when training the employees, as it creates
better understanding between employees and management. This skill has been found to be
effective in generating sales as it demonstrates one's knowledge. Public speaking anxiety and
fear is caused by negative association towards the communications. Any expected and
unexpected communications trigger anxiety and increase communication apprehension. High
communication apprehension prevents a person from engaging in oral communication

7EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
(McCroskey, 1977). An individual who avoids public speaking due to lack of knowledge can
overcome the trait by repeated practice. Avoiding public speaking due to fear of audience or
strangers also leads anxiety and nervousness. Another trait related to this communication issue is
the anxiety and uncertainty of the situation in addition to the other cultural, psychological and
social factors (McCroskey 2001).
Communication apprehension and the ability to communicate is different and may be the
outcome of a negative association. An individual may momentarily try speaking in unpleasant
situation letting the negative association to evolve (Autman et al., 2016). Low communication
apprehension according to Blume, Baldwin & Ryan (2013) is associated with low frequency to
take up leadership position in business organisations. It also decreases the willingness to
appreciate the multicultural world. To be able to adapt to new situations, one must have high
communication apprehension. As per Russ (2013), high level of communication apprehension is
interrelated with decision making process. It decreases the willingness to involve others in
decision making process. It leads to poor collaboration and coordination with the employees and
subordinates. Russ (2012) argued that the there is strong relationships between the learning
preferences in the organisational setting and the communication apprehension. Employees with
high communication apprehension prefer reflective observation learning and those with the low
communication apprehension had strong preference for the concrete experience and active
experimentation learning. Those with high communication apprehension were accustomed to
diverse learning styles. Russ (2012) also asserted that the level of communication apprehension
influences the interpersonal workplace relationships. It also influences the effectiveness as leader
or manager. It means both high and low communication apprehensions have their own benefits

8EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
and disadvantages. Those with very high level communication apprehension must lower it to
avoid negative repercussions such as poor professionalism at workplace.
To develop cross-cultural competencies, cultural intelligence is required. It helps reduce the
anxiety and influence both communication effectiveness as well as the satisfaction of job. High
intercultural communication apprehension allows giving better support to the employees working in
an international organisation (Neuliep, 2017). It is highly beneficial for the expatriates to excel in
different nations and different cultures. It is also beneficial for the host country employees; there are
fewer adjustment problems at the workplace. However, these group of people do face tension when
communicating with the foreign managers during corporate meetings. However, home country
workers with a combination of anxiety as well as job satisfaction, are found with high motivation.
The high motivation is attributed to high salary and status of the job. Those tensed are mainly due to
barriers to intercultural communication barriers (Bücker et al., 2014). Only some of the corporations
have made their position in the global marketplace, while others have failed to sustain the
competitive advantage. The secret behind the multinational organisation is that they have
demonstrated the cultural sensitivity. They have respected the cultural differences while
communicating with people. The companies that failed to attain similar positions is due to the
inadequate acculturation of their managers on international assignment. It implies for the
effective cross-cultural etiquette. The low intercultural communication apprehension leads to
poor management of workforce diversity (Okoro, 2012).
Intercultural communication apprehension is associated with the anxiety, uncertainty, as
well as desire to engage in intercultural communication. If an intercultural communication is
provoking anxiety has a negative impact on willingness to communicate with a partner from a
different culture. Anxiety and uncertainty are related but separate concepts. Willingness to

9EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
interact with the intercultural partner is also contributed by the Ethnocentrism (Logan, Steel, &
Hunt, 2015). According to Oommen (2014), if there is perceived family support in regards to
handling the conflicts with the members of the host culture, there is a decrease in intercultural
communication apprehension. It, in turn, resulted in increased preferences for “integrating and
the compromising styles” of communication. It further decreased the preferences for avoiding
and dominating styles. It implies that perception of social support goes beyond the increase in
acculturative stress and psychological well-being. It may affect the integration of immigrants
into the host culture. Employees with experiences of living overseas have high intercultural
sensitivity. Therefore, such employees demonstrate higher satisfaction with the organisational
communication. Such employees were found to handle the conflicts better using solution-
oriented style (Mao & Hale, 2015). It can be concluded that the intercultural communication
apprehension is necessary for business communication and job satisfaction. It also helps in
conflict management, therefore; low apprehension is a drawback to deal with business conflicts.
Action plan
After identifying the two communication issues and conducting literature review, I have
developed insights into the importance of the two communication styles in a business setting.
Therefore I have developed an action plan for the next six months to overcome these issues.
I will watch online videos to learn the cross-cultural skills and watch interviews of CEO
and other expatriates to observe their communication style in foreign nations. Observational
learning is the effective mode of understanding a particular behaviour. By watching others skilful
in certain behaviour will reinforce the personal ability to acquire the same skills. This is
underpinned by the observational learning by Bandura (Jennings & Henderson, 2014). I will

10EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
engage in group discussions with people from diverse cultures within the online forums. It will
help develop an acquaintance with the different cultures and their values and beliefs. I can gain
confidence and learn new strategies to stay relax while speaking in public. Learning confident
strategies would make the process effective in reducing the communication apprehension
(German et al., 2017). It will help me practice active listening skills and important element in
developing intercultural communication. Apart from the virtual programme, I plan to participate
as a volunteer in the community cultural program that is meant for raising awareness on heart
disease. It will help me face the audience with diverse backgrounds without anxiety (Jackson,
2015).
I will engage in mindfulness practices, such as yoga and meditation to increase
emotional awareness. These are effective tools in decreasing anxiety and depression. It is
effective to identify and address the negative attitude towards something or unknown fears
(Gelles, 2015). Further, I will enrol myself in six months "Communication Skills training course"
from PD Training teachers in Melbourne. I will learn soft skills and proactive verbal and
nonverbal skills to speak in front of an unacquainted audience. It will help in fast learning rather
than online learning programme. Other than that I will also engage in university workshops and
internships to enhance my verbal and public speaking competence (German et al., 2017).
I will maintain a reflective journal that will help me track my thoughts and feelings when
speaking in public or to strangers. It will help me recognise my accomplishments and focus on
improvement. At the end of six months, the journal would be an effective guide in future earning
needs. Further, to enhance my knowledge on the public speaking competence as well as
intercultural communication apprehension, I will purchase the books, named "Cross-Cultural

11EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
and Intercultural Communication” by William B. Gudykunst and “Talk Like TED: The 9 Public-
Speaking Secrets of the World's Top Minds by Carmine Gallo” (Stob, 2015).
I will evaluate my improvement in these communication issues by presenting a speech or
participating in any debate competition in university. I will collect feedback from peers and
mentors after every two weeks. The evaluation would be based on the intensity of anxiety when
speaking in large group of people including both strangers and acquaintances. I will take online
video examinations to asses my score (Omer & Abdularhim, 2017).
Conclusion
I am grateful to get this assignment where I could diagnose my communication issues.
Engaging in reflective practice helped me learn about different diagnostic tools and their
importance. It has increased my self-awareness. A literature review has helped me gain in-depth
knowledge of the significance of these communication skills in business setting and how
incompetence may affect job and achievement of organisational goals. I am confident to
overcome my communication deficiencies by implementing evidenced-based the action plan for
six months. In future, I expect to confidently present my ideas in a diverse workplace setting and
demonstrate high cultural awareness.

12EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
References
Autman, H., Kelly, S., Gaytan, J., & Hunter, S. (2016). MEASURING HIGH SCHOOL
STUDENTS'COMMUNICATION READINESS: DOES COMMUNICATION
APPREHENSION, WRITING ABILITY, AND SPEAKING ABILITY CORRELATE
WITH STUDENTS'PERCEPTIONS OF PROFESSIONAL APPEARANCE?. The
Journal of Research in Business Education, 57(2), 42.
Bailey, B. (2018). The Importance of Nonverbal Communication in Business and How
Professors at the University of North Georgia Train Students on the Subject.
Blume, B. D., Baldwin, T. T., & Ryan, K. C. (2013). Communication apprehension: A barrier to
students' leadership, adaptability, and multicultural appreciation. Academy of
Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 158-172.
Bücker, J. J., Furrer, O., Poutsma, E., & Buyens, D. (2014). The impact of cultural intelligence
on communication effectiveness, job satisfaction and anxiety for Chinese host country
managers working for foreign multinationals. The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 25(14), 2068-2087.
Coopman, S. J., & Lull, J. (2014). Public speaking: The evolving art. Cengage Learning.
Retrieved from: https://books.google.co.in/books?
hl=en&lr=&id=Jz4aCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=public+speaking+competence+i
n+business+&ots=yCt8195Mks&sig=0OYHOyTxTpXIpUDRV4OQapqXeQ8&redir_esc
=y#v=onepage&q=public%20speaking%20competence%20in%20business&f=false

13EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
Erozkan, A. (2013). The Effect of Communication Skills and Interpersonal Problem Solving
Skills on Social Self-Efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 739-
745.
Flaherty, J. E. (2015). The effects of cultural intelligence on team member acceptance and
integration in multinational teams. In Handbook of cultural intelligence (pp. 210-223).
Routledge.
Gelles, D. (2015). Mindful work: How meditation is changing business from the inside out.
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
German, K., Gronbeck, B. E., Ehninger, D., Monroe, A. H., & Germam, K. M.
(2017). Principles of public speaking. Routledge.
Jackson, D. (2015). Employability skill development in work-integrated learning: Barriers and
best practice. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 350-367.
Jennings, W. G., & Henderson, B. B. (2014). Social learning theory. The Encyclopedia of
Theoretical Criminology.
Logan, S., Steel, Z., & Hunt, C. (2015). Investigating the effect of anxiety, uncertainty and
ethnocentrism on willingness to interact in an intercultural communication. Journal of
Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(1), 39-52.
Mao, Y., & Hale, C. L. (2015). Relating intercultural communication sensitivity to conflict
management styles, technology use, and organizational communication satisfaction in
multinational organizations in China. Journal of Intercultural Communication
Research, 44(2), 132-150.

14EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
Marinho, A. C. F, Mesquita de Medeiros, A., Gama A. C. C, & Teixeira, L. C. (2017). Fear of
public speaking: perception of college students and correlates. Journal of Voice, 31(1),
127.e7–127.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.12.012
McCroskey, J. C. (1977). Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent history
theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4, 78-96.
McCroskey, J. C. (2001). An introduction to rhetorical communication. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self‐report as an approach to measuring
communication competence.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1993). Identifying compulsive communicators: The
talkaholic scale. Communication Research Reports, 10(2), 107-114.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1995). Correlates of compulsive communication:
Quantitative and qualitative characteristics. Communication Quarterly, 43(1), 39-52.
Neuliep, J. W. (2017). Intercultural Communication Apprehension. The International
Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication.
Neuliep, J. W., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The development of intercultural and interethnic
communication apprehension scales. Communication Research Reports, 14(2), 145-156.
Okoro, E. (2012). Cross-cultural etiquette and communication in global business: Toward a
strategic framework for managing corporate expansion. International journal of business
and management, 7(16), 130.

15EFFECTIVE BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
Omer, A. A. A., & Abdularhim, M. E. (2017). The criteria of constructive feedback: The
feedback that counts. Journal of Health Specialties, 5(1), 45.
Oommen, D. (2014). The relationships among perceptions of social support, Intercultural
Communication Apprehension (ICA), and conflict management preferences in the
context of cultural adaptation. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 43(3),
215-237.
Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. D. (2003). Development of the nonverbal
immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self‐and other‐perceived nonverbal
immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51(4), 504-517.
Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Powell, L. (2012). Organizational communication for
survival. Pearson Higher Ed.
Russ, T. L. (2012). The relationship between communication apprehension and learning
preferences in an organizational setting. The Journal of Business Communication
(1973), 49(4), 312-331.
Russ, T. L. (2013). The Influence of Communication Apprehension on Superiors' Propensity for and
Practice of Participative Decision Making. Communication Quarterly, 61(3), 335-348. doi:
10.1080/01463373.2013.776989
Stob, P. (2015). Talk Like TED: The 9 Public-Speaking Secrets of the World's Top Minds.
Teven, J. J., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1998). Measurement of tolerance for
disagreement. Communication Research Reports, 15(2), 209-217.