HB 692 Community Assessment Plan for Elderly in Burbank, California

This project outlines a comprehensive community assessment plan designed to improve healthcare services for elderly citizens in Burbank, California. The plan begins by setting clear assessment objectives and boundaries, followed by the identification of key stakeholders, including residents, project management, implementing companies, and hospitals. It then details the selection of an appropriate assessment method, emphasizing the importance of understanding community needs, especially those related to the health of the elderly. The plan describes the implementation of the assessment through a series of steps, including issue identification, stakeholder meetings, and the formulation of a detailed action plan. Timelines and a budget are provided, along with a framework for reporting, feedback, evaluation, and monitoring to ensure the plan's success. The project emphasizes the importance of a systematic approach to address health-related issues and promote a healthier community for older adults.

Running head: MANAGEMENT
Community Management and Organizations
Name of the student
Name of the university
Author Note:

2
MANAGEMENT
Table of Contents
Assessment Objectives and Boundaries..........................................................................................3
Identification of Stakeholders..........................................................................................................3
Selection of the Appropriate Assessment Method...........................................................................4
Description on the use of the community assessment methods.......................................................4
Timelines.........................................................................................................................................5
Budget..............................................................................................................................................6
Reporting and Feedback..................................................................................................................6
Evaluation and Monitoring..............................................................................................................6
References........................................................................................................................................8

3
MANAGEMENT
Assessment Objectives and Boundaries
The major objectives of the project are to provide a proper community system and
healthcare services to the elderly citizens of Burbank, California. The service can be provided
through the use of the different types of the health care centers and other hospitals
(burbankca.gov, 2019). The plan for the project is to reduce any kind of issues related to health.
The proper maintenance of the health issues can help to mitigate the outbreak of any kind of
diseases.
According to, Allison et al. (2015) the project manager will be the one to make the final
decision on the identification of the plans and programs to start the development of a healthy
older community of the city. The assessment must answer on the sources of the community
assessment elements, the selection of the best sources, the selection of the team which will lead
the project and the process through which the project will be implemented (Zurawski et al.
2016). The community plan must be presented in a scientific and systematic manner in order to
ensure the success of the business in a proper manner.
Identification of Stakeholders
The stakeholders of the following community plan includes the residents of Burbank, the
project management team, the companies in charge of implementing the project and the hospitals
that are in charge of the medical related needs of the elderly person (Zurawski et al. 2016). The
stakeholder’s forms an important part of the assessment as because the stakeholders will have a
direct impact on the result of the project. The main groups or community that will be impacted

4
MANAGEMENT
are basically the elderly citizens who generally are unable to maintain their homes and thus are in
the risk of contaminating diseases.
The major interest of the project management team is to reduce different issues related to
health. The reduction may lead to the development of a community action plan that will address
the issues related to pollution, unhygienic lifestyles and many more as such. According to,
Sarriot & Kouletio (2015) the project management team has to provide the necessary solutions in
order to ensure the success of the business.
Selection of the Appropriate Assessment Method
Community needs is defined as the gap in between the current situation and the situation
that is expected to be. The needs of the community method generally relate to the health needs of
Burbank. The increase in the amount of pollution and the prevalence of situation that can
promote the diseases has prompted to take up a project in order to avoid such a situation.
According to, Sarriot & Kouletio (2015) the assessment method will help to gain a deep
understanding of the community and thus the promotion of health and human service
providers to the elderly citizens is the major assessment method that can be selected here.
Description on the use of the community assessment methods
The new model based on accountable health of the elderly citizens in Burbank is totally
based on the gradually emerging evidence of different types of the social needs through the
means of clinical community link services (Israel et al. 2019). This helps the organization to
change health outcomes as well as meet the different kinds of the health related needs of the

5
MANAGEMENT
community. The current condition of the elderly citizens has been the main reason behind the
construction of the assessment methods.
The action plan will be implemented in a number of steps. This includes;
a. Step 1- Identification of the people on whom the action plan will be implemented
b. Step 2- Identification of the issues
c. Step 3- Meeting with the stakeholders
d. Step 4- Formulation of the Action Plan
e. Step 5- Implementation of the Community Action Plan
f. Step 6- Monitoring of the Plan
Timelines
STEPS TIME SCHEDULE
Step 1 10 days
Step 2 15 days
Step 3 10 days
Step 4 22 Days
Step 5 45 Days
Step 6 30 Days
TOTAL DAYS 132 Days

6
MANAGEMENT
Budget
STEPS BUDGET KEY PERSONS
Step 1 $6000-$7000 Project Management executives
Step 2 $8000-$10000 Project Manager and Executive
Step 3 $4000-$5000 Project manager and
Stakeholders
Step 4 $12000-$14000 Project manager
Step 5 $20000-$25000 Project manager and Executives
of Project
Step 6 $4000-$6000 Project Executives
TOTAL $54000-$67000
Reporting and Feedback
The reporting and feedback forms an important part of the community action plan. The
proper reporting and feedback helps the management to assess the success or failure of the
project and accordingly amend those (Israel et al. 2019). The community plan will be monitored
and evaluated on the basis of a number of different parameters. The consideration of the

7
MANAGEMENT
evaluation based on the parameters needs to be evaluated from time to time to assess the health
community plan’s success.
The final outcomes will be published in a hard and soft copy and circulated to all the
stakeholders in order to ensure the success of the business in a proper and effective manner. The
final outcomes of the community plan will help to assess the plan and then amend it according to
the current needs of the community.
Evaluation and Monitoring
The evaluation of the different results of the community planning and monitoring can
help judge the quality of the project (Krieger et al. 2016). The consideration of the different steps
used for the planning can be helpful for the success of the project management. The steps taken
are in line with the demand of the project and thus the assessment process can be rated positively
in the following case.

8
MANAGEMENT
References
Allison, J. E., Khan, T., Reese, E., Dobias, B. S., & Struna, J. (2015). Lessons from the Labor
Organizing Community and Health Project: Meeting the Challenges of Student
Engagement in Community Based Participatory Research. Journal of Public Scholarship
in Higher Education, 5, 5-30.
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Coombe, C. M., Parker, E. A., Reyes, A. G., Rowe, Z., &
Lichtenstein, R. L. (2019). Community-based participatory research. Urban Health, 272.
Krieger, N., Waterman, P. D., Chen, J. T., Soobader, M. J., & Subramanian, S. V. (2016).
Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis,
and violence: geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures—the public
health disparities geocoding project (US). Public health reports.
Public Financial Information." Burbank, CA | BurbankCA.gov - Official Website of the City of
Burbank, California, www.burbankca.gov/departments/financial-services/public-
financial-information.
Sarriot, E., & Kouletio, M. (2015). Community health systems as complex adaptive systems:
ontology and praxis lessons from an urban health experience with demonstrated
sustainability. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(3), 255-272.
Zurawski, A., Komaromy, M., Ceballos, V., McAuley, C., & Arora, S. (2016). Project ECHO
brings innovation to community health worker training and support. Journal of health
care for the poor and underserved, 27(4), 53-61.