Community Engagement Report: A Comparison of Education and Charity

This report provides a comparative analysis of community engagement in two distinct projects: an education program focused on early childcare and a charity initiative by the 'I will fund project of the UK' aimed at promoting youth participation in social activities. The report highlights the differences in their approaches, emphasizing that while both projects strive to foster community well-being through charitable endeavors, the education program prioritizes childcare standards, and the charity project focuses on social awareness and community involvement. It evaluates best practices for community engagement, effective communication strategies, stakeholder partnerships, and the use of social media for outreach and fundraising. Furthermore, the report assesses the research methodologies employed by both projects and their impact on societal issues, ultimately concluding that community engagement is a powerful tool for driving behavioral changes and addressing societal challenges through collaborative efforts.

2 Community Engagement

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY..................................................................................................................................3
The difference between the two programmes..............................................................................4
Comparison of the projects..........................................................................................................4
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................1

INTRODUCTION
Community engagement is the process of working together group of people have same social
interest to address the issues in community. Group of people collaborate for the welfare of the
society. Community engagement used to bring environmental to enhance the health of the
society (Johnston and Lane, 2019). Education programs for childcare is project to give quality
education and early care to the children which is aim to develop learning and development areas
for the children. Through this project education of the children is brought out as a main concern.
I will fund project of the UK motivates young people to take part in social activities for the
betterment of their community (Pratt and de Vries, 2018). This report will cover differences
between the both projects, evaluation on best practices for the community engagement of both
projects, reflection what differently these two project do, it will further discuss difference in
effective communication, stakeholder partnership and inclusion for the community engagement.
It will also describe how these both project analyse or conduct their research, their community
mapping, social media engagement of both project as how they connected with social media and
finally it involves the evaluation and justification for the best practices.
MAIN BODY
The education programme that is being opted in this regard is one of those essential criteria that
is mainly of the type of the charitable assumptions that will fall in regard to the most trusted of
all types. This programme aims at establishing the standards of education to the prominent
children that are in due of the education facilities (Gorczyca and Hartman, 2017). Education is to
be incorporated by all the facets and that can be originated through ways of deriving and
determining them. Childcare is one of the spectacular approach that is eventually brought about
by vigorous analysis and that which can deal with the prominence of educating people and the
circumstances to foster childcare. The other project that is being taken as apart of this report
orientation is the charitable program which is to provide people with the mode of encapsulating
with facilities. Charity is one of the important formulation and in other words it is a necessity to
be encroached upon because, without charity there is no pace of getting carried away by the
circumstances of helping the poor and the mean (Alhidari and et.al, 2018). One may probably be
able to tackle with the circumstances to derive the better possible situations that could highlight
the cause. The two programmes aims at bringing about the purpose which can be further
evaluated into processing the entire set of the norms that are to be evaluated.

The difference between the two programmes
Both the programs will fall into depicting the choices of bringing and foster the help by
providing the entities that are purely derived by the aspect of charity. The difference will lie in
the prospect of which the project 1 is entirely of the concept of fostering care towards the well
being of children whereas the other prospect is the one that will entitle the cause of bringing the
social activities that are necessary to be entitled (Spear, 2017). The social activities are nothing
but the kind of evaluations which can be made in determining the standards of the people and
spreading awareness regarding the matters that are probably not known to them. These
differences are the ones that are mostly associated with challenges and those that can satisfy the
onset of every need.
Comparison of the projects
The comparison of both the projects lie in the prospect of being available to the people and
imbibing the nature of need. Both the processes are into being helpful to people and that can be
easily portrayed as the onset of similarity. They might differ in terms of the processes that are
there yet they get connected by the prominence of satisfying the need of the people by
enlightening the cause up to which they have been evaluated. The project one in this regards is
bringing in the explanation that is oriented with project which aims at bringing about the criteria
of resolving the child care which will have to be posted at regular intervals of time. The project
will also emphasize upon the fact that child care is one of the important criteria and people will
have to be more oriented with how far they can move ahead with the speculations of providing
proper care to people all around (Ni and et.al, 2017). The project will provide the implications of
which there are certain social activities that will have to be carried forward a trust that people can
get to identify standard as well as we can have an awareness about the situation that are
pertaining. This is a necessity because there are certain situations what are happening in the
society and many people are not aware of the things that a pertaining. The I will Foundation is
more into thinking about all the speculations of how far people can get involved in two activities
and they can contribute the best of their ability in order to make people understand the essence of
living. The contradiction of both the projects will go ahead and the comparison will lie in
satisfying the need. The needs or necessity that will have to be highlighted and both the project
are aiming towards bringing about all the important criteria of dealing with the charitable
considerations.

The programs are different because of their approaches as well as the norms in deriving the
standards of the approaches will differ. One is with the child foster care which is necessary and
its major focuses upon the children. The other is the community approach where it will bring
about all the specialised mechanism in order to approach people. Both are effective and effective
communication is necessary in order to educate people according to the norms and policy of the
project. Communication plays a vital role in both the project. Effective communication can get
people equipped with the right amount of knowledge that is necessary for them to move ahead
with the circumstances of deriving their approaches. The child care will have to be inhibited by
taking and deriving all the possible examples and that is only possible when people convey in the
right amount of knowledge. This will bring about a lot of effective in corporation that is due in
the project. Both the project aims at community engagement and that is necessary in order to
orient people with the right amount of knowledge otherwise this is of no use. The stakeholders of
both the projects as well as the organisations that are taking up the project are playing a major
role where their participation is said to be an important and a crucial factor to be analysed
(Svensson and Moorman, 2019). One may not be able to identify the choices as well as the
impact that an activity imposes upon the society and this is evaluated upon all the possible
measures up to which and the research is carry forwarded. In order to move ahead with the best
possible strategies that can be incorporated by the two projects social media plays a major role.
Social media is one of the most mesmerizing category that can bring about every evaluation into
existence. Using social media for the project can move ahead with the right amount of data that
is necessary and they can also reach many people based on the views as well as training them
accordingly. In social media there are many people that are found and mostly is the right amount
of knowledge can also be gained by using the social media engagement to stop almost 90% of
the people are on social media and there are various channels of communication to explore. A
proper research which is oriented by the two projects can make them understand the feasibility of
approach and based on this the justification of practices can be analysed. This create a greater
impact that is oriented with the right amount of knowledge which is necessary and community
engagement is gained through the probable factors that are derived by the two projects. One may
not be able to justify the campaigns unless and until the societal commitment and the issues that
arise by the society are imposed upon (Veludo-de-Oliveira and et.al, 2017). The community
engagement is what is being highlighted by both the projects and the depict the criteria of every

issue that the society is facing. Both the issues are the child care which will have to be fostered
upon and the community evaluations which are to be encroach upon. The behavioural changes
for the betterment of the society are also highlighted and these are being campaigned over
different platforms to get the reach and will not carry any issues further. There are different
opinions that are derived and based on the situation of the community or the society and impact
is generated. The picture and factors that are a part of bringing about the entire evaluation of the
project are depicted in such a way that the campaigns art of being evaluated will bring about all
the issues that our society is facing. The report also specifies that there is any quality that is
maintained over the entire circumstances and people go hand in hand in order to derive the
standards of the campaigns (Kolesnik, 2019, May). This is necessary because in order to bring
about a kind of evaluation that is being portrayed up on the situations of child care and also
educating people regarding various societal circumstances it is a major difference that is being
ratified by different charitable constitutions as well as other institutions. The entire entity of the
organisation lies in how far the programs are being evaluated and how far they are reaching
people and bringing about a change in their existence.
CONCLUSION
From the above report it is analysed that the community engagement aimed to work by
collaborate to resolve the societal or communist issues. People in the community work together
to improve the situation of the community to free up society from any issue. Community
engagement is the powerful approach which is able to bring out the behavioural changes for the
betterment of the society. Different group of people developed the campaign through which they
helped the needy ones they worked together to free up the society from any issue. Through this
process people from the same opinion work together to improve the situation of the community.
Digital media also helped the campaigns to address the societal issues or to proceed for the fund
so that it would be used for the needy one. Report described about the differences between the
projects as how they operate what were their motto.
This report concluded with the evaluation of best practices of the projects for the
community engagement. As campaigns are always developed to address the social issue through
which group of people were aimed to resolve the issues by creating awareness in public about
social norms. Social media platform also developed the way for the campaigns to generate the

awareness among the people to address any kind of issues. It also described about the difference
communication pattern between the projects also effective stakeholder partnership and inclusion
for the community engagement. Report also described about the analysation and research
program for the campaigns also concluded with the social media engagement of the project as
how they raise fund through social media platform, how it helped them to connect people with
their project. Therefore, community engagement committed with the important aspect to provide
help to the community and to resolve the societal issue.

REFERENCES
Books and journals
Alhidari and et.al, 2018. Modeling the effect of multidimensional trust on individual monetary
donations to charitable organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 47(3).
pp.623-644.
De Weger, E. and et.al 2018. Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist
review. BMC health services research. 18(1). pp.1-18.
Gorczyca and Hartman, 2017. The new face of philanthropy: The role of intrinsic motivation in
millennials’ attitudes and intent to donate to charitable organizations. Journal of Nonprofit
& Public Sector Marketing. 29(4). pp.415-433.
Johnston, K.A. and Lane, A.B., 2019. An authenticity matrix for community engagement. Public
Relations Review. 45(4). p.101811.
Kolesnik, 2019, May. NOTES ON THE PLACE OF CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS IN
THE SYSTEM OF SUBJECTS OF FINANCIAL LAW OF UKRAINE. In EASTERN
EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS (p. 350).
Ni and et.al, 2017. Professionalization and cost efficiency of fundraising in charitable
organizations: The case of charitable foundations in China. VOLUNTAS: International
Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 28(2). pp.773-797.
Pratt, B. and de Vries, J., 2018. Community engagement in global health research that advances
health equity. Bioethics. 32(7). pp.454-463.
Spear, 2017. Impression management activity in vision, mission, and values statements: A
comparison of commercial and charitable organizations. International Studies of
Management & Organization. 47(2). pp.159-175.
Svensson and Moorman, 2019. Cross-border regulations: Exploring legal considerations in the
United States of nonprofit sport organizations engaged in international charitable work. J.
Legal Aspects Sport. 29. p.118.
Veludo-de-Oliveira and et.al, 2017. Comparing the explanatory and predictive power of
intention-based theories of personal monetary donation to charitable organizations.
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 28(2). pp.571-
593.
1

2