This essay provides a comprehensive comparison of two major sociological perspectives: functionalism and conflict theory. It begins by defining both theories, highlighting functionalism's emphasis on societal stability and interconnectedness and conflict theory's focus on competition and inequality. The essay explores how functionalism views society as a complex system where each part serves a function, contributing to overall stability, while conflict theory sees society as a dynamic entity shaped by power struggles and resource competition. The essay examines the views of Durkheim, Marx and Engels, and Parsons. The essay delves into the relationship between individuals and society, showing how functionalism prioritizes shared norms and values for social cohesion, and how conflict theory emphasizes the impact of social inequalities. The essay also discusses the differing views on social change, with functionalism favoring gradual change and conflict theory advocating for far-reaching transformations to reduce inequality. The conclusion summarizes the core differences, emphasizing the value of both perspectives in understanding the complexities of social life. The essay uses academic references to support its arguments.
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
