Construction Design Teams: For and Against Management Theories

This essay explores the formation of construction design teams and the application of management theories and principles. It discusses the roles of designers, architects, engineers, contractors, and subcontractors in meeting client requirements. The essay argues that management theories can provide effective working standards and improve productivity within construction firms by guiding resource usage and enabling innovative approaches. However, it also acknowledges criticisms that suggest the application of management theories can sometimes introduce complexities, hinder flexibility, and potentially lower productivity within design teams. The essay concludes that the effectiveness of management theories in construction design teams depends on the specific context and the ability to balance structured approaches with the dynamic nature of construction projects. Desklib offers a wide range of academic resources, including essays and solved assignments, to support students in their studies.

Essay

Table of Contents
Essay topic: Forming construction...................................................................................................3
Introduction......................................................................................................................................3
Main Body.......................................................................................................................................3
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................5
References........................................................................................................................................6

Essay topic: Forming team in Construction Company
Introduction
The process of forming team in construction includes process through which designing a
structure at a certain location by putting together different elements to build that structure. The
construction designer team performs a variety of tasks that relates to taking ideas from relative
individuals and through the use of professional skills bringing those ideas to light (ElKelish and
Ahmed, 2021). The management theories build on effective standards on the basis of which
productive efforts can be raised for enabling better efforts in the construction industry. The given
document is an essay that evaluates on forming of a construction designer team for different
firms and debating on for and against the application of managing theories principles (Füller,
Hutter and Kröger, 2021).
Main Body
The construction tasks are inclusive of several individuals such as; designers, architects,
engineers, contractors and sub-contractors. These individuals are all engaged in construction
tasks for meeting the requirements of the client. The engagement of management theories and
relative principles can guide better terms of working for a construction team in which various
operations of the firm are effectively managed. The workforce manager in the construction firm
can derive appropriate standards of workings when using appropriate management theories and
principles. By seeking to workplace complexities and frequent changes in the business
environment might lead to failures of business plans and strategies. By deriving appropriate
theories and working principles from a managing team the firm could grant effective working
standards and develop a greater potential for working in the contemporary business markets
(Mhatre and et. al., 2021).
The team in the construction industry plays a vital role with regard to reacting to an idea
being developed and using professional skills to attain the desired results. The team works on the
construction platforms even before when construction is started and continues throughout the life
cycle of the construction project. The team generally consists of engineers and architect who
engages better terms for operating the industry for a longer period of time. The stated team can
develop a better basis of working under which the use of managing theories and relative
principles could boost the productivity of the construction firm. The variety of work performed

in the construction industry is being coordinated through designing teams. For the process being
coordinated tasks can be produced while working in groups with effective use of resources.
The theories of management play a vital role in developing better standards of working in
the construction firm. Such theories establish an effective basis for which coordinative workings
could be enabled while performing a variety of tasks in the construction firm. The use of such
theories directs efforts being produced in the firm by considering the usage of resources. The
designer team in the construction including can largely be benefited from the use of managing
theories and some might find it difficult while operating various construction tasks. With respect
to changing market conditions or dynamic market conditions, an increase in competition and
frequent changes in behaviour of stakeholders of the firm might hinder the growth or operations
of the construction firm (Rindova, and Martins, 2021). By taking an instance of managing
theories operations of the construction industry can be managed effectively. This will ensure
proper usage of resources and would enable creative and innovative methods for approaching
desirable goals and objectives of the construction firm.
On the other hand, there are some critiques that believe that the use of managing theories
or relative principles in construction explores the perspective of the designing team. It is being
said that the designing team constituting of architects and engineers works as per defined
strategies. The terms of the working of the construction firm when being monitored through the
designer team in the construction industry sometimes adoption of theories and principles could
be a disturbing element. Therefore, it can be contradicted that use of managing theories and
principles while regulating operations of a designing team in the construction firm could lower
the productivity of the firm (Yuan and et. al., 2022). Through the use of managing theories
designing teams in the construction industry can sometimes face difficulties with regard to
operating construction activities through complex managing principles. Furthermore, it can be
said that adopting additional managing theories and principles could be determined as the
wastage of resources in the construction firm.
Through the analysis, it can be said that the adoption of managing theories and principles
can prove to be both advantageous and disadvantageous to the construction firm. The firm can
operate its construction operations by deriving an effective basis for working through the
adoption of managing theories and principles. This could be reflected by the effective standard
being developed through the use of such theories and principles. However, such theories and

principles on the other hand, might appear to derive complex working standards in the
construction firm. The strategy to deliver productive outcomes could result in causing reverse
impacts which could be the result of complexities of the managing theories and principles
(Zhang, Zhou and Horn, 2021).
Conclusion
From the analysis of the above essay report, it can be concluded that the functions of a
construction designer team could work with the application of managing theories and principles
and vice versa. It can be said that the designer construction team who is in favour of the
application of management theories seeks to benefit from a coordinated course of action and
helps in devising appropriate working standards in the construction firm. On the other hand,
taking use of managing principles and theories can produce a negative impact over productivity
which could be result of increased complexities in the construction firm.

References
Books and Journals
ElKelish, W.W. and Ahmed, R., 2021. Advancing accounting education using LEGO® Serious
Play simulation technique. Accounting Education, pp.1-17.
Füller, J., Hutter, K. and Kröger, N., 2021. Crowdsourcing as a service–from pilot projects to
sustainable innovation routines. International Journal of Project Management, 39(2),
pp.183-195.
Mhatre, P., Gedam, V., Unnikrishnan, S. and Verma, S., 2021. Circular economy in built
environment–Literature review and theory development. Journal of Building
Engineering, 35, p.101995.
Rindova, V.P. and Martins, L.L., 2021. Shaping possibilities: A design science approach to
developing novel strategies. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), pp.800-822.
Yuan, H., Wang, Z., Shi, Y. and Hao, J., 2022. A dissipative structure theory-based investigation
of a construction and demolition waste minimization system in China. Journal of
Environmental Planning and Management, 65(3), pp.514-535.
Zhang, L., Zhou, L. and Horn, B.K., 2021. Building a right digital twin with model
engineering. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 59, pp.151-164.