This assignment analyzes a case scenario involving contract law principles. Peter, a retired PE teacher, purchased an office chair advertised as comfortable. The assignment examines whether the chair's features constitute contract terms, distinguishing between representations and terms. It explores if the chair's lower-back support claim is a term, classifying it as an express term (condition) and discussing the consequences of its breach. The analysis further investigates the validity of an exclusion clause and its potential impact on Peter's ability to sue for breach of contract. The document references relevant case laws like Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams, Van Den Esschert v Chappel, L’Estrange v Graucob, and White v John Warwick to support the arguments.
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
