Contract Law: Mark's Remedies and Rights Against Rob

This assignment provides an introduction to contract law, defining contracts as legally enforceable agreements. It explores various aspects of contract law, including business-to-business contracts, service agreements, and the importance of clearly defined terms. The assignment analyzes a scenario involving Mark and Rob, where Rob allegedly breached a contract. The core of the assignment focuses on providing advice to Mark regarding his rights and remedies, emphasizing the need for a written contract and evidence of breach. The analysis highlights the importance of written agreements and the potential challenges in claiming remedies without such evidence. The conclusion reiterates the significance of clear contract terms and the process for addressing breaches, including potential legal actions.

Contract Law

Introduction
A contract is an agreement that is legally enforceable between at least two meetings in which
each one expects a legal commitment that must be completed. There are several aspects of daily
life including contracts, including buying a property, applying for vehicle credit, specifying
work-related administrative work, and agreeing to terms and conditions1.
Legal issues, including contracts, appear regularly when a meeting fails to implement the legal
commitment it has agreed to make2. When a meeting agrees to neglect to play, the other party
may regularly sue for damages or, in some limited cases, may ask the court to proceed with the
power of the other party was promised.
Contracts can be a source of valid discussions when they are not clearly made. Meetings that
have a misunderstanding of the arrangements can sue each other and bring a court to resolve the
dispute. In addition, when an organization signs an agreement and subsequently leaves the
business or fails its warranties, the other party may have to seek legitimate business in a general
or liquidation court to get help.
This assignment is based on advice suggested to Mark related to claiming any remedies and
rights against Rob.
Solution to the situation
The nature of contract between both parties; Mark and Rob is of business to business type. In this
contract; services are rendered for a fee or when precise services need to be provided and
thinking about all the possible outcomes of contracts means being assured of clear conditions
that should be met in order to implement an agreement 3. Mandatory consent can go to court.
In terms of getting paid, a business contract will outline details on:
 Terms around when the project needs to be completed:
 What must be delivered
 When payment is due
1 Posner, E. A. (1995). Contract law in the welfare state: A defense of the unconscionability doctrine, usury laws, and related
limitations on the freedom to contract. The Journal of Legal Studies, 24(2), 283-319.
2 Peel, E., & Treitel, G. H. (2007). The law of contract (pp. 1-2). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
3 Schwartz, A., & Scott, R. E. (2003). Contract theory and the limits of contract law. Yale LJ, 113, 541.

A business contract is an agreement in which each collection agrees to an exchange, which
usually includes money, goods or administrations. Commercial contracts insure both buyers and
sellers, reducing settlement agreements4. The agreement may be as long or as short as is
necessary to address the important sub-issues of the agreement.
Service agreements are business contracts that are used when selling support. The administrative
arrangement provides important subtleties, for example, given by the administration, the time the
administration will provide, the administrative costs, when the contribution is payable and a
number of important subtleties to the agreement between the meetings.
Advice to Mark
The aforementioned statement highlights the experience Mark had to go through when Rob
shortened the window without speaking to Mark and had no choice but to work at the shop
completed before the default date. This search governs access to the terms and whether any have
been entered, and as far as this is true, to motivate Mark as to what claims he can make and what
the remedies and injuries are that he deserved for the opening hours.
Since this issue is only about the deal between Mark and Rob, we can continue to start by
acknowledging the idea of the deal. The authoritative link between Mark and Rob is that of a
business-to-business deal and, as stated in fact, the type of agreement they have entered into is
that of an offer of results5.
Next, the basis on which the agreement is made should be adhered to, which means that it would
be necessary to effectively identify the type of agreement. Imprint clearly asked Rob to make a
large window from top to bottom on one of the four sides of the open space and the work is
expected to be completed by June 1, thus adding further meaning to the advertisement this is as if
the work was not finished by June 1st or if the windows had not been made to the predetermined
level, Mark would not have agreed with Rob. It is seen in Bannerman v White [1861] to give
additional meaning to something obvious by the person who wants an object or administration,
4 Burton, S. J. (1980). Breach of contract and the common law duty to perform in good faith. Harvard Law Review, 369-404.
5 Bix, B. H. (2008). Contract rights and remedies, and the divergence between law and morality. Ratio Juris, 21(2), 194-211.

that the particular call or prelude is seen as a term. After all, it could be said that Marco will
mark the size of the window and want the store to be fully operational by June 1 confirmed as
the end date6.
Based on the above analyses; it is clear that to claim remedies and right Mark needs written
contract between Mark and Rob; stating terms and conditions between them. There should be
written evidence which can proof the breaching of contract between both parties. Without
showing any written evidence which can proof that there’s actually breaching of agreement. In
this given case; Mark cannot claim for remedies and right to cover his losses due to late opening
of the shop and wrong size of windows7. Besides this the only option left with Mark is to
negotiate with Rob; because there’s no written proof that shows Rob has agreed to complete the
construction service before 1st of June.
It is not always necessary to make formal agreements for a legally restrictive business contract,
at least, when the agreements are not reduced to gimmicks, some mess can occur. Therefore, it is
ideal for working out understanding. The absence of prepared service agreements and solutions
to cope has encouraged many differences. This can encourage business loss and hostility.
Sometimes, if the agreement is not recorded in paper format, it cannot be enforced, regardless of
whether there is a discussion about the terms. Most states have adopted the Uniform Trade Code
(UCC) which requires all agreements to be recorded on paper in the case of a one-year contract.
Conclusion
Most contracts could be verbal, as they will never keep an eye on a field, but when something
goes wrong, a complicated agreement promises both players. If one of the participants in a bona
fide agreement believes that the other party has entered into the agreement, the damaged game
may file a claim against the breaking party. The dress is the valid circle used to select whether
the agreement was terminated or whether the breach was postponed due to various
circumstances.
Terms of business and separately negotiated trading contracts should clarify what each meeting
of the trade agreement agrees. The required statements shall include the value, terms of the
6 Martin, J. S. (2018). Private Law Remedies, Human Rights, and Supply Contracts. Am. UL Rev., 68, 1781.
7 Barnett, R. E. (1986). Contract remedies and inalienable rights. Social Philosophy and Policy, 4(1), 179-202.

allowance (eg 30 days, single amount or allowances), suitability of the merchant or
administrations provided and how, when and where the cur.