Corporate Accounting & Reporting: Impairment Loss Analysis Report

This report provides an overview of impairment loss accounting, focusing on fixed assets under AS 28 and IAS 36. It covers the recognition and measurement of impairment loss, emphasizing the comparison between carrying value and recoverable value. The report explains both internal and external indicators of impairment, such as market value declines and obsolescence. It also describes the concept of Cash Generating Units (CGUs) and how to calculate recoverable value, which is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. The value in use is determined by discounting future expected cash flows, and the fair value is determined according to IFRS. The report concludes with disclosure requirements, emphasizing the importance of transparency in financial statements regarding impairment assessments. The report is a student's work and offers insights into the practical application of impairment accounting principles.

CORPORATE ACCOUNTING & REPORTING ASSIGNMENT

1
By student name
Professor
University
Date: 16 Spetember 2017.
1 | P a g e

2
Contents
Introduction...…………………………………………………………………………………………….......3
Recognition & measurement of impairment loss……………………..……………………...4
Conclusion and Disclosure..……………………………………….....…………………………………5
Refrences.....……………………………………………………………….......................................6
Introduction – Impairment
2 | P a g e

3
AS 28 and IAS 36 deals with the impairment accounting of the fixed assets. In case the indicators
for impairment do exist then the same needs to be reassessed for value and marked down if the
negative indiactors do suggest so. There can be internal as well as external indiactors. The mian idea
behind the introduction of this standard is that the company should not value its assets at more than
the recoverable value, which is higher of the value in use or the fair value less cost of disposal of the
asset. Goodwill and other intangible assets having indefinite life is being assessed for impairment
separately at end of each period. (Fay & Negangard, 2017).
Recognition & measurement of impairment loss
3 | P a g e

4
The differential of the carrying value of the assets and the recoverable value is recognised as the
impairment loss in the books. Once impairment is posted, it can be reversed in the future years based
on the assessment in case the positive indicators do exists. External indicators can be like assets in books
is higher than the market capitalization, market value of assets declined considerably or there is a
change in the taste, fashion, preferences, and other negative trends or market interest rates have
increased, etc. whereas internal factors can be in the nature of increased obsolescence on the asset,
economic performance of the asset has decreased, the asset is lying idle and is being held for sale, or the
investment in joint venture or the subsidiary is more than the investee’s assets held in books, etc. (Das,
2017) The company also needs to check on the depreciation policy, the estimated useful life, etc at the
time of checking on the impairment. In case the single asset is not able to generate the revenues, we see
a group or the class of assets which would be able to do so independently and it is called Cash
Generating Unit (CGU).
The recoverable value is the higher of fair value less the cost of disposal and the value in use.
The recoverable value may be calculated for a single asset or a CGU. (Goldmann, 2016)
The value in use if tteh fair value of the future expected cash flows discounted at a rate of interest. The
cash flows should be depending upon the lastest financials considering the time value of money, the
uncertainity of the cash flows and the illiquidity in the market. It should also not account for any major
overhaul expenditure that may be incurred in the near future. It should be realistic and based on valid
assumptions and backed by supportings. (Michaely & Jacob, 2017) Similarly, the rate of discount should
be based on market conditions and the rate which the shatreholders would have expected on investing
in the company. It should be based on the rate of borrowing that the company would have incurred in
case the company would have bought assets from borrowed funds.
The fair value less cost of disposal should be determined in accordance with the fair value
accounting as per IFRS. It should be at the arm’s length price in the binding sale agreement or in the
active market or if nothing is available, then based in the DCF technique. (Meroño-Cerdán, et al., 2017)
Conclusion and disclosures
4 | P a g e

5
The topic of impairment is based on assumptions and should be properly disclosed in the
financials like
1. the amount of impairment,
2. the fair value estimation,
3. the internal and external indicators relied on, etc.
5 | P a g e

6
References
Das, P., 2017. Financing Pattern and Utilization of Fixed Assets - A Study. Asian Journal of Social Science
Studies, 2(2), pp. 10-17.
Fay, R. & Negangard, E., 2017. Manual journal entry testing : Data analytics and the risk of fraud. Journal
of Accounting Education, Volume 38, pp. 37-49.
Goldmann, K., 2016. Financial Liquidity and Profitability Management in Practice of Polish Business.
Financial Environment and Business Development, Volume 4, pp. 103-112.
Meroño-Cerdán, A., Lopez-Nicolas, C. & Molina-Castillo, F., 2017. Risk aversion, innovation and
performance in family firms. Economics of Innovation and new technology, pp. 1-15.
Michaely, R. & Jacob, M., 2017. Taxation and Dividend Policy: The Muting Effect of Agency Issues and
Shareholder Conflicts. Review of Financial Studies, 30(9), pp. 3176-3222.
6 | P a g e