Corporate Governance Analysis: Structure, Influence, and Impact

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of corporate governance, examining its core principles, structures, and practices. It defines corporate governance as the system guiding and controlling an entity, balancing stakeholder interests, and facilitating goal achievement. The report explores the UK Corporate Governance Code, its evolution, and its emphasis on board composition, shareholder relations, and accountability. It analyzes the roles and responsibilities within corporate governance, emphasizing the importance of clear structures, risk management, organizational performance, and ethical conduct. A key focus is the comparison of the influence of institutional shareholders versus individual investors on a company's governance, highlighting how different shareholder types impact decision-making, accountability, and long-term strategy. The report also discusses the significance of transparency, ethical behavior, and the integration of good governance principles to ensure sustainable business performance and stakeholder trust.

Corporate
Governance

ContentsINTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
MAIN BODY..................................................................................................................................1
Analyse the structure that should be in place for effective corporate governance and compare
as well as contrast which influence institutional shareholders have on company’s corporate
governance with that of shareholders in company comprising many individual investors.........1
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................5
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7

INTRODUCTION
Corporate governance is considered as the system of norms, procedures and practices
through which an entity is guided as well as controlled. It crucially incorporates balancing the
interest of firm’s various stakeholders like clients, suppliers, shareholders, government and many
others. Moreover, this also facilitates the structure for accomplishing an entity’s goals; it
encompasses practically each area of management, from action plans as well as internal controls
to measurement of performance and corporate disclosures. This report will be going to discuss
corporate governance and its significance as well as it will compare and contrast which influence
institutional shareholders have on business firm’s corporate governance with that of shareholders
in company comprising many individual investors.
MAIN BODY
Analyse the structure that should be in place for effective corporate governance and compare as
well as contrast which influence institutional shareholders have on company’s corporate
governance with that of shareholders in company comprising many individual investors.
Corporate governance is considered as the system of norms, procedures and practices
through which an entity is guided as well as controlled. It crucially incorporates balancing the
interest of firm’s various stakeholders like clients, suppliers, shareholders, government and many
others. Moreover, this also facilitates the structure for accomplishing an entity’s goals; it
encompasses practically each area of management, from action plans as well as internal controls
to measurement of performance and corporate disclosures. As per the OECD official definition
of corporate governance in business, the key intent of corporate governance is to assists in
developing trustworthy atmosphere, transparency and accountability that are essential to foster
long term investment, monetary stability as well as business integrity.
Corporate governance is essential as this assure that entities are faithful related to its
monetary status, even when it is not ideal. In addition to this, it also assures that firms undertaken
appropriate things for its consumers as well as their shareholders, even when this considers
admitting to mistakes. For example: Firms often issue recalls for defect goods. Admitting
mistakes as well as facilitating a way to fix this, assures customers safety as well as safeguards
profit. These mistakes conceal drives towards audiences mistrust. Such as firm like Toyota that is
leading up to the year of 2014 the death of 5 individuals were linked to safety issues regarding
1

Toyota vehicles. It was also fined $1.2 billion for covering up information as well as not rapidly
recalling whole affected vehicles (What Is the Importance of Corporate Governance?. 2020)
Along with this, corporate governance is also helpful for firm to regulate risk as well as minimise
opportunity for corruptions. Moreover, this also assures that entity safeguards their members,
staff and administration.
Development of Corporate governance Code from its root to current
Initially the developments of corporate governance within United Kingdom started in year
1980s. UK Corporate Governance Code established standards of effective practices for listed
firms upon board composition as well as improvement, shareholder relations, accountability
remuneration and audit. This is mainly published through Financial, Reporting Council (FRC).
Based upon the Harvard Law Forum, UK Code of Corporate Governance facilitates that board is
accountable for guidelines as well as activities that reinforce a healthy culture as well as also the
board have to involve with personnel by one or accumulation of directors appointed from
personnel, a formal staff advisory panel as well as designated non- executive director and many
more that meet situation of firm as well as workforce.
In year 2016: The financial reporting council (FRC) has accomplished their 2016 updates to
UK Corporate Governance Code as well as to standard for auditors, which finalises their
execution of EU audit regulation as well as directive. Moreover, they have also issues upgraded
guidelines upon Audit Committees. As the modification and development into 2016 UK
Corporate Governance code are less, in relation to audit committee composition as well as
towards revelation of planned external audit tender, modification to norms upon Audit
Committees are much substantive. Along with this, FRC have published their annual report upon
execution and impact of UK Corporate Governance Codes at the time of 2016 allowed
“Developments into Corporate Governance”. Herein, confidence has developed into the way
firms are governed against a falling audience trust backdrops within business along with
disclosure of longer period viability statements, developed risk reporting as well as huge
concentrates upon boardroom diversity.
In February 2017, the financial reporting council (FRC) announced the plans related to
wide-ranging reviews of UK Corporate Governance Code. In this, code internationally be
familiar with strengths developed over last 25 years. Moreover, this also undertakes effective
balance among the provisions as well as principles and developing demands upon the framework
2

of corporate governance. Additionally, this also focuses upon culture of corporate as well as
succession planning and problems enhanced into the green paper government. Also, on 29 th
August, 2017, government published their responses towards consultation of Green paper. This
determines a various proposals which they aimed to performed in future, along with inviting
FRC to begin a discussion with intent of revising corporate Governance code of UK. Beside this,
respective code got revised; it comprises 17 principles as well as 41 provisions. The existent
support principles have been removed. Also in few cases it has been included new provisions and
principles related to guidance upon effectiveness of board.
In year 2018, UK Corporate Governance Code, 2018 is basically used to accounting period
initiating on or after 1 January 2019. This put essential emphasis upon relations among firms,
stakeholders and shareholder. Moreover, in this the effectiveness of corporate culture
establishment is promoted which is related with entity intent, strategy of business, promotes
truthfulness as well as values diversity. In addition to this, overall firms with a premium listing
of equity share within United Kingdom are needed under listing norms for reporting into its
annual report as well as account upon how it has applied the code. Respective code also
concentrates on using the principles as well as reporting on results attained. For the provisions of
the code, entities have to reveal how they have complied with it or facilitate an explanation that
is effective for its person situation. Along with this, UK Corporate Governance Code, 2018 get
revised and came into force in year 2019 as well as whole premium listed firms will report
against it into this particular year. Corporate governance is considered as the system of norms,
procedures and practices through which an entity is guided as well as controlled. It crucially
incorporates balancing the interest of firm’s various stakeholders like clients, suppliers,
shareholders, government and many others. Moreover, this also facilitates the structure for
accomplishing an entity’s goals; it encompasses practically each area of management, from
action plans as well as internal controls to measurement of performance and corporate
disclosures. This report will be going to discuss corporate governance and its significance as well
as it will compare and contrast which influence institutional shareholders have on business firm’s
corporate governance with that of shareholders in company comprising many individual
investors. As per the analysis of FRC, it has been identified that:
 Various firms are struggling with explaining intent as well as what an effectual culture
means along with several substituting marketing lines or slogans for clear aim.
3

 Limited reporting upon diversity, the firms who did report effectively has clear plans to
accomplish their targets instead of gender as well as understood long term diversity
value.
 Some effective illustrations of reporting through entities that are enhancing utilising
incentives related to non monetary matters as well as are also grounded into longer period
tactics.
 Moreover, there is insufficient undertaken of culture as well as tactics importance or the
opinions of stakeholders. Based upon the year 2016 FRC’S report on culture, entities
have to be commenting upon culture and currently states how they are observing as well
as evaluating it (Improved governance and reporting required to promote sustainability
and trust in business, 2020).
Governance requires time, devotion and responsibility from pioneers to comprehend the
advantages of adjusting all degrees of an association. Great corporate administration guarantees a
reasonable and straightforward business climate, where everybody can be considered responsible
for their activities. Then again, poor corporate administration prompts squander, helpless
organization and debasement. Just great administration gives feasible and strong business
execution. Great administration must be fused in the great conduct and practical insight of the
individuals who are accountable for running an association. At the point when done
appropriately, administration establishes a legit and straightforward climate that advances
organized arranging and dexterity in execution. Likewise, it empowers board individuals and
leader advisory groups to commit cash to the partnership for development and development.
Associations endeavouring to improve administration need to intently look at their inner business
structures, cycles, and activities. There are mainly ten principles of good corporate governance
explanation of these are as follows :-
 Role and responsibilities – There ought to be clearness as for singular obligations, the
hierarchical desires for heads and the function of chief and administering boards of
trustees.
 Structure and composition – A leader board of trustees must have the correct gathering of
individuals, considering the foundation, aptitudes and experience of every person.
Additionally, it must know about how the consideration of an individual adds to the
aggregate limit and powerful working of the panel.
4

 Objective and strategy – In an business firm executive committee plays essential role in
defining purpose, vision and strategies which helping organisation in understanding them
as well as adapting the plans to implement them.
 Risk management – Through implementation of appropriate risk as well as internal
control supervision system and executive committees provide assistance in enhancing the
likelihood which business firm meets their goals and objectives.
 Organizational performance – Executive committee evaluates as well as determines
proper performance categories and indicators for business firm.
 Committee effectiveness – The adequacy of a chief council can be significantly improved
via: cautiously arranging its exercises; proficiently leading board gatherings; intermittent
assessments of hierarchical execution; having a leader progression plan; and the viable
utilization of subcommittees, when suitable.
 Information flow – It is significant that the leader advisory group guarantees the
progression of data to the board that helps with deciding; that there is a climate of
straightforwardness and responsibility for outer partners and for representatives all
through the organization; and that the honesty of the fiscal reports and other material data
is protected.
 Organizational maturity – The executive committee has played essential as well as
improving role in the capabilities of business firm they serve.
 Culture and ethics – Executive committee sets tone related to ethical as well as
responsible decision making throughout the business firm.
 Engagement – The executive committee provide assistance to business firm in effective
engagement with stakeholders as well as staff members.
Corporate governance is considered as the system of norms, procedures and practices
through which an entity is guided as well as controlled. It crucially incorporates balancing the
interest of firm’s various stakeholders like clients, suppliers, shareholders, government and many
others. Moreover, this also facilitates the structure for accomplishing an entity’s goals; it
encompasses practically each area of management, from action plans as well as internal controls
to measurement of performance and corporate disclosures. As per the OECD official definition
of corporate governance in business, the key intent of corporate governance is to assists in
5

developing trustworthy atmosphere, transparency and accountability that are essential to foster
long term investment, monetary stability as well as business integrity.
Corporate governance is essential as this assure that entities are faithful related to its
monetary status, even when it is not ideal. In addition to this, it also assures that firms undertaken
appropriate things for its consumers as well as their shareholders, even when this considers
admitting to mistakes. For example: Firms often issue recalls for defect goods. Admitting
mistakes as well as facilitating a way to fix this, assures customers safety as well as safeguards
profit. These mistakes conceal drives towards audiences mistrust. Such as firm like Toyota that is
leading up to the year of 2014 the death of 5 individuals were linked to safety issues regarding
Toyota vehicles. It was also fined $1.2 billion for covering up information as well as not rapidly
recalling whole affected vehicles (What Is the Importance of Corporate Governance?. 2020)
Along with this, corporate governance is also helpful for firm to regulate risk as well as minimise
opportunity for corruptions. Moreover, this also assures that entity safeguards their members,
staff and administration.
Initially the developments of corporate governance within United Kingdom started in year
1980s. UK Corporate Governance Code established standards of effective practices for listed
firms upon board composition as well as improvement, shareholder relations, accountability
remuneration and audit. This is mainly published through Financial, Reporting Council (FRC).
Based upon the Harvard Law Forum, UK Code of Corporate Governance facilitates that board is
accountable for guidelines as well as activities that reinforce a healthy culture as well as also the
board have to involve with personnel by one or accumulation of directors appointed from
personnel, a formal staff advisory panel as well as designated non- executive director and many
more that meet situation of firm as well as workforce.
In year 2016: The financial reporting council (FRC) has accomplished their 2016 updates to
UK Corporate Governance Code as well as to standard for auditors, which finalises their
execution of EU audit regulation as well as directive. Moreover, they have also issues upgraded
guidelines upon Audit Committees. As the modification and development into 2016 UK
Corporate Governance code are less, in relation to audit committee composition as well as
towards revelation of planned external audit tender, modification to norms upon Audit
Committees are much substantive. Along with this, FRC have published their annual report upon
execution and impact of UK Corporate Governance Codes at the time of 2016 allowed
6

“Developments into Corporate Governance”. Herein, confidence has developed into the way
firms are governed against a falling audience trust backdrops within business along with
disclosure of longer period viability statements, developed risk reporting as well as huge
concentrates upon boardroom diversity.
In February 2017, the financial reporting council (FRC) announced the plans related to
wide-ranging reviews of UK Corporate Governance Code. In this, code internationally be
familiar with strengths developed over last 25 years. Moreover, this also undertakes effective
balance among the provisions as well as principles and developing demands upon the framework
of corporate governance. Additionally, this also focuses upon culture of corporate as well as
succession planning and problems enhanced into the green paper government. Also, on 29 th
August, 2017, government published their responses towards consultation of Green paper. This
determines a various proposals which they aimed to performed in future, along with inviting
FRC to begin a discussion with intent of revising corporate Governance code of UK. Beside this,
respective code got revised; it comprises 17 principles as well as 41 provisions. The existent
support principles have been removed. Also in few cases it has been included new provisions and
principles related to guidance upon effectiveness of board.
In year 2018, UK Corporate Governance Code, 2018 is basically used to accounting period
initiating on or after 1 January 2019. This put essential emphasis upon relations among firms,
stakeholders and shareholder. Moreover, in this the effectiveness of corporate culture
establishment is promoted which is related with entity intent, strategy of business, promotes
truthfulness as well as values diversity. In addition to this, overall firms with a premium listing
of equity share within United Kingdom are needed under listing norms for reporting into its
annual report as well as account upon how it has applied the code. Respective code also
concentrates on using the principles as well as reporting on results attained. For the provisions of
the code, entities have to reveal how they have complied with it or facilitate an explanation that
is effective for its person situation. Along with this, UK Corporate Governance Code, 2018 get
revised and came into force in year 2019 as well as whole premium listed firms will report
against it into this particular year. As per the analysis of FRC, it has been identified that:
Various firms are struggling with explaining intent as well as what an effectual culture means
along with several substituting marketing lines or slogans for clear aim. Limited reporting upon
diversity, the firms who did report effectively has clear plans to accomplish their targets instead
7

of gender as well as understood long term diversity value. Some effective illustrations of
reporting through entities that are enhancing utilising incentives related to non monetary matters
as well as are also grounded into longer period tactics.Moreover, there is insufficient undertaken
of culture as well as tactics importance or the opinions of stakeholders. Based upon the year
2016 FRC’S report on culture, entities have to be commenting upon culture and currently states
how they are observing as well as evaluating it.
Governance requires time, devotion and responsibility from pioneers to comprehend the
advantages of adjusting all degrees of an association. Great corporate administration guarantees a
reasonable and straightforward business climate, where everybody can be considered responsible
for their activities. Then again, poor corporate administration prompts squander, helpless
organization and debasement. Just great administration gives feasible and strong business
execution. Great administration must be fused in the great conduct and practical insight of the
individuals who are accountable for running an association. At the point when done
appropriately, administration establishes a legit and straightforward climate that advances
organized arranging and dexterity in execution. Likewise, it empowers board individuals and
leader advisory groups to commit cash to the partnership for development and development.
Associations endeavouring to improve administration need to intently look at their inner business
structures, cycles, and activities.
At first the improvements of corporate administration inside United Kingdom began in
year 1980s. UK Corporate Governance Code set up norms of compelling practices for recorded
firms upon board creation just as progress, investor relations, responsibility compensation and
review. This is essentially distributed through Financial, Reporting Council (FRC). In view of
the Harvard Law Forum, UK Code of Corporate Governance encourages that board is
responsible for rules just as exercises that strengthen a solid culture just as likewise the board
need to include with faculty by one or amassing of chiefs delegated from work force, a
conventional staff warning board just as assigned non-leader chief and a lot more that meet
circumstance of firm just as labor force.
In year 2016: The budgetary announcing gathering (FRC) has achieved their 2016 updates to UK
Corporate Governance Code just as to standard for examiners, which finishes their execution of
EU review guideline just as order. In addition, they have additionally issues overhauled rules
8

upon Audit Committees. As the adjustment and advancement into 2016 UK Corporate
Governance code are less, corresponding to review advisory group sythesis just as towards
disclosure of arranged outer review delicate, alteration to standards upon Audit Committees are a
lot of considerable. Alongside this, FRC have distributed their yearly report upon execution and
effect of UK Corporate Governance Codes at the hour of 2016 permitted "Improvements into
Corporate Governance". In this, certainty has formed into the manner in which firms are
represented against a falling crowd trust sceneries inside business alongside revelation of longer
period practicality explanations, created hazard announcing just as gigantic concentrates upon
meeting room variety.
In February 2017, the budgetary revealing committee (FRC) declared the plans identified with
wide-going surveys of UK Corporate Governance Code. In this, code universally be acquainted
with qualities created over most recent 25 years. Besides, this likewise attempts powerful
equalization among the arrangements just as standards and creating requests upon the system of
corporate administration. Furthermore, this endless supply of corporate just as progression
arranging and issues improved into the green paper government. Additionally, on 29 th August,
2017, government distributed their reactions towards meeting of Green paper. This decides a
different proposition which they intended to acted in future, alongside welcoming FRC to start a
conversation with expectation of reexamining corporate Governance code of UK. Next to this,
individual code got reexamined; it contains 17 standards just as 41 arrangements. The existent
help standards have been eliminated. Likewise in not many cases it has been incorporated new
arrangements and standards identified with endless supply of board.
Corporate governance is considered as the system of norms, procedures and practices
through which an entity is guided as well as controlled. It crucially incorporates balancing the
interest of firm’s various stakeholders like clients, suppliers, shareholders, government and many
others. Moreover, this also facilitates the structure for accomplishing an entity’s goals; it
encompasses practically each area of management, from action plans as well as internal controls
to measurement of performance and corporate disclosures. In UK corporate governance result in
several development from its roots to current UK corporate Governance Code 2018. In addition
to this, there are some principles of good governance such as directors, remuneration,
accountability and audit as well as relation with shareholders. All these plays important role in
9

corporate governance and also provide assistance in conducting work within effective manner.
Along with this, both institutional shareholders in comparison of independent investors have
wide influence on corporate governance. Although, institutional investors are using their
influence in effective manner.
In year 2018, UK Corporate Governance Code, 2018 is fundamentally used to bookkeeping
period starting on or after 1 January 2019. This put fundamental accentuation upon relations
among firms, partners and investor. Also, in this the viability of corporate culture foundation is
advanced which is connected with element expectation, system of business, advances honesty
just as qualities variety. Also, by and large firms with an excellent posting of value share inside
United Kingdom are required under posting standards for announcing into its yearly report just
as record upon how it has applied the code. Particular code focuses on utilizing the standards just
as giving an account of results achieved. For the arrangements of the code, elements need to
uncover how they have conformed to it or encourage a clarification that is powerful for its
individual circumstance. Alongside this, UK Corporate Governance Code, 2018 get reconsidered
and came into power in year 2019 just as entire premium recorded firms will report against it
into this specific year.
 There ought to be clearness as for singular obligations, the hierarchical desires for
heads and the function of chief and administering boards of trustees.
 A leader board of trustees must have the correct gathering of individuals, considering the
foundation, aptitudes and experience of every person. Additionally, it must know about
how the consideration of an individual adds to the aggregate limit and powerful working
of the panel.
In an business firm executive committee plays essential role in defining purpose, vision and
strategies which helping organisation in understanding them as well as adapting the plans to
implement them. Through implementation of appropriate risk as well as internal control
supervision system and executive committees provide assistance in enhancing the likelihood
which business firm meets their goals and objectives. Executive committee evaluates as well as
determines proper performance categories and indicators for business firm. The adequacy of a
chief council can be significantly improved via: cautiously arranging its exercises; proficiently
leading board gatherings; intermittent assessments of hierarchical execution; having a leader
progression plan; and the viable utilization of subcommittees, when suitable. It is significant that
10

the leader advisory group guarantees the progression of data to the board that helps with
deciding; that there is a climate of straightforwardness and responsibility for outer partners and
for representatives all through the organization; and that the honesty of the fiscal reports and
other material data is protected. The executive committee has played essential as well as
improving role in the capabilities of business firm they serve. Executive committee sets tone
related to ethical as well as responsible decision making throughout the business firm. The
executive committee provide assistance to business firm in effective engagement with
stakeholders as well as staff members.
CONCLUSION
After going through overall discussion, it has been summarised that Corporate governance is
considered as the system of norms, procedures and practices through which an entity is guided as
well as controlled. It crucially incorporates balancing the interest of firm’s various stakeholders
like clients, suppliers, shareholders, government and many others. Moreover, this also facilitates
the structure for accomplishing an entity’s goals; it encompasses practically each area of
management, from action plans as well as internal controls to measurement of performance and
corporate disclosures. In UK corporate governance result in several development from its roots
to current UK corporate Governance Code 2018. In addition to this, there are some principles of
good governance such as directors, remuneration, accountability and audit as well as relation
with shareholders. All these plays important role in corporate governance and also provide
assistance in conducting work within effective manner. Along with this, both institutional
shareholders in comparison of independent investors have wide influence on corporate
governance. Although, institutional investors are using their influence in effective manner.
11

REFERENCES
Books and Journal
Aguilera, R. V., Judge, W. Q. and Terjesen, S. A., 2018. Corporate governance
deviance. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), pp.87-109.
Bhatt, P. R. and Bhatt, R. R., 2017. Corporate governance and firm performance in
Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society.
Bhagat, S. and Bolton, B., 2019. Corporate governance and firm performance: The
sequel. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, pp.142-168.
Buallay, A., Hamdan, A. and Zureigat, Q., 2017. Corporate governance and firm performance:
evidence from Saudi Arabia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1),
pp.78-98.
Ciftci, I. and et. al., 2019. Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets:
Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 28(1), pp.90-103.
Detthamrong, U., Chancharat, N. and Vithessonthi, C., 2017. Corporate governance, capital
structure and firm performance: Evidence from Thailand. Research in International Business and
Finance, 42, pp.689-709.
Lagasio, V. and Cucari, N., 2019. Corporate governance and environmental social governance
disclosure: A meta‐analytical review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental
Management, 26(4), pp.701-711.
Kieschnick, R. and Moussawi, R., 2018. Firm age, corporate governance, and capital structure
choices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, pp.597-614.
Adnan, S. M., Hay, D. and van Staden, C. J., 2018. The influence of culture and corporate
governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure: A cross country analysis. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 198, pp.820-832.
Abbadi, S. S., Hijazi, Q. F. and Al-Rahahleh, A. S., 2016. Corporate governance quality and
earnings management: Evidence from Jordan. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance
Journal, 10(2), pp.54-75.
Bhaumik, S. and et. al., 2019. Corporate governance and MNE strategies in emerging
economies. Journal of World Business, 54(4), pp.234-243.
Bae, S. M. and et. al., 2018. A cross-country investigation of corporate governance and corporate
sustainability disclosure: A signaling theory perspective. Sustainability, 10(8), p.2611.
12

Paniagua, J., Rivelles, R. and Sapena, J., 2018. Corporate governance and financial performance:
The role of ownership and board structure. Journal of Business Research, 89, pp.229-234.
Admati, A. R., 2017. A skeptical view of financialized corporate governance. Journal of
Economic Perspectives, 31(3), pp.131-50.
Liu, X. and Zhang, C., 2017. Corporate governance, social responsibility information disclosure,
and enterprise value in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, pp.1075-1084.
Aguilera, R. V., Marano, V. and Haxhi, I., 2019. International corporate governance: A review
and opportunities for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, pp.1-42.
Al-Sartawi, A. M. M. and Sanad, Z., 2019. Institutional ownership and corporate governance:
evidence from Bahrain. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(1), pp.101-115.
Kovermann, J. and Velte, P., 2019. The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax
avoidance—A literature review. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 36,
p.100270.
Arlen, J. and Kahan, M., 2017. Corporate governance regulation through nonprosecution. The
University of Chicago Law Review, pp.323-387.
Online
What Is the Importance of Corporate Governance?. 2020. [Online]. Available through:<
https://bizfluent.com/facts-6884459-importance-corporate-governance-.html >
Improved governance and reporting required to promote sustainability and trust in business.
2020. [Online]. Available through:< https://www.frc.org.uk/news/january-2020/improved-
governance-and-reporting-required-to-prom>.
13