Corporate Governance: Analysis of Gold Limited Report

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of corporate governance, specifically focusing on Gold Limited. It begins by outlining the structure of the report and then delves into the impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on financial reporting and corporate responsibility. The report examines the influence of the board of directors on the organization's governance and the potential impacts of their decisions. Additionally, it highlights the differences between corporate governance and management within an organization, emphasizing the distinct roles and responsibilities of each. The report references relevant literature and concludes with a summary of the key findings and recommendations for Gold Limited, considering the American, UK, and Australian corporate governance frameworks and their implications.

CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE

TABLE OF CONTENT
 INTRODUCTION
 Question 1
 Question 2
 Question 3
 Conclusion
 References

INTRODUCTION
 Corporate governance is the technique which is used by organization to controlled and
operate the business. Gold limited is a gold mining entity which headquarter based on
the New York.
 Report focus on the American mandatory corporate governance regime with UK and
Australia as well and influence and power affecting the board of the gold limited and
all study based on the gold limited.
 This report also focus on the difference between the management and corporate
governance.

Question 1
 Sarbanes oxley Act help the investor of the organization from the fraud report
financial report. This Act stabilized in the 2002 by the American government.
 It is mandatory for the senior officer of the corporation to clary the all things
which is written in the financial statement of the company.
 This act help the investor to take right step for the investing in the any
organization.
 According to the Act this will increase the responsibility of the organization
and help the to give the punishment which are doing the fraud with the
investment and the organization as well.

Question 2
 In the Gold limited the board may be influence the governance power and increase the
pay role of the employee which creating the big issue in the organization at the recent
and also take care of the joint venture on the secrete which might be reveal by the CEO
of the organization.
 Board might be use the governance power which they have to take and give the advice
about the accept the position in the board.
 They have to take the responsibility that the any kind of problem regarding to the
security were not accuse and if accrues then they gave to solve it as soon as possible

Question 3
 Corporate governance within an organization is different from management of an
organization.'
 corporate governance and management of the organization is both are different from
the each other. Corporate governance mean that control the action of the group which is
beneficial of the whole organization.
 In this they create the polices for the organization that decide the special restriction for
the all and also describe that how people can Act in this Corporate governance includes
the board of the Directors of the company .

CONCLUSION
 From the above study it has been summarized that laws of the corporate governance
laws of the America , UK Australia which includes the Sarbanes Oxley Act in
America, UK Corporate governance Code in UK and Australian Security and
investment Commission with the basic difference of that.
 it also define the difference between them. after that also suggest to the organization
to which is better then the among.
 This report also summarized that the influence and power affecting of the Board of the
organization. it also summarized that the difference between the Corporation
governance and management of the organization in respect of the organization.

REFERENCES
 Tricker, R.B. and Tricker, R.I., 2015. Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and
practices. Oxford University Press, USA.
 Yermack, D., 2017. Corporate governance and blockchains. Review of Finance. 21(1).
pp.7-31.
 Dimopoulos, T. and Wagner, H.F., 2016. Corporate Governance and CEO Turnover
Decisions. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper.(12-16).
 Armstrong, C.S. and et.al., 2015. Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance.
Journal of Accounting and Economics. 60(1). pp.1-17.