Counterintelligence, NCISP, and Homeland Security: A Detailed Report

This report provides an overview of counterintelligence, focusing on its primary objective of protecting intelligence programs. It examines the role of counterintelligence at a national level, including defensive analysis and Counterintelligence Force Protection Source Operations (CFSO). The report emphasizes the mission of counterintelligence in equipping Homeland Security with timely intelligence, with a focus on delivering information to state, local, tribal, and territorial partners. It then delves into the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan (NCISP) and its guidelines, highlighting policies and standards for informed decision-making and disrupting criminal activities. The report further explores the mission statement and goals of organizations, particularly in law enforcement, including the reduction of crime. Finally, it discusses governance structures, organizational regulations, and standards for providing strategic direction, ensuring equal opportunities for participating agencies, and employing committees to execute policies. The report references several academic sources to support its analysis.

RESPONSE

Part 1:
The counterintelligence primary objective aim towards protecting any of the intelligence
program against opposition intelligence services. It involves activities that are conducted for
countering espionage, or assassinations (Harrison & Zaksauskienė, 2016). At a national level, the
counterintelligence has been associated to the defensive analysis which is about looking for the
vulnerabilities in one’s organization, in regard to the risks and benefits. Apart from this,
Counterintelligence Force Protection Source Operations (CFSO) are for human source operations
that have been conducted abroad with intention to fill up the gap in the national level coverage. It
is mainly for the protection from any terrorism (Stech & Heckman, 2018).
The mission of the Counterintelligence is to properly equip the Homeland Security Enterprise
with the timely intelligence and relevant information that is needed to keep the Homeland
completely safe and resilient. With this, there is a need to focus on delivering counterintelligence
to state, local, tribal and other territorial partners. There have been geographical boundaries that
involves monitoring and searching of programs which needs to plan about the different roles,
missions and responsibilities (Duvenage, Sithole & Von Solms, 2017). There are different
approaches that are required for gathering information and sharing it. The Homeland Security
encompasses the defense, and foreign intelligence, with law enforcement communities that
includes public information such as the broadcast of real time news.
Part 2:
a. The NCISP and Intelligence
The guideline helps in highlighting about the different policies and standards which highlights
about making informed choices and decisions, along with target resources and disruption of
prolific criminals (Regan & Monahan, 2014). The intelligence led policing helps in providing
with public safety measures that includes the trends of criminal activity and increased
information sharing. The process involves identifying data and collecting the raw data which is
for producing intelligence products. The processing and collation also involves the evaluation of
validity and reliability measures that are for separating information from intelligence.
b. Guideline 2: Mission Statement and Goals

The mission statement has been mainly for highlighting the purpose of the organization. This can
include the ideas related to enhancing the public safety measures or information sharing
procedures. It is important to understand the short- and long-term goals that are measurable and
observable. The law enforcement goals involves the reduction of crime incidence and
suppressing criminal activities. The mission statement is created and approved through
advancement of efficient and accurate exchange of information.
c. Guideline 3: Governance
The governance is defined to be about the organizational regulations and standards that have
been exercised by the management for providing proper strategic directions. This is mainly for
creating a supported structure with operations, assigning tasks, allocating and managing
resources and developing policies. The governance structures ensures about the equal
opportunities for participating agencies and users who have complete ownership in law
enforcement and public safety. The governing bodies might employ the committees to help in
executing and adhering to the different center policies and procedures. The operational
committees might be asked to focus on policies like purge and retention.

References
Duvenage, P., Sithole, T., & von Solms, S. (2017, June). A Conceptual Framework for Cyber
Counterintelligence: Theory That Really Matters. In European Conference on Cyber
Warfare and Security (pp. 109-119). Academic Conferences International Limited.
Harrison, M., & Zaksauskienė, I. (2016). Counter‐intelligence in a command economy. The
Economic History Review, 69(1), 131-158.
Regan, P. M., & Monahan, T. (2014). Fusion center accountability and intergovernmental
information sharing. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 44(3), 475-498.
Stech, F. J., & Heckman, K. E. (2018). Human Nature and Cyber Weaponry: Use of Denial and
Deception in Cyber Counterintelligence. In Cyber Weaponry (pp. 13-27). Springer,
Cham.