A Critical Discussion on the Role of Child's Voice in UK Public Law

This essay critically discusses the Children Act 1989 and the significance of a child's voice in public law proceedings within the UK. It explores the act's provisions for safeguarding children and promoting their welfare, emphasizing the shift from parental rights to recognizing children's independ...Read More

CRITCALLY DISCUSS
(LAW)

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY ..................................................................................................................................3
Question ......................................................................................................................................3
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................13
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................14

INTRODUCTION
Children act 1989 is a UK based, which assign various role and responsibilities and
obligation to local governmental authorities, parents, judiciary and various other government
agency in United kingdom, to assure with that children are being safeguarded and where their
social welfare is being encouraged. It is being centralized on the thought that children are being
top-quality cared for within their own household, still it also forms with the provision with the
instances where families and parents do not leads with cooperation with bodies which are being
statutory. It states that children care will be the predominant concerns of the UK courts. It
specifies with any delays in the proceedings will be having the damaging impact on the welfare
of the children. It is being ascertained that court needs to take into the consideration the wishes
of children which relates with their educational, emotional and physical needs which effect the
change n child. Parental duty is being characterized in the Act as all work, rights, quality,
responsibilities and authorization which by a law a parent and has in connection with that of the
child and his belongings. Existing report will critically cover the argument with respect with the
standing of child voice in public law proceedings.
MAIN BODY
Question
Children act 1989 is of high importance as it has led down with the means of underlying
welfare to the children in the region. This have introduced with changes concerning to the social
welfare of the child where fundamental to the idea desire and feelings of children are being taken
into concern when making any decision which might affect them. Traditionally the parents of the
children were being sees to have the rights over their child, however to this legislation is being
turned which take that children has free-standing rights . These act accepted with child
centralized rule which remains at the of all the local control. Children voice are being more
prominent as the are being safer now as compared to 30 years ago used as examples (Pimm-
Smith, 2020). However, many of the situation being featured by the children, work and their
household they calculate on today could not have been overlooked and predicted by the
lawmakers which include level of pressure currently in the system , and can be the use of of
Section 20 which relates with non compulsory arrangements of accommodation for solitary
migratory and asylum search children who are being get in the nation with having no ties with
families. It is being stated that over the past decade, the principle which are being preventative

in nature underpinning the act 89 have scoured with asceticism, chronologically with rising
needs and underfunded services of children. It is being required to continuously e principle
which is being importance on authorities to work with to repossess and resource that for the
prevention in the act which is being supported by adequate and sufficient funding. This
provides with clear concept which implies with single point of accountability which is being
professional for children. It states that single individual who is being uniquely centred in place
which is being local and in which they activity, bring jointly different surroundings which are
being associated with the system in the best curiosity of the children. It is being supply with the
legal underpinning for the all child matters outcomes model.
It is being stated that children's are not just the inactive recipients of concern for other
people for the interest which is being served with favourable means to them, they are the moral
actor with right of their own and with a point of view which is being their own, which is required
to be heard by authorities in power (Kosher and Ben-Arieh, 2020). It states that child must be
looked with a story which is being important and vital to tell. They are the real people and not
abstractions. Children's have a rights and those rights are well-established characteristic of
scenery which is judicial in the nature. The right enclose reflect with the attribute and the
meeting which speaks about that judiciary, parent or the local authority are being expected to
have social welfare of the child as their interest which is highly primary in nature. Article 3 of
the law states with that in all actions concerning with child, where they are being interpreted by
private and public institution, administrative authority, court of laws and legislative bodies the
best interest of the child should be at the concern which is being primary in nature. It is being
stated and the convention decree that primary responsibility for bringing up children lies with
the households where they should be perceived with their primary needs and wants. It implies
with lawyer nominated shall stand for the child in accord with the direction which are being
standard from the guardian which implies with unless the solicitor considers taking account the
views of the guardian(Newman, 2020) . It implies with child desire to give instruction manual
which struggle that with the guardian and where its is being able to having respect to the child
perceptive to give direction on his behalf, where the solicitor will carry the proceeding which is
being directed and instructions which are being received from children. In advance with the basic
meeting with a child, the lawyer will have communicated with the guardian and being told about
the improvement phase of child , its experience till day, its affective and psychological state,

outer influences of the child and any communication and cultural issues associated with the
same.
It states that first gathering with the well-thought-of child should take place at the venue
place where the minor can feel as much safe, comfortableness and ease as accomplished. For
example the minor must have met with its guardian and hence have received and explantation
with role of the solicitor, if it is being not than the child must be told about the nature of the role
which is being associated with the solicitor, with the nature of the proceedings, the reason behind
conducting the proceedings ad what will take place in the court, its also relates with opinions
and views of any experts and social workers who are being involved in the case and with the
framework which is being legal to the framework of the proceedings. However, the above
mentioned statement which relates with delay in the appointment of the Guardian in public law
proceeding implies with silence of the voice is being argued as it is not so as the act is being
concerned with welfare and care of children which is at the utmost priority. It is being stated that
Advocate of must assess with the competency of child to give instructions .
It is being specifically recognized that child who is being competent should and will be
able to communicate and express with their feelings and wishes, opinions on background events
which leads to proceedings. It states with the perception of varied reason of why the individual
child is being in care and with the percept of fundamental quantity of time which is being
associated that with they will stay in care with. Its is being implied upon that the children should
be able to demonstrate and communicate the perceptive of the orders which are being taken and
passed in the court and make with their own view and ideas which can be utilised further in
future. It states that in the mentioned case of ReS who was a Minor which cautions that
understanding to the decision by the child which can be favourable and unfavourable implies
with not an absolute means in assessment of the competency of the same.
However, it has to be addressed relatively to issues which are being associated that with
proceeding and where by any judgement which is being sound on the calls for issues for insights
and by recognition which can be encountered by both experience and maturity, whereby both the
solicitor and court must be slow to analyse that the apprehension of the individual child is
sufficient. It is being stated in the act that the child may be manageable who wants to impress
and being open to susceptibility, where the further intelligence is with needs of factor which are
being associated that with anger, trauma, stress, mistrust and pressure by other . It implies that

this all will affect with the understanding being with the individual child and affect with their
thinking process. It relates with the constitution of competence is being essential, whereby the
lawyer must determine upon whether or not there is struggle which is being associated that with
laid down instruction before considering the issues which are being competent. However to
critic with the statement, it is being stated that child is being entitled with explanation which is
proper with the events of the date. They must be listened carefully to ensure that their view,
opinions, feelings and wishes are being taken with consideration which is being primary in
nature. It is being accounted by the means where the child who is being competent and its
instructions conflict that with the guardian, the lawyer must carry proceedings in conformation
with those of the directions and keep on to stand for the individual child. Here it is being
understood that the guardian proceed to stand for the child but with different solicitor. The
problem which is being related to that with the competence must be kept under scrutiny and
review in the whole process of proceedings (Jones,2020).
It implies that the child is mechanically a party. It implies that the inquiry of active
engagement should be at the forefront of all the communication with the children and its is being
essential that their views are being taken in full thought and supply with due weight age. The
nonverbal child will not be active but their rights will be advocated and upheld by the solicitor
and the guardian. Participation can take with the forms of letter with the judge and can be with
the request for having the meeting with the judge. Participation leads with checking of the
understanding of child from time to time, employed at the child step as far as being
accomplished, where it takes into report how the children like to talk and find out with inventive
ways to pass on with the children (McHale,2017). It implies that having the knowledge base of
what is being constituted significant participation is being extremely essential and debatably
critical to ensure that the engagement is not tokenisation. It states that the engagement which
takes with the forms of missive, the parents have right to record with evidence. Children should
also be drop with this possibility. It is the child more than anyone else who will have to live with
what is that the judiciary determine. They are being quite competent of being morale performer
in their own rights, just as the mature may have to do what the assembly decide whether they like
it or not. So the child who has the chances of meeting the judgements maker utilise an
experience which they might not have with their own household which is being well-thought-of
and comprehend with. It states that children can possibly suffer with injury if they are being kept

in isolation from or what if they are being ignored with important matter in their lives. It states
that social control of child right to take part may be in and of itself in the children the best
curiosity aside from any equilibrium off harm exercising which is being carried out by the
authorities. It implies that the adjudicator has the chance to see child as real individualist and
with the opportunity to identify what precisely is being required by the child as conflicting to
relying on anyone else report (Bridgeman,2017).
The Children's Act 1989 made the redial changes in the laws related to the children and
their families so the children can raise their voices birth in the relation of the private and the
public laws. The Act was made on the children so mainly it was mentioned their rights and how
they can express their feeling so their family and say about their problems and get their rights.
Before this Act take place there were already many previsions that take place but it was not
available for the child focused on the child and it was not able to rise the voices of the children as
an individual The Children Act modify parents and children to fully take part in Court
proceedings. Now, if the General Authority are participating with children, they must afford
regard to the Act’s provisions and react accordingly.
The children's have their own rights and those rights are properly featured by the legal
scenery. The United nations group meeting on the rights of the Child 1989 us the principles
international instruments helps to define the rights of the child. It was identified by the United
Kingdom but it is not binding in the North Ireland Court. Articles 6 to the 40 of conversation set
out of the many rights beginning with the rights of the living and ending with the rights of a child
and related suspect rights.
The rights shrine show the ethos in the speech between the Court, parents and local
agencies are well awaited to have the child's social welfare as their main interest. According to
the article 3 needs that in all the actions concerns with the child, where it is undertaken by the
private and the public institutions, legislative bodies and the authorities and their best interest
shall be the primary considerations. The Group meeting also decrees that the primary duty for
bringing up child's lies with their house members. The third subject is that children should be
detected.
However the children's are not being concern are they do not get their rights after having the
Article 3. most of the children still not hear by the parents, and they cannot express their feelings
and they lies most of the times with their families

Articles 12 shows that the children who are not capable to show or express their own
views be assessed that the rights to express their views freely in the all matters effecting the
child. The view if the children's being gen according to their age and their level of maturity to
understanding anything. In particular this must include the opportunities to be heard in any
juridical and administrates intraprocess g affecting the child.
As per the all those articles, children's are getting their voices but still they are not getting
their rights are their voices cannot be rises because of the delay in the appointments of the
Guardian in the public law proceedings and the child voice remain silent. It is necessary for the
UK government to take necessary actions and the country count should give the proper
instruction to give importance to the children's rights and their voice should be risen by them, so
they can express their view and children's can also give their onion within the court's. Daley by
the Guardians in the public law proceeding is not meeting the Children's act in action and to
make this act more effective.
This law also concern about the responsibility f the parents and it defines as the all the
rights, power, duties and the responsibilities and authorize that which by the law of the parent's
has in relation to the properly. if the child's parents are married both have progenitor duty; if they
are single, the father does not mechanically have parental responsibility however, A father of a
child, who was not married to the mother at the case of birth may utilize to the courts for genitor
responsibility, or this may be done through common agreement between the mother (or child)
and father. if it is being not than the child must be told about the nature of the role which is being
associated with the solicitor, with the nature of the proceedings, the reason behind conducting the
proceedings ad what will take place in the court, its also relates with opinions and views of any
experts and social workers who are being involved in the case and with the framework which is
being legal to the framework of the proceedings. However, the above mentioned statement which
relates with delay in the appointment of the Guardian in public law proceeding implies with
silence of the voice is being argued as it is not so as the act is being concerned with welfare and
care of children which is at the utmost priority. It is being stated that Advocate of must assess
with the competency of child to give instructions .
According to the section 8 of the Children act 1989 outlines the hearing and order which
can issue by the UK court. The contact order shows the requirements of the person the child
residences with it allow the contract the any of the other person. A Prohibited steps order'

Prevent helps to base the parent;' from the full parental duty without concerning with the
judiciary. A occupier order puts in place the disputation for whom a child should live with. A
special issues order relies on to directions are given by the authorities to solve the quarry that has
arise related to the responsibilities of the parents regarding their child. Section 8 gives their
orders cannot be made with regard to child who are looked later except for the house order.
When an petition is made to the court for a section 8 order the judicature takes into act: the
prime of the projected petition; the relation the single has to the kid; the interruption that could
be beginning to the child and, if the children are being looked after by the national authorization:
the local government plans for the child's upcoming future and the wishing for the child's
parents.
A guardians shall be appointed by the court to safeguarding the children in the UK
according to the law and it should be according to the children's interest timeless this is deemed
not to be need by the court. The court can also appoint the solicitor to represent the child as their
care taker and look for his eduction and care for the children as their parents. The guardian has
access to and may take the conies of the local authorities records related to the concerned with
the child. A guardians are understand the obligations to shows and safeguard the child's interest
during the currency of the legal proceedings, and they will invariably be represented by the
solicitor according to the child act. The children who are older ,may, if they disagree with the vie
f their guardians, interest their won solicitor if the child is disagree with their guardian and their
view does not match with them then they have the options to gi other any other, and they can rise
their vice in the court about theists problems n if their Guardian is not caring about them and thy
do not take carte of them. The guardian have the social work expertise but children.
However the children's are not getting their rights because of the delay in the law
proceeding in the public hearing, judges do not give the importance to this kind of asses and
children's account rise their voices, and they cannot get the justice. Most of the times reason
behind the delay are that the most of the times its take times to identify the other guardian for the
child and their al appointments cannot be fixed with the child. I the court give order the change
the guardian of the child then but getting the rights can take the year of times and till that child
have to with the guardian who were with them before. So it makes hard for the child's to get the
justice and their voices remain silent. It is necessary for the court to come up with the better law
and give importance to the rights of the child so the children's can get justice, and they can

change guardian who can understand their point of view and children's can get the guardian's
who can live with them, or they can help the child to get a better care and life where both can
understand each other. If there is no understanding between the child and the guardian then it
makes hard for the child to live a better life because sometimes the view of the children's are
different and their demand are different as compare to the view and demand of the guardian they
live with, and they cannot provide the proper care that wanted by the child.
Delay in the hearing accent the mind of the child, and they cannot effect concentrate on
their other work and it can feet thirteen lethal, it means that their voice will be silent, and they
will not get what they reality want and their rights will keep contented by r he peoples so it is
necessary for the court to come up with the new article and rights, or they can make the special
act where children's voice can be raise and the proceeding and appointment of the guardian can
be proceed properly and child can live their life happy, and they can also get the rights they get
from the judiciary.
There are some circumstances where the guardian can be appointed like if the child is facing and
complementation or difficulties. It can include the cases like alligation of at harm snuffed by the
children's such as parental aligation, where the agencies and local orthotist are there in the cases
(Stalford., 2018). It can also be related to the safeguarding related concerns and many more.
There are many children who are facing the problems with their family or their parents
are not able to do anything according to the child's interest where the Guardian are needed and
guardian also helps them to provide the rights if the child but delay in the proceeding making the
children's face more problems, and they are not getting the proper gusseted, and they have to
continue their rest of the life like before. Their voices are not being rise due to the delay in the
proceeding. Mostly common reason behind delaying the processing is that the family courts are
already having many cases related to the children where the court have to provide the child
Guardian for their well-being and care and their best interest. Lack of guardian in the United
kingdom is affecting and making the proceedings delay and the voice of children's are remain the
silent. IT is necessary for the participant's or local authorities to recruit the people who can work
as the guardian (Stalford., 2018). Other reason behind the guardian are not being available
because the Guardians not get the salaries from the institution, and they also have some work
that related to their own family and it is not easy for them to look for both. Their own family is
also an priority, so they are not able to take care of the other children.

Identification or recruitment of the new guardian can solve the problems and it can
reduce the time of court proceeding related to the child's and social services in attitudes should
look for the recruitment, so they can help children to rise their voices, and they can leave better
and happy life with the guardian who are take care of them and understand their point of view
The role of guardian – A group participant of all the groups, including the interviews of
the Judiciary , describes that the role of an Guardian is to reflect the voice of child in the public
proceeding, Guardians are responsible to assessing the care planning decisions are appointed and
proportionate to make sure that interest of the child can be meet and their needs and welfare can
be protected. The Interdependency of guardian was consistently cited as an imperative part of
their roles in the public proceedings. This concludes a scrutinizing the local authority care plan
and evidence for the child, and also extends the giving them a various approach as social workers
many not have considered or the parents has thus for not been willing to accept. All the
participant's were agree that the care plan for the children's world often change as the result of
guardian's intervention. The judicial reliance on the prospectives of the guardian's during the
hearing of court was identify as the focused group and the views supported by the judiciary, who
were already agreed with the view of the guardian, and they believe their view if more vital and
the decisions in the case. The guardian's independent was believed to be the one of the key
strength of the tandem model.
All the participants examine the distribution between the legal based arguments and
welfare that underpinned various roles any guardian. Distinct responsibilities, both relation
between the guardian the child and in relation top their respective share within the court
proceedings, led the consensus that the tandem model was not able to lead the efforts of
duplication. Conversely, it was argued that one of the strength of that model is that it was how
the distinct value of both professional discipline to an appropriate outcome for the child. Act take
place there were already many previsions that take place but it was not available for the child
focused on the child and it was not able to rise the voices of the children as an individual The
Children Act changers parents and children to full take part in Court proceedings. Now, if the
Local Authorization are participating with children, they must give respect to the Act’s
commissariat and respond agreement.
The participant were tend to agreed that the ideal situations was for the both solicitor and
the Guardian to attend the public law hearing. The property of this prospective, however, varied

well across different professional groups and in relation to antithetical hearing variety. Whilst
there was agreement that representation by a canvasser was necessary for all hearings, this was
not ever the case for custodial. It was not unusual for the guardian’s attending to be defence.
Driven mostly by logistics and flexible resources,
A quite often ion the proceeding of the child in the family court, children's need guardian
to be involved. This kind of cases take place when the parents are unable to care for their child
and represent the best interest of the child in their care and helping them. A appoint a Guardian
for the child also create some problems and this kin of issues may not only be suitable of being
with by the parent's alone. A child guardian are normally appointed in the cases that can include
the social services although are becoming the common across the private law processing. The
main aim of appointing the child guardian by the court to represent the interest and rights of the
children in the proceedings.
A child need a guardian matter the interest of the child many not be presented. This can
be normally occurs and there are an problems with the parent's power to look after the needs and
interests of the child. This could be either due to illness, mental incapacity or the fact that the
parents are also active in the proceeding and the child’s curiosity are reasoned to be separated
from the child's parents. The rights shrine reflect the ethos in the conversation between the Court,
parents and local authority are well expected to have the child's welfare as their main concern.
According to the article 3 needs that in all the actions concerns with the child, where it is
undertaken by the private and the public institutions, legislative bodies and the authorities and
their best interest shall be the primary considerations.
The legal guardian are provided by the court, and they s get some amount of money to
helps child and it can be someone who assume themselves as the parent's of the child, and they
provide all the necessities to the child like their food, schooling , cloths and behave as their
parent's but due to the delay in the proceeding child do not get the guardian's who can provide
them all these factors and According to the child act 1989 children 's have rights to get the
guardian if the child do not have the parent's or their parent's cannot afford for their child and
any kind of problems their parents are providing their child so. Delay in the proceeding
concretion the problem for the child, and they have to wait till their court provide them a legal
guardian but it can take around 2 to 3 years sometimes and sometimes more that so the voice of

the child remain silent, and they cannot get what they deserve in their Life, and they cannot live a
life as they want to live and sop for the student's , and do things according to their interest.
CONCLUSION
AS per the report has been examine the Child Act 1989 that provide the child a voice to
live their according to their best interest and this legislation was passed by the UK government.
This law helps to provide protection in the proceedings and improve the well-being of the child
from their birth. Its primary aims are for all child, wherever their background or fortune to have
the support they need to, be healthy, and they can act safe and live safely This report has been
critically discussed the hold in the designation of the guardian in the national law proceeding and
this how Violating the rights of children.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Kosher, H. and Ben-Arieh, A., 2020. Children’s participation: A new role for children in the
field of child maltreatment. Child abuse & neglect, 110, p.104429.
Newman, E., 2020. Theoretical research: Practice of adoption in Aotearoa before the 1881
adoption of children act. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work32(3), p.43.
Pimm-Smith, R., 2019. District schools and the erosion of parental rights under the Poor Law: a
case study from London (1889–1899). Continuity and Change 34(3). pp.401-423.
McHale, A., 2017. The misuse and abuse of Section 20 of the Children Act 1989 (Doctoral
dissertation, University of Chichester).
Jones, R., 2020. A Drama in Two Parts: Part I—The 1989 Children Act and Children’s Social
Services. In A History of the Personal Social Services in England (pp. 211-245).
Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Bridgeman, J., 2017. The provision of healthcare to young and dependent children: the
principles, concepts, and utility of the Children Act 1989. Medical law review 25(3).
pp.363-396.
Bridgeman, J., 2017. The provision of healthcare to young and dependent children: the
principles, concepts, and utility of the Children Act 1989. Medical law review.25(3).
pp.363-396.
Deblasio, L., 2020. Adoption and Law: The Unique Personal Experiences of Birth Mothers in
Adoption Proceedings. Routledge.
Fenton, C., 2020. Is consent causing confusion for clinicians? A survey of child and adolescent
Mental health professional’s confidence in using Parental Consent, Gillick Competence
and the Mental Capacity Act. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry.25(4). pp.922-931.
Haase, J.D., 2019. The Utility of Public Law and Private Law in Incorporating the Voice of the
Child in Family Law Proceedings. UNBLJ.70. p.333.
Igwe, I. and Agbawodikeizu, P. U., CHILD RIGHT ACT DOMESTICATION AND
DAUNTING PROBLEM OF CHILD LABOUR AND TRAFFICKING IN NIGERIA: A
NEXUS.
Jones, R., 2020. A Drama in Two Parts: Part I—The 1989 Children Act and Children’s Social
Services. In A History of the Personal Social Services in England (pp. 211-245). Palgrave
Macmillan,. Cham.
Katner, D. R., 2020. Delayed Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, the Kavanaugh Confirmation
Hearing, and Eliminating Statutes of Limitation for Child Sexual Abuse Cases. Am. J.
Crim. L..47. p.1.

Pollock, J., 2020. Appointment of Counsel for Civil Litigants: A Judicial Path to Ensuring the
Fair and Ethical Administration of Justice. Ct. Rev..56. p.26.
Richardson, K. and Coapes, L., 2017. WCFLCR Poster: Section 20 Children Act 1989-Co-
operation, Compromise or Catastrophe? Consideration of the postives, negatives and best
practice in care proceedings.
Shah, M. G., 2020. Children of conflict: an analysis of the Jammu and Kashmir Juvenile Justice
(Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2013. Indian Law Review.4(1). pp.105-119.
Simon, L. D., 2019. The Guardian Trustee in Bankruptcy Courts and beyond. NCL Rev., 98,
p.1297.
Stalford, H. E., 2018. David and Goliath: Due Weight, the State and Determining
Unaccompanied Children’s Fate. Journal of Immigration, Asylum & Nationality
Law..32(3). pp.258-283.