STRM042 Critical Issues: Literature Review on Globalization

Verified

Added on  2023/06/11

|21
|6489
|90
Literature Review
AI Summary
This literature review critically examines globalization, exploring its multifaceted impacts on developed and developing nations. It synthesizes various perspectives on globalization's effects on international trade, cultural exchange, and economic development. The review highlights both the advantages, such as increased market access, technological advancements, and poverty reduction in developing countries, and the disadvantages, including job displacement in developed nations, exploitation of labor, and potential price disparities. It further analyzes the role of multinational corporations, technology, and foreign direct investment in shaping globalization's trajectory, emphasizing the importance of cultural understanding and knowledge transfer in international business operations. The review concludes by underscoring the complex and often contradictory nature of globalization, calling for a nuanced approach to understanding its implications for businesses and societies worldwide.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
Running head: LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
Submitted by
Globalization
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
2
Table of Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................3
Critical literature review on Globalization...................................................................................................3
Conclusion.................................................................................................................................................11
References.................................................................................................................................................12
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
3
Introduction
In current business scenario, the pace of globalization is enlarging because of different cause like
growth in ICT, expansion of social media channels, increasing capital mobility, rise of new
electronic payment system, development in complex monetary products, as well as emergence of
footloose multinational and transnational companies (Ruckert, Macdonald, and Proulx, 2017).
This report demonstrates the critical literature review on globalization. It also depicts the positive
and negative side of globalization in developed nations. This report also focuses on advantages
and disadvantages of globalization in developing nations.
Critical literature review on Globalization
According to Rogers et al. (2016), Globalization is the procedure of interaction and integration
amid corporations, people and government at worldwide. Globalization has increased because of
advanced communication technology and transportation. The global interaction may increase the
chances of international trading, ideas as well as culture.
In contrast to this, Watkins et al. (2015) stated that globalization is the assimilation of markets in
the global economy which leads to increase interconnectedness of national financial system.
Markets in which globalization is particularly affected is a financial market like money, capital
markets, insurance markets, credit markets, and commodity markets (Cerchione, Esposito, and
Spadaro, 2016).
In the view of Hietschold Reinhardt and Gurtner (2014), the globalization of entertainment and
sports is a key feature of late 20th and early 21st era. Globalization is referred as enduring
procedure where culture, societies, provincial markets become cohesive via global crossing
network of trading as well as communication (Cerchione, Esposito, and Spadaro, 2016).
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
4
On the other hand, Ado and Su (2016) evaluated that the procedure of globalization entails the
several factors such as rapid technology development, which makes global communication
possible and political growth like fall of communication and development in transportation that
makes traveling faster and more frequent.
In support of this, Cooke Veenand Wood (2017) stated that rapid technology facilitates the
opportunity for the company for higher development with initiation of supplementary areas, and
permits higher customer synchronization. Globalization may increase the mutual cultural value
as well as facilitates a higher viable position, minimum operating expenses in other nations,
access to resources, new raw material and opportunities of investment (Ruckert, Macdonald, and
Proulx, 2017).
According to Pukall and Calabrò (2014), there are large numbers of emerging areas in developed
nations that are consequences of privatization in public-sector. There are different industries that
want to extend and expand their value chain at international level in order to increase the demand
of consumer (Massaro, et. al., 2016).
In contrast to this, Yaqub et al. (2014) stated that Globalization has an impact on the business
management, which can be demonstrated by the number of transaction across the borders.
Business is the ongoing procedure to develop a wide category of their footprint as it is used to
decline the expenses and increase the economies of scale (Ali, and Miller, 2017).
Wang Andre and Greenwood (2015) stated that multinational companies are a consequence of
globalization. It involves central role within the practices of globalization such as inflows of
international foreign direct investment. Within Europe, the company focuses on the western
economy as it leads to size constraints (Abed, Dwivedi, and Williams, 2015).
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
5
On the other hand, Cama Jorge and Peña (2016) opined that due to globalization, the company
has needed to identify new geographical sector for a business deal such as competition in the
market. This strategy can be also beneficial to enlarge their market and increases economies of
scale as globalization provides compression of time-space, and competitive economies benefit at
all level as well as support to attract the investors (Garza-Reyes, 2015).
As per the view of Jasti and Kodali (2015), globalization is beneficial for a corporation as in
different parts of the globe, people make efforts to buy different products accessible in the
international marketplace. Highly wealthy and educated individual from different backgrounds
may communicate within a westernized area (Touzard, et. al., 2015).
In favor to this, Dubey et al. (2017) stated that western style is a symbol of power and wealth as
well as the elite embraces the western style of a pattern of behaviour and products in order to
impress others (Shahbaz, Bhattacharya, and Ahmed, 2015). In nowadays, the western pattern of
behaviour, culture, and language is considered in international business (Bezerra, and Gomes,
2016).
On the other hand, Yawar and Seuring (2017) described that competition is the visible favorable
effect of globalization that can enhance the product quality due to international competition.
There are two approaches that should be used by the company in order to enhance the product’s
quality named customer is the king approach and customer services (Fellnhofer, 2015).
According to Van Laar et al. (2017), domestic corporations fight with the foreign competition.
The company should make efforts to improve their standard in order to enhance the extent of
satisfaction among customers and survive in the market. When an international brand enters into
the nation then, it needs to improve their goodwill to sustain into the areas (Abeza, et. al., 2015).
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
6
It also generates rivalry at the marketplace and aids to adjust into the global scenario (Bonal, and
Fontdevila, 2017).
On the other side, Hatemi et al. (2015) stated that globalization creates the favorable effect on
culture. The world that an individual living in today’s era is an outcome of different culture
meeting. An individual of one culture demonstrates the effects of their culture as well as focuses
on cultures that are feasible (Zimmermann, DF Ferreira, and Carrizo Moreira, 2016).
In the view of Carter et al. (2015), societies have become superior as they have welcomed
individual of other backgrounds and civilization as well as generate an entirely new culture of
their own. Due to globalization, language, cooking styles, customs, and language has improved.
It is same in the form of movies, musical style and other art (Pike, and Page, 2014). Due to
globalization, business moves from one nation to another hence they should learn the notion of a
culture of other nation (Audulv, et. al., 2016).
As per the view of Hu et al. (2015), an individual has job security in developed nations. It is
stated that an individual lose their jobs as developed nations have outsourced the industrialized
and white collar jobs. It is also evaluated that there is less job for people in developed nations
(Campos, et. al., 2014). Since, manufacturing act is outsourced to nations in which cost of
producing goods with pays are low as compared to their nations. Company can outsource the
business function in developing nations such as India and China during globalisation
(Dominguez, et. al., 2015).
In contrast to this, Miller McAdam and McAdam (2018) stated that there are different kinds of
people such as programmer, accountants, scientists, and editors and they have lost their jobs
because of outsourcing to an inexpensive location like India. At the same time, globalization
considers the misuse of labour (Adamson, et. al., 2017).
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
7
According to Perri and Peruffo (2016), safety standard can be disregarded to manufacture the
inexpensive products. In practices, the current practice in Latin America is open-handed
multinational that moves their operations to South East Asia and China because of market and
cost considerations (Asongu, 2015).
In opposed to this, Horwitz (2015) discussed that globalization may lead to disparity in prices.
Due to enhancement in the rivalry, developed nations are forced for declining price of products
because other nations such as China manufacture products at the lower expenses, which makes
products at inexpensive as compared to ones manufactured in developed nations (Amighini, et.
al., 2015). Company forces to decline price of their goods in order to maintain their customers in
developed nations (Phillips and Moutinho, 2014). It is disadvantageous to the company as it may
decline the ability to sustain social welfare in their nations.
According to Waterval et al. (2015), globalization plays an imperative role in poverty reduction
in developing nations. Poverty is reduced in percentage of their active below poverty line such as
fast-developing nations like Vietnam, India, as well as China. Along with this, other nations such
as Sub-Saharan Africa are registered as opposite trend (Harrison, 2015).
In support of this, Jasti and Kodali (2015) evaluated that due to globalization, an individual from
diverse nations such as offered different job opportunities within the worldwide. It has generated
the aspect of outsourcing. Developed nation offers work to developing nations in which costs are
inexpensive (Harrison, 2015).
In contrast to this, Tummers (2016) stated that there are different kinds of works like accounting,
marketing, insurance, customer support and software development are provided in developing
nations such as India. Hence, the nation that is provided the work may enjoy getting the jobs
(SpasojevicLohmann, and Scott, 2018).
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
8
Van Helden and Uddin (2016) opined that company has provided an opportunity in order to
capitalise in emerging nation as well as acquire talent, which is accessible here. In the
developing nation, there is inadequate wealth, which may delay the development of domestic
corporations as well as employment (Law, et. al., 2015). Because of global nature of businesses,
people of developing nations can acquire profitable employment opportunity (Spasojevic,
Lohmann, and Scott, 2018).
On the other hand, Campos et al. (2018) stated that technology is a powerful force that drives the
world with regards to congregate commonality. It is used to make effective communication,
travel, and transport during globalization. An individual from different areas want the things that
they have heard, realized and experienced via technology (Wiethe-Körprich, et. al., 2017).
Organization via management can capture the information from a different place on the globe
that can be practiced at the workplace (Samantra, et. al., 2016).
As per the view of Martin (2016), television and media play an effective role to influence the
insight of globe from a comparatively small national settlement as well as realism into
international concern and global area. Furthermore, multinational company can develop the
subsidiary in new areas and develop the understanding regarding how to transfer from parent to
local operations (Wiethe-Körprich, et. al., 2017). Knowledge can also flow from one division to
another as a entire organization may get advantageous from development sectors (Samantra, et.
al., 2016).
In contrast to this, Quinones Nicholson and Heeks (2015) stated that one of the ways that an
organization can use in transferring knowledge is a movement of personnel that takes place
within multinationals. It can develop the bank of understanding regarding working in different
circumstances and people from diverse cultures (Cheng, Johansen, and Hu, 2015).
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
9
As per the view of Costa Soares and de Sousa (2016), an organization can use of transferring
knowledge in the movement of personnel that takes place at the multinationals. It develops the
bank of understanding regarding working in diverse circumstances with people from diverse
culture (Silvius, and Schipper, 2014). It demonstrates the stock of understanding that could be
developed and used to provide the benefits to the organization (Khan, and Azeem, 2014).
In favor of this, Aljuwaiber (2016) discussed that foreign investment is a direct outcome of
globalization. Foreign investment always focused by an organization as it facilitates the capital,
resources, and technology to a nation that will aid the economic development of the host nation
(Hardy, and Tolhurst, 2014). It may enhance the employment in both direct and indirect manner
(Fredriksson, and Liljestrand, 2015).
On the other hand Brown and Mason (2017), state that export may increase in a nation and also
enhances the current account and also provides support in repayment of external debt. But, there
is certain criticism to lead the foreign control (Mahut, et al., 2017).
According to Figueroa-Domecq et al. (2015), developing nation can practice general or particular
industrial and trade policies to promote the foreign direct investment, foreign tourist services,
and capital. It can indirectly or directly contribute to their economic activities in global level
(Narayanan, 2015).
In opposed to this, Restall and Conrad (2015) stated that globalization is accountable for
unemployment circumstance in the world but, at the same time, it provides some job opportunity.
Despite the facts that it provides job opportunity to the globe but it is still accountable for the
current issue (Lupton, 2014). It is demonstrated that global integration and increased travel may
gain the competitiveness at the enterprise and national levels (Eagle, Jones, and Greig, 2017). It
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
10
also forces the producers to address the ways in order to decline the costs, enhance efficiency
and increase the productivity (Boussebaa, 2015).
According to Sartor et al. (2014), the key factor is to decline the level of employment from 1980
to 2000 from national to regional macroeconomic policies that were executed and sustained.
Along with this, those nations with liberal macroeconomic may reform and pursue the politics to
endorse the flexible labor markets and employment practices (Kosmützky, and Putty, 2016).
These nations also focus on judicious enforcement of labor and decentralized industrial relations
systems (Garner, Conroyand Bader, 2015).
In contrast to this, Oliver Lorenc and Innvær (2014) discussed that nations which highly engaged
with employment regulations, laws with policies may experience a higher level of employment
as companies are not competent to influence and retain to employees in jobs (Dey, and 2016).
According to Buenechea-Elberdin (2017), the average traffic rate is continually increasing in
developing nations such as some nations have currently executed to trade reform. Furthermore,
trade policy is a significant concept during globalization and in the lower income developing
nations (Morley, et. al., 2015).
In contrast to this, Haynes (2017) discussed that introduction of the internet, widespread use of
computers, faxes and mobile phones, e-commerce, and cheaper transportation facilities are
provided in the developing nation as it can provide a different opportunity to the company
(Charlton, et. al., 2016). However, in certain circumstance, there is a gap between traditional
industries and global firms as globalization has provided new opportunities for developing
nations in terms of generating the jobs and expanding the exports (Sigler, 2016).
According to Bayulken and Huisingh (2015), different developing nations competing for foreign
investors due to longer tax holidays, several incentives, and costly subsidies for multinationals.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
11
The rivalry between developing nations may decline the favorable net effect of globalization
(Hemmerling, Hamm, and Spiller, 2015).
Conclusion
From the above analysis, it can be concluded that globalization is the procedure of interaction
and integration amid corporations, people and government at worldwide. It can be also
summarized that globalization can both positive and negative impact on business management in
developed nations such as decline transactions cost, identify new geographical sector for a
business deal, and viable competitions are the positive side of globalization. It can be also
summarized that job security, safety standard and variation in prices is the negative side of
globalization in a developed nation. It can be also summarized that poverty reduction, different
job opportunities, technology, foreign investment are the positive side of globalization in
developing nations. It can be concluded that unemployment and trade is the negative side of
globalization in developing nations.
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
12
References
Abed, S.S., Dwivedi, Y.K. and Williams, M.D., 2015. Social media as a bridge to e-commerce
adoption in SMEs: A systematic literature review. The Marketing Review, 15(1), pp.39-57.
Abeza, G., O’Reilly, N., Séguin, B. and Nzindukiyimana, O., 2015. Social media scholarship in
sports management research: A critical review. Journal of Sports Management, 29(6), pp.601-
618.
Adamson, G., Wang, L., Holm, M. and Moore, P., 2017. Cloud manufacturing–a critical review
of the recent development and future trends. International Journal of Computer Integrated
Manufacturing, 30(4-5), pp.347-380.
Ado, A. and Su, Z., 2016. China in Africa: a critical literature review. critical perspectives on
international business, 12(1), pp.40-60.
Ali, M. and Miller, L., 2017. ERP system implementation in large enterprises–a systematic
literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(4), pp.666-692.
Aljuwaiber, A., 2016. Communities of practice as an initiative for knowledge sharing in business
organizations: a literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(4), pp.731-748.
Amighini, A., Cozza, C., Giuliani, E., Rabellotti, R. and Scalera, V.G., 2015. Multinational
enterprises from emerging economies: What theories suggest, what evidence shows. A literature
review. Economia e Politica Industriale, 42(3), pp.343-370.
Asongu, S., 2015. Liberalisation and financial sector competition: a critical contribution to the
empirics with an African assessment. South African Journal of Economics, 83(3), pp.425-451.
Cuvelier, J., Vlassenroot, K. and Olin, N., 2014. Resources, conflict, and governance: A critical
review. The extractive industries and society, 1(2), pp.340-350.
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
13
Audulv, Å., Packer, T., Hutchinson, S., Roger, K.S. and Kephart, G., 2016. Coping, adapting or
selfmanaging–what is the difference? A concept review based on the neurological literature.
Journal of advanced nursing, 72(11), pp.2629-2643.
Bayulken, B. and Huisingh, D., 2015. A literature review of historical trends and emerging
theoretical approaches for developing sustainable cities (part 1). Journal of cleaner production,
109, pp.11-24.
Bezerra, G.C., and Gomes, C.F., 2016. Performance measurement in airport settings: a
systematic literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(4), pp.1027-1050.
Bonal, X. and Fontdevila, C., 2017. Is Education for Sustainable Development the means to
bring about inclusive development? Between idealist and alternative positions. Current opinion
in environmental sustainability, 24, pp.73-77.
Boussebaa, M., 2015. Professional service firms, globalization, and the new imperialism.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(8), pp.1217-1233.
Brown, R. and Mason, C., 2017. Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and
conceptualization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49(1), pp.11-30.
Buenechea-Elberdin, M., 2017. A structured literature review about intellectual capital and
innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), pp.262-285.
Cama, M.G., Jorge, M.L. and Peña, F.J.A., 2016. Gender differences between faculty members
in higher education: A literature review of selected higher education journals. Educational
Research Review, 18, pp.58-69.
Campos, A.C., da Costa Mendes, J., Albino Silva, J. and Oom do Valle, P., 2014. Critical
success factors for a total quality culture: A structural model. Tourism & Management Studies,
10(1).
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
14
Campos, A.C., Mendes, J., Valle, P.O.D. and Scott, N., 2018. Co-creation of tourist experiences:
A literature review. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(4), pp.369-400.
Carter, R.W., Thok, S., O’Rourke, V. and Pearce, T., 2015. Sustainable tourism and its use as a
development strategy in Cambodia: a systematic literature review. Journal of Sustainable
Tourism, 23(5), pp.797-818.
Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., and Spadaro, M.R., 2016. A literature review on knowledge
management in SMEs. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14(2), pp.169-177.
Charlton, K.E., Russell, J., Gorman, E., Hanich, Q., Delisle, A., Campbell, B. and Bell, J., 2016.
Fish, food security and health in Pacific Island countries and territories: a systematic literature
review. BMC public health, 16(1), p.285.
Cheng, Y., Johansen, J. and Hu, H., 2015. Exploring the interaction between R&D and
production in their globalization. International Journal of Operations & Production
Management, 35(5), pp.782-816.
Cooke, F.L., Veen, A. and Wood, G., 2017. What do we know about cross-country comparative
studies in HRM? A critical review of literature in the period of 2000-2014. The International
Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), pp.196-233.
Costa, E., Soares, A.L. and de Sousa, J.P., 2016. Information, knowledge and collaboration
management in the internationalization of SMEs: a systematic literature review. International
Journal of Information Management, 36(4), pp.557-569.
Dawar, G. and Singh, S., 2016. Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity: A literature
review. Journal of IMS Group, 13(1), pp.61-71.
Dey, B. and Ali, F., 2016. A critical review of the ICT for development research. In ICTs in
Developing Countries (pp. 3-23). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
15
Dominguez, C., Nascimento, M.M., Payan-Carreira, R., Cruz, G., Silva, H., Lopes, J., Morais,
M.D.F.A. and Morais, E., 2015. Adding value to the learning process through online peer review
activities: towards the elaboration of a methodology to promote critical thinking in future
engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 40(5), pp.573-591.
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Papadopoulos, T. and Fosso Wamba, S., 2017. World
class sustainable supply chain management: a critical review and further research directions. The
International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(2), pp.332-362.
Eagle, R., Jones, A., and Greig, A., 2017. Localism and the environment: A critical review of
UK Government localism strategy 2010–2015. Local Economy, 32(1), pp.55-72.
Esposito, E. and Evangelista, P., 2014. Investigating virtual enterprise models: literature review
and empirical findings. International Journal of Production Economics, 148, pp.145-157.
Fellnhofer, K., 2015. Literature review: investment readiness level of small and medium-sized
companies. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 7(3-4), pp.268-284.
Figueroa-Domecq, C., Pritchard, A., Segovia-Pérez, M., Morgan, N. and Villace-Molinero, T.,
2015. Tourism gender research: A critical accounting. Annals of Tourism Research, 52, pp.87-
103.
Fredriksson, A. and Liljestrand, K., 2015. Capturing food logistics: a literature review and
research agenda. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 18(1), pp.16-34.
Garner, S.L., Conroy, S.F., and Bader, S.G., 2015. Nurse migration from India: a literature
review. International journal of nursing studies, 52(12), pp.1879-1890.
Garza-Reyes, J.A., 2015. Lean and green–a systematic review of the state of the art literature.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, pp.18-29.
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
16
Hardy, C. and Tolhurst, D., 2014. Epistemological beliefs and cultural diversity matters in
management education and learning: A critical review and future directions. Academy of
management learning & education, 13(2), pp.265-289.
Harrison, N., 2015. Practice, problems, and power in ‘internationalization at home’: critical
reflections on recent research evidence. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4), pp.412-430.
Hatemi, G., Seyahi, E., Fresko, I., Talarico, R. and Hamuryudan, V., 2015. Behçet’s syndrome: a
critical digest of the 2014-2015 literature. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 33(Suppl 94), pp.S3-S14.
Haynes, K., 2017. Accounting as gendering and gendered: A review of 25 years of critical
accounting research on gender. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, pp.110-124.
Hemmerling, S., Hamm, U. and Spiller, A., 2015. Consumption behavior regarding organic food
from a marketing perspective—a literature review. Organic Agriculture, 5(4), pp.277-313.
Hietschold, N., Reinhardt, R. and Gurtner, S., 2014. Measuring critical success factors of TQM
implementation successfully–a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production
Research, 52(21), pp.6254-6272.
Horwitz, F., 2015. Human resources management in multinational companies in Africa: a
systematic literature review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,
26(21), pp.2786-2809.
Hu, Q., Mason, R., Williams, S.J. and Found, P., 2015. Lean implementation within SMEs: a
literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(7), pp.980-1012.
Jasti, N.V.K., and Kodali, R., 2015. A critical review of lean supply chain management
frameworks: a proposed framework. Production Planning & Control, 26(13), pp.1051-1068.
Jasti, N.V.K., and Kodali, R., 2015. Lean production: literature review and trends. International
Journal of Production Research, 53(3), pp.867-885.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
17
Jones, M.F., Singh, N. and Hsiung, Y., 2015. Determining the critical success factors of the wine
tourism region of Napa from a supply perspective. International journal of tourism research,
17(3), pp.261-271.
Khan, S.U. and Azeem, M.I., 2014. Intercultural challenges in offshore software development
outsourcing relationships: an exploratory study using a systematic literature review. IET
Software, 8(4), pp.161-173.
Kosmützky, A. and Putty, R., 2016. Transcending borders and traversing boundaries: A
systematic review of the literature on transnational, offshore, cross-border, and borderless higher
education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(1), pp.8-33.
Law, S.H., Tan, H.B. and AzmanSaini, W.N.W., 2015. Globalisation, institutional reforms and
financial development in East Asian economies. The World Economy, 38(2), pp.379-398.
Leask, A., 2016. Visitor attraction management: A critical review of research 2009–2014.
Tourism Management, 57, pp.334-361.
Lupton, D., 2014. Health promotion in the digital era: a critical commentary. Health promotion
international, 30(1), pp.174-183.
Mahut, F., Daaboul, J., Bricogne, M. and Eynard, B., 2017. Product-Service Systems for
servitization of the automotive industry: a literature review. International Journal of Production
Research, 55(7), pp.2102-2120.
Martin, B.R., 2016. R&D policy instruments–a critical review of what we do and don’t know.
Industry and Innovation, 23(2), pp.157-176.
Massaro, M., Handley, K., Bagnoli, C. and Dumay, J., 2016. Knowledge management in small
and medium enterprises: a structured literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management,
20(2), pp.258-291.
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
18
Miller, K., McAdam, R., and McAdam, M., 2018. A systematic literature review of university
technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda. R&D
Management, 48(1), pp.7-24.
Morley, M.J., Scullion, H., Collings, D.G. and Schuler, R.S., 2015. Talent management: A
capital question. European Journal of International Management, 9(1), pp.1-8.
Narayanan, V., 2015. Export barriers for small and medium-sized enterprises: A literature review
based on Leonidou's Model. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(2), p.105.
Oliver, K., Lorenc, T. and Innvær, S., 2014. New directions in evidence-based policy research: a
critical analysis of the literature. Health research policy and systems, 12(1), p.34.
Perri, A. and Peruffo, E., 2016. Knowledge spillovers from FDI: a critical review from the
international business perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(1), pp.3-
27.
Phillips, P. and Moutinho, L., 2014. A critical review of strategic planning research in hospitality
and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, pp.96-120.
Pike, S. and Page, S.J., 2014. Destination Marketing Organizations and destination marketing: A
narrative analysis of the literature. Tourism Management, 41, pp.202-227.
Pukall, T.J., and Calabrò, A., 2014. The internationalization of family firms: A critical review
and integrative model. Family Business Review, 27(2), pp.103-125.
Quinones, G., Nicholson, B., and Heeks, R., 2015. A Literature Review of E-Entrepreneurship in
Emerging Economies: Positioning Research on Latin American Digital Startups. In
Entrepreneurship in BRICS (pp. 179-208). USA: Springer, Cham.
Restall, B. and Conrad, E., 2015. A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential
for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 159, pp.264-278.
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
19
Rogers, R., Schaenen, I., Schott, C., O’Brien, K., Trigos-Carrillo, L., Starkey, K. and Chasteen,
C.C., 2016. Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature, 2004 to 2012.
Review of Educational Research, 86(4), pp.1192-1226.
Ruckert, A., Macdonald, L., and Proulx, K.R., 2017. Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: a
conceptual review. Third World Quarterly, 38(7), pp.1583-1602.
Samantra, C., Datta, S., Mahapatra, S.S. and Debata, B.R., 2016. Interpretive structural modeling
of critical risk factors in software engineering project. Benchmarking: An International Journal,
23(1), pp.2-24.
Sartor, M., Orzes, G., Nassimbeni, G., Jia, F. and Lamming, R., 2014. International purchasing
offices: Literature review and research directions. Journal of Purchasing and Supply
Management, 20(1), pp.1-17.
Shahbaz, M., Bhattacharya, M., and Ahmed, K., 2015. Growth-globalisation-emissions nexus:
the role of population in Australia. Monash Business School Discussion Paper, (23/15), pp.p1-
33.
Sigler, T.J., 2016. After the ‘world city’has globalized: Four agendas towards a more nuanced
framework for global urban research. Geography Compass, 10(9), pp.389-398.
Silvius, A.J. and Schipper, R.P., 2014. Sustainability in project management: A literature review
and impact analysis. Social Business, 4(1), pp.63-96.
Spasojevic, B., Lohmann, G. and Scott, N., 2018. Air transport and tourism–a systematic
literature review (2000–2014). Current Issues in Tourism, 21(9), pp.975-997.
Touzard, J.M., Temple, L., Faure, G., and Triomphe, B., 2015. Innovation systems and
knowledge communities in the agriculture and agri-food sector: a literature review. Journal of
Innovation Economics & Management, (2), pp.117-142.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
20
Tummers, L., 2016. The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review
of co-housing research. Urban Studies, 53(10), pp.2023-2040.
van Helden, J., and Uddin, S., 2016. Public sector management accounting in emerging
economies: A literature review. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 41, pp.34-62.
Van Laar, E., van Deursen, A.J., van Dijk, J.A. and de Haan, J., 2017. The relation between 21st-
century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in human behavior,
72, pp.577-588.
Wang, C.C., Andre, K. and Greenwood, K.M., 2015. Chinese students studying at Australian
universities with specific reference to nursing students: a narrative literature review. Nurse
Education Today, 35(4), pp.609-619.
Waterval, D.G., Frambach, J.M., Driessen, E.W. and Scherpbier, A.J., 2015. Copy but not paste
A literature review of cross-border curriculum partnerships. Journal of Studies in International
Education, 19(1), pp.65-85.
Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., and Kale, D., 2015. National innovation systems
and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for
innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature. Research Policy, 44(8),
pp.1407-1418.
Wiethe-Körprich, M., Weber, S., Bley, S. and Kreuzer, C., 2017. Intrapreneurship competence as
a manifestation of work agency: A systematic literature review. In Agency at Work (pp. 37-65).
Springer, Cham.
Yaqub, O., Castle-Clarke, S., Sevdalis, N. and Chataway, J., 2014. Attitudes to vaccination: a
critical review. Social Science & Medicine, 112, pp.1-11.
Document Page
LITERATURE REVIEW ON GLOBALISATION
21
Yawar, S.A. and Seuring, S., 2017. Management of social issues in supply chains: a literature
review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics,
141(3), pp.621-643.
Zimmermann, R., DF Ferreira, L.M. and Carrizo Moreira, A., 2016. The influence of supply
chain on the innovation process: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An
International Journal, 21(3), pp.289-304.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 21
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
logo.png

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]