Critical Analysis and Review of Research Paper (Healthcare Module)

This report offers a critical analysis of a research paper focusing on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), employing the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for evaluation. The analysis delves into the methodology, including systematic review and meta-analysis, justifying the approach and addressing research problems. It examines the strengths and weaknesses of the study, supported by evidence from various databases like Medline and Embase. The report also discusses primary and secondary research methods, such as interviews, surveys, and questionnaires, alongside the use of EndNote software for data management. The conclusion highlights the importance of rigorous research practices and the impact of findings on healthcare practices, emphasizing the mortality rates, CVA, MI, and other diseases. The report provides a detailed overview of the research process and the implications of the findings.

CRITICAL ANALYSIS
AND REVIEW OF
RESEARCH PAPER

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3
Analysis and review using methods of critical appraisals skills program tool (CASP)..............3
Justify and argue for appropriate methodology along with method to address research
problems......................................................................................................................................6
Justify the strengths and weaknesses by using supporting evidence..........................................7
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................9
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................10

INTRODUCTION
Research paper refers to a guide which is designed in such a way that it can help to
provide some path which is through their performance of different question that are unsolved and
concern with research. There is justification that are defined in different aspects that can explain
the research quality. There are numbers of research that are evaluated for quality of living
standards in targeted people of them. There are different skill programmes that helps to explain
as a techniques which can be used to deliver the high quality of training for healthcare
professionals. In this time, each and everyone likes to evolve their life quality along with living
standards. Moreover, healthcare professionals like to have important role for the development of
skills in life along with standard of living. Adding to this, this report says that DART with
clopidogrel and Aspirin can persist until the CABG is faced by the patients as ACS (Wagg,
(2018)).
MAIN BODY
Analysis and review using methods of skills program tool
This refers to one of important and larger tool that can be able to identify the weakness
and strength on different process of research that is getting performed. Along with this, this tool
helps for determining the investigation that can particularly assist to conduct the proper sources
by using the right sources which can assist to use the natural resources. Moreover, There are
some checklist related with paper that is being analyse, should be fitted out along with
categorised in different research based on qualitative analysis. This tool help to get ensure about
different presentation of research that is being appropriate along with meaning findings.
Appraisals checklists are contained by CASP that provide the way to dedication in some studies
which is cohort in nature. There are diagnostic studies which is based on economic changes and
many more. On the basis of selected topic there are different checklists in which some of them
are discussed further (Skalidou, (2018)).
Analysis of first checklists refers to systematic review that is clearly based on different
questions that can clearly focused on different questions that are able to render solution or may
be not. In this report can identify that analysis on therapy of dual anti-platelet that is before
grafting of artery bypass. Moreover, this topic is focuses on to develop report that are based on

questions and related to interventions. There is highlighting of different questions in a way that it
can be realisable in relation to provide outcome from assessment which is there for future.
From above, the analysis of research which is based on different loop and is able to
determine correct and applicable information during preparation & information of project. After
analysing different research paper, it is defined as many individual that have own idea along with
perception for specific things. During developing report, there is need of proper research along
with relevance is needed for evidence. This topic is able to deliver clear understanding about
matter that is reliable for preparation of report. In that time, the analysis is based on different
vision about collecting and creating data which are essential for report writing. This report says
about studies which are based on this assay called as DAPT assay with clopidogrel and Aspirin
before CABG entering. To get perfection in preparation of meta analysis, there is selection of
keyword along with references which are necessary due to they are able to provide evidence
based data forming along with providing of article which is related with journals. Journals are
generally collected by Medline, Embase and scopus. Data are available in appendix there in
systematic report when there are searching from above journal like Embase.
Other checklists that helps to cover the data which is relevant in respect to reports.
Moreover, report cover topics like dual anti-platelet therapy, acute coronary syndrome, coronary
artery bypass that are related with coronary obstructive pulmonary disease, clopidogrel, aspirin
and so on. Report should contain the initial data by bibliographic unit along with this can help to
check the genuineness of research and report that is created. In relation to meta-analysis, report
has been categories in three different parts like systematic searches in electric database that is
required (Bourabain and et. al., (2020)). There is need to visit through google & google scholar
and google that can provide an approach and there is also official website of that organisation
which is passing through different checklists which is measured in qualitative terms. Detailed
study analysis says that is conducted in reviews, this can help in quality of reports. Along with
recent reviews, there are detail of statement which are collected through EndNote software that is
initiated as per removing artificial information of Xerox research in relation to increase the
quality research. Here, CASP measurement is highly effective to know different factor that is
helpful in context to gain better quality of reviews.
In this checklists, it is identified that results of the review is either combined or not. As
per this, regards are given below which are there for the proper aspect of review. There is need

to be confirmed that there should not be any duplication of any study that are based on research
which are not allowed in any circumstance. By assuring through EndNote software that is used
frequently and research yield up-to 4003, there should not any duplicated record that is detailed
study along with help in screening of their studies which are 41 in numbers. In relation to this,
review is there which includes 4 trails which are random in nature that are based on clinic & 6
prospective cohort and 6-7 retrospective cohort studies. In order to improve the quality of paper
or report, most important factor that are driven for realistic studies that are taken in order with
8029 patients (Knopp-Sihota, (2019)).
Qualitative measure of reviews that are dependent on overall objective and drawn at end
of the review. This report states about view that DAPT along clopidogrel and Aspirin that is
before CABG help to know patience along ACS leads to failure of renal. Different increase the
rate of mortality along to conclude with DAPT which is connected. Given result are fine in
nature. After screening, this report includes 41 articles. Along with this, information collected
from different 15 studies that are included with meta-analysis. Other checklists that are used to
define the different aim which can applied in local population or not. There it can be said that
checklists that are being useful in this report which is there to took realistic of concerned
population along with this, there are different research are being conducted. Sometimes it can be
improved by using different techniques which is there in CASP tool to help and improve the
quality of research.
According to this, many number of checklists which have discussed in relation to
implementation in a manner to improve and get advantage in relation to improve research origin
along with to eliminate the issues are undertaken during research. So, there can be concluded that
research are passed in better manner that has been conducted in realistic method along with
example which is to concern different research and population which has been conducted (Lubbe
and et. al., (2020)).
In relation to this, report is able to well analysed and able to create outcome that are
important to considered and acknowledge, this can said to be an impactful way along with proper
manner. In context to this, there are highlighted output there that have the mortality rate, CVA
and MI, re-operation and different diseases like re-exploration, renal failure and so on.
According to this, during research conducting there should essential an meta analysis that
can help into derive which is by meta-analysis that having high cost. Instead to harm there is

approach that are use during these days. This review can prove and able to help in the analysis
that people who are there dealing with different medical and health related issues which are due
to improper quality of health along with due to unnecessary analysis that is waste of time. As per
current meta-analysis, it is able to simply provide some justification which is there in terms of
medication that is by systematic review along with meta-analysis.
Justify along with argue for methodology and methods to address research problems
Research methodology refers to specific different procedures that can be used to process,
identify & selected for analyse which is about project. It is able to allow the effectiveness of
different research procedures and able to provide readers the detailed analysis of the subject
materials. Basically, it is the answer which is there provided for main questions. There is analysis
of data which is there collected. In includes two different types of market research that is said to
be the primary research and secondary research (Alspaugh & Phillips, (2020)).
Primary research- This is the type of research which is generally used by the
researchers to collect information and data directly than depending on such data that are there
already collected from previous researches. It is the direct interaction with different organisation
along with their customer which are used for exact value and demand of their product and goods
or services in different marketplace. This type of market research can be conducted by using the
analysis procedure which is able to provide the information that is based on that research which
is going to discussed further.
 Interviews- This refers to the face-to-face questioner which is there within two different
people or any type of group or in between different communities. This concerns with
time taking approach which needs particular investment in relation to gather specific
people along with this to market their survey which is there based on conducting
interview. It is a source of economy where there is analysis of situation & different
conditions that can enhance productivity along with profitability of firm. There is need to
use the resource in proper manner that wastage should be diminished and optimum use of
resource can be used.
 Survey- This is another way to collect data and information where there is generally use
of online survey now-a-days. This can be generated through different link and also can be
by browsing and playing video. This is able to cover the dimension of value of different

products which is consumed by consumers which is in their respected marketplace
(Buffel and et. al., (2018)).
 Questioner- These are the set of questions which are used to dedicate towards products
and services that is going to deliver to consumers.
As per present report, there is an analysis that author used different steps that is related
with research tools that can help researchers to extract data from local and general people.
Recently, quality of report has imported through EndNote software that review duplication of
data that is extracted in report.
Secondary research- This is the one which also called as desk report. This is the
research method which involves the use of already researched data. Here collected data is
summarised and collected to increase the effectiveness of overall research. This is the addition of
different study and their results that is performed by different government, Agencies and
organisation by which it associated with specific industry. In Small industry with some limited
budget are able to adopt that type of research that is most affordable techniques and they are also
used in the coordination in instant decision in different operation in company (Harris and et. al.,
(2018)).
As above showed meta- analysis, this have been clearly seen that there are collaborative
approach with several authors in both fields primary and secondary research, and this commonly
extract the complete data which have been mentioned in many types of articles which includes
newspaper, magazine etc. The author have been utilized various research related strategies
therefore to manage all the effective sources in order to perform research. The range of data is
extracted as well as data is measured from the official site of NIH and in addition this studies is
quite useful and helpful in order to understand the whole concept of cross sectional studies , such
kind of quality of research they helps in building effective reports with no duplication and along
with this quality of research (Skiba and et. al.,(2019)).
Justify the strengths and weaknesses by using supporting evidence
As this have been seen that meta-analysis uses both types of methodology of research
which often helps in possessing number of strengths and weakness which mostly regarding with
research they are discussed below;
For primary research
Strengths Weaknesses

 By relating with primary research
author have been used the process of
meta-analysis in effective manner in
order to established direct relationship
with various group of peoples which
could provide them effective source of
information.
 There is another strength which is
associated with primary research , they
uses tools in a proper manner for the
purpose of extraction the data which is
appropriate and trustworthy (Stout and
et. al.,(2019)).
 The weakness which have been found
in primary research is that this
consumes more time as well as they can
not be use by small scale enterprises for
the purpose of studies.
 There is also some weakness which is
barely connected to such type of
research which includes higher cost
during creating the report along with its
data is well known as flexibility in
nature.
For secondary research
Strength Weaknesses
 The techniques of this research are very
useful in time saving and in cost saving
along with this, this technique avoid
interactions with group of peoples and
retaliating issues occurs during meeting
unproductive peoples (Orlando and et.
al., (2019)).
 This technique save time in valuable
resources whilst conducting meta-
analysis or systematic reviews.
 This research mostly provides the
effective informations which are related
to the applicable resources which
 In the terms of secondary research
another weaknesses have been
identified that data could be extracted
on the behalf of previous years and the
ancient data which was collected by the
researchers and the effective
information of which there is no
existence and has been dead long ago.
 There are number of errors which
occurs due to the reason of duplication
of data and information increases and
the quality of research and report
decreases (Dupire and et. al., (2018)).

would give finest experience for the
readers and the viewer.
 This research is mainly conducted by
primary and secondary research in a
proper manner. In addition this is very
useful for extraction of data which are
high cost.
CONCLUSION
As per discussed above, this has been analysed that meta-analysis is evaluated because
this has been provided on the behalf of several pointing ,which mostly occurs during checkpoint
which are listed above. The report which was prepared has been passed through several checklist
and checkpoints. There are number of strengths and weakness which are analysed on the basis of
applicable sources. It is concluded by the effective information and applicable resources which
are often conducted during ethical research.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Wagg, (2018). The use of computer mediated communication in providing patient support: A
review of the research literature. International journal of nursing studies, 82, 68-78.
Skalidou, (2018). The challenges of screening and synthesising qualitative research in a mixed-
methods systematic review. The case of the impact of agricultural certification schemes.
Journal of Development Effectiveness, 10(1), 39-60.
Bourabain and et. al., (2020). The conceptualization of everyday racism in research on the mental
and physical health of ethnic and racial groups: a systematic review. Journal of racial
and ethnic health disparities, 1-13.
Knopp-Sihota, (2019). Factors associated with pain assessment for nursing home residents: A
systematic review and meta-synthesis. Journal of the American Medical Directors
Association, 20(7), 884-892.
Lubbe and et. al., (2020). The integrative literature review as a research method: A
demonstration review of research on neurodevelopmental supportive care in preterm
infants. Journal of Neonatal Nursing.
Alspaugh & Phillips, (2020). Women's contraceptive perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes: an
integrative review of qualitative research. Journal of midwifery & women's health,
65(1), 64-84.
Buffel and et. al., (2018). A manifesto for the age-friendly movement: Developing a new urban
agenda. Journal of aging & social policy, 30(2), 173-192.
Harris and et. al., (2018). Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance
series—paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol
development for qualitative evidence synthesis. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 97,
39-48.
Stout and et. al.,(2019). 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital
heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American
College of Cardiology, 73(12), e81-e192.
Dupire and et. al., (2018). CSR strategies in response to competitive pressures. Journal of Bskiba
and (2019). Do payday loans cause bankruptcy?. The Journal of Law and Economics,
62(3), 485-519.
Orlando and et. al., (2019). Systematic review of patient and caregivers’ satisfaction with
telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients’ health.
PloS one, 14(8), e0221848.
Skiba and et. al.,(2019). Do payday loans cause bankruptcy?. The Journal of Law and
Economics, 62(3), 485-519.