Analysis: Attitudes, Perceptions, and Farmer Responses to GMOs India

This report provides a critique of a study focusing on attitudes and perceptions towards Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) among farmers in India. The critique examines the study's introduction, highlighting the lack of statistical context regarding GMO usage trends. The methodology section assesses the reliability of the data, noting the absence of raw data and detailed descriptions of the methods and instruments used, impacting the study's replicability. The results and discussion are analyzed for data rigor, acknowledging the use of a standard questionnaire and mixed-method approach. The conclusion reflects on the study's insights into participant attitudes towards GMOs and the authorities they trust, while also emphasizing the importance of recommendations for future research. Desklib provides access to similar solved assignments and past papers for students.

Introduction:
Through the study it can be possible to identify the attitudes and perceptions that fosters or
challenges the use and consumption of GMO which justifies the choice of the topic in this study1. This is
a relevant strategy since they play an important role in the usage of the GMO technology. However, the
study does not provide any statistical information about GMO usage and its possible trends in India or
worldwide to develop a context for the study which is a significant flaw in the research design2.
Methodology:
It should also be noted that since the study did not include the raw data from the interviews and
questionnaires it does affect the reliability of the information to some extent. It has been suggested by
some authors that sampling strategies and sampling bias can influence the reliability and validity of the
study3. The study however did not outline the methods and instruments used in its details. The study
directly delves into the findings from the questionnaire without outlining the research question,
background or the methodology of the study which can make the process of replicating the study
challenging. Thus a lack of such information can significantly reduce the possibility to replicate this
study in its exactness.
Results and Discussion:
By analyzing the structure of the study it can be assumed that the data collected did not require
much analysis and most of the questions and their answers were self explanatory4. . The rigor of the
data could be attributed by the utilization of the standard questionnaire that was given to all the
respondents and due to the fact that the statistics from the collected data was reported in the study5.
Additionally, the strategy for the collection of the data can be understood from the structure of the
study that used both qualitative and quantitative approaches within a mixed method system also added
to the rigor of the study. 6. Thus, even though most of the questions were relevant to the research, some
of the questions still had limited relevancy to the study.
Conclusion:
1 Berthelsen H, Hakanen J, Kristensen TS, Lönnblad A, Westerlund H. A qualitative study on the content validity of
the social capital scales in the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire (COPSOQ II).
2 McCusker K, Gunaydin S. Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the
research. Perfusion. 2015 Oct;30(7):537-42.
3 McCusker K, Gunaydin S. Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the
research. Perfusion. 2015 Oct;30(7):537-42.
4 Alavi M, Archibald M, McMaster R, Lopez V, Cleary M. Aligning theory and methodology in mixed methods
research: Before Design Theoretical Placement. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2018 Feb
11:1-4.
5 Alavi M, Archibald M, McMaster R, Lopez V, Cleary M. Aligning theory and methodology in mixed methods
research: Before Design Theoretical Placement. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2018 Feb
11:1-4.
6 King N, Horrocks C, Brooks J. Interviews in qualitative research. SAGE Publications Limited; 2018 Dec 29.

The results of the study provided some fresh insights and new perspectives into the attitudes
and the perceptions of the participants towards GMO in relation to the authorities the respondents
trusted on for GMO related data. It can be stated that recommendations as well as suggestions for
future studies is an important aspect for any research since it can help to address the main problem that
the research tried to address.