Peer Review and Critique: Sustainable Buildings in Australia

This report presents a peer review and persuasive critique of research focused on sustainable buildings in Australia. It highlights the importance, realistic nature, and management of the research, emphasizing its relevance to the Australian construction industry and corporate social responsibility. The review assesses the appropriateness of the research methodology, noting the use of quantitative methods and the positivism philosophy. The report concludes that the research contributes to a better understanding of sustainable building practices and provides valuable insights for strategic decision-making. Desklib is a great platform to find similar solved assignments and study resources.

Assessment 3
Peer review persuasive critique
presentation

Table of Contents
• INTRODUCTION
• Importance of research
• Realistic nature of the research
• Management of the research
• Appropriateness of research
• Relevance of research methodology
• CONCLUSION
• References

INTRODUCTION
The research conducted is all about the sustainable buildings in Australia. This research
covers the research overview and justification of it. Literature review along with the
research aim and objectives are also specified in the research. Research methodology and
significance of the research are also viewed for better understanding of the tools and
techniques used in the research. Literature review is based on the research topic and aim
along with the objectives on sustainable buildings in Australia.

Importance of research
The current research has a great importance in the construction industry in Australia. It
mainly focuses on the sustainability and corporate social responsibility while
constructing the building in Australia. Importance of the research is such that it has
expanded the knowledge base of the research topic on sustainability and construction
industry. This research conducted has given the latest information about the research
topic with the help of collecting data either in the primary or secondary manner.

Realistic nature of the
research
Realistic nature of the research can be stated with the help of the data
collected and analysed in order to gather the public opinion about the
research topic. This research is realistic because not only the primary data is
used in preparing the research report but also the secondary data as well in
the form of literature review.

Management of the research
There is a good management of the research undertaken while generating the
report. It can be stated in terms of the type of data collection tools used and
sampling along with the time horizon of the entire research. Researcher has used
primary data collection method because it assists in using information taken out for
the first time. For this questionnaire is formed which mentions close-ended
questions.

Appropriateness of research
The current investigation on sustainable building is appropriate in nature
because of the quantitative research methodologies used while conducting
the research. This investigation helps in identifying the importance of
sustainable building in the opinions and views of chosen respondents.

Relevance of research
methodology
Research methodology used in the current research is relevant in nature because it has assisted in
the successful accomplishment of the research objectives. This is because the investigator has used
different techniques in research methodologies such as research philosophy, research approach,
research strategy and research choice. Taking about philosophy, it is classified into three major
types that are: epistemology, ontology and axiology. Investigator has chosen epistemology and
under this positivism philosophy is chosen. The current investigation is more of numerical nature
and positivism philosophy which evaluates numerical piece of information.

CONCLUSION
It is concluded conducting research is an important concept to learn and
study so that its applications can be applied in the real world organizations.
This is because research helps in an in depth analysis and examination of the
research topic and objectives which helps in data collection and review of it.
This is done so that strategic decision making for the future considerations
can be made in order to increase the productivity of the company.

References
• Gao, Y., Schunn, C.D.D. and Yu, Q., 2019. The alignment of written peer feedback with draft problems and its impact
on revision in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), pp.294-308.
• MacArthur, C.A., 2018. Evaluation and revision. Best practices in writing instruction, 287.
• Reddy, K., Harland, T., Wass, R. and Wald, N., 2021. Student peer review as a process of knowledge creation through
dialogue. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), pp.825-837.
• Saterbak, A., Moturu, A. and Volz, T., 2018. Using a teaching intervention and Calibrated Peer Review™ diagnostics
to improve visual communication skills. Annals of biomedical engineering, 46(3), pp.513-524.
• Woiceshyn, J. and Daellenbach, U., 2018. Evaluating inductive vs deductive research in management studies:
Implications for authors, editors, and reviewers. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An
International Journal.
• Xiao, Y. and Watson, M., 2019. Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education
and Research, 39(1), pp.93-112.
• Zengilowski, A., Schuetze, B.A., Nash, B.L. and Schallert, D.L., 2021. A critical review of the refutation text
literature: Methodological confounds, theoretical problems, and possible solutions. Educational Psychologist, 56(3),
pp.175-195.